Vaccines Are Bioweapons

TESTIMONY - TRANSCRIPT

I DO MY BEST TO KEEP THIS UP TO DATE:  

ALL BLOGPOSTS ARE IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER HERE:  https://thunderflower2021.blogpost.com/2021/10/table-of-contents.html?m=1 

 

DR. LAWRENCE PALEVSKY

 GIVES EXPERT TESTIMON TO CONNECTICUT LEGISLATURES  

 Refer to Joe Imbriano, FullertonInformer.com 

I have a blog page about Joe and his tireless efforts to report the truth! 

Search this blog and Joe Imbriano. My TablevOf Contents is all messed up thanks to the Senate Judiciary shills that suppressed my work WITHOUT any admittance or explanation! Serving themselves! 

Search on Vimeo: "Vaccines Busted' and the channel is "TruthCures" 

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky  

HD 720p on VIMEO - TESTIMONY

(Sorry the copying and pasting resulted in an altered format this time, and I don't know why) 

18min 9 sec

LEGISLITAVIE INFORMATIONAL FORUM

TO DISCUSS CONNECTICUT’S POLICIES ON REQUIRED IMMUNIZATIONS

My name is Dr. Lawrence Palevsky. I’m a pediatrician who trained at NYU School of Medicine. Graduated in 1987; finished my residency at Mt. Sinai Hospital in NY in 1990. Did a fellowship at Belleview Hospital in the outpatient department. The first nine years of my career were spent in NY in intensive care unit working in the neonatal intensive care unit, working in-patient in the hospital, working in a clinic and then eventually having a private practice.  In 1983, when I started medical school, I was taught vaccines were safe and were effective and would give them. But I was not taught about any of the science around their safety or any of the studies on how safety was done. And it wasn’t until 1998 that a mother came up to me and said, “Dr. Larry, did you know that there was mercury in vaccines?” And I said, “No, I did not” And as a medical student, I was trained to critically think. If you see an observation, you go after it – try and figure out if there’s a question to ask. So instead of just ignoring it, I looked further into the vaccine ingredients, and I found that there were a number of vaccine ingredients, that in animal studies were proven to be very dangerous to animals and I didn’t understand why the same ingredients were actually in vaccines. I was starting to hear stories from parents not dozens – not hundreds – but thousands of stories from parents who took a very healthy child into the doctor’s office and then found that their child lost much of their health – whether it was their speech, - whether it was seizures - whether it was death – whether it was asthma, allergies, exzema. Whether it was autism, Whether it was learning disabilities, whether it was inflammatory bowel disease –auto immune diseases. And every one of those parents were told it had nothing to do with the vaccine.  Every single one. And this continues today. (2min 17sec) But yet when I look at the ingredients that are in the vaccines, I have the science to actually explain how these medical problems could be happening in these children.

Dumbing down of USA by the nefarious NWO’s!

Today, one child in five is learning disabled. In 1976, it was one in seventeen! One in six under age eight; one in two adolescents; one in four young adults is diagnosed with a mental behavior or emotional disorder.  One in twenty children under the age of five have seizures.  One child in forty develops autism. The number of cases of children and adults with children with auto-immune diseases is rising exponentially. It’s one of the highest-rising diseases in this country. And the vaccine ingredients – if you are willing to look at them and understand how they work when they’re injected into the body – can be seen to be responsible for every single one of these cases.  3min 29 sec  So what are these ingredients?  Well, when I was in medical school, we were taught that the body has something called the blood brain barrier. The blood brain barrier is like Ft. Knox to the brain.  Elements of the bloodstream cannot get into the brain. And those elements include drugs, viruses, and bacteria – among other things that are in the blood.  Drug companies were very concerned about being able to develop drugs, TO GET THE DRUGS INTO THE BRAIN. And so they used something called a nanoparticle. Nanoparticle is a very small particle bound to the drug, and they found that if they could put a nanoparticle onto a drug they could get that drug to go into the brain.  And it shows in animal studies that they were able to do this. They then were able to take an emulsifier. – which is something that is good with both water and fat, it can dissolve in both. And if they added the emIulsifier to the nanoparticle bound to the drug, they could increase drug entry into the brain 20-fold! This is right out of animal studies that I’ve found. So you have a drug, a nanoparticle, and you have this emulsifier. The vaccines are constructed the same way. You have the vaccine viruses and bacteria that are bound to a nanoparticle called aluminum. That aluminum is a nanoparticle. And by definition, a nanoparticle has the potential to enter the brain. 5min 9 sec  Most vaccines also contain a particle called polysorbate 80, or  sorbital.  Both of those compounds are emulsifiers.  Emulsifiers bind very tightly to nanoparticle aluminum which is bound very tightly to the vaccine antegens. This raises a question, if the vaccine model is the same model that the drug companies are using to enhance the delivery of drugs into the brain, is it possible what vaccine ingredients are making their way into the brain of our children? That could explain why so many parents are watching their kids deteriorate after vaccinations, even though the doctors, media, and government 5 min 57 sec say:  Absolutely no connection.  Though the science suggests there is.  You cannot find a single study in the literature that addresses whether aluminum into the body penetrates the brain; whether any vaccine ingredients enter the brain, and whether polysorbate 80 enhances the delivery of any of those ingredients into the brain. And when I could not find those studies, I was concerned – because I’m told, you’re told 6min32 sec that vaccines are evaluated and very very distinctly tested for safety - but yet you cannot find a study that says, ‘Does aluminum stay/get into the brain of children?’ Does aluminum take other vaccine ingredients into the brain that don’t belong in the brain? Because when ingredients get across the brain barrier, that don’t belong in the brain, it causes inflammation. And inflammation is what we see in one in five children with learning disabilities.  And one in forty children with autism. All you have to do is ask the guidance counselors and if you get honest pediatricians who are telling you what they see in their practice, they’re seeing kids one after another with more and more brain disorders.  Now, as a medical doctor who is taught to think, I then went into their literature and said, “Are proper science studies done?” (safety studies) where you take a vaccine and inject it into a hundred kids and then you give a hundred kids a saline placebo (inert) No study exists to actually evaluate the safety of a vaccine compared to a placebo group.  When vaccines are studied, the maximum amount of days the vaccines are studied are ten days to two weeks.  And unfortunately, the vaccine manufacturers pre-select what side effects they will allow to be associated with the vaccines.  So if the child has a vaccine reaction that is associated with the vaccine; the vaccine manufacturers  will decide whether or not it should or should not be associated with the vaccine. AND THE PUBLIC KNOWS THIS AND ARE LEARNING IT MORE AND MORE.  So if your child develops seizures five months after a vaccine, your child is told by the doctor that’s nothing to do with the vaccine. But that’s not true, considering there’s no studies to prove it.  There’s never been a study really addressing whether a vaccination in two months or even 9 hours (should be years – audio is tampered with) of age, could be related to an event that happened months or years later.  And yet, we have some of the sickest children in our country. In New York, we lost the religious exemption on June 13^th because unvaccinated children with this religious exemption were blamed for a measles outbreak. When I met with a representatives in New York, I told them there is no study to prove that unvaccinated children have ever been proven to start an epidemic. And he was surprised.  9 min 33 sec And he said, “I would vote against the removing the religious exemption if I can’t find a study that proves it. He could not find a study and voted to repeal the religious exemption anyway. Because there are no studies.  There are no studies proving unvaccinated children are responsible. There is consensus and here’s why there is consensus. We are taught that vaccines stop the children from carrying the germs that we are vaccinating against.  And study after study shows that children who are vaccinated can still carry the germs by the vaccine.  So the vaccinated are still capable of spreading disease but the unvaccinated are being unfairly blamed because of the consensus opinion, but not true science. The End Justifies the Means! To repeat, no study, no science has ever proven that vaccines eliminate the existence of the organism in your body. If anything, science is showing the vaccines cause the organisms to mutate and there are plenty of articles showing that strains are replaced by new strains after vaccination.  Similarly, to the way antibiotics are bringing about new strains of bacteria because of the overuse of antibiotics.  So, why are we blaming the unvaccinated children? 11 min 29 sec  No study has ever been done in this country appropriately to address the health outcome of children who were vaccinated vs the children who were not vaccinated. I have been seeing families in my practice for over 20 years that have opted out of vaccination.  They are the healthiest children I have ever seen.  I have families who have older children who have been vaccinated. Middle children who have been partially vaccinated.  And younger children who have not been vaccinated at all. And those families are rising in number, and they see the difference between the healthcare counts of their children, who are rarely sick, versus their older children, who are getting IEP’s in schools, needing medication, 12 min 19 sec ERs, and constant health issues.  And all I can get when I hear that, when I state something like that, is “Well, that’s anecdotal” Well, it’s anecdotal if you see it a couple of times, but it’s not anecdotal when you see it for over twenty years.  And when you speak to parents, and when you speak to teachers, and when you speak to guidance counselors and when I speak to pediatricians who are too afraid to come out in public

12 min 43 sec  There is pressure to ostracize the families who know the science and know the lack of science that’s available. There’s a LOT of consensus. And when I think about the subject of  “vaccination”, I want to ensure if they are going to prevent infectious diseases in children – that we don’t create something worse in its place. Unfortunately, we’re dealing with a lot of beliefs instead of actual science. And beliefs go a long way.  13 min 33 sec   I took the oath to do no harm, but when I look at the science, and I don’t see longterm studies, and I see only short-term studies, up to 4-10 days – where the side effects are manipulated by the manufacturers, who are the only ones doing the studies on the vaccines. And when I see no placebo groups, and I see no studies of the single ingredients, combined ingredients, and I see the science, the biochemistry of the ingredients of animal studies where animals who are given the aluminum are found to have motor delays and behavioral problems, which is a great deal of what we’re seeing in children today, I say, are we first doing no harm? And so, ‘first doing no harm’ means the precautionary principle, and more and more parents are understanding the dangers of vaccines and that’s why we’re seeing so much pressure to mandate vaccines.  [seems like dialogue was extracted above.  What is “that’s why”?]

14 min 22 sec also missing dialogue here, it seems  -- because more science is coming out. In order to create herd (when I listened second time, but I don’t think he said that) immunity, you have to be able to prove the children who are vaccinated are immune.  The sad part about that is that whenever you vaccinate a population of children, you’re always gonna have a population that doesn’t develop any antibodies at all. The estimates of that are about 10%. The vaccines will fail on 10% of the population. Vaccination – no antibody production. But the next group is even more suspicious. Because when you vaccinate, and you do produce an antibody, there is science to show that the presence of an antibody doesn’t guarantee immunity either. And we don’t know the percentage of children who get a vaccine, develop an antibody 15 min 27 sec but aren’t immune at all. We assume that if we vaccinate, we’re getting protection. We assume that if we vaccinate, we’re stopping spread of disease. Those are assumptions that have never been solidified in science. And I am happy to offer more explanations during the Q and A. I wouldn’t say that if I didn’t have the science to prove it. The parents that I work with in New York, that I see around the country, are very concerned that their rights are being taken away – that their knowledge about the science – is being pushed away by an agenda that only says “unvaccinated children are a problem” 16 min 10 sec

Just to wrap up, in New York when we had the measles outbreak – I’m sorry, in California [This dialogue seems contradictory with NY/CA and therefore I believe dialogue was altered or deleted] when they had a measles outbreak, there were 194 cases. Of the 194 cases, 73 cases were due to the actual virus in the vaccine itself.  38%. 73 cases were due to the measles virus causing measles.  All the literature states that measles, virus-infection is not true measles, and should not be counted as a health threat.  That means only 121 kids developed measles 16 min 25 sec – 121 people. New York State did NOT do the proper testing that’s given down by the CDC to test every child to see if the children had measles strain, vile-type measles, or a mutated measles. There are cases around the country and around the world where in a 95 – 98% vaccinated population, they had measles outbreaks because they found mutated viruses.  As I said before, there are cases where the virus mutates where there are strain replacements. New York State did NOT do 17 min 35 sec the proper testing on the thousand-plus young children and adults who came down with measles. They wrote a little blurb on the CDC website – of the two wild viruses that were responsible for the measles outbreak. But we in New York know that the testing was not done.  4200 kids on Long Island had the religious exemption and were not vaccinated and there was not one case of measles on Long Island. Thank you.  

 

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10