Fraudulent Collections

Warm-up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heZS-V8GpH4

(Needs updating for this past year but I recently found this working since Blumenthal, et al abused power and disabled it)

I DO MY BEST TO KEEP THIS UP TO DATE:

ALL BLOGPOSTS ARE IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER HERE: https://thunderflower2021.blogpost.com/2021/10/table-of-contents.html?m=1

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR THIS BLOG; https://www.publiusroots.com/2018/04/table-of-contents.html

The notes I added are gone!

I wanted to save some typing but everything is a struggle!

REMINDER

Update. 15JULY2021

What would you do ?

Sing out of key?

Dear Ten Ant,

You believe us, don't ya?

Good Morning Residents –

We wanted to follow up with the events of last night. New Haven police department arrived at the property due to a tip call they received concerning someone who was in danger of harming themselves. It was an incomplete address given to the police but the police needed to complete their due diligence. The police assessed there was not a threat to the other residents of the building and were mainly concerned with the person who was in danger to themselves. This was the cause of the emergency lock down that occurred last night. The police completed their work and allowed us to lift our lock down. The person in question was not confirmed to be in our building.

We appreciate everyone for their patience and understanding while New Haven police department conducted their work.

Thank you,

Team 360 State

COPY NOTES into A Document

FOR YOUR REFERENCE AT YOUR LEISURE😃💛💙💜💚❤🌻🌹🌺💥O💥O💥P💥S💥- Some errors supplemental brief. Objection needs mopping up! I'll mark up errors in a day or two. Gotta work on hard copy for court. Probably will use Letters Of Erata. Paragraph 4, Pg 5 of objection: completely OMIT.

I knew they were hacking! 5/14/2021

Defendant's Motion For Trial By Telephone

Pursuant toSec 8-1 and Sec 24-1, and any other rule which applies, defendant motions this court for trial by telephone as apposed to trial by video.

HISTORY

Plaintiff submitted a fake bill dated in 2015 to the court regarding outstanding balance allegedly owed to LVNV Funding, which is owned by Sherman Companies. Though Pamela Johnson is an attorney, she fails to sign documents as an attorney and without a Juris Number. She also signs documents as Pamela Sherman, which defendant has presented to the court upon research of this company's activity.

The motions which plaintiff submitted into court with no response, except "denied", even though evidence was produced forthwith.

Defendant, Pro Se, has claimed the case has no merit - that

1) Attorney in Michigan unlawfully represents Plaintiff, LVNV, located in North Carolina.

b) Plaintiff now claims to be registered in Connecticut yet was not been registered in Michigan despite having a Stillman Law Office in Connecticut, using a Pro.Hac Vice Juris Number on NUMEROUS cases in this civil court of New Haven, CT alone - as well as the same Pro Hac Vice Juris Number throughout the state of Connecticut Court System.

2) Plaintiff provided no satisfaction of burden of proof, only an unsubstantiated bill with an unprofessional affidavit signed by Pamela (5/13/2021) Sherman since that is her maiden name; or name when a man if this person is a transgender. Plaintiff also signed this affidavit supposedly in Greenville, NC in front of a notary, and yet retained a Michigan attorney for representation despite the fact there was no geological connection with that area. For the attorneys to even accept the representation was ludicrous, claimed defendant.

The court issued an order for trial by video without providing access to the court services center computer for a video conference. There was no assurance that defendant's phone was assured not to be hacked or hit with a virus - and the data consumed would be removed from defendant's service. Additionally recently, defendant's laptop was hit with an EMP attack by someone who entered the court services center when she was using it in New Haven, CT. They also did that to her tablet - both of which had to be reprogrammed where they were purchased.

5/13/2021: the following was moved to FACTS before submitting to court. No objection was made by attorney:

For the Court to issue a decision as a personal decision with an "It's okay by me but the judge at trial can do whatever he wants" - defendant considers this a Nefarious Ruling on its face. Though the letter was stamped in and a stamped copy was mailed to Stillman Law Office in Michigan, at the recommendation of the clerk since the documents are scanned in for record purposes the letter was a request.

THIS IS A MOTION.

FACTS AND ARGUMENT

1. This case has no merit. There is no ledger for the defendant to respond to. The plaintiff only submits unsubstantiated documents, including a Nefarious affidavit signed by "Pamela Sherman" who is an alias of "Pamela Johnson" and refers to herself as "The Urban Outlaw". There is no Juris Number after her name., Yet she has been entered into the BAR Association with a Juris Number. She may not have a law degree like they did with Rod Solomon [sole-man, transgendered most likely] who practices law in Washington DC and was contracted to write the Nefarious add-on program to Section 8 of HUD, MTW which ironically is used for Man To Woman transgenders, yet titled as "Move To Work" which makes absolutely no sense and wastes Section 8 money.

2. Defendant claims this is more gangstalking against her using ABUSE OF POWER. She has been TARGETED for decades - by corrupted officials.

3. Though it was declared that LVNV Funding Corp Office was located in Delaware for this case, the records have thus been altered. They were also not a registered company in Connecticut and still, registration has been backdated and records were frauded to cover-up what the defendant has already set forth in her Answer and Special Defenses, which took a great deal of time to prepare.

4. Source: opencorporates.com

corporatewiki.com

Though LVNV Funding was only listed in Delaware in Open Corporates, the records were altered after the defendant shared this information on social media, which both NSA and the Technocracy enjoy viewing and the USGov only rewards the crooks. These printouts are in Appendix C&D.

Reminder, this was a drafted copy, typed off my phone since the spineless two-bits disabled my computer. No subpoena was requested for this case.

5. There are numerous more addresses/states for the SAME company. Defendant is issuing a subpoena for information on the IRS Tax ID as well as company registration numbers. This is clearly a situation in which the US Government has taken part in nefarious business activity - right in plain sight - apparently considering they will just use force on anyone who claims their corruption is as evident as the nose on the face of a person. Defendant perceives this as a vested interest which lies with grossly-inflated wealth documented by multi-billionaires like Jeff Bezos, owner of Amazon, using fake collections as additional "proof" of extended "accounts receivables" - and most likely these collections companies launder crime money!

6. Small Claim Form. LVNV Funding in Greenville, SC is listed as the plaintiff and they have no jurisdiction in Connecticut! They also list themselves as a CORPORATION yet elsewhere claim they are LLC!

7. Number 11 on small claim form, is defective and fraudulent.

a) No name of the issuer, which would be the aggrieved party and significant to this case. This alone would be cause for the court to dismiss without trial.

b) No specification of what the credit card was for. What company defendant allegedly purchased from, and at least the last four numbers of the card itself, thereafter providing a copy of the card, along with ledger information. No specification of alleged date defendant defaulted. No indication of attached document to elaborate. This leaves a dynamic of adding and removing records "behind the scenes". FRAUD: Issuer assigned it's rights, title,and ownership of the defendant's debt to plaintiff. This is criminal on its face! Another very clear reason for the court to dismiss the case and bring quasi-criminal action against the plaintiff yet it is obvious this court is party to the nefarious activity, fulfilling some of the 25 prominently listed goals of the Illuminati, who lead the Satanic Underground, as Ted Gunderson, former FBI Section Chief, has reported many times and many of his videos are still on YouTube, yet he died from being poisoned by spineless CIA cowards - with arsenic. The CIA was created to carry out the Illuminati Goals, which also include the Georgia Guidestone Goals. The senator in Nevada, who worked with Dr. Ted Gunderson, was a CIA man, an attorney, whose goal was to satisfy CIA wants through deceiving Dr. Gunderson, who gave him benefit of doubt. That man, John DeCamp, was obviously continuing to be a CIA man and refusing to collect the million dollars on the Johnny Gosch case - was an obvious reflection on fraud and embezzlement. Noreen Gosch, his mother, enjoyed millions of dollars by capitalizing on this Satanic sacrifice of her little boy - and her husband didn't care. They were obviously involved with the swinging (husband-wife swapping) and even "parties" at their home. Johnny Gosch did see his mother as a teenager and she did nothing to offer him protection and he either went back to those who kidnapped, raped, and tortured him, or he sought help from others. Despite her being rich from this crime-scam, there was no mention in her video that she even gave him a penny. Most likely he asked her why she sold him to the SATANISTS. Defendant has had interaction with children who were victims of paedophilia. The two local police were like the North Pole & South Pole. The one who was happily married and vigilant with paedophile cases had an untimely Death.

8. Matthew Bardos signed the Small Claim Form on this case yet failed to provide an in-state contact information. Additionally, defendant found that he worked with a Connecticut (insert) Pro Hac Vice Juris Number. (Insert - but note, this is still draft form) Various Records have therafter been altered.

9. Defendant entered her appearance with e-filing and successfully uploaded documents on the case. Yet her efforts were nefariously disrupted be a Court Services Center attorney, who blocked her account and claimed the defendant had to physically bring her licence to their office.(insert: in WETHERSFIELD) Defendant claimed she was just targeting her and using ABUSE OF PROCEDURE to cover up wrongdoings, which the plaintiff frames itself on.

10. Time creating this motion: 3 days.

LAW

Sec 8-1

Sec 24-1

Any other law or rule which applies to this motion by the Defendant Pro Dr.

SUMMARY

Defendant, Pro Se, is a law-abiding citizen who is responsible in paying her bills. She never filed bankruptcy, nor did she ever issue Letters Of Forgiveness to any creditors. She paid what was owed. Her GE Money Accounts (2 cards, both had excellent credit) had REVOLVING CREDIT when paying amounts due within 6 months. Synchrony Bank purchased GE Money/Amazon accounts. They did NOT merge with GE Money! That is another false statement by plaintiff. Just view the corporation documents on record.

Upon taking over defendant's Amazon credit cards, Synchrony Bank was obligated to do one of two things:

1) Continue with the agreement/contract, or

2) Provide Defendant with a new contract which she could opt out of and stop using the card and let bthe minimum payment due continue to automatically be received by check (since Synchrony Bank was altering payments online, figuring Defendant wouldn't verify the next day) The contract which Synchrony Bank purchased was THEIR responsibility. The woman who was hired by Synchrony Bank (obviously for higher pay) was given the managerial job to oversee Amazon accounts. She had been doing the same thing at GE Money - and GE Money considered the bad handling of those accounts a loss in profits, which is why they sold them to Synchrony (insert) which GE Money owned 85% stock in, trying to get them on the right track, allowing them to be chartered by GE Money/Capital.

Defendant was angered about the fraudulent billing by Synchrony and stopped using the card, paid off what she owed and cut off communication with Synchrony. YEARS LATER - various Sherman Companies began harassing Defendant for money, as already supported in Special Defenses and Answer.

Why this Court keeps this case going has nothing to do with administration of justice or the law, which are supposed to be the same thing.

Due to the need of creating aMOTION to ensure rights of Defendant to have a hearing via phone call (and therefore requires both parties to have all documents sufficiently profered and scanned in timely to prepare for the hearing/trial, Defendant hasn't had time to prepare a Bill Of Particulars involving the cost of time and expenses on this frivolous case yet. Additionally, the Military Affidavit was illegally submitted by the plaintiff. They are not Chief, cook, and bottle washer.

This concludes this MOTION FOR PHONE CALL FOR TRIAL, set at the New Haven Courthouse via a teleconference without providing the defendant the equipment to hold one safely and without cost to the Defendant.

Appendix is attached.

Prepared By,

FOR THE DEFENDANT, Pro Se

APPENDIX

A - Notice By Court 4/18/2021

B - page from Defendant's Credit Report of 2015

"SYNCHRONY BANK" - false claim of delinquency (amount does not consistently equal aforesaid case)

C - opencorprates.com - info on LVNV, South Carolina. Marked as Plaintiff

D - Connecticut Secretary Of State Business Search

LVNV - with Las Vegas address only

E - Searches produced by Defendant, pasted on a 2-page Microsoft Word Document

F - opencirporates.com - printout lists LVNV Funding 43 times. No validation of Tax ID number.

G. Receipt from cost using Fed Ex Computer $17.36

Receipt From Tyco copies $28.00

There are several more costs, such as by cost of mailing to plaintiff since the court violated plaintiff's e-filing and the plaintiff blocked Defendant's email. USPS charges approximately $9 for Priority Mail, and FedEx charges $11 for ground shipping envelopes.

🌻🌻🌻🌻 If this happens to you or someone you know, ESTABLISH YOUR RIGHTS. Make sure they don't abuse you! 🌻🌻🌻🌻

UPDATE 5/11/2021 10:15am EST

The Plaintiff entered a PRETRIAL Motion To Dismiss "Pursuant To PB 24-20" 5/6/2021 - a$$holes never mailed me a copy yet certified they did! Never emailed me yet I registered as efile, they have my email address!

Court Operations intercepted my- registering, which was complete - by ordering me to hand carry my license to their damn WETHERSFIELD Office, right by location of Stillman Atty in CT- Moylan!

MY TIMELY MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WAS NOT HEARD! They wait 10 MONTHS to enter their damn motion after my Counterclaim! No objection to my Motion For Default either! A$$holes give no History, FACTS, Law on the damn PRETRIAL MOTION.

💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥

SMALL Claim BLAME

Follow-up

May 11, 2021

Email just sent

With attachments

I will try to add those attachments here....

Blogger has intercepted my ability to add the pictured documents = typical!

I know you're busy... My comment about MILITARY AFFIDAVITS

1. They are at the discretion of the party, primarily defendant such as in SMALL CLAIMS cases, to use as a defense - NOT MANDATORY

2. Yet these attorneys like Howard Lee Schiff and Stillman Law submit them WITHOUT permission from the defendant! WTF!

3. A notary should be obligated to refuse to notarize, my opinion. And documents notarized by an out of state notary should be deemed without merit!

4. The Service Members Civil Relief Act - Central Verification Service - is UNCONSTITUTIONAL

5. Cost for each search on a person is supposed to be $86.40 - yet Stillman Law Firm never charges!

6. An Affidavit is a Court Document - THE COURT IS SUPPOSED TO DO THE VERIFYING

7. The court commits a crime by allowing the plaintiffs attorney to even submit it.

8. They are obviously using fake names, claiming they collected when the defendant obviously didn't even get the small claim!

9. The court rules in plaintiff's favor! WTF #OperationHarveyRabbit (Jimmy Stewart film in 1950)

10. If the plaintiff exists, a nonappearance is cause to arrest, right? Police should at least find them, and include charges on the case!

11. There is something really nefarious going on by collecting this info! What are they using it for? Can it be intercepted?

12. They obviously fail to implement any prerequisite for the searches!

13. I bet Stillman Law isn't even registered with them. If so. Their registration activity should be investigated!

That's my opinion. I wanted to stop by before my small claim trial, but I just got toner and CVS paper was cheap because I had a coupon. ALL OF The Small Claims cases were not even issued SCC numbers when the SMALL CLAIMS CENTRAL OPERATIONS still existed! Only a fraction were.

Have a good day. I doubt you can communicate anything about this and don't want to jeopardize your job as paralegal at the Court Service Center. You're the best! You've helped me so much through the years.

##################

Brief before the Storm...This is a brief I prepared, but I also have an objection. I will post it after it is entered into court. This hasn't been edited yet. I don't think there will be many errors.

Defendant's Supplemental Brief

This case was initiated by an out-of-state attorney firm in Michigan, named Stillman Law Office - rather than the Stillman Law Office right here in Connecticut. Defendant Anne Bradley never has even gone to Michigan except travelling through a part of it from leaving her home in Minnesota - it is not even worth mentioning since she never stopped in the state.

The court should have not docketed the case because of this as well as many other reasons.

The court had no proof that Stillman Law Firm submitted a 30-day notice to the defendant AS REQUIRED before a Small Claim can be filed. Defendant claimed they did not provide this notice in her pleading, and thereafter they mailed defendant a backdated letter, dated 5-5-2021. How obvious can it get? They did not even argue what defendant had relayed in court.

The court should have dismissed this caase for plaintiff's inept handling of a this meritless attempt to collect a fictitious debt.

Defendant has been contacted by numerous companies by email - claiming that Amazon claimed she owed them money, that her GE Money account was not paid, that her Synchrony account was not paid. All of this has been relayed in detail to the court with a huge appendix - how more obvious can it be? Not one company referred to in this case, INCLUDING THE PLAINTIFF, has jurisdiction in Connecticut!

Defendant claims that Synchrony Bank was a like a business cancer to GE Money, aka GE Capital. They took advantage of GE Capital and generated "bad money" into the economy. This made the Federal Reserve celebrate. This went along the lines of Jeffrey Epstein.

Though Synchrony Bank claims they are the new GE Capital, that they merged, etc. - these claims are deliberately false and RIGHT IN PLAIN SIGHT.

According to OpenCorporates.com, Synchrony only existed since 2015, which is far from true. They existed for many years before that, and probably even before GE Capital did. It was time for them to move to GE and destroy their popularity, their healthy contribution to the economy. That is the Jeffrey Epstein Way. That is the Federal Reserve Plan. Jeffrey Epstein had absolutely no moral values, was a multi-billionaire from TAKING, not MAKING. He was part of a Satanic Sex Cult. One of his goals was to impregnate as many women as possible, to spread his genes far and wide, similar to Malcolm X (who is probably Barack Obama's real father since Ann Dunham delayed going to Hawaii with her parents to see Malcolm X at the UN) yet to an even more exaggerated degree, thanks to the wonders of technology. Jeffrey Epstein's live-in girlfriend was referred to his "madame" and she was Bill Gate's transgender-wife's sister. Bill Gates is divorcing his "wife" Melinda because Justice is closing in on him and he wants to hide his assets. They probably learned that from Dr. Ted Gunderson, who in fact sacrificed his all (insert: protecting his family) to take down this evil Satanic Empire that greatly harmed children. The CIA had the largest child sex-trafficking business in the world! And the Clintons were trafficking drugs using CIA operatives such as Oliver North, and murdering anyone who got in their way, such as the two teenage boys (last names were Henry and Ives) who saw a drug drop made from the crafted helicopter which Bill Clinton got at the state of Arkansas' expense when he was governor - all to solicit drugs, especially cocaine. And he laundered his $100 million a month through the Hubble-Rose Law Firm. Dr. Gunderson divorced his wife, never stopping loving her, even moving to Nevada to further his cause of justice against the Satanic Underground.

Bill Gates' plan included a collaborative effort by the Elite Billionaires who are nothing but sociopaths, wanting to kill off billions of people and fulfill their Georgia Guidestone Dream of just having 500,000 people in the world. Fortunately, his mass murder bioweapon (created in North Carolina and transported to China) which he dubbed "Wuhan Virus" was intercepted by intelligence and replaced with a placebo, known as the common flu, aka Cornavirus, with the expectation that this evil operation would just bottom-out as long as there wasn't a successful back-up plan. Apparently Bill Gates managed to use his satanic computer to calculate a new strategy - which was in part, diagnosing healthy people with this fake epidemic, referred to as a pandemic - a word which is an ADJECTIVE yet reinvented and defined as "an epidemic that is pandemic". As James Corbett and James Evan Pilato said, "We are now unhealthy until we prove that we are healthy" in a similar fashion as "guilty until proven innocent".

Good world leaders have had to proceed with caution, to buy time they need to ensure the safety and security of the world before they could suppress the evil efforts of the sociopathic technocracy. It is not the tool that is the problem, it is the toolmaker!

Defendant's apartment has been illegally entered, vandalized many times, as previously said - yet the court seems to consider this a need to elevate its own corruption - even though the plaintiff even has an illegal appearance and absolutely shows no merit to the case, not even providing a ledger to even begin discussion of any descrepencies.

Defendant's apartment has been so vandalized that her file cabinet was completely emptied - documents scattered on her kitchen floor, what was left of them. This has been relayed to the court as well.

Yet the court continues to side with the nefarious plaintiff, which has absolutely no legal standing - all because the corrupted underworld has targeted the defendant and they use their jobs as a weapon rather than as a service to the public. Not one document which the plaintiff submitted can be authenticated - right down to the notary who signed. If the court even tried, they would realize this.

Defendant has provided numerous proofs of the illegitamate and invasive atttempts to harass her for money she does not owe.

Yet the court continues this baseless case even though a well-prepared Motion For Default Judgment On Counterclaim was submitted and NEVER OBJECTED TO by the plaintiff! The plaintiff is used to using backdoor dirty politics and other illegalities to get rulings in its favor!

Because the defendant has emphasized the plaintiff has shown no diligence as well as submitted nothing that was true, the court should have NEVER allowed it to enter a one-page MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM 11 months after the counterclaim was entered! The court nefariously extracted pages to the counterclaim and re-entered it as a revised counterclaim the day following its filing the defendant's already two-week old submitted document! The court allowed the plaintiff to upload documents immediately yet blocked the defendant from doing so, so it could further deliberately delay by not scanning in the documents she submitted for WEEKS ON END. Defendant did not re-enter documents! Defendant only amended one document, that's it! No revised pleadings!

(Insert on blog: the career criminal prosecuted, Lawrence Mark Hurley embezzled hundreds of thousands of dollars from the courthouse for almost 20 years obviously, yet the Middletown, CT judge only allowed state police to audit three years, even when tens of thousands of dollars had been embezzled. He also embezzled from the state prosecutors' union as treasurer! That's when an attorney turned him in after tracing his own union dues check!) The court is oftentimes used as a weapon by sociopathic elites! - end of blog insert

Judge Abrams not only illicitly evicted defendant but also conspired with Public Storage, Inc - which stole her property in her unit, breaking the lock off, claiming she owed money when in fact they refused to deposit her money order, which she paid every month since they played games with her checking account, including claiming they didn't have her check, and she would give them another and they would cash BOTH. They heaped charges on her account even though she continued to pay rent and said they would have to wait for a replacement check for that month. Nevertheless, the charges were $250 and their office owed the defendant over $400 from a lawsuit she entered against them prior to that. They never paid. They never credited her account. And Judge Abrams allowed them to steal all her property and personal possessions, fully knowing they owed her over $400 since it was right in the court case. Defendant was never paid even that money and could not get help collecting from the New Britain court, which is where Abrams transferred to!

It is unclear in the CT Practice Book that the defendant has a right to move the court to dismiss a case when it has counterclaimed. Yet undoubtedly a counterclaim reflects not only a dismissal motion but also seeks retribution for as many costs as possible. Simply look up every company which this case refers to in OpenCorporates.com. NOT ONE COMPANY, INCLUDING THE PLAINTIFF, HAS JURISDICTION IN CONNECTICUT! The court keeps spinning its wheels as if it expects some tragic event will befall the defendant, just like when her hamstring was badly torn as she was getting on a Metro North train, because the man in front of her dropped material like silicone on it (the floor) to cause her to severely slip. It was fortunate that she had hold of the handrail because she surely would have broken her back or neck otherwise. Her badly torn hamstring was NOT treated at the hospital despite being transported by ambulance. The ER doctor said he would give her crutches as a means of therapy and told her to walk home past midnight - a mile away, despite her leg internally bleeding and very swollen. He knew it was internally bleeding, They did an ultrasound and said they couldn't find anything because the blood was in the way!

There is no purpose served when the law is so badly broken by the lawmakers and administrators themselves! They degrade society and ruin people's lives such as defendant's, who only sought to live honestly, responsibly.

Those who destroy others' lives for the sake of evil, eventually discover that they destroy themselves - yet it has greatly crippled society and deprived people from achieving, contributing to the world they greatly embrace with all positive thoughts.

One can only ponder why is it so important to TAKE rather than MAKE.

This supplement is being submitted by the defendant, who has experienced many preventable traumas which she was the victim of, emphasizing the depravity of this society must end. They destroy everything that is good. They destroy Nature. And as Prince Phillip said, "The End of Nature, is the End of Humankind".

Prepared and Submitted,

FOR THE DEFENDANT, PRO SE

Anne M. Bradley

***********************************

TODAY I SERVED A HEFTY SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEF AND MY OBJECTION TO THE INEPT MOTION TO DISMISS

1. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF, 57 PAGES

Case No. NNH-CV-2-6105010-S : State of Connecticut

LVNV Funding, LLC : Superior Court

Vs : Court of New Haven

Anne M. Bradley : May 13, 2021

New Haven Court Copy to scan in

DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

The plaintiff of record, LVNV, entered its address as a postal box rather than a legitamate physical address. It is listed as FOREIGN-OWNED. has postal address is PO Box 10466, Greenville, South Carolina 29603. OpenCorporates.com relay 43 companies using the LVNV Funding name brand, indicating its corporate office is 780 Lynnhaven Parkway, Ste 229, VIRGINA BEACH, VA 23452-7332 as of 11 Sep 2018. All other locations are defined as "branch" including DELAWARE! Though defendant has not wanted to include an appendix, these two pages are necessary to validate how deep the corruption is, and is therefore marked Appendix A, pages 1-2.

Corporate information on LVNV has been altered several times on internet since the inception of this case; yet the plaintiff fails to remedy information on record through pleadings, only covers it up. It is no longer listed as having physical location in South Carolina, yet WEST VIRGINIA location uses the 55 Beattie Place, Suite 110, Greenville, SC address which defendant further claims more CORRUPTION. (one way defendant found this information was googling "lvnv greenville sc opencorporates") Reference pages 3 and 4 in Appendix. Jurisdiction for West Virginia is West Virginia, not Connecticut! Defendant knows for a fact that it enters its physical address of 55 Beattie Place, Suite 110, Greenville SC 29601 in MANY cases in Connecticut; ie case name of LVNV Funding LLC vs Purity Kateule supposedly of 925 William Street, Bridgeport, CT 06608, who is probably not even a real person - case was marked settled without any appearance of the defendant! This person is an obvious home owner, there is no apartment number - IF THEY EXIST. Determination can easily be made by contacting the City Assessor's office. This small claim was signed by an "Eric Smith" of the Law offices of Howard Lee Schiff, PC, It is unknown how many locations they use. Defendant has not searched OpenCorporates.com for this information. It is only an example. The Stillman Law Office has a Pro Hac Vice Appearance with Juris Number 438732, This was printed in Appendix on Counterclaim, pages 17-19 (COUNTERCLAIM WAS NEVER REVISED BY THE DEFENDANT; THE COURT FRAUDED RECORDS BY ENTERING A "REVISED COUNTERCLAIM"!) Defendant's printer was intercepted by technocrats who help the corruption of court cases, yet it is clearly seen their Pro Hac Vice Juris Number was searched and the Stillman Law Office of Michigan was allowed. Juris type "F" means Pro Hac Vice in Connecticut. Defendant even included the definition term in the Appendix-19 of Counterclaim. Pro Hac Vice: A lawyer who has not been admitted to practice in a particular jurisdiction but who is admitted temporarily for the purpose of conducting A PARTICULAR CASE. Stillman Law Office has ONE business ID of 1166757 (Appendix 24) using a Maryland Address - yet has MANY OFFICES IN USA, as provided by the OpenCorporates.com website!

It is unknown who is actually retaining the Stillman Law Firm on this aforesaid case, yet they claim they represent LVNV Funding. Oddly, the court allowed them to add "Assignee of Synchrony Bank" which is at the least improper to describe the plaintiff as that and an obvious bullying technique. Yet even the court documents of the case prove the Assignee was Sherman Companies, aka Sherman Originator III, LLC. Additionally, they nefariously made the transaction in Georgia, when the parties only had jurisidiction in Delaware. They, in turn, "sold" defendant's alleged account to LVNV Funding, LLC, which defendant has proven in the Appendix to Counterclaim - is owned by Sherman Companies! Yet this nefarious transaction is also entered by the plaintiff on aforesaid case!

The court should have not docketed the case because of this as well as many other reasons.

The court had no proof that Stillman Law Firm submitted a 30-day notice to the defendant AS REQUIRED before a Small Claim can be filed. The Priority Mail which it fraudulently submitted is from a different sender and additionally, had no real tracking information - the Stillman Office typed up fraudulent information as affirmation of mailing. There was nothing that they produced which authenticized their claims in "Plaintiff's Statement of Service" and defendant has shown there was no tracking information when doing a search AFTER the nefarious entry by plaintiff of tracking information! Yet the court continues this nefarious case!

OpenCorporates Search on Stillman Law Office on May 12, 2021:

United States flag inactive LAW OFFICE OF GINA WEBB STILLMAN, LLC (Connecticut (US), 17 Nov 2005- , 49 SHERWOOD TERRACE SUITE 1A, OLD SAYBROOK, CT, 06475)

United States flag inactive LAW OFFICE OF L. VAN STILLMAN, P.A. (Florida (US), 10 Jun 1997- )

United States flag branch STILLMAN LAW OFFICE, LLC (New Hampshire (US), 21 Jul 2015- , 110 West Road, Suite 217, Towson, MD, 21204, USA) Previously/Alternatively known as STILLMAN LAW OFFICE

United States flag branch STILLMAN LAW OFFICE, LLC (New Jersey (US), 16 Jan 2015- )

United States flag branch STILLMAN LAW OFFICE, LLC (Texas (US), 23 Jan 2015- , 815 BRAZOS ST. STE. 500 AUSTIN, TX 78701)

United States flag branch STILLMAN LAW OFFICE, LLC (Ohio (US), 24 Sep 2015- , MARYLAND)

United States flag branch STILLMAN LAW OFFICE, LLC (Washington (US), 16 Jan 2015- , 110 WEST ROAD STE 217, TOWSON, MD, 21204)

United States flag STILLMAN LAW OFFICE, LLC (Maryland (US), 5 Dec 2008- , SUITE 217 110 WEST ROAD TOWSON MD 21204)

United States flag branch STILLMAN LAW OFFICE, LLC (Connecticut (US), 26 Jan 2015- , 110 WEST ROAD, SUITE 217, TOWSON, MD, 21204, USA)

United States flag branch STILLMAN LAW OFFICE, LLC (Florida (US), 20 Jan 2015- )

United States flag branch STILLMAN LAW OFFICE, LLC (Massachusetts (US), 22 Apr 2015- , 110 WEST ROAD SUITE 217, TOWSON,, MD, 21204)

United States flag STILLMAN, P.C. (Michigan (US), 14 Sep 1994- , 30057 ORCHARD LAKE RD STE 200 FARMINGTON HILLS MI 48334) Previously/Alternatively known as STILLMAN LAW OFFICE

United States flag branch Stillman Law Office, LLC (Rhode Island (US), 12 Mar 2015- , 30057 ORCHARD LAKE ROAD STE 200, FARMINGTON HILLS, MI, 48334) Previously/Alternatively known as STILLMAN LAW OFFICE

United States flag branch Stillman Law Office, LLC (Virginia (US), 17 Jul 2015- , 9712 BELAIR RD STE 203, BALTIMORE, Maryland, 21236-0000)

United States flag Stillman, P.C. (Virginia (US), 4 Sep 2020- , 30057 Orchard Lake Rd Ste 200, Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334-2265) Previously/Alternatively known as STILLMAN LAW OFFICE

SPECIFIC INFORMATION ON PLAINTIFF:

JURISDICTION IS MICHIGAN, NOT CONNECTICUT!

MICHAEL STILLMAN IS CHIEF, COOK, AND BOTTLE WASHER! WTF!

STILLMAN, P.C.

Company Number

800958831

Previous Company Numbers

165619

Incorporation Date

14 September 1994 (over 26 years ago)

Company Type

DOMESTIC PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Jurisdiction

Michigan (US)

Registered Address

30057 ORCHARD LAKE RD STE 200 FARMINGTON HILLS MI 48334

United States

Previous Names

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL R. STILLMAN, P.C.

Alternative Names

COLLECTION LAW ADVOCATES (trading name, 2012-12-06 - 2022-12-31)

LEGALFEECOLLECTIONS.COM (trading name, 2016-05-10 - 2021-12-31)

STILLMAN LAW OFFICE (trading name, 1999-01-12 - 2004-12-31)

STILLMAN LAW OFFICE (trading name, 2005-02-03 - 2015-12-31)

STILLMAN LAW OFFICE (trading name, 2016-03-01 - 2021-12-31)

THE STILLMAN OFFICE (trading name, 2004-05-26 - 2019-12-31)

Agent Name

MICHAEL R. STILLMAN

Agent Address

STE 200, 30057 ORCHARD LAKE RD, FARMINGTON HILLS, MI, 48334

Directors / Officers

MICHAEL R. STILLMAN, agent

MICHAEL R. STILLMAN, president

MICHAEL R. STILLMAN, treasurer

MICHAEL R. STILLMAN, secretary

MICHAEL R. STILLMAN, director

Registry Page

Defendant claimed in her pleading they did not provide any timely notice , and thereafter plaintiff backdated letter, dated 5-5-2021, sending it to her AFTER THE CASE WAS ENTERED, AFTER DEFENDANT'S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM WERE SUBMITTED ON JULY 7, 2020 SIMULTANEOUSLY. How obvious can it get? They did not even argue what defendant had relayed to the court. They did not respond with a copy of that backdated letter after defendant indicated this. They knew what they sent her was ILLEGAL.

The court should have dismissed this case for the illegal-appearing plaintiff's inept handling of a this meritless attempt to collect a fictitious debt.

Defendant concludes that Synchrony Bank was a like a business cancer to GE Money, aka GE Capital. They took advantage of GE Capital and generated "bad money" into the economy. This made the Federal Reserve celebrate. This went along the lines of Jeffrey Epstein.

Though Synchrony Bank claims they are the new GE Capital, that they merged, etc. - these claims are deliberately false and RIGHT IN PLAIN SIGHT.

According to OpenCorporates.com, Synchrony only existed since 2015, which is far from true. This was when Synchrony legally took over defendant's GE Money/Amazon account. Defendant attempted to get her bank activity from her local branch for that year since her documents have been repeatedly stolen out of her apartment by CORRUPTED TRAITORS TO USA. Synchrony, in fact, existed for many years before that, and possibly even before GE Capital did. Defendant concludes: It was time for them to move to GE and destroy their popularity, their healthy contribution to the economy. That is the Jeffrey Epstein Way. That is the Federal Reserve Plan. Jeffrey Epstein had absolutely no moral values, was a multi-billionaire from TAKING, not MAKING. He was part of a Satanic Sex Cult. One of his goals was to impregnate as many women as possible, to spread his genes far and wide, similar to Malcolm X (who is probably Barack Obama's real father since Ann Dunham delayed going to Hawaii with her parents to see Malcolm X at the UN) yet to an even more exaggerated degree, thanks to the wonders of technology. Jeffrey Epstein's live-in girlfriend was referred to his "madame" and she was Bill Gate's transgender-wife's sister. Bill Gates is divorcing his "wife" Melinda because Justice is closing in on him and he wants to hide his assets. They probably learned that from Dr. Ted Gunderson, who in fact sacrificed his all to take down this evil Satanic Empire that greatly harmed children. The CIA had the largest child sex-trafficking business in the world! And the Clintons were trafficking drugs using CIA operatives such as Oliver North, and murdering anyone who got in their way, such as the two teenage boys (last names were Henry and Ives) who saw a drug drop made from the crafted helicopter which Bill Clinton got at the state of Arkansa's expense when he was governor - all to solicit drugs, especially cocaine. And he laundered his $100 million a month through the Hubble-Rose Law Firm. Dr. Gunderson divorced his wife, never stopping loving her, even moving to Nevada to further his cause of justice against the Satanic Underground.

Bill Gates' plan included a collaborative effort by the Elite Billionaires who are nothing but sociopaths, wanting to kill off billions of people and fulfill their Georgia Guidestone Dream of just having 500,000 people in the world. Fortunately, his mass murder bioweapon (crebated in North Carolina and transported to China) which he dubbed "Wuhan Virus" was intercepted by intelligence and replaced with a placebo, known as the common flu, aka Cornavirus, with the expectation that this evil operation would just bottom-out as long as there wasn't a successful back-up plan. Apparently Bill Gates managed to use his satanic computer to calculate a new strategy - which was in part, diagnosing healthy people with this fake epidemic, referred to as a pandemic - a word which is an ADJECTIVE yet reinvented and defined as "an epidemic that is pandemic". As James Corbett and James Evan Pilato said, "We are now unhealthy until we prove that we are healthy" in a similar fashion as "guilty until proven innocent".

Meantime, Sherman Companies continue to falsify records, collect money that isn't owed, aggressively harming individuals such as defendant on this case - serving its higher Illuminati purpose of destroying lives, stealing or vandalizing their property through the support of the nefarious Bar Association which beats their chests and claims right to steal people's property, even through illegal entries, when THEY claim the property and possessions are not paid for! Defendant meticulously entered every company it owned in the Timeline, which functions as the Table of Contents of the Appendix at Page 3. As an update, defendant is pasting the following comment made by a concerned patriot of USA, on the Credit Info Center's website:

Bud Hibbs has a good bit of info on them.

http://budhibbs.com/debtcollectorpages/alegis_corp.htm

LVNV Funding, LLC,

DBA/ Resurgent Capital Services, LP

Dba/ Alegis Group, LLC

Aka/ Sherman Financial Group, LLC

aka/Pinnacle Financial Group

7825 Washington Ave. S, Ste 301

Minneapolis, MN 55439-2409

Fka/ Sherman Acquisitions

Aka/FNBM, LLC

Aka/Ascent Card Services

Aka/Ventus Capital Services

Aka/Performance Recovery Group

Aka/Receivables Management Solutions?

Address 260 E. Wentworth Ave,

West St. Paul, MN, 55118.

PH: 651-457-1130 & 800.299.8302

That stupid credit card scam....DON"T FALL FOR THAT CRAP!!!!!

http://debt-consolidation-credit-repair-service.com/forums/showthread.php?t=279123

Scroll down to see the offer

Other Sherman Companies, as noted in defendant's Timeline are

Fieldstone Assit Management, LLC

United States flag FIELDSTONE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC (Delaware (US), 21 Sep 2009- )

United States flag inactive branch FIELDSTONE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC (Nevada (US), 16 Oct 2009- )

United States flag inactive branch Fieldstone Asset Management LLC (North Carolina (US), 1 Oct 2009- , 2 South Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC, 27601)

FIELDSTONE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC

Company Number

4732862

Incorporation Date

21 September 2009 (over 11 years ago)

Company Type

Limited Liability Company

Jurisdiction

Delaware (US)

Agent Name

THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY

Agent Address

CORPORATION TRUST CENTER 1209 ORANGE ST, WILMINGTON, New Castle, DE, 19801

Directors / Officers

THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY, agent

2. Granite Asset Management, LLC

United States flag BLUE GRANITE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC (Delaware (US), 18 Oct 2010- )

United States flag inactive GRANITE ASSET MANAGEMENT GP, LLC (Texas (US), 28 Dec 2004- 8 Feb 2013, 7901 KNOB HILL AVE. PASADENA, TX 77505)

United States flag GRANITE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC (Delaware (US), 4 Sep 2009- )

United States flag inactive branch GRANITE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC (New York (US), 23 Nov 2010- 1 Aug 2013, RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES LP, ATTN LUKE UMSTETTER, 55 BEATTI PL STE 110 MS 425, GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29601)

United States flag inactive branch GRANITE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC (Maryland (US), 4 Oct 2010- , CORPORATION TRUST CO 1209 ORANGE ST WILMINGTON DE 19801)

United States flag GRANITE ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. (New Jersey (US), 20 Jan 2004- )

United States flag GRANITE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC (New York (US), 19 Oct 1999- , ATTN: JAMES DUFFY, JR., 1517 FRANKLIN AVENUE, GARDEN CITY, NEW YORK, 11530) Previously/Alternatively known as GRANITE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC

United States flag inactive GRANITE CONSULTANCY & ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC (New Hampshire (US), 13 May 2008- , 23 Williamsburg Drive, Amherst, NH, 03031, USA)

United States flag inactive GRANITE HARBOR ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC (Massachusetts (US), 5 Mar 2014-29 Feb 2016, 19 SCHOONER RIDGE, MARBLEHEAD,, MA, 01945)

United States flag inactive GRANITE PEAK ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC (California (US), 12 Mar 2019- , 23 TREESIDE CT. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA 94080)

United States flag GRANITE PEAK ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC (Delaware (US), 13 Nov 2013- )

United States flag branch GRANITE PEAK ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC (Connecticut (US), 27 Nov 2013- , 203 NE FRONT STREET, SUITE 101, MILFORD, DE, 19963, USA)

United States flag inactive branch GRANITE PERSONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC (New York (US), 6 Nov 2001-28 May 2015, ONE CABLEVISION CENTER, LIBERTY, NEW YORK, 12754) Previously/Alternatively known as GRANITE PERSONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC

United States flag GRANITE PERSONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC (Delaware (US), 31 Oct 2001- )

United States flag inactive GRANITE SOLAR ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC (New Hampshire (US), 22 Feb 2018- , 40 Brentwood Rd, Exeter, NH, 03833, USA)

United States flag inactive GRANITE STATE ASSET MANAGEMENT L.L.C. (New Hampshire (US), 28 Feb 2006-19 Jan 2010, 13 Cobbel Hill Dr, Dover, NH, 03820, USA)

United States flag inactive GRANITE VIEW ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC (California (US), 29 Aug 2005- , 1300 45TH AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94122)

United States flag inactive branch Granite Asset Management, LLC (North Carolina (US), 1 Oct 2009- , 2 South Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC, 27601)

United States flag Granite Bay Asset Management, LLC (Nevada (US), 8 Apr 2021- )

United States flag inactive branch Granite Springs Asset Management, LLC (Alaska (US), 21 Mar 2011- , 1220 N. Market Street Ste 806 Blumberg Excelsior Corporate Services, Inc, Wilimngton, DE 19801)

United States flag Granite View Asset Management, LLC (Colorado (US), 29 Mar 2010- )

United States flag branch SEELAUS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC (New York (US), 28 Jun 2010- , 1221 AVE OF THE AMERICAS, 42ND FL, NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10020) Previously/Alternatively known as GRANITE SPRINGS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC

United States flag SEELAUS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC (Delaware (US), 27 Mar 2009- ) Previously/Alternatively known as GRANITE SPRINGS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC

United States flag Solid Granite Asset Management, LLC (Alaska (US), 7 Feb 2018- , 505 OLD STEESE HWY STE 122, FAIRBANKS, AK, 99701)

United States flag branch Solid Granite Asset Management, LLC (Tennessee (US), 12 Jan 2021- )

Officers of Granite Asset Management

source: OpenCorporates

GRANITE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC dos process agent, United States flag GRANITE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC (New York (US), 19 Oct 1999- )

Solid Granite Asset Management, LLC general partner, United States flag DARK BASALT SAFE ASSET, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Alaska (US), 8 Mar 2018- )

GRANITE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC

Company Number

4727889

Incorporation Date

4 September 2009 (over 11 years ago)

Company Type

Limited Liability Company

Jurisdiction

Delaware (US)

Agent Name

THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY

Agent Address

CORPORATION TRUST CENTER 1209 ORANGE ST, WILMINGTON, New Castle, DE, 19801

Directors / Officers

THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY, agent

3. Found 5 companies

Limestone Asset Management, LLC

exclude inactiveAdvanced Options

United States flag inactive branch LIMESTONE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC (New York (US), 27 Apr 2012- 2 Aug 2013, RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. ATTN: LUKE UMSTETTER, 55 BEATTIE PL., STE. 110, MS 425, GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29601)

United States flag LIMESTONE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC (Delaware (US), 11 Sep 2009- )

United States flag inactive branch LIMESTONE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC (Nevada (US), 16 Oct 2009- )

United States flag LIMESTONE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC (Florida (US), 22 Jul 2010- )

United States flag inactive branch Limestone Asset Management LLC (North Carolina (US), 2 Oct 2009- , 2 South Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC, 27601)

LIMESTONE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC

Company Number

L10000077249

Status

Active

Incorporation Date

22 July 2010 (almost 11 years ago)

Company Type

Florida Limited Liability

Jurisdiction

Florida (US)

Agent Name

ORION INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT LTD. CORP

Agent Address

c/o Orion Investment, Miami, FL 33131

Directors / Officers

IBRAHIM N AL-RASHID

ORION INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT LTD. CORP, agent

4. LVNV Funding, LLC

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Indiana (US), 16 Feb 2012- , 625 PILOT RD, STE 3, LAS VEGAS, NV 89119)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Florida (US), 22 Mar 2011- )

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (South Carolina (US), 12 Sep 2006- )

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Texas (US), 12 Sep 2011- , 211 E. 7TH STREET SUITE 620 AUSTIN, TX 78701)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Maine (US), 14 Jul 2016- )

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (West Virginia (US), 10 Sep 2007- , 6801 S. CIMARRON ROAD, SUITE 424-J, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89113)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Kansas (US), 24 Jun 2010-15 Jul 2022, 55 Beattie Place Suite 110, GREENVILLE, SC 29601)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Idaho (US), 23 Feb 2006- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE SUITE 110 GREENVILE, SC 29601)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Oregon (US), 15 Nov 2017- , 6801 S CIMARRON ROAD SUITE 424-J, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89113)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (New York (US), 29 May 2009- , 80 STATE STREET, ALBANY, NEW YORK, 12207-2543)

United States flag LVNV FUNDING LLC (Delaware (US), 13 Apr 2005- ) Trademarks: LVNV FUNDING

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Maryland (US), 9 Apr 2007- , 6801 S. CIMARRON ROAD SUITE 424-J LAS VEGAS NV 89113)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Washington (US), 5 Jan 2012- , 6801 S CIMARRON RD, SUITE 424-J, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89113-2273)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Montana (US), 13 Jul 2016- , 6801 S. CIMARRON ROAD SUITE 424-J Las Vegas, NV 89113)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Connecticut (US), 17 Jul 2013- , 6801 S. CIMARRON ROAD, SUITE 424-J, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89113, USA)

United States flag inactive LVNV FUNDING LLC (Virginia (US), 11 Aug 2017-11 Sep 2018, 780 Lynnhaven Parkway, Suite 220, Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23452-0000)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Ohio (US), 6 Dec 2007- , DELAWARE)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Louisiana (US), 15 Mar 2007- , 501 LOUISIANA AVENUE BATON ROUGE, LA 70802)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (North Dakota (US), 24 Oct 2017- , 6801 S CIMARRON RD STE 424-J LAS VEGAS, NV 89113-2273)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Utah (US), 3 May 2017- , 6801 S CIMARRON RD STE 424-J Las Vegas, NV 89113)

United States flag inactive branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Massachusetts (US), 15 Sep 2006- 1 Oct 2008, 625 PILOT RD., STE 3, LAS VEGAS,, NV, 89119)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Massachusetts (US), 9 Feb 2009- , 6801 S. CIMARRON ROAD SUITE 424-J, LAS VEGAS,, NV, 89113)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (New Jersey (US), 14 Jul 2016- )

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Michigan (US), 28 Aug 2014- , 601 ABBOT ROAD EAST LANSING MI 48823)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Iowa (US), 22 Nov 2011- , 6801 S CIMARRON RD. STE 424J, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89113, USA)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Utah (US), 18 Sep 2012- , 6801 S CIMARRON RD STE 424-J Las Vegas, NV 89113)

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Louisiana (US), 17 Jul 2019- )

United States flag branch LVNV FUNDING LLC (Oklahoma (US), 22 Apr 2014- )

United States flag inactive LVNV FUNDING, INC. (Florida (US), 27 Aug 2007- )

United States flag LVNV FUNDING, INC. (Virginia (US), 11 Sep 2018- , 780 Lynnhaven Pkwy Ste 220, VIRGINIA BEACH, Virginia, 23452-7332)

Note! Bryan Falerio is one of the many CAREER CRIMINALS IN THIS CORRUPTED, SATANIC UNDERWORLD/UNDERGROUND!

LVNV FUNDING LLC BRANCH

Company Number

1113216

Status

Active

Incorporation Date

17 July 2013 (almost 8 years ago)

Company Type

Foreign Limited Liability Company

Jurisdiction

Connecticut (US)

Branch

Branch of LVNV FUNDING LLC (Delaware (US))

Registered Address

6801 S. CIMARRON ROAD, SUITE 424-J, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89113, USA

United States

Agent Name

CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY

Agent Address

100 PEARL STREET, 17TH FLOOR, MC-CSC1, HARTFORD, CT, 06103

Directors / Officers

BRYAN FALIERO, president

CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY, agent

DANIEL J. PICCIANO III, vice president

LEWIS JACKSON WALKER III, secretary

RSS feed icon

Recent filings for LVNV FUNDING LLC

7 Jul 2020

AGENT ADDRESS

6 Jul 2020

CORRECT AGT ADD

6 Jul 2020

AGENT ADDRESS

6 Mar 2020

REPORT (2020)

11 Feb 2019

REPORT (2019)

12 Apr 2018

REPORT (2018)

23 Feb 2018

BUSINESS ADDRES

18 Jul 2017

REPORT (2017)

LVNV FUNDING, NORTH CAROLINA ONLY HAS JURISDICTION IN NORTH CAROLINA!

LVNV Funding LLC BRANCH

Company Number

1124043

Status

Current Active

Incorporation Date

16 November 2009 (over 11 years ago)

Company Type

Limited Liability Company - Foreign

Jurisdiction

North Carolina (US)

Branch

Branch of LVNV FUNDING LLC (Delaware (US))

Registered Address

2626 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 550

Raleigh

27608

United States

Agent Name

Corporation Service Company

Directors / Officers

Bryan Faliero, president

Corporation Service Company, agent

Daniel Joseph Picciano , III, vice president

Lewis Jackson Walker , III, vice president

Registry Page

https://www.sosnc.gov/online_services...

RSS feed icon

Recent filings for LVNV Funding LLC

0 officers!

Found 0 officers

LVNV FUNDING

5. PYOD, LLC

Found 37 companies

PYOD, LLC

exclude inactiveAdvanced Options

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Alabama (US), 19 Dec 2008- )

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Maryland (US), 7 Sep 2007- , SUITE 424-K 6801 S. CIMARRON ROAD LAS VEGAS NV 89113)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Idaho (US), 2 May 2011- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE STE 110 GREENVILLE, SC 29601)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Washington (US), 21 Dec 2011- , 6801 S CIMARRON RD, SUITE 424-K, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89113)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (North Dakota (US), 24 Oct 2017- , 6801 S CIMARRON RD STE 424 LAS VEGAS, NV 89113-2273)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Nevada (US), 7 Sep 2007- )

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Connecticut (US), 17 Jul 2013- , 6801 S. CIMARRON ROAD, SUITE 424-K, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89113, USA)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (West Virginia (US), 28 Dec 2007- , 6801 S. CIMARRON ROAD, SUITE 424-K, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89113)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Iowa (US), 14 Nov 2011- , 6801 S CIMARRON ROAD SUITE 424K, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89113, USA)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Tennessee (US), 22 Dec 2011- )

United States flag PYOD LLC (Delaware (US), 30 Aug 2007- )

United States flag inactive branch PYOD LLC (Idaho (US), 7 Sep 2007- 8 Dec 2009, 625 PILOT RD STE 5 LAS VEGAS, NV 89119)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Louisiana (US), 17 Jul 2019- )

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (New Jersey (US), 14 Jul 2016- )

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Utah (US), 3 May 2017- , 6801 S CIMARRON RD STE 424-K Las Vegas, NV 89113)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Rhode Island (US), 5 Jan 2012- , 6801 S. CIMARRON ROAD SUITE 424-K, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89113)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Massachusetts (US), 24 Feb 2012- , 6801 S. CIMARRON RD SUITE 424-K, LAS VEGAS,, NV, 89113)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Montana (US), 13 Jul 2016- , 6801 S. Cimarron Road Suite 424-K Las Vegas, NV 89113)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Michigan (US), 23 Sep 2014- , 601 ABBOT ROAD EAST LANSING MI 48823)

United States flag inactive branch PYOD LLC (District of Columbia (US), 23 Aug 2018-23 Aug 2018, 6801 S CIMARRON RD, SUITE # 424-K, LAS VEGAS, Nevada, 89113)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (North Carolina (US), 16 Nov 2012- , 2626 Glenwood Avenue,, Suite 550, Raleigh, NC, 27608)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Utah (US), 18 Sep 2012- , 6801 S CIMARRON RD STE 424-K Las Vegas, NV 89113)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (New York (US), 29 May 2009- , 80 STATE STREET, ALBANY, NEW YORK, 12207-2543)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Oregon (US), 8 Nov 2017- , 6801 S CIMMARRON RD STE 424-K, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89113)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Colorado (US), 5 Sep 2007- )

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Ohio (US), 24 Dec 2007- , DELAWARE)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (South Dakota (US), 28 Mar 2018- )

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (South Carolina (US), 10 Sep 2007- )

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (Pennsylvania (US), 8 Aug 2014- , CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY Dauphin)

United States flag branch PYOD LLC (District of Columbia (US), 23 Aug 2018- , 6801 S. CIMARRON RD, SUITE 424-K, LAS VEGAS, Nevada, 89113)

Sorted by company name

Sort by relevance

← Previous12Next →Results per page

Enterprise users only

Share This SearchShare On LinkedIn Share On Facebook Share On Google Plus Share On Twitter

Get as Open DataXML or JSON

Enterprise UsersCSV or XLS

Filtered by jurisdictionShow all

1 Alabama (US)

1 Colorado (US)

1 Connecticut (US)

1 Delaware (US)

2 District of Columbia (US)

1 Florida (US)

2 Idaho (US)

1 Indiana (US)

1 Iowa (US)

2 Louisiana (US)

1 Maine (US)

1 Maryland (US)

1 Massachusetts (US)

1 Michigan (US)

1 Montana (US)

1 Nevada (US)

1 New Jersey (US)

1 New York (US)

1 North Carolina (US)

2 Utah (US)

Filter by data held

35 Branch Relationship

23 Company Address

2 Identifier

3 Industry Code

6 Licence

2 Telephone Number

Filter by current status

19 Active

2 Active In Good Standing

1 Active Existing

1 Active Good Standing

1 Canceled

1 Current Active

1 Exists

4 Good Standing

1 Inactive Cancelled (Administr...

Filter by company type

1 Collection Agency

1 Collection Agency - Foreign

6 FOREIGN LIMITED LIABILIT...

1 FOREIGN LLC

1 FOREIGN LMTD LIAB CO - OOS

1 Foreign LLC

1 Foreign LLC - Profit

1 Foreign Limited Liability

10 Foreign Limited Liability Com...

1 Foreign Limited Liability Com...

1 Foreign Limited-Liability Com...

1 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPAN...

1 LLC - Foreign

5 Limited Liability Company

1 Limited Liability Company (Fo...

1 Limited Liability Company (No...

1 Limited Liability Company - B...

2 Limited Liability Company - F...

PYOD LLC BRANCH

Company Number

1287824

Status

Current Active

Incorporation Date

16 November 2012 (over 8 years ago)

Company Type

Limited Liability Company - Foreign

Jurisdiction

North Carolina (US)

Branch

Branch of PYOD LLC (Delaware (US))

Registered Address

2626 Glenwood Avenue,, Suite 550

Raleigh

27608

United States

Agent Name

Corporation Service Company

Directors / Officers

Bryan Faliero, president

Corporation Service Company, agent

Daniel Joseph Picciano , III, vice president

Lewis Jackson Walker , III, vice president

Registry Page

https://www.sosnc.gov/online_services...

RSS feed icon

Recent filings for PYOD LLC

24 Mar 2020

ANNUAL REPORT LLC

25 Mar 2019

ANNUAL REPORT LLC

15 Mar 2018

ANNUAL REPORT LLC

19 Jun 2017

CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF REGISTERED OFFICE/AGENT

15 Mar 2017

ANNUAL REPORT LLC

15 Mar 2016

ANNUAL REPORT LLC

28 Apr 2015

ANNUAL REPORT LLC

5 Feb 2015

REVOKED CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY

see all filings

Source North Carolina Secretary of State, Business Registration Division, https://www.sosnc.gov/divisions/busin..., 28 Jan 2021

ADD DATA (WEBSITE, ADDRESS, ETC)

Company Addresses

HEAD OFFICE ADDRESS

6801 S. Cimarron Road, Suite 424-K, Las Vegas, NV, 89113

MAILING ADDRESS

2626 Glenwood Avenue,, Suite 550, Raleigh, NC, 27608

Found 0 officers

PYOD, LLC

6. RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES

Found 61 companies

Resurgent Capital Services

exclude inactiveAdvanced Options

United States flag inactive RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES INC. (South Carolina (US), 19 Jan 1999-24 Sep 1999)

United States flag inactive RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES INC. (South Carolina (US), 12 Aug 1998-26 Mar 1999)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Louisiana (US), 28 Apr 2000- , 501 LOUISIANA AVENUE BATON ROUGE, LA 70802)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Michigan (US), 3 Mar 2000- , STE 110 MS 425 55 BEATTLE PLACE GREENVILLE SC 29601)

United States flag RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Oklahoma (US), 6 Mar 2000- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (California (US), 31 Jan 2000- , 55 BEATTIE PL STE 110 MS 425 GREENVILLE SC 29601)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (West Virginia (US), 2 Feb 2000- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE, SUITE 110, GREENVILLE, SC, 29601)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Ohio (US), 31 Jan 2000- , DELAWARE)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (South Carolina (US), 2 Sep 1999- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Utah (US), 1 Nov 1999- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE STE 110 GREENVILLE, SC 29601)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Utah (US), 2 Sep 1999- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE STE 110 GREENVILLE, SC 29601)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Tennessee (US), 31 Aug 1999- , MAIL STOP 425 55 BEATTIE PL STE 300 GREENVILLE, SC 29601-2127 USA)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Indiana (US), 7 Sep 1999- , 55 BEATTIE PL, STE 110, MS 425, GREENVILLE, SC 29601)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (New York (US), 31 Aug 1999- , 80 STATE STREET, ALBANY, NEW YORK, 12207-2543)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (North Dakota (US), 22 Mar 2000- , 55 BEATTIE PL STE 110 GREENVILLE, SC 29601)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Montana (US), 2 Aug 2000- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Hawaii (US), 14 Sep 1999- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Texas (US), 12 Aug 1999- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Nebraska (US), 28 Aug 2000- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Kentucky (US))

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Washington (US), 11 May 2000- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE, SUITE 110, GREENVILLE, SC, 29601)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Iowa (US), 27 Aug 1999- , 55 BEATTIE PL. STE 110 MS 425, GREENVILLE, SC, 29601, USA)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Maine (US), 31 Aug 1999- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Florida (US), 22 Sep 1999- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Vermont (US), 1 Feb 2000- , 55 BEATTIE PL STE 110, MAIL STOP 425, GREENVILLE, SC, 29601 - 5115, USA)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Pennsylvania (US), 1 Feb 2000- , CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY Dauphin)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (New Jersey (US), 4 May 2000- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Kansas (US), -15 Jul 2022, 55 Beattie Place Suite 110, GREENVILLE, SC 29601)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Maryland (US), 1 Sep 1999- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE, SUITE 110, MS425 GREENVILLE SC 29601)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Arkansas (US), 14 Sep 1999- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE SUITE 300, MAIL STOP 425 GREENVILLE, SC 29601)

******

Found 61 companies

Resurgent Capital Services

exclude inactiveAdvanced Options

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Idaho (US), 31 Aug 1999- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE SUITE 110 GREENVILLE, SC 29601)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Georgia (US), 2 Feb 2000- , 55 Beattie Place, Suite 110, GREENVILLE, SC, 29601, USA)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Missouri (US), 4 May 2000- , 221 BOLIVAR ST, JEFFERSON CITY, MO, 65101)

United States flag RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P. (Delaware (US), 24 Jun 1999- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Connecticut (US), 29 Sep 1999- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE, SUITE 110, GREENVILLE, SC, 29601, USA)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Wisconsin (US), 7 Feb 2000- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (South Dakota (US), 13 Mar 2000- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Massachusetts (US), 27 Sep 1999- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE, SUITE 110, GREENVILLE,, SC, 29601)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Nevada (US), 9 May 2000-31 Dec 9999)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (New Hampshire (US), 31 Jul 2000- , 55 Beattie Place Suite 300 MS 425, Greenville, SC, 29601, USA)

United States flag RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES LLC (Delaware (US), 23 Sep 1999- )

United States flag RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES PR LLC (Delaware (US), 23 Aug 2007- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES PR LLC (South Carolina (US), 5 Sep 2007- )

Puerto Rico flag inactive branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES PR LLC (Puerto Rico, 31 Oct 2007- , 154 Rafael Cordero Street Suite 506 San Juan, PR 00901)

United States flag inactive branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES PR LLC (Nevada (US), 24 Aug 2007- )

Singapore flag inactive RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES PTE. LTD. (Singapore, 22 Jul 2010- , 7 SHENTON WAY #01-02 SINGAPORE CONFERENCE HALL, 068810)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. (District of Columbia (US), 30 Oct 2013- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE, Suite 110, GREENVILLE, South Carolina, 29601)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. (Arizona (US), 15 S. MAIN STREET, GREENVILLE, SC 29601)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. (Louisiana (US), 27 Jul 2006- , DOMICILE: DELAWARE)

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Oregon (US), 23 Sep 1999- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE, SUITE 110, GREENVILLE, SC, 29601)

United States flag inactive branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, LLC (South Carolina (US), 24 Sep 1999-23 Sep 2005)

United States flag branch Resurgent Capital Services L.P. (Mississippi (US), 8 May 2000- )

United States flag branch Resurgent Capital Services L.P. (New Mexico (US), 14 Sep 1999- )

United States flag branch Resurgent Capital Services L.P. (Rhode Island (US), 20 Mar 2000- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE, SUITE 300, MS 425, GREENVILLE, SC, SC, 29601)

United States flag branch Resurgent Capital Services L.P. (Virginia (US), 23 Mar 2000- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE STE 300, MS 425, GREENVILLE, South Carolina, 29601-0000)

United States flag branch Resurgent Capital Services L.P. (North Carolina (US), 3 Apr 2000- , 2626 Glenwood Avenue,, Suite 550, Raleigh, NC, 27608)

United States flag branch Resurgent Capital Services L.P. (Minnesota (US), 8 Sep 1999- )

United States flag branch Resurgent Capital Services L.P. (Colorado (US), 1 May 2000- )

United States flag branch Resurgent Capital Services L.P. (Wyoming (US), 3 Mar 2000- , 55 Beattie Place Suite 110 Greenville, SC 29601 USA)

United States flag branch Resurgent Capital Services L.P. (Alabama (US), 4 Feb 2000- )

********

Found 61 companies

Resurgent Capital Services

exclude inactiveAdvanced Options

United States flag branch Resurgent Capital Services Limited Partnership (Alaska (US), 26 Nov 2001- , 55 BEATTIE PLACE SUITE 110, GREENVILLE, SC, 29601)

Sorted by company name

Sort by relevance

← Previous3Next →Results per page

Enterprise users only

Share This SearchShare On LinkedIn Share On Facebook Share On Google Plus Share On Twitter

Get as Open DataXML or JSON

Enterprise UsersCSV or XLS

Filtered by jurisdictionShow all

1 Alabama (US)

1 Alaska (US)

1 Arizona (US)

1 Arkansas (US)

1 California (US)

1 Colorado (US)

1 Connecticut (US)

3 Delaware (US)

1 District of Columbia (US)

1 Florida (US)

1 Georgia (US)

1 Hawaii (US)

1 Idaho (US)

1 Indiana (US)

1 Iowa (US)

1 Kansas (US)

2 Louisiana (US)

2 Nevada (US)

5 South Carolina (US)

2 Utah (US)

Filter by data held

52 Branch Relationship

30 Company Address

2 Identifier

4 Industry Code

5 Licence

1 Telephone Number

Filter by current status

1 A Active

30 Active

1 Active And In Good Standing

1 Active Current

1 Active Good Standing

1 Active/Compliance

1 Cancelled

1 Current Active

1 Exists

8 Good Standing

1 Incorporated/Qualified

3 Mer

1 Revived In Good Standing

1 Struck Off

1 Withdrawn

Filter by company typeShow all

1 Collection Agency

1 Collection Agency - Foreign

2 Domestic - Profit

1 EXEMPT PRIVATE COMPANY L...

1 FOREIGN

7 FOREIGN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

2 FOREIGN LP

1 FRGN LIMITED PRTNSHP

1 Foreign - Profit

2 Foreign LLC - Profit

2 Foreign LP

18 Foreign Limited Partnership

1 Foreign Limited Partnership (88)

1 Foreign Limited Partnership (LP)

1 Foreign Limited-Liability Com...

R Foreign ULPA Limited Partnership

1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (FOR...

3 Limited Liability Company

5 Limited Partnership

4 Limited Partnership - Foreign

Found 2 officers

Resurgent Capital Services

exclude inactiveAdvanced Options

inactive RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES LP member, United States flag inactive branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES PR LLC (Nevada (US), 24 Aug 2007- )

inactive RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, LP agent, United States flag inactive branch TRADD STREET CAPITAL LLC (Louisiana (US), 15 Dec 2008- )

Sorted by officer name

Sort by relevance

Results per page

Enterprise users only

Filter by jurisdiction

1 Louisiana (US)

1 Nevada (US)

7, RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES PR, LLC

United States flag RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES PR LLC (Delaware (US), 23 Aug 2007- )

United States flag branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES PR LLC (South Carolina (US), 5 Sep 2007- )

Puerto Rico flag inactive branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES PR LLC (Puerto Rico, 31 Oct 2007- , 154 Rafael Cordero Street Suite 506 San Juan, PR 00901)

United States flag inactive branch RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES PR LLC (Nevada (US), 24 Aug 2007- )

8. SFG REO, LLC

Found 2 companies

SFG REO, LLC

exclude inactiveAdvanced Options

United States flag branch SFG REO LLC (Nevada (US), 31 Jul 2007- )

United States flag SFG REO, LLC (Delaware (US), 3 May 2007- )

9. Sherman Acquisition II Limited Partnership

Found 1 companies

Sherman Acquisition II Limited Partnership

exclude inactiveAdvanced Options

United States flag SHERMAN ACQUISITION II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Delaware (US), 10 Oct 2003- )

SHERMAN ACQUISITION II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Company Number

3714403

Incorporation Date

10 October 2003 (over 17 years ago)

Company Type

Limited Partnership

Jurisdiction

Delaware (US)

Agent Name

THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY

Agent Address

CORPORATION TRUST CENTER 1209 ORANGE ST, WILMINGTON, New Castle, DE, 19801

Directors / Officers

THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY, agent

Source Delaware Department of State: Division of Corporations, http://www.corp.delaware.gov/, 27 Aug 2019

ADD DATA (WEBSITE, ADDRESS, ETC)

Company network

Not yet available for this company. Click to find out more

Latest Events

2003-10-10

Incorporated

2003-10-10 - 2018-05-09

Addition of officer THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY, agent

See all events

Corporate Grouping USER CONTRIBUTED

None known. Add one now?

10. Sherman Acquisition, LLC

Found 11 companies

Sherman Acquisition, LLC

exclude inactiveAdvanced Options

United States flag 385 SHERMAN ACQUISITION LLC (Delaware (US), 30 Dec 2013- )

United States flag 5 OLD SHERMAN ROAD ACQUISITION, LLC (Connecticut (US), 5 Jul 2018- , 11 ROLLIN ROAD, WOODBRIDGE, CT, 06525, USA)

United States flag branch A. O. SHERMAN, LLC (Connecticut (US), 15 Dec 2005- , C/O WHITCRAFT LLC, 76 COUNTY ROAD, EASTFORD, CT, 06242, USA) Previously/Alternatively known as AO SHERMAN ACQUISITION CO LLC

United States flag inactive SHERMAN ACQUISITION GROUP, L.L.C. (Michigan (US), 17 Jun 1998-18 Mar 2008, P.O. Box 4540 TROY MI 48099)

United States flag inactive branch SHERMAN ACQUISITION II GENERAL PARTNER LLC (Texas (US), 6 Feb 2004-19 Dec 2006, 1021 MAIN STREET SUITE 1150 HOUSTON, TX 77002)

United States flag SHERMAN ACQUISITION II GENERAL PARTNER LLC (Delaware (US), 10 Oct 2003- )

United States flag SHERMAN ACQUISITION L.L.C. (Delaware (US), 1 Feb 1999- )

United States flag inactive SHERMAN HEIGHTS ACQUISITION, LLC (Connecticut (US), 4 Dec 1997- , 130 TUNXIS VILLAGE, FARMINGTON, CT, 06032)

United States flag branch Sherman Acquisition, LLC (Colorado (US), 20 Jan 2005- )

United States flag Sherman LP Acquisition LLC (Minnesota (US), 27 Dec 2012- , 233 Park Avenue South, Suite 201, Minneapolis, MN, 55415)

United States flag Sherman Lander LP Acquisition LLC (Minnesota (US), 17 Oct 2017- , 233 Park Avenue South, Suite 201, Minneapolis, MN, 55415)

CONNECTICUT BRANCH OWNED BY WITCHCRAFT?

YET THEY CALL IT WHITCRAFT AS A CODE?

CONSIDER THIS: NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL! THE FBI SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE EVEN REPORTED IT! YET THE ACTIVE ATTORNEY GENERAL SUPPRESSED IT AND WOULD NOT EVEN ALLOW THEM TO ARREST DAVID WHEELER FOR IMPERSONATING AGENT WILLIAM ALDENBURG! IN FULL GEAR, STOLEN FROM FBI SOMEHOW! OBAMA'S HANDS WERE 100% IN IT! HE THINKS HE IS A CULT LEADER, TO CARRY ON THE GOALS OF MALCOLM X AND ILLUMINATI!

A. O. SHERMAN, LLC BRANCH

Company Number

0842666

Status

Active

Incorporation Date

15 December 2005 (over 15 years ago)

Company Type

Foreign Limited Liability Company

Jurisdiction

Connecticut (US)

Branch

Branch of A.O. SHERMAN, LLC (Delaware (US))

Registered Address

C/O WHITCRAFT LLC, 76 COUNTY ROAD, EASTFORD, CT, 06242, USA

United States

Previous Names

A.O. SHERMAN ACQUISITION CO. LLC

Agent Name

SECRETARY OF THE STATE

Agent Address

30 TRINITY STREET, HARTFORD, CT, 06106

Directors / Officers

JOE MAISTO, cfo

SECRETARY OF THE STATE, agent

Registry Page

http://www.concord-sots.ct.gov/CONCOR...

RSS feed icon

Recent filings for A. O. SHERMAN, LLC

30 Apr 2019

REPORT (2019)

30 Apr 2019

REPORT (2018)

30 Apr 2019

REPORT (2017)

23 Mar 2017

REPORT (2016)

23 Mar 2017

REPORT (2015)

8 May 2015

REPORT (2014)

8 May 2015

REPORT (2013)

8 May 2015

REPORT (2012)

see all filings

Source Connecticut Secretary Of State, Commercial Recording Division, http://www.concord-sots.ct.gov/CONCOR..., 9 May 2021

ADD DATA (WEBSITE, ADDRESS, ETC)

Company Addresses

MAILING ADDRESS

76 COUNTY ROAD, EASTFORD, CT, 06242, USA

11. Sherman Acquisition Limited Partnership

Found 4 companies

Sherman Acquisition Limited Partnership

exclude inactiveAdvanced Options

United States flag SHERMAN ACQUISITION II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Delaware (US), 10 Oct 2003- )

United States flag branch SHERMAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (New Jersey (US), 16 Jan 2003- )

United States flag SHERMAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Delaware (US), 1 Nov 2000- )

United States flag SHERMAN ACQUISITION TA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Delaware (US), 3 May 2002- )

Three located in Delaware, the more corruption the merrier!

12. Sherman Acquisition TA LP

Operation Harvey Rabbit with Jimmy Stewart: Found 0 companies

Sherman Acquisition TA LP

exclude inactive

13. Tradd Street, LLC

Found 28 companies

Tradd Street, LLC

exclude inactiveAdvanced Options

United States flag 125 TRADD STREET, LLC (South Carolina (US), 4 Mar 2015- )

United States flag 159 TRADD STREET, LLC (South Carolina (US), 14 Mar 2005- )

United States flag 1790 TRADD STREET, LLC (Delaware (US), 12 Jan 2018- )

United States flag 183 TRADD STREET, LLC (South Carolina (US), 14 Sep 2006- )

United States flag 2 TRADD STREET, LLC (South Carolina (US), 17 Oct 2013- )

United States flag inactive 22 TRADD STREET, LLC (South Carolina (US), 2 Aug 2004-15 Sep 2016)

United States flag 6 TRADD STREET, LLC (South Carolina (US), 21 Sep 2001-17 Sep 2051)

United States flag SEVENTEEN TRADD STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC (South Carolina (US), 15 Jun 2000-31 Dec 2050)

United States flag inactive branch TRADD STREET CAPITAL LLC (West Virginia (US), 16 Dec 2008-11 Jul 2013)

United States flag TRADD STREET CAPITAL LLC (Delaware (US), 19 Nov 2008- )

United States flag inactive branch TRADD STREET CAPITAL LLC (Louisiana (US), 15 Dec 2008- , 5615 CORPORATE BLVD., STE. 400B BATON ROUGE, LA 70808)

United States flag inactive branch TRADD STREET CAPITAL LLC (New York (US), 29 May 2009-18 Jun 2013, CT CORPORATION SYSTEM, 111 EIGHTH AVENUE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10011)

United States flag TRADD STREET CAPITAL, LLC (Arizona (US), 22 Aug 2014- , 22638 N 54TH WAY PHOENIX, AZ 85054)

United States flag TRADD STREET COLLECTIVE, LLC (Missouri (US), 10 Feb 2020- , 117 S LEXINGTON ST, STE 100, Harrisonville, MO, 64701)

United States flag TRADD STREET HOLDINGS LLC (Delaware (US), 19 Nov 2008- )

United States flag inactive branch TRADD STREET HOLDINGS LLC (Nevada (US), 15 Dec 2008- )

United States flag inactive branch TRADD STREET LLC (Idaho (US), 15 Dec 2008-12 Mar 2012, 625 PILOT RD STE 2 LAS VEGAS, NV 89119)

United States flag inactive branch TRADD STREET LLC (South Carolina (US), 21 Jan 2009-22 May 2013)

United States flag inactive branch TRADD STREET LLC (Nevada (US), 15 Dec 2008- )

United States flag inactive branch TRADD STREET LLC (Maryland (US), 15 Dec 2008- , THE CORPORATION TRUST INCORPORATED 1209 ORANGE STREET WILMINGTON DE 19801)

United States flag inactive branch TRADD STREET LLC (Ohio (US), 15 Dec 2008- , DELAWARE)

United States flag TRADD STREET MANAGEMENT LLC (South Carolina (US), 24 Jul 2014- )

United States flag inactive TRADD STREET PARTNERS, LLC (Georgia (US), 24 Sep 1999- 9 Nov 2002, TRADD STREET PARTNERS LLC, ATLANTA, GA, 30340, USA)

United States flag TRADD STREET PROPERTIES, LLC (Ohio (US), 1 Jan 2014- )

United States flag TRADD STREET, LLC (South Carolina (US), 27 Feb 2006- )

United States flag branch Tradd Street Capital LLC (Colorado (US), 15 Dec 2008- )

United States flag inactive Tradd Street Investments, LLC (Virginia (US), 5 Jul 2012-31 Oct 2014, 2020 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW, #292, WASHINGTON, District Of Columbia, 20006-0000)

United States flag inactive branch Tradd Street LLC (Alabama (US), 19 Dec 2008- )

This above search is far from being complete! Page 4 of Defendant's Small Claim Answer/Counterclaim Timeline is filled with more listed companies, as of 2020 - no doubt they have added many more nefariously!

This evil underground of traitors search for money! These sociopaths do all they can to destroy this nation and make it their OWN! Where has that OWN word been used? Follow the people, follow the money! They are the Satanic Underworld/Underground, ajoined with the Illuminati!

Defendant has provided numerous proofs of the illegitamate and invasive atttempts to harass her for money she does not owe.

Because the defendant has emphasized the plaintiff has shown no diligence as well as submitted nothing that was true, the court should have NEVER allowed it to enter a one-page MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM 10 months after the counterclaim was entered! The court nefariously extracted pages to the counterclaim and re-entered it as a revised counterclaim the day following its filing the defendant's already two-week old submitted document! The court allowed the plaintiff to upload documents immediately yet blocked the defendant from doing so, so it could further deliberately delay by not scanning in the documents she submitted for WEEKS ON END. Defendant did not re-enter documents! Defendant only amended one document, that's it! No revised pleadings!

There are judges who love to hate the defendant and Judge Abrams is one of them. Judge Levin is another - since defendant fired his son early on in a personal injury case, because she was hit from behind and suffered a very painful concussion, which lead to her having to take pain medications in order to continue working to pay for her cost of living. She should have been able to stay home as a victim. The attorney disrupted that and was so evil he refused to help her with anything. The medical company which this driver worked for could have been sued since he was on the job, in training. Even though the attorney did so much harm to her, his father stepped in as a judge to try to "finish her off" particularly with the help of crooked politicians like Richard Blumenthal, who conspired and got them to adduce charges in a baseless case, TWO YEARS AFTER SHE WAS ILLICITLY ARRESTED AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAVEN which is unlawful itself! Judge Abrams not only illicitly evicted defendant but also conspired with Public Storage, Inc - which stole her property in her unit, breaking the lock off, claiming she owed money when in fact they refused to deposit her money order, which she paid every month since they played games with her checking account, including claiming they didn't have her check, and she would give them another and they would cash BOTH. They heaped charges on her account even though she continued to pay rent and said they would have to wait for a replacement check for that month. Nevertheless, the charges were $250 and their office owed the defendant over $400 from a lawsuit she entered against them prior to that. They never paid. They never credited her account. Defendant did all she could to collect that money personally, including sending a letter to Public Storage CEO in New Hampshire! Judge Abrams blocked her efforts through court! And Judge Abrams allowed them to steal all her property and personal possessions, fully knowing they owed her over $400 since it was right in the court case.

It is unclear in the CT Practice Book that the defendant has a right to move the court to dismiss a case when it has counterclaimed. Yet undoubtedly a counterclaim reflects not only a dismissal motion but also seeks retribution for as many costs as possible. Simply look up every company which this case refers to in OpenCorporates.com. NOT ONE COMPANY, INCLUDING THE PLAINTIFF, HAS JURISDICTION IN CONNECTICUT! The court keeps spinning its wheels as if it expects some tragic event will befall the defendant, just like when her hamstring was badly torn as she was getting on a Metro North train, because the man in front of her dropped material like silicone on it to cause her to severely slip. It was fortunate that she had hold of the handrail because she surely would have broken her back or neck otherwise. Her badly torn hamstring was NOT treated at the hospital despite being transported by ambulance. The ER doctor said he would give her crutches as a means of therapy and told her to walk home past midnight - a mile away, despite her leg internally bleeding and very swollen. He knew it was internally bleeding, They did an ultrasound and said they couldn't find anything because the blood was in the way!

One can only ponder why is it so important to TAKE rather than MAKE.

Prepared and Submitted,

FOR THE DEFENDANT, PRO SE

Anne M. Bradley

CERTIFIED MAILING

A copy of this aforesaid Supplemental Brief, dated May 13, 2021, has been mailed to the following:

Stillman Law Office

alias: Stillman, PC

30057 Orchard Lake Road, Suite 200, Farmington Hills, MI 48334

___________________

2. OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM FROM 10 MONTHS AGO

Case No. NNH-CV-2-6105010-S : State of Connecticut

LVNV Funding, LLC : Superior Court

Vs : Court of New Haven

Anne M. Bradley : May 13, 2021

DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION

TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM

Pursuant to PB 41-5, PB 15-8, PB 41-4, and 41-3, Defendant hereby objects to the Plaintiff's one-page Motion To Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaim ten months after the Counterclaim was issued,

HISTORY

Aforesaid SMALL CLAIM was assigned a civil case number, not being a civil case, and the court has told the defendant, Pro Se, that all SMALL CLAIMS are given only civil case numbers since 'the QUARANTINE although court employees ask defendant what her Small Claim Case Number is and defendant has claimed she has viewed Small Claims cases on the court website. Defendant, Pro Se, has claimed the case has no merit and that the BURDEN OF PROOF WAS NOT SATISFIED BY PLAINTIFF:

1. The Attorney Law Firm in Michigan, Stillman Law. which unlawfully represents Plaintiff, LVNV, (see Facts, Paragraph 1, Section C) lo cated in Greenville, South Carolina, used the same Pro Hac Vice appearance on hundreds, possibly thousands of Connecticut cases when in fact Defendant has relayed:

a. Pro Hac Vice Juris Number can only be approved by the court for a few select cases according to Black's Law Dictionary.

b. Connecticut Attorney Christopher T. Moylan, has nefariously joined appearance with the Michigan attorney. Matthew Bardos, using the same Pro Hac Vice Juris Number. Defendant has claimed that is illegal and another reason for the court to not docket the case.

c. Plaintiff set forth in its court document that its email is nefariously connecticut@stillmanlaw.com yet claim the Michigan Law Office is representing office for this nefarious business, LVNV.

d. NOTICE REGARDING FAIR DEBT COLLECTION ACT . Defendant has claimed Failure to abide by the Fair Debt Collection Act, even citing this law in Entry No. 100.33, as claimed by the Defendant previously.

1) Connecticut Attorney, Christopher T. Moylan of WETHERSFIELD, CT, nefariously joined this appearance with Michigan Attorney Matthew Bardos using the same Pro Hac Vice Number, Michigan address, yet refer to a Connecticut phone number and email as part of their appearance. Defendant claimed it is ILLEGAL for the court to docket this case. Attorney Moylan has not been registered in Michigan despite having Juris numbers for his license AND representation of the Law Office in Connecticut --neither of which were disclosed in the appearance on the Notice. Defendant claimed Plaintiff strategically dated its Affidavit signed in Greenville, NC on April 23, 2020 - yet had not used it for correspondence or court purposes until the court entered the small claim on 6/18/2020. No notice (to serve as a Summons) to the Defendant was sent to Defendant until just a few days from setting its return date, 7/9/2020, which was AFTER the Small Claims Notice was sent, NOT BEFORE. Defendant claimed the Return Date is also obviously less than 30 days from filing of the SMALL CLAIM using a CIVIL CASE NUMBER, with NO EXPLANATION why the court failed to abide by its own Rule of Court. Defendant was up day and night to complete and timely submit the following: Answer and Special Defenses, Appendix comprising of at least 300 pages, Timeline to use in lieu of Master Appendix in order to document explanations of experiences in which she's continuously been harmed as a TARGETED PERSON. Defendant has claimed that this also gives rise to quasi-criminal, of which is an AUTOMATIC RIGHT IN CIVIL CASES. Defendant claimed No fake Quarantine on a fake virus on FRAUDULENT DATA can justify any government organization to break laws! Additionally, defendant has claimed to the court there is no MARTIAL LAW, and it was because former President Trump, who tried to implement Martial Law, was suppressed by being ordered to appoint Vice President Mike Pence as in Charge of the Coronavirus "Pandemic". The word Pandemic is originally an adjective and no noun can logically be created out of it with a meaning that uses the adjective, yet defendant has claimed that is just what the is being nefariously done, defining Pandemic as an "epidemic that is pandemic"

a) WETHERSFIELD is where the COURT OPERATIONS is located for the State of Connecticut. Once Defendant successfully created her e-filing account online using COURT PROCEDURE, she filed her Appearance as e-filing and proceeded to upload her Answer and Special Defenses, which she worked tirelessly to scan in at home, one page at a time. This was already emailed in segments of less than 25mb to conteract Google from refusing to send - to the Michigan Law Office according to what their paralegal informed the Defendant to use, though nefariously refusing to correct court records. Conveniently, the COURT OPERATIONS Attorney in WETHERSFIELD, CT, intercepted Defendant's e-filing by BLOCKING what she had already been approved of. Defendant claimed they did not have the decency to even call Defendant to inform her what they did or why they did it. Defendant claimed their intent was CRIMINAL, iu that they singled Defendant out. The Court Operations attorney orded Defendant to go to their office in WETHERSFIELD with her license for ID and that her identity in the court which the Michigan attorney chose to be heard by (New Haven, CT) was insufficient. Despite numerous complaints by Defendant, it was clear that the Court Operations attorney was using her job as a weapon, to target the already greatly-aggrieved Defendant, Anne M. Bradley. For her to additionally refuse to accept a notarized statement was ludicrous. Additionally, Defendant claimed Plaintiff obviously STRATIGICALLY WAITED FOR THE ROLL OUT OF THIS FAKE QUARANTINE to further abuse power, making up rules as they go along, rather than continuing to abide by laws and rules already documented since THERE WAS NO MARTIAL LAW, AS HARD AS TRUMP AND HIS LONG-TIME DEMOCRAT COUNTERPARTS ATTEMTPTED TO PUT THAT IN PLACE LIKE HITLER DID.

2. Defendant claimed that Pro Hac Vice Juris Numbers are used as MODIS OPERANDI on NUMEROUS cases on this civil court of New Haven, CT, by the STILLMAN LAW OFFICE, using both Michigan and Connecticut contact information. Defendant claimed it is ILLEGAL - this was exacerbated by the same Pro Hac Vice Juris Number throughout the Sate of Connecticut Court System. (Some repetition is in this motion for emphasis to ensure this is given proper attention to issues such as LEGAL PREREQUSITES BEFORE DOCKETING THE CASE. Defendant has relayed these violations more than once in prior documents, motions, of which were not objected to by the plaintiff.)

e. Defendant claimed to the state's SMALL CLAIMS Court in Hartford that Plaintiff violated laws and rules, including failing to serve her a notice according to law, at which time she could respond and resolve issues, particularly relating to a baseless action, before they filed a SMALL CLAIM. Thereafter, the court failed to satisfy the requirements necessary to determine the case could even be docketed, and just let them illegally docket the aforesaid case.

1) THEREAFTER, A USPS Priority Mail envelope was physically placed in Defendant's mailbox where she lives, AND THERE WAS NO TRACKING INFORMATION ON THE USPS BARCODE, obviously purchased from a machine, placed on the Priority Mail envelope, and erroneously placed in Defendant's mailbox through ILLEGAL ACCESS TO HER MAILBOX. Defendant claimed that is both a FEDERAL OFFENSE, and the person who opened her mailbox for the plaintiff also committed a CRIME. Defendant claimed that the Plaintiff erroneously entered its own prepared document, not any PRINTOUT FROM THE SHIPPING SERVICE, to validate authenticity, BEFORE THERE WAS EVEN ANY TRACKING INFORMATION ON RECORD SINCE THE PACKAGE WAS OBVIOUSLY NOT DELIVERED BY THEM, BUT BY SOMEONE THROUG THE STILLMAN LAW OFFICE. THE RETURN ADDRESS WAS A CHICAGO INVESTIGATING SERVICE, which defendant claimed was also nefarious and most likely the investigating service was an illegal operation. It was NOT sent by the plaintiff ACCORDING TO LAW.

2) Plaintiff, whose attorney calls herself THE URBAN OUTLAW, provided no satisfaction of burden of proof, only an unsubstantiated bill with an unprofessional affidavit signed by SHERMAN COMPANIES in GREENVILLE, NC. Sherman surname is Attorney Pamela Sherman-Johnson's maiden name; or name when a man if this person is a transgender. She failed to enter her Juris Number on the affidavit, dated on April 23, 2020. Attorney "Johnson" also refers to herself as the "Urban Outlaw" as she brags herself to be, also claimed this affidavit was supposedly signed in GREENVILLE, NC in front of a notary, and yet retained a Michigan attorney for representation despite the fact there was no geological or LEGITMATE connection with that area OR the State of Connecticut . Defendant claimed for the Stillman Law Firm in Michigan to even accept the representation was ludicrous, illegal. It is reflective of the depraved behavior of SATANISTS in this country who may typically claim the name "Still Man" a good Satanic ritual for the transgendered victims - as a means of MIND CONTROL to make them believe it was meant to be.

a. The Stillman Law Office obtained a return date LESS THAN 30 DAYS FROM THE NEFARIOUS FILING OF SMALL CLAIM, which the plaintiff claims is ILLEGAL and reflective of more abuse of process to deprive her of her rights. Defendant also timely submitted a fee waiver to file WITH her COUNTERCLAIM, of which the court delayed processing. Nevertheless, the court provided THREE MONTHS RETURN DATE for the Plaintiff to respond. Defendant claimed The Court was deliberately showing prejudice, abuse of procedure, BREAKING RULES OF COURT TO CONSPIRE WITH PLAINTIFF.

3. Though Defendant entered motions in court, the court selectively and only ruled on Motion For Phone Call for TRIAL, YET RULED NO ACTION NECESSARY. Even though the court oddly responded to Defendant's letter as a ruling that the judge signing the ORDER approved a hearing by phone yet erroneously approved the trial judge to appeal her approval, despite it being a COURT ORDER outside of Defendant's right for DUE PROCESS OF LAW.

4. The court frauded Defendant's Motion for Default Judgment On Counterclaim. This motion was typed by Defendant using the Court Service Center in New Haven on October 7, 2020. The document automatically saved in the court computer system when Defendant created it. The format was standard with a straight left margin, yet the one scanned into court has a crooked left margin in the motion where the HISTORY is located. This does not even correspond to any format option through MICROSOFT WORD, which is the word processing choice of the New Haven Courthouse.

ALTERED:

a. "In April" is false. Defendant relayed "In June" when Plaintiff physically placed the erroneous USPS Priority Package in her apartment mailbox, somehow having access. Defendant immediately reported this federal offense to an FBI Agent in New Haven, since the USPS had no record. For the record to be rigged for weeks, possibly months thereafter, only proves cover-up. Defendant printed the results of NOT FOUND and included it in Appendix, submitted to the court. The bar code was NOT a typical purchase when the mail is accepted by the USPS carrier or clerk. Though Defendant's apartment is frequently vandalized by people affiliated with the landlord (Bozzuto, Inc - though they use MEPT, LLC even though it is a registered NON PROFIT and the employees are on the Bozzuto payroll, they bragged in Housing Court that the reason they never changed her apartment lock before she moved in was because "she can trust us" even though they were attempting to illegally evict her in the court case, which Defendant brought up and the judge defended the landlord immediately saying he would strike her statement)

5. The court issued an order for trial by video without providing access to the court services center computer for a video conference. There was no assurance that defendant's phone was assured not to be hacked or hit with a virus - and the data consumed would be removed from defendant's service. Defendant's first laptop was destroyed, which was why she had to use the court service center to type the Motion For Default Judgment which the court selectively fails to rule on. months later. Defendant had to purchased a second laptop. Defendant's replacement laptop was hit with an EMP attack by someone who entered the court services center when she was using it in New Haven, CT. They also did that to her tablet - both of which had to be reprogrammed where they were purchased, and neither are working properly to date. (Note, Microsoft recently disabled Defendant's access to her own laptop on May 4, as she had begun working on this motion from her laptop, due to having to retype 75% of the document since the FedEx computer was compromised and the font was forced as a light grey font, disabling viewing when it is scanned in as a court document, favoring the plaintiff and court's wants. Defendant has said she has had had to rent the Federal Express computer or handwrite, both of which has cost great time and expense. FACTS on this motion include the cost of attempted Motion For Clarification on a RULING WHICH WAS DELETED FROM THIS CASE, WITH NO INDICATION ON WHY IT WAS. That Ruling included 'NO ACTION NECESSARY as well as ORDER that trial judge was permitted to reverse its ruling that trial by phone was granted. This particular circumstance is perceived to be by the Defendant to be RECORDS FRAUD, to include the tampering of documents on her person as well as illegal entries in her apartment to remove and replace her copies of the ORDER in which she prepared a MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION FOR, which was never entered into court since the documents were intercepted. Defendant has emphasized that she has had to pay for Priority Mailings every time she has produced documents to be entered entered into court, rather than efile AS A MATTER OF RIGHT. PLAINTIFF CONVENIENTLY ENTERS ITS DOCUMENTS THROUGH EFILING, using Attorney Moylan who is located right by COURT OPERATIONS IN WETHERSFIELD, CT. Defendant's e-filing appearance was registered yet intercepted by the COURT OPERATIONS in WETHERSFIELD, ordering defendant to go to their office in person to show them her license ID - at which time defendant claimed that to be nefarious and aiding and abetting plaintiff and most likely ample opportunity to vandalize her apartment (which her landlord not only did not change the lock on her apartment door, yet REFUSED to in housing court, even admitting it did not change he apartment door lock)

Plaintiff issued aforesaid MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM, without motioning the court to accept a VERY LATE MOTION, intercepting the order of pretrial motions, since defendant entered MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT due to the lack of diligence by Plaintiff on this meritless case, including pointing out that no objection to to her COUNTERCLAIM was even issued; only "Plaintiff denies" with no reasons in an Answer which the court allowed the Plaintiff THREE MONTHS TIME for, despite the defendant not only having three days to act on a nefariously-mailed Small Claim just 5 days prior to the court's determined ANSWER DATE, which was outside of the Rules of Court, since it is required to allow for at least 30 days from the date the Small Claim is filed.

FACTS/Argument

1. Cost for producing this aforesaid motion alone exceeds $50 and time expended would easily be estimated as 40 hours at the least. Defendant was charged over $30 to rent the Fed Ex Computer and upon discovery that the compromised computer again had numerous typos affecting the coherency of the motion, the Defendant requested FedEx to promptly return the shipment, which cost $9.50 to mail through Federal Express to the Plaintiff within 12 hours leaving it with them to deliver. She was hoping it intercepted pickup but since it was already picked up, this created a delay in preparing a proper motion to submit in court. As it turned out, defendant could not submit a MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION since the original order was switched by another order allowing the trial judge to accept or reject a remote oath, which makes no sense since all hearings are heard remotely, In this case, the hearing is by phone rather than video. Though it was not required by other hearings heard by phone, Defendant is attaching a notarized Oath in liew of "swearing in" which takes place in person for court hearings and trials.

2. Original Ruling on defendant's letter/request which was also mailed to the the plaintiff, showing it was stamped in: Granted, yet stipulating that the trial judge could reverse court's decision by NOT GRANTING TRIAL BY PHONE for no justification. This ruling was switched, so defendant has thereafter modified her MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION to OBJECTION to Plaintiff's untimely Motion To Dismiss Defendant's COUNTERCLAIM, submitted ELEVEN MONTHS AGO, with no motion to the court for accepting a VERY Late Motion, to include reason for not objecting to Defendant's MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (which also referred to plaintiff's lack of diligence) Defendant continued to emphasize: For the Court to issue a decision as a personal decision with an "It's okay by me but the judge at trial can do whatever he wants" - defendant considers this switched ORDER to be a Nefarious Ruling on its face. Defendant requested the court to correct it in her Motion For Phone Call At Trial, since the letter was not responded to legitamately. No trial judge can reverse decision of the same court unless it was the actual trial judge who made that decision and only on rare occasions. Defendant's letter was difficult to complete by computer, since her computer was compromised by an EMP attack and had to be dropped off for repair, reprogramming. A portion was typed on her phone and emailed to a copy center to print. MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION WAS TO CLEAR UP THE MATTER OF DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW, WHICH ON THIS MATTER WOULD BE RIGHT TO HAVE A HEARING BY PHONE - WHICH IS CURRENTLY ALLOWED BY THE STATE COURTS BY MOVING PARTIES. YET the motion for clarification was not submitted due to switched Orders. Because the Defendant motioned to Dismiss her COUNTERCLAIM, Defendant is modifying her aforesaid motion as an objection.

3. Defendant has claimed this case has no merit, as relayed in History, that the court should have disqualified it before docketing.

4. "Remote Hearing" is set for May 20, at 3:30, yet the court did not provide any instructions in its order. Defendant had Claimed this should not be a hearing by video, only by phone, using the phone number provided throughout this case, as stated in the closing of this motion

a. Upon calling the court on May 11, 2021, the defendant was told that she could call the morning of May 20 and request both a pin number AND phone number for her to call for a remote session. Defendant seeks a COURT ORDER including this instruction in order to preserve her rights.

5. Copy of this motion is certified to Stillman Law Office in Michigan, though throughout this case, Defendant claims they have no legal right to be on this case and have not provided any ledger to validate that Defendant owes LVNV, or Synchrony Bank any money at all. She pays her bills in full! She will not allow anyone to cheat her in fraudulent actions, which includes a full week of struggling last week with numerous unauthorized actions on her bank account, most likely created by people who called companies and told them they were the Defendant's name and use Defendant's phone number to ADD to orders which she could not afford, overdrafting her bank account by approximately $280 - all of which she got back from her understanding bank after hours of struggling on the phone, explaining to well-meaning companies that she is a targeted person and suggesting they increase their security requirements to avoid fake calls to appease criminal politicians.

6. Defendant is forced to submit another motion - MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION - due to the Court's failure to grant a full assurance that a trial by phone will take place - not remote - and place it on record rather than grant permission for the TRIAL Judge to erroneously reverse the order of the Court at time of trial. Due to not having full access to Microsoft Word functions, using Word Pad, since the reprogrammed computer is deficient, a bottom margin has been created with 1.5" in order to hand-write the page numbering. Word Pad allows pictures and paint on documents, yet will not even allow inserted page numbering. Defendant claims it is typical reflection on the nefarious activities of MICROSOFT. Technical IT tricks are commonplace in government. Defendant claims they do it to invoke chaos and confusion, so the public may lose its individual power in order to thrust forward a socialist government which was typical of the NAZI party in World War 2.

7. Pretrial Motions serve the purpose of being heard BEFORE TRIAL, yet this court has evaded its duties in hearing defendant's motions, and plaintiff has not even objected to motions, confident obviously, that its conspiring with COURT OPERATIONS is successful, and has no intent of following laws or Rules Of Court. Yet today, May 11, Defendant discovered that this aforesaid case now has an uploaded MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM, supposedly filed on May 7 - YET PLAINTIFF NEVER SERVED, NEVER EMAILED THE DEFENDANT THIS MOTION, THEREBY MAKING THEIR MOTION NOT ONLY DEFECTIVE BUT FRAUDULENT AND WITHOUT DILIGENCE. The structure of the motion is WITHOUT HISTORY, FACTS, LAW. The motion did not include "Memorandum of Law to be submitted forthwith" and therefore cannot revise the motion, particularly since the Defendant is now objecting to its unserved motion, which it had the court file.

8. This pleading was very time-consuming to prepare due to alterations of the font and layout by Microsoft on the RENTED FEDERAL EXPRESS COMPUTER. What was viewed on the screen was NOT what would print. Therafter and before it is entered into court, Defendant obtained the proper ink in order to complete this pleading at home, despite her computer not being restored fully since it was attacked by an EMP when she was at the courthouse to mail a Release of Records to a dental office.

a. Not only did that dental office's top management resent being made accountable, but they obviously influenced the four dentists seen thereafter to get them to harm her by telling her they would pull her tooth rather than fill it. Defendant claimed they were not being professional and eventually found a dentist who promptly filled her tooth, which had infection at that point due to the months of neglect by numerous dentists. This is another affirmation that she is a targeted person by the corruption which has much control on the government and courts.

9. Again, Defendant emphasizes the MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS TO BE SIGNED BY THE PARTY ITSELF. NO APPOSING PARTY CAN COMPLETE A MILITARY AFFIDAVIT FOR THE OTHER PARTY. IT IS ILLEGAL. IT IS FRAUD. ANOTHER REASON WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN DOCKETED. Additionally, a Military Affidavit on the Defendant is up to the Defendant to use on this case, and it is not required as stated in PB 17- 21 and other laws, rules, regulations. Even if the Defendant is in the Military, it is the Defendant's right on whether to submit a Military Affidavit or not as a means of defense, such as a need to be on TDY elsewhere in the US or abroad.

a. Defendant spent numerous hours on the phone calling the Department of Defense Manpower Data Center in both Washington, DC and using the 800 number for California, which is answered by a call center in Fort Knox, Kentucky. Throughout these calls, she placed emphasis on "what are the policies and procedures for processing an inquiry on the status of a person as it relates to whether or not they are in the military?" Defendant emphasized to them that no attorney can just "cold call" to get information on someone, that they have to have permission from the person or have to have a document they are verifying. In this case; neither prerequisites took place. Defendant did not submit a MILITARY AFFIDAVIT to verify. Had she, the court is obligated to verify, not the Pro Hac Vice attorney, who defendant claims has an illegal appearance, and this case is illegal for numerous other reasons.

b. The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act cannot allow any agency of the government freely give information to those who inquire unless there is justification. A frivolous claim the person owes money is FAR FROM JUSTIFICATION.

10. The font size for this document is now set at 14 due to the SMALL PRINT OF WHAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE font size 12.

11. According to CT Rule 24-19, UPON the making of a counterclaim, the clerk has to PROMPTLY give notice to the plaintiff of a new Answer Date. Additionally, the Defendant certified that a copy of the COUNTERCLAIM was served on the plaintiff, AND the COUNTERCLAIM was entered as part of the record by the court.

Waiting THREE MONTHS to issue an Answer Date to the Plaintiff is a violation of DUE PROCESS OF LAW. This law is cited right on the court document which was scanned in as Plaintiff's Answer, making it a DELIBERATE VIOLATION, WITH NO EXPLANATION WHY.

12. Section 8-1 covers the process in civil matters. Though several forms do not apply to aforesaid matter, there is still an expected order in which documents are to be submitted, received, heard. Anything to the contrary makes the case WITHOUT MERIT, reason to GRANT DEFENDANT'S PRETRIAL MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. A Motion for the court to rule in a party's favor may be granted more than once during proceedings. THERE IS NO LIMIT ON HOW MANY TIMES A MOTION FOR JUDGMENT MAY BE ISSUED. NEVERTHELESS THE COURT FAILS TO HEAR THIS MOTION AND OTHER PRETRIAL MOTIONS TO DATE.

13. Defendant submitted MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT ON COUNTERSUIT on October 7, 2020 - three+ months after the plaintiff filed this small claim; three months after the defendant timely submitted Answer and Special Defenses and Counterclaim simultaneously with over a 300-page Appendix with Timeline to use as detailed Appendix. In this motion, defendant emphasized mail fraud regarding the Stillman Law Office Proof of Mailing, illegal appearance, case without merit, and lack of diligence by the plaintiff in prosecuting, including responding to each listed Answer and Special Defense. Additionally, plaintiff failed to Object. Plaintiff failed to Motion For Judgment on itself.

LAW

PB 41-5, PB 15-8, PB 41-4, and 41-3 - as stated in the CT Practice Book

PB 24-19 will NOT open as a text to copy and paste on the Federal Express computer, on internet. Defendant claims that was either a MICROSOFT manipulation or possibly the State of CT Judicial Branch altererd what they place online, UNLESS someone is an attorney who has a backdoor access. Defendant was given a 2016 version of the Connecticut Practice Book by a court clerk at the time they received a newer revision and is able to reference it for this motion.

Section 8-1 covers the process in civil matters.

SUMMARY

At no point did the Defendant indicate a hearing was necessary on motions. Yet they are not heard except for Motion for Hearing by Phone Call, which was not properly ruled on since the judge claimed NO ACTION NECESSARY, thus concurring that the trial judge can erroneously appeal the Court's Ruling, granting a phone call. Despite the many reasons THIS CASE should be ruled in favor of the Counterclaimant-Defendant, the court delayed processing of the Counterclaim, thereby abusing proceedure - despite the fact the court knew that the Defendant properly certified MAILING THE PLAINTIFF since the WETHERSFIELD COURT OPERATIONS ERRONEOUSLY DEPRIVED DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO e-FILE. Nevertheless, the fact this case HAS NO MERIT and should have not even been docketed, the court has allowed its continuance, depriving Plaintiff's right at every juncture. The enormous burden, the enormous time expended, the enormous costs have far exceeded $5,000. Time alone totals over 350 hours and at a rate of only $15/hour, the defendant meets the cost of LEGAL FEES FOR THIS CASE WHICH WAS DOCKETED LAST YEAR. Costs of mailing exceeds $100. Costs of computer rental and paying for copies exceed $100. Cost for having to purchase a laptop to replace her prior laptop which was destroyed by CYBER ATTACK exceeds $300 and the replacement is only a partial replacement as far as functionality goes, since the prior laptop was a Dell Inspiron, carrying a much higher value, due to its functional capabilities, and could not be replaced. Excessive time caused by nefarious technocratic tricks caused by MICROSOFT primarily is another costly stress factor -- all completely unnecessary if the court just did its job in determining the judiciability of this aforesaid case.

WHEREFORE, Defendant objects to the plaintiff's untimely and ill-prepared motion to Dismiss Counterclaim, further emphasizing supported reason to grant Counterclaim in full at $5,000.

Prepared and Submitted,

FOR THE DEFENDANT, PRO SE

___________________________

Anne M. Bradley, Pro Se

PO Box 206514

New Haven, CT 06520

203-909-9131

RULING

THE COURT, HAVING HEARD AFORESAID MOTION, HAS RULED

GRANTED/DENIED

ALONG WITH SATISFYING CLARIFICATION REQUIREMENTS IN ITS RULING

CERTIFICATION OF MAILING

Aforesaid motion on this State of Connecticut case has been mailed this day, May 13, 2021, to the out-of-state-plaintiff:

Stillman Law Office

30057 Orchard Lake Road

Suite 200 Department 100

Farmington Hills, MI 48334

______________________

Search This Blog

Is it Justice or Just Us?

Fraudulent Collections

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

June 2024

March 2022

911 - September 11, 2001