ILLEGAL EVICTION 2024
LINK TO THIS BLOGPOST:
http://www.publiusroots.org/2024/09/illegal-eviction-2024.html
Note, there are three blogposts on this blog, titled with "Illegal Eviction"
Here are the two others:
1.
2.
TABLE OF CONTENTS - see ref link because I am in a hurry
REFERENCE LINKS:
ILLEGAL EVICTION: https://motherearthtoo2022.blogspot.com/2024/10/illegal-eviction-2024.html?m=1
NEW 3 October 2024 - APPENDIX OF 264 246 PAGES a hacker changed the number of pages from 246 to 264!
https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/09/illegal-eviction-2024.html?m=1
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=SOCIAL+SECURITY+ACT&f=treesort&num=660#sourcecredit
This link below will not work because the complete url has not been selected. Am having problems with this format - the toolbar keeps disappearing.
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml;jsessionid=66C4C5E32ADA1256815D6576403A1D67?req=granuleid%3AUSC-1994-title42-chapter8&saved=%7CU09DSUFMIFNFQ1VSSVRZIEFDVA%3D%3D%7CdHJlZXNvcnQ%3D%7C%7C660%7Cfalse%7Cnull&edition=prelim
10/14/2024: I am still not dropbox savvy and need to get to Tyco to find out more. I have had some setbacks and have not been there yet. Hopefully tomorrow.
A HUD Form 52641, also called a Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) contract, is a legal document that outlines the agreement between a landlord and a Public Housing Agency (PHA) where the PHA will provide financial assistance to a tenant (family) leasing a unit from the landlord under the Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8 housing), essentially guaranteeing the landlord a set monthly payment on behalf of the tenant, with specific conditions regarding the unit's eligibility and rent amount that must be met by both parties.
iNCASE ANYONE IS INTERESTED: (all HUD forms)
ud.gov/program_offices/administration/hudclips/forms/hud5 ,
by the way, "You are a project-based tenant"
Oh, by they way, morons, "You never mantions this in any of the voluminous documentation"
Oh, by the way, morons, the form for Project based is NOT what you had me fill out.
HUD-52531-A, PBV Agreement to Enter into Housing Assistance Payments Contract, Part I. HUD-52531-B, PBV Agreement to Enter into Housing Assistance Payments .
https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/OCHCO/documents/52531A.pdf
TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS
OFFICE OF PUBLIC AND INDIAN HOUSING
i am not Native American! I am a mongrel Irish/French/English who may be related to the Monarchy which is probably the coolest thing in my life now.
https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/52531B.PDF
nmacrotrends.net prove there was not even a WUHAN-CORONAVIRUS-COVID, BLA BLA BLA crises
yet Donald Trump mass murdered many at Paradise CA and they were burned to ashes. Using laser weapons he purchased 5 months prior - Jake Morphonios reported it yet when the Paradise fire hit, he took down the video! Someone gave him the Pentagon purchasing document that showed this huge purchase - and Trump did not seek endorsement by James Mattis. Trump fired James Mattis, Rex Tillerson, Jeff Sessions, John Kelly his Chief of Staff - all doing great work!- he tried to fire Mike Pence
Most likely Trump made a delay in reporting deaths.....to tack on to the COVID BS. a year later.....
I just found this: Alarming Statistics on Missing Persons in Connecticut. The statistics on lost persons in Connecticut reveal a troubling reality. In 2022, over 800 people were reported missing in the state, according to the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection (DESPP).
compare that with this:
The number of missing people in Paradise, California after the Camp Fire in 2018 fluctuated, but at one point was over 1,200:
Are you thinking what I am thinking? CA has a population that does circles around CT....
As of November 2023, Paradise, California had a population of a little over 9,000 people. This is a significant increase from the 2020 census, when the population was 4,764, and a decline from the 2010 census, when the population was 26,218.
These notes are sloppy but best I can do right now and I need to get going.
1
https://rems.ed.gov/docs/2021ToolBox/CA_Case_Study_1_Wildfire.pdf
Ohn
UPDATE ON PLAINTIFF'S HOUSING COMPLAINT. 9/30/2024. I tried to submit it today but he wants me to list every defendant on the form so I have to return tomorrow. I do not believe I will change the complaint although knockrentals.com is not on it. They are not even a registercd company with the state or OpenCorporates.com Update: after this there is a registered account for them. THEY WERE USING KNOX RENTALS - like Fort Knox - but changed it.
.png)
.png)
They just use one fraudulent name after another!
I had to fax this to the court because they would not do their jobs and accept it! Update: The motion did not suffice. I submitted it becasue the blog I read indicated we can submit housing complaints. It did not share what form that would be. Cyber Crime kept me from accessing the form, as difficult as it was to search for it. So I submitted this motion. Thereafter I submitted the form, etc. Which is partly shown in the dropbox file. I paid my rent into court. See reference blogposts.
DOCKET NO. ___________ : SUPERIOR COURT-HOUSING
ANNE M. BRADLEY : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
VS : NEW HAVEN, CT
BOZZUTO GROUP, INC. : SEPTEMBER 27, 2024
PLAINTIFF’S HOUSING COMPLAINT
ON 360 STATE STREET
Pursuant to Housing Court Process in New Haven, CT, Plaintiff will be submitting a fully detailed housing complaint, which aligns with the newly-formed case as described below. .
HISTORY
1. On September 18, 2024, Defendant found folded up paper wedged in her door and was terrified of opening her door since it may have been a bomb. Defendant was later approached by a neighbor, who told her “someone asked me where you were on the 18th” and made other statements which obviously reflected that marshal.
2. On September 20, 2024, it was imperative for her to leave, despite still feeling ill from a viral flu. Upon opening the door she discovered a crumpled up paper which was titled NOTICE TO QUIT, backdated to September 12, stamped by Marshal Frank P. Sandillo with no declaration page of service. Very likely the landlord may have crumpled it in the door. Defendant was later
approached by a neighbor on the 20th, who told defendant, “Someone asked me where you were on the 18th” and made other statements which obviously reflected that marshal who stuffed the Notice to Quit in her door, rather than just sliding it and rather than ringing her door bell or contactingh the concierge or management office. Defendant emphasized to that disabled neighbor (diagnosed with cerebral palsy) that was very inappropriate for that person to approach her apartment when it was clearly not her concern and there is a concierge as well as landlord management who could have called, since defendant was sick and had been in her apartment for some time. Defendant promptly went to the housing courthouse the same day she found this crumpled up paper in her door. Housing personnel claimed there was absolutely nothing she could do even though a NOTICE TO QUIT is part of the Summary Eviction Process and has to be served pursuant to CGS 47a-23.
3.This paper titled NOTICE TO QUIT requires the defendant to leave her SECTION 8 apartment in the middle of the month, October 18, 2024, despite the obvious fact that rent is paid on the first for the whole month.
4.It is therefore imperative to pay what is deemed as fair use and value into court in order for the defendant to preserve her
rights as a tenant who pays the rent monthly and timely and claims fraudulent
1
billing and constant abuse by the landlord creates this unlawful dynamic which this plaintiff, who is NOT the landlord, has issued action against her, who has lived at 360 State Street since January 2013. She has also obtained proof that her rent checks for July, August, and September were indeed cashed by the landlord/owner of 360 State Street, New Haven, CT.
HOUSING COMPLAINT TO BE SUBMITTED FORTHWITH WITH A COPY OF THIS NOTICE ATTACHED.
FOR THE PLAINTIFF
____________________
ANNE M. BRADLEY, PRO SE
PO BOX 206514
NEW HAVEN, CT 06520
203-5080858
Email is unavailable due to the landlord erroneously disabling wifi access in her apartment
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that aforesaid NOTICE OF HOUSING COMPLAINT on 360 State Street, New Haven, CT 06510 is faxed to the following:
Thru: Management Office at 360 State Street, New Haven, CT 06510
To: Bozzuto Group, Inc - owner of 360 State Street
FAX: ___________________________
Address as above
Also mailed to:
Elm City Communities
360 Orange Street
New Haven, CT 06511
(they refuse to provide a fax number)
________________________
Anne M. Bradley, Pro Se
2
i WILL BE DELETING THIS SINCE i UPDATED WHAT i WILL BE SUBMITTING INTO COURT TOMORROW, OCT 1. HAPPY BIRTHDAY JIMMY CARTER, FORMER PRESIDENT OF USA - 100TH! OCTOBER 1, 2024
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
BELOW WAS ATTACHED TO HOUSING COMPLAINT DUE TO THE FAILURE OF DUE PROCESS BY ACCEPTING MY MOTION INTO COURT!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
DOCKET NO. ___________ : SUPERIOR COURT-HOUSING
ANSONIA STATE STREET, LLC : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
VS : NEW HAVEN, CT
ANNE M. BRADLEY : SEPTEMBER 27, 2024
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO PAY FAIR USE AND VALUE INTO COURT (EMERGENCY MOTION)
Pursuant to CGS 47a-26b including CASE LAW, and CPB 11-1 and CPB 11-2, the Defendant moves this court to accept what is assumed to be fair use and value into court for the month of October, NLT October 10.
HISTORY
1. On September 18, 2024, Defendant found folded up paper wedged in her door and was terrified of opening her door since it may have been a bomb. Defendant was later approached by a neighbor, who told her “someone asked me where you were on the 18th” and made other statements which obviously reflected that marshal.
2. On September 20, 2024, it was imperative for her to leave, despite still feeling ill from a viral flu. Upon opening the door she discovered a crumpled up paper which was titled NOTICE TO QUIT, backdated to September 12, stamped by Marshal Frank P. Sandillo with no declaration page of service. Very likely the landlord may have crumpled it in the door. Defendant was later
1
approached by a neighbor on the 20th, who told defendant, “Someone asked me where you were on the 18th” and made other statements which obviously reflected that marshal who stuffed the Notice to Quit in her door, rather than just sliding it and rather than ringing her door bell or contacting the concierge or management office. Defendant emphasized to that disabled neighbor (diagnosed with cerebral palsy) that was very inappropriate for that person to approach her apartment when it was clearly not her concern and there is a concierge as well as landlord management who could have called, since defendant was sick and had been in her apartment for some time. Defendant promptly went to the housing courthouse the same day she found this crumpled up paper in her door. Housing personnel claimed there was absolutely nothing she could do even though a NOTICE TO QUIT is part of the Summary Eviction Process and has to be served pursuant to CGS 47a-23.
3. This paper titled NOTICE TO QUIT requires the defendant to leave her SECTION 8 apartment in the middle of the month, October 18, 2024, despite the obvious fact that rent is paid on the first for the whole month.
2
4. It is therefore imperative to pay what is deemed as fair use and value into court in order for the defendant to preserve her
rights as a tenant who pays the rent monthly and timely and claims fraudulent billing and constant abuse by the landlord creates this unlawful dynamic which this plaintiff, who is NOT the landlord, has issued action against her, who has lived at 360 State Street since January 2013. She has also obtained proof that her rent checks for July, August, and September were indeed cashed by the landlord/owner of 360 State Street, New Haven, CT.
MEMORANDUM OF LAW TO BE SUBMITTED FORTHWITH
ORAL ARGUMENT REQUIRED
WHEREFORE, defendant moves this court to grant the defendant the right to make payments of fair use and value into court until this matter is properly disposed of.
Attached:
Notice to Quit
FOR THE PLAINTIFF
____________________
ANNE M. BRADLEY, PRO SE
PO BOX 206514
NEW HAVEN, CT 06520
203-5080858
3
Email is unavailable due to the landlord erroneously disabling wifi access in her apartment
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that aforesaid MOTION TO PAY FAIR USE AND VALUE INTO COURT AS OF OCTOBER is in compliance with Rules of Court and a copy of the foregoing along with Attached copy of Notice To Quit, totalling 6 pages, as been faxed to the Plaintiff of Record:
Peter W. Hoops
Hoops Associates, LLC
19a Thomas Street
Groton, CT 06340
Fax: 860-445-8911
Also mailed to:
Elm City Communities
360 Orange Street
New Haven, CT 06511
(they refuse to provide a fax number)
________________________
Anne M. Bradley, Pro Se
ORDER
Aforesaid Defendant’s Motion to Pay Fair Use and Value into Court, having been heard, is:
GRANTED/DENIED
___________________
THE COURT
===============================================
==============================================
THE FOLLOWING IS A DRAFT AND i HAVE MUCH MORE TO SAY IN MY MOTION! THESE ARE VERY CROOKED, CRIMINAL PEOPLE WHO OWN 360 STATE STREET - WHICH IS BOZZUTO GROUP, INC.
DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT- DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT
DOCKET NO.___________ : SUPERIOR COURT HOUSING
ANSONIA STATE STREET, LLC : JUDICIAL DISTRICT NEW HAVEN
VS. : AT NEW HAVEN, CT
ANNE M. BRADLEY : , 2024
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO PAY FAIR USE AND VALUE INTO COURT
Pursuant to CGS 47a-26b and CPB 11-1 and 11-2, the Defendant moves this court to accept what is assumed to be fair use and value into court as of October, making this rent substitute due by October 10, 2024.
HISTORY
1. On September 18, 2024, Defendant found folded up paper wedged in her door and was terrified of opening her door since it may have been a bomb. Defendant was later approached by a neighbor, who told her “someone asked me where you were on the 18th” and made other statements which obviously reflected that marshal. Defendant emphasized to that disabled neighbor (diagnosed with cerebral palsy) that was very inappropriate for that person to approach her apartment when it was clearly not her concern and there is a concierge as well as landlord management who could have called, since defendant was sick and had been in her apartment for some time.
2. On September 20, 2024, it was imperative for her to leave, despite still feeling ill from a viral flu. Upon opening the door she discovered a
1
crumpled up paper which was titled NOTICE TO QUIT, backdated to
September 12, stamped by Marshal Frank P. Sandillo with no declaration page of service. Very likely the landlord may have crumpled it in the door. Defendant promptly went to the housing courthouse the same day she found this crumpled up paper in her door. Housing personnel claimed there was absolutely nothing she could do even though a NOTICE TO QUIT is part of the Summary Eviction Process and has to be served pursuant to CGS 47a-23.
3. This paper titled NOTICE TO QUIT requires the defendant to leave her SECTION 8 apartment in the middle of the month, October 18, 2024, despite the obvious fact that rent is paid on the first for the whole month.
4. It is therefore imperative to pay what is deemed as fair use and value into court in order for the defendant to preserve her rights as a tenant who pays the rent monthly and timely and claims fraudulent billing and constant abuse by the landlord creates this unlawful dynamic which this plaintiff, who is NOT the landlord, has issued action against her, who has lived at 360 State Street since January 2013.
2
FACTS
1. Defendant claims improper service of the NOTICE TO QUIT
a) No marshal should have been willing to stuff the paper in her door as apposed to ringing her doorbell or calling her to meet as a first attempt. The paper was not accessible on her side of the door and was wadded up, which was scarey.
b) No marshal should have been willing to take a defective NOTICE TO QUIT anywhere. The preparer failed to cite any laws, including the basic one which is 47a-23 which is right on the example form for NOTICE TO QUIT in the Handbook prepared by Court Operations of Connecticut.
c) This marshal deliberately wadded up this paper without the required declaratory statement by plaintiff - elaborating on the position of Ansonia State Street, LLC as it relates to 360 State Street with no proof of who actually paid for the marshal since an attorney who was a HISTORY MAJOR, signed this NOTICE TO QUIT with no validation as to whom he represents. There was also no declaratory statement by the marshal indicating attempts to serve - if he rang the door bell or called the defendant, or had the concierge call the defendant, and making a statement it was served on what day and what time.
3
i. Employees who worked in the management office when MEPT CHAPEL, LLC was used as a front, were actually paid by Bozzuto, Inc - the real owners of this building.
ii. They got media to report that MEPT Chapel Street were the prior owners. They also got media to report that SOM Living (with Dragana LaCore as representative) was the new owner; yet it was changed to Beachwood Properties as the new owner AFTER THE ARTICLE WAS PUBLISHED - AND NO DOUBT OTHER MEDIA DID THE SAME SINCE SEVERAL REPORTED THIS SALE WITHOUT VERIFYING ANYTHING. This $2.2 billion building, as it is assessed, was reported by media that it was sold for only $160 million, which is FRAUD among other things. They also have three mortgages, the third being $89 billion on this $2.2 billion property. These issues were explained to Alberta Witherspoon in May or June of 2024, who is now Housing Commissioner. It is also presumed that this would be why the landlord had the maintenance manager use dangerous force to break her door latches and force his way in despite the numerous screams she made yelling “Get out! I am taking a bath!” along with other comments reflecting her fear of him.
4
2. Attached to this motion is a bank check for $198 to cover for October 2024. Any actions which the court makes, defendant respectfully requests they call her since the landlord disrupted her wifi here and she cannot access her main email account from inside her apartment. Additionally, she stopped getting mail at 360 State Street due to tampering with her mail, along with illegally placing a Priority Mail envelope in her mailbox, with a return address of Illinois, claiming it was cause for a nefarious small claim action against her, which the plaintiff nefariously claimed an Amazon bill for MEDICAL SERVICES was due - on a Synchrony Bank Card, which was purchased from GE Money --yet in fact, she owed nothing to Amazon or the credit card holder, finding out she overpaid and they never gave her the money back, which did not surprise her since Synchrony Bank was frauding her billing. Defendant claims no rent is past due and that she pays the Section 8 rent timely every month, complying with the lease, though the landlord has been frauding the billing despite having a court order to remove almost a $14,000 nefarious balance - which they have frauded on the ledger printout as if it never occurred. In comparison, other ledgers did have this court order on it, yet it is difficult to locate all documents preferred as defense due to their constant illegally entering, vandalizing and stealing personal documents as well as possessions. The requirement of CGS
5
47a-26 where it says: The last agreed upon rent shall be the prima facie evidence of the fair rental value; and if all or a portion of the defendant’s rent is being paid to the plaintiff by a housing authority, municipality, state agency or similar entity, this requirement shall be satisfied if the defendant deposits with the court an amount equal to the portion of the fair rental value of the premises the last agreed upon rent shall be prima facie evidence of the fair rental value of the premises. One of the fraudulent charges they have incorporated in the ledger is increasing rent with no knowledge, no notice, and no agreement. The Section 8 rent is $198, which is considered unfair as it is, considering also the numerous costs which this landlord as well as Housing Authority, currently dba Elm City Communities, from illegal entries and abusive inspection requirements.
a) Parties to the The Section 8 Contract, as shown in Exhibit ___ are defendant-tenant Anne M. Bradley and the landlord Bozzuto Management and HUD, represented by the Housing Authority titled Elm City Communities, yet they use other titles to define their organization as well, which seems illegal for a nonprofit to do.
b) This defendant actually went to the Housing Authority and said she needed to speak to someone regarding what her rent payment
6
is. The receptionist printed a letter dated that same day, indicating her rent requirement is $265; which angered the defendant, particularly since the landlord at 360 State Street had been charging her that for over a year, and they were also issued a court order to stop the erronous billing and to remove the erroneous balance of approximately $14,000.
c) Due to a great number of problems and violations of this Section 8 lease, which deliberate and complete disregard by the local Housing Authority, defendant has prepared a detailed notarized statement, including a firm statement that she believes this landlord is a common criminal and this building should be handed over to a credible company.
d) Ledger copies are provided, into the best of her ability in the Appendix to this motion.. Yet it is imperative for the court to realize that the manager by the name of Kyle Huckle intercepted her efforts to obtain a current printout of the ledger on September 24, despite the office assuring her it was available to be picked up on September 23. Defendant was feeling too sick to get it and explained she would have to go there the next day. It is also imperative for the court to realize that this owner frauds records with criminal intent.
7
3. Defendant has not prepared a Motion To Dismiss based on her experiences with the New Haven Courts, failure in Due Process of Law, and abuse of procedure, as well as frauding records.. This would only be a means of delay and she would not be able to assert her rights in an eviction process, as illegal as it already is - by an attorney who knows better and therefore should be criminally charged.
4. This landlord has attempted to evict defendant before, in 2018, under the guise of a different name - how handy for them, yet completely fraudulent. They also conspire with police to make a false arrest, which the court deprived her rights to be reimbursed for $2,500 bail that was illegal order, with no probable cause. The court issued an illegal Nolle despite the fact that defendant on this case refused to plea due to no probable cause.
5. Case title: Corey Spruill vs Anne M. Bradley, 2009-2010. This Housing Court ineptly released all money paid into the court for a year to COREY SPRUILL, taking advantage of the defendant Anne M. Bradley being hospitalized caused by poisoning at which time the marshal was present in her apartment, illegally evicting her and even using a code to turn off her ADT Security alarm, which meant he was most likely the one who was illegally entering her apartment and stealing things, even her framed “family coat of arms” which was all she had to remember her
8
father by after her brother and a paedophile priest murdered her father. The priest poisoned him with arsenic causing him to hemorrhage from both ends and refused to take him to the hospital or call for an ambulance. Defendant had to call police and informed them the priest was obviously trying to kill her father. They would do nothing about the priest attempting to murder her father yet at least he was taken to the hospital and his whole system had to be flushed and he had to have at least three transfusions. Her brother later offered to help her get our father into a decent nursing home, yet he admitted he lied to her once she could not do anything legally and nobody she called even cared about the very fact her brother bragged that he lied to make him die because “he is no use to us anymore” which parallels with the NEW WORLD ORDER OF BARBARIANS, a four part series of a lecture provided by Dr. Dunnegan, who relayed what Dr. Lawrence Day said to him and 80 other resident doctors in Philadelphia, PA - 20 years prior, 1969, emphasizing the criminal underworld is winning and there is nothing the doctors can do but get people to acclimate to their nefarious plans. Dr. Day had died in 1989, and was no longer a direct threat to Dr. Dunnegan. He was part of the criminal underworld. This brought fear and dismay to these doctors. Dr. Dunnegan reported this lecture in a lecture format. Regrettably, this noble doctor died at the early age of 71!
9
a) Corruption, organized crime, is indeed a continuous torment to this defendant and at no point is it ever justifiable except on NAZI/Illuminati self-seving standards!
b) This landlord conspired with police to arrest the defendant; at which time they may have even intentionally wanted to rig a circumstance to kill her since they waited 45 minutes in the lobby for the concierge named Karim to tell them when defendant left her apartment so they could supposedly arrest her in the hallway - yet they walked the opposite way in the hallway AFTER seeing her, as an obvious attempt to get her to hurry back to her apartment so they could shoot her or taser her in the back - which would most certainly kill her since she is disable d from a 20-ton truck slamming into her head-on with an attorney who took her case when she was in a coma and her mother signed the papers without consulting with her father. She was hospitalized 3 1/2 months and on crutches another 3. Refused physical therapy and more - all because this attorney wanted to help the town at fault. His brother Donald Kendall paid a hitman to kill the President of Chile just because he refused to sell Pepsi in his country! This was discovered by defendant’s father a year after she settled out
10
of court, at which time he shared it with her in confidence, since those attorneys would surely have killed him for telling anyone this truth.
6. This MOTION TO PAY FAIR USE AND VALUE into court, dated September 27, 2024 comprises of 13 pages along with an Appendix which comprises of a total of ____ pages. It is typed in 14 Font size, Times New Roman, due to the 12 font being illegible on her laptop.
LAW
CGS 47a-23
CGS 47a-26
HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC: the right for tenants facing eviction action to motion the court to pay fair use and value into court.
SUMMARY
When any legal action is taken against a person; they have an innate legal right to respond and issue a counter action or rebuttal! The State of Connecticut is nefariously allowing any Notice To Quit to be illegally served and illegally litigated! All Marshal documents served have to be made available to the court! It is the court’s responsibility to ensure legitamacy/grounds for any action! It is the responsibility for the court to identify criminal intent! It is the responsibility for the court to not take part in the obvious DEVIL’S CHESSBOARD TACTICS OF CORRUPTED OFFICIALS, WHICH INCLUDES BUSINESS OWNERS AND ATTORNEYS!
As this defendant has stated throughout, the continuous criminal activity at 360 State Street is only covered up by the City Government, including the police who act as their mafia - and the media act as their mafia as well! They are in pay-to-play schemes which includes the police relying on the BOZZUTO, Inc. COMPANY to rake in the bucks since they invest in
11
their pensions! No money, no retirement!
This Notice to Quit was served with 100% criminal intent and this defendant, Anne M. Bradley deserves to be compensated for the continuous hell in which she goes through, particularly the violation of her privacy, assaults, and most recently illegal entry of her apartment using force - and most likely the maintenance supervisor expecting to get away with murdering her! Security Systems are used as spy weapons and continuous invasions of privacy on all devices! Defendant is bringing up Housing Action against this landlord, since this court fails to allow Due Process Of Law in regards to the right to countersue in this SUMMARY PROCESS. Additionally, a copy of this Motion is being mailed to the Elm City Communities as well as State Farm Insurance due to their continuous attempts to commit insurance fraud on defendant’s apartment, as a matter of practice, which reflects they commit insurance fraud on a continuous basis with other tenants who fall victim to their fraud.
The ledger is continuously frauded! Billing is frauded! ALL ON-SITE CHARGES ARE REQUIRED TO BE ADDED TO THE LEASE, WHICH HAS TO BE PRESENTED TO THE SECTION 8 ADMINISTRATOR TO DETERMINE ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE RENT PORTION OF THE LANDLORD. Section 8 is determined by the tenant’s income; not the amount of the rent.
Defendant’s Notarized Statement elaborates on many of the crimes they have committed on a continuous basis since the initial paperwork was prepared! The Defendant should be credited back for ALL RENT paid and NOT OWE ANYTHING during her stay here due to the deliberate criminal activity of this corrupted owner, which has not changed since she moved in January 2013 - although they have criminally attempted to get her to complete a new application for tenancy - all for the purpose of denying tenancy; claiming this building has a new owner, which is deliberately a lie and all those who took part in this, such as Kyle Huckle whose title changes every time it is brought up - demanding to sign this was with criminal intent! The only reason he backed off was because he got heat from higher authorities, most likely FBI! They have compromised the Defendant’s safety, health, and security as well as frauded charges - even using a lame excuse that “you have two leases” which is completely criminal! Their criminal actiions are so stupid and recognizable, that they should have been arrested a long time ago! Criminal politicians come to their defense!
12
WHEREFORE, defendant moves this court to permit this defendant to pay fair use and value into court on aforesaid matter, which HAS begun because she was nefariously served a NOTICE TO QUIT which by statutes should comply with 47a-23.
ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
APPENDIX
A - AGREEMENT and Accompanying Documents
B - Proof of rent payments of July, August, September DEPOSITED/CASHED by “360 State Street” representative
C - DEFENDANT’S NOTARIZED STATEMENT
D - DEFENDANT’S INTERROGATORIES FOR PLAINTIFF TO COMPLETE
E. Assessor’s Office Report on 360 State Street, New Haven, CT 06510
F. CGS 47a-23
G. CGS 47a-26
H. PROOF FROM THE BANK RENT CHECKS WERE CASHED BY LANDLORD
I. COPY OF HOME DEPOT DELIVERY/PACKING SLIP
Prepared and Submitted,
DEFENDANT PRO SE
_________________________
Anne M. Bradley
PO Box 206514
New Haven, CT 06520
203-508-0858
AFORESAID MOTION HAVING BEEN HEARD, IS
GRANTED/DENIED
__________________
THE COURT
13
DOCKET NO.___________ : SUPERIOR COURT HOUSING
ANSONIA STATE STREET, LLC : JUDICIAL DISTRICT NEW HAVEN
VS. : AT NEW HAVEN, CT
ANNE M. BRADLEY : SEPTEMBER 27, 2024
DEFENDANT’S NOTARIZED STATEMENT
1. This matter involves a NOTICE TO QUIT, which must first be determined as legitamate.yet was not by Housing Court.
a) Though the Housing Court should have a copy of it, there has been no action taken on it regarding its legitamacy such as lack of probable cause, and noncompliance with CGS 47a-23.
b) The Housing Court is aware of this Notice To Quit since I, the defendant Anne M. Bradley, went to the Housing Court Clerk’s office the day that I pulled it out of my door when I opened the apartment door on September 20. No one at the Clerk’s office looked for the Marshal’s copy, which is required to be reported to the court - to verify anything. The marshal backdated the service date to September 12, which was the day before defendant’s HOME DEPOT DELIVERY was made and also the same day in which I went out to check her mail at the Yale Post Office since I had not been there since August 29 and they assured me that my lock would be changed due to someone unlocking my mailbox and leaving it open for two weeks - during which time the death of my mother occurred and if relatives had notified me, someone else my mail, not that this is any of the court’s business, yet it is common knowledge the crooked bureaucracy in Connecticut loves to exploit the people they victimize, it worked so well for Barack Obama and others. There has been no action taken by the Housing Court to order, even charge Bozzuto, Inc. - the landlord - and its alleged attorney Hoops with FRAUD, among other things.due to this illegal NOTICE TO QUIT which is a court document pursuant to CGS 47a-23.
2. My apartment has been infested with garbage flies and I discovered they were using some kind of air gun to force them in by my door. I heard the pop - and when I went to the door and turned the light on, numerous garbage flies were flying eratically, like they would if they were forced by an airgun.
1
3. Ever since I moved to 360 State Street, this has been a horrible experience. Corrupted people lying and cheating me and others. Using Satanic symbols all over and claiming they were part of the church community Similar to what the Church of Satan does in Sandy Hook, where the fraudulent/fake elementary school shooting was declared by even Barack Obama, who wasted at least millions of government dollars to have 68 federal agent cars there. Adam Lanza was not even a real person. It is estimated that Obama frauded the economy over one trillion dollars on this and the Governor (Danell Malloy) played along and gave a conspiring attorney firm at least one million dollars of state money to prove the hoax was real. He did that after trying to file bankruptcy on Connecticut, which would weaken government for Barack Obama, as he was trying to collapse the whole government so he could implement Marshal Law like Hitler did.
4. I have been deliberately injured by people obviously paid to help the criminal underworld, which Bozzuto, Inc is obviously a part of.
5. BOZZUTO is the landlord. It is on my lease. Any adendums to the lease, or modifications to the lease, have to be made in my presence, with my approval.
6. Kyle Huckle has been here 10 years and yet now more than ever is just a puppet for the landlord and he tried to get me to complete a REQUEST FOR TENANCY packet despite the fact I sent the cited laws to his office by email - along with the bogus $89 BILLION mortgage which this place has on record at the Clerk’s Office. The building cannot have a mortgage over its assessed amount! Fixtures on the property are not part of the mortgage! I even heard their argument was that the tenants were considered collateral! This supports my belief that they had a big plan to blow up the building at some point and make a huge profit like the owner of the World Trade Center did. I pressume despite it being common knowledge now that AMERICANS MASS MURDERED OVER 3,000 people on September 11 - it makes no difference in the justice system due to corrupted politicians and judges.
7. It is obvious to me that Kyle is wired so they tell him what to say and do as they listen to what he is doing. Eventually he backed off from his attempts in making me complete a REQUEST FOR TENANCY which he claimed “all the other tenants had to fill one out so you do too” And I was told by some tenants they DID fill out this illegal packet and one tenant told me she was never approached and had lived here since the building was opened, 2009. I continued to refuse and Kyle was not taking my no as any “red flag” that what they were doing was illegal despite my referencing my emails which he did see; forwarded by Chris Robinson, the Assistant Building Manager back then. Kyle’s title has
2
changed and nobody has stated they are his assistant.
8. I paid my Section 8 rent for July, August and September and all months prior to that. I have obtained the proofs that these checks were cashed by a “representative” of “360 State Street” which is what Dragana LaCore told me to make the checks out to even though it conflicted with what the lease had. I asked if it could be changed; she only said “Don’t worry about it”.
9. I had to pay for electric because they did not make their own electricity yet. Their large cell battery was not up to its required charge. They submitted a letter, signed by Dragana (who is from Ukraine) notifying us that this on-site service would soon be available and when.
10. Just after that notification, they conspired with State Police to get me arrested. The landlord’s office was open when this all took place, so Dragana could call the neighbors on my floor and tell them to stay inside, I am a dangerous person. This was a handy opportunity for police to kill me and get away with it! Yet I did not run back to my apartment when Karem Singh told the police I was leaving my apartment and they could rush up the elevator to pull their murderous stunt, but I needed to run back to my apartment when I saw them. They saw me; so why would I do that. I figured they were looking for someone else and I had to get some things done, particularly involving insurance fraud by Kemper Insurance -since I had just completed a claim form to the Office of Special Deputy Receiver way out in Chicago, despite the fact that I was nearly murdered by the town truck sander driver in Upstate NY! He laughed about what he did to me during a pretrial hearing and since my attorney did not speak up I did and firmly asked him why he was laughing and was he trying to kill me since I turned down a stalking sex trafficker in that down just before that, telling him to leave me alone, he was a pig.
11. I am obviously worth more dead than alive to the criminal underworld that has deep hooks in this US Government. Harming me has been so commonplace and makes my life hell.
12. I applied for Energy Assistance since I was still paying for electricity. Kyle Huckle only gave me a letter indicating they pay for everything so I didn’t have any electric bill. Nevertheless, I showed Community Action Agency my electric bills and they still refused to process me. They also enjoyed over $19 million dollars from doinations from the fake Sandy Hook shooting - rolled over to them by the City of Milford, who fired and charged their own clerk of stealing the money, which I am sure was really about the fact he knew it was a massive fraud scandal organized by Barack Obama with many elites in Connecticut as conspirators, such as Susan Bisewiecz who was then Secretary of Connecticut State. And the
3
coach of the UConn Huskies who “raised” a lot of money despite the fact only one child was real and that child did not die. They used closed caskets. One casket that was open was probably a manikin of a child. Adam Lanza did not exist. And one of the fake parents, even impersonated the FBI Supervisory Agent In charge yet he was protected by Barack Obama and nobody arrested him! His name was ________________________
13. Besides not getting Energy Assistance, I was not informed I could apply for Rent Rebate until some years later. The rent rebate is now calculated based on what utility costs are. So how can someone get both subsidies anyway? My utility costs are part of my rent. Additionally, I have had numerous costs which resulted from the vandalism and constant abuse here, along with major building code infractions that the City let slide. Those infractions could have caused the building to blow up and were causing heavy doses of microwaves in my apartment, that were considered lethal. I had to purchase an expensive meter to determine this - I was having so many health problems and even would wake up with no oxygen in my system, having to go to the window and keep breathing. They technology they use now is massively dangerous in the wrong hands and it is certainly in the wrong hands! They are even bragging about building a star that is several million degrees in Farenheit and then claim that the star is not dangerous! It would be like ten atomuc bombs going off and would destroy the world!
14. I was illicitly arrested and the landlord tried to get me evicted; that was the plan. They were not successful and yet faked being my friend. I realized by then they were far from being any friend! I would emphasize the illegal entries, even documented it in a letter thru Kyle and to the Bozzutos since they are the owners here. But it still didn’t matter and Kyle just said, “I was told not to respond to you” Great management skill he has!
15. Because Bozzutos hide their contact information, and the very fact I am so poor and so inundated by this continous criminal behavior - I have had no one over Kyle to discuss anything with. And frankly, discussing is just a waste of time. They commit crimes, they harm my apartment using their building as a weapon and I am fed up!
16. We had poisoned water and may still. One time it was so bad that the water was gray. We got a letter from Susan and she said we could still use it, “it’s just gray” which comes from the city water and was not treated! How disgusting and incompetent. Susan was the one involved with trying to evict me. I won the case and they were ordered to remove the fraudulent billing. So what do they do? They keep fraudulently
4
billing after that!
17. Kyle followed Dragana in claiming I have two leases. NO I DO NOT! AND THAT IS OUTRIGHT STUPID!
18. They never changed my door lock, either! I complained in housing court and Susan’s response was, “We don’t need to change your lock; you can trust us” and my response was, “Trust? You are trying to illegally evict me and you say trust?” Immediately the judge snapped, “I am striking that statement” I said, “Of course you will because you are defending the landlord anyway!”
19. Regarding vandalizing, they remotely turned off my washer in the bathroom after I reported the maintenance manager relieving himself in my trash can! Nobody would even investigate. I threw out the plastic bag he took a dump in but his urine was still in the bottom of the trash can. They retaliated by turning off my washer, taking off the portions of the bathtub and sink faucet, which distribute the water so the water sprayed all over. It took me a while to figure out what I could do to compensate for that since they refused to do any maintenance whatsoever, and that has been for the past 2 years. My refrigerator ice machine has been damaged for 4 years! They also replaced the inside plastic bar on the door with a busted one - they have obviously done so many thefts here, using my apartment for “spare parts” - they stole my wifi router which I got shortly after I moved in. They stole it about a year later, 2014, just before they had a guy cause my hamstring injury, which was obviously intended to be murder, to make me break my back or neck. Yet I had hold of of the train handrail. It was not Metro North’s fault. The guy who did it was even still standing there watching and would not even offer to help me, because I was was supposed to die. A woman heard me cry and called the conductor, who called for an ambulance. I could not move, I was in so much pain. Even calling someone on the phone was not possible, I had a grade 4 hamstring tear and the ER doctor refused treatment! Refused to get me an urgent vistit also, and claimed it was all in my head! He was the supervising doctor! I was in agony for over 3 weeks, unable to take a shower or anything and my white leg turned black. The doctor I saw after that claimed I needed surgery and I refused. I said I did not want them to murder me. It was after this abuse that Dragana told me they had a storage unit for me and if I did not get the unit then, they would not have another one for me, despite my need to heal from that horrible man who I reported to police yet police deleted the report!
20. Later I had an avulsion behind my knee - obviously caused by a laser weapon. Fortunately I secured a good doctor in NYC yet it took me a while before I could see him. The local doctors were trying to harm me
5
more. Including insisting I have physcial therapy - basically to finish me off - like the doctor in the nursing home did to my father when he had blood clots caused from the paedophile priest poisoning him.
21. This concludes my notarized statement which exposes much of the corruption and depravity that I have been subjected to here at 360 State Street. The Bozzutos and their conspirators have no excuse for this harm to me! Yet they decide among themselves to do this as a means to a justified end - I am out of their hair! As if I am the only one who says anything. I do not believe that!
Prepared and Signed by:
_________________________
Anne M. Bradley
NOTARY:
6
DOCKET NO.___________ : SUPERIOR COURT HOUSING
ANSONIA STATE STREET, LLC : JUDICIAL DISTRICT NEW HAVEN
VS. : AT NEW HAVEN, CT
ANNE M. BRADLEY : SEPTEMBER 25, 2024
DEFENDANT’S INTERROGATORIES
PURSUANT TO CPB SEC 13-2
CPB 11-1, CPB 11-2
Form 203
1. It is imperative to determine the very legitamacy of the alleged plaintiff as well as the probable cause for this AFORESAID case., CAUSED BY THE SERVICE OF A NOTICE TO QUIT, WHICH IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH STATUTE 47a-23 including caselaws.
2. Due to the very fact that intentional FRAUD and more has taken place, the Pro Se Defendant is presenting these interrogatories, the basics of which are framed according to Connecticut Court Form 203, and which has been modified to fit this aforesaid case, which has begun with a NOTICE TO QUIT, as provided in the Appendix of Defendant’s Motion To Pay Fair Use And Value into Court.
3. The undersigned, who is the Defendant Pro Se, hereby propounds the following interrogatories to be answered by the Plaintif, Ansonia State Street, LLC, under oath, within thirty (30) days of the filing herof in compliance with the Practice Book Section 13-2 as well as PB _____ due to the need to modify this according to the aforesaid case.
4. In Answering these interrogatories, the Plaintiff is required to provide all information within their knowledge, possession of power. If an interrogatory has subparts, answer each subpart separately and in full and do not limit the answer to the interrogatory as a whole. If any interrogatories cannot be answered in full, answer to the extent possible.
1. Identify the person(s) who, at the time of the defendant’s alleged failure to pay rent for August and September 2024, owned the premises located at 360 State Street, New Haven, CT.
1
Definition of premises: THE LAND AND BUILDINGS OWNED BY SOMEONE, ESPECIALLY BY A COMPANY OR ORGANIZATION
a) If the OWNER is a natural person, please state.
i. Name and any other name by which the owner has been known.
ii. Date of Birth
iii. Home address of Owner
iv. Business address of Owner
v. Agent of Service
(b) If the OWNER is not a natural person, please state:
i. Name/Title of which is used on record as property OWNER
ii. Business Address
iii. Agent of Service
iv. Nature of Business (SIC code according to IRS reporting category as well as structure such as corporation, partnership, etc)
v. Any other name or title used by this OWNER of aforesaid property
vi. Proof of Registration as a business in Connecticut
vii. Name of all managers of the property since defendant has been a tenant, January 2013, to include WHO PAID THEIR SALARIES
2. Identify the person(s) who currently have responsibility over the maintenance and inspection of the premises as well as the history of the the person(s) who have had responsibility over the maintenance and inspection of the premises since January 2013.
3. Provide a complete copy of the Tenancy Record covering January 2013 to present and state the the most current rent amount to which the defendant had agreed upon as a Section 8 Tenant.
4. State legal basis why your office claims repeatedly that the aforesaid tenant, Anne M. Bradley, has two leases with your organization, which has been repeatedly argued by this office, to include by Kyle Huckle who is the alleged current manager, who keeps having a title change to his position
2
i. State all titles which Kyle Huckle
has held at this premises since January 2013 or date of hire.
(a) Should “Community Manager” be used, define what Community Manager is since no landlord has any right to manage people, any more than they can argue that an $89 billion mortgage is justified because the tenants are collateral.
4. Provide a current ledger covering all of the time in which the aforesaid defendant Anne M. Bradley has been a SECTION 8 TENANT including date of move-in and date of Section 8 Contract signed.
5. Provide the COURT ORDER which took place for the landlord to have to remove the following erroneous charges: late fees, excessive rent over the agreed amount, and all on-site charges , totalling almost $14,000, which was removed from the ledger by a CREDIT entry dated along with explanation it was a court order
1.
3.
DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT
I will be back
One more thing, as preliminary: Bozzutos Quit Claimed their property several times! They did not quit claim it to MEPT Chapel Street yet the records are frauded as such! Consider what their tax forms must look like! This is a group of organized criminal companies! MEPT Chapel, LLC went defunct yet they apparently claim to have no responsibility in committing their crimes!
A quitclaim deed makes no assurance that the grantor actually has an ownership interest in a property; it merely states that if the grantor does, they release those ownership rights. Quitclaim deeds are typically used to transfer property in non-sale situations, such as transfers of property between family members.
There should be existing law which disallows companies from quit claiming.
.png)
DOCKET NO. NHH-CV24-5005875-5 : SUPERIOR COURT OF CT
ANNE M. BRADLEY : J.D. OF NEW HAVEN
V : HOUSING SESSION
ANSONIA STATE STREET, LLC et al : October 21, 2024
MEMORANDUM OFLAW ON MOTION TO STRIKE
HISTORY
1. On September 18, 2024, the plaintiff saw a paper wedged in her door, which appeared like a device such as a bomb. She had been ill since October 12 and had not left her apartment. The management was called due to her inability to pick up the anticipated delivery of 5 crates from Home Depot on the 13th because she was too sick.
2. Plaintiff’s door was taped up all around with duct tape on or about September16 due to someone using an airgun loaded up with insects and shooting them in her apartment through cracks in the door. They did this several times as she was sick in her apartment. She used her rubbing alcohol, 90% proof, in a large spray bottle to kill these “garbage flies”. This has been done to her before several times including infesting her apartment with maggots, which she claimed was an echo of Donald Trump’s MAGA image.
3. Plaintiff noted her concerns on her blog, regarding being worried there was a bomb inserted in her door, just under the lock where she did not use duct tape. She took pictures and they have been deleted off her phone, either by cyber crime or by an illegal intruder who found her phone, which she placed on a note along with her pin numbers to not forget what the pins were and where to keep her phone.
4. On September 20, Plaintiff left the building to run errands including going to the Post Office to get mail covering the 2-week span she had not checked it. She presumed since she shared concerns that this wedged
1
“device” was not a bomb. Upon opening the door, a NOTICE TO QUIT with an advertisement attached was backdated to September 12 with an advertisement attached. This clipped NOTICE TO QUIT fell on the floor of the hallway, a common area. No one rang her door bell or called her.
5. After researching her rights, she found a blog which claimed that housing complaints can be filed in the housing court, which was always contrary to what the housing court told her. Though she searched for a housing complaint form on her phone, there was no complaint form that showed up. She later realized this was CYBER CRIME disrupting what she was doing.
6. Due to the fact she was sure a housing complaint could be issued and the fact that the NOTICE TO QUIT WAS INVALID ON SEVERAL COUNTS, she proceeded to submit a complaint which she typed. A housing clerk was quite rude to her and refused to take it. It is unknown whether she called the chief clerk or emailed the chief clerk regarding this. She emphasized “There is nothing you can do. You have to wait for a Summons.” Plaintiff claimed that was not at all proper since she had rights and no action can be served by a marshal agai nst someone without judicial permission and provide equal rights of the receiver of papers unless it is an execution which would involve a warrant and/or hearing before the court. It is abuse of procedure. Plaintiff faxed her original typed complaint to the court within a week of finding the defective Notice to Quit, since they refused to take it in at their office.
7. Attorney Pitt claimed he had to return the typed complaint, saying court forms had to be submitted. Plaintiff went back to the courthouse and he insisted she write the form out, not type it. Plaintiff did what he told her to do and commented it was very sloppy and insufficient; that the form was insufficient for processing a housing complaint. Nevertheless the complaint form and NOTICE OF LAWSUIT and NAMES OF DEFENDANTS was prepared and submitted. These forms were typed by the plaintiff shortly thereafter even though they had not been served yet, Attorney Pitt claimed she had to mark them as AMENDED because he uploaded the
2
UNSERVED COMPLAINT, which seemed odd and against Due Process of Law, and certainly gave defendants opportunity to view what was not yet served. Plaintiff was suspicious that this was opportunity fo fraud the Appendix to the preferences of the attorneys for the defendants.
8. Plaintiff retained her own scanned copy and told the clerk that she would made copies for the defendants. Attorney Pitt refused to let her do this and recently used it against her by claiming he copied 3,000 copies for her as a “favor” - yet plaintiff discovered his office may enjoy up to $3,000 to their account for doing this “copy service” which according to the law may be reimbursed up to $1 a page for this copying. Plaintiff emphasized to the chief clerk, Attorney Pitt, that she wanted to do the copying and he would not let her. She wanted to be sure that what she submitted would be duplicated properly. The Appendices comprise of 246 pages and it is estimated that each set of the complaint was approximately 270 pages since he wanted to serve the forms she typed to REPLACE what was not served yet. It truly was quite baffling to her that he uploaded what was not served yet. She considered it abuse of process, lack of DUE PROCESS OF LAW.
9. Defendants were served by a marshal the first week of October. The marshal assured plaintiff on the 15th via text message that they were all served and she could pick up the complaint and proof of service for each one at the housing court. Plaintiff responded that she would try to get there on the following day, the 16th. She was unable to due to being up all night and therefore she went to the courthouse on the 17th. To her surprise, Attorney Pitt denied that the marshal dropped off the complaint and that “The marshal doesn’t need to give you a service process yet. You have to wait.” Plaintiff disagreed with the housing court attorney and proceded to cite the laws which reflect he was wrong.
10. Plaintiff had to prepare a REQUEST for the court to get the marshal to submit to her or the court the ORIGINAL WRIT, APPENDIX, AND FORMS and why what he was doing was unlawful. It was indeed her concern that he “needed” the originals to fraud and certainly lessened her feeling of
3
safety in any public place, having experienced this dynamic frequently and been physically harmed to the point she had to recover for months at home.
11. The REQUEST was dated September 18; and upon arriving at the courthouse, and checking the status of the case, it was discovered that Attorney Pitt uploaded an insufficient, noncompliant, MOTION TO DISMISS by the Attorney for the Defendant Ansonia State Street, LLC. Additionally there were two appearances for one defendant and one agency (Elm City Communities) uploaded on the case. Attorney Pitt made no acknowledgement of these documents yet plaintiff had already seen them. She found his rhetoric to be self-serving and lacking DUE PROCESS OF LAW. He even stated to her, “What do you have to worry about if defendants fail to appear? That is an automatic judgment for default because of that. That was indeed very odd he was would say that when he approved the upload of a defective Motion To Dismiss by Defendant Ansonia State Street with a Memorandum Of Law separately submitted even though they were uploaded at the same time.
FACTS/ARGUMENT
LEGAL INSUFFICIENCIES
1. Marshal Frank SANDillo (page 2 of Appendix) is likely to be a resident at the same apartment complex which the plaintiff resides. The Plaintiff will argue both circumstances.
a) If this marshal lives at this complex, by logic there is CONFLICT OF INTEREST, particularly since there is much pay-to-play going on by the companies which claim to have ownership of this property, as relayed in the COMPLAINT.
i. One of the frequent circumstances which occur is continuous illegal entries. No marshal who lives in the same complex should be allowed to serve a Notice to Quit when Plaintiff has relayed many complaints regarding the illegal entries to the landlord, to
4
the housing authority, to Livable City Initiative - several documents verifying her efforts have been presented in the Appendix to the Complaint/WRIT. Though the defendant’s MOTION TO DISMISS claimed that plaintiff failed to complain about this, it was clearly shown in the Appendix on many documents that what he stated in the motion was a deliberate lie. Most likely he expected to get away with it by frauding records of the original since Attorney Pitt is withholding the complaint along with the marshal’s proof of service on the defendants.
1. Marshal’s abuse of power in New Haven, CT is commonplace. Significant to this is the fact that a New Haven Marshal, Miller, illegally evicted plaintiff in 2010, at which time he helped himself to her ADT system, entering a code to turn it off when she had never given anyone the code to her ADT system. He was not a resident of that apartment building on 38 Arch Street. He was likely an illegal intruder since she relayed to the court that there were illegal intrusions at that apartment during the unlawful case of being accused of nonpayment of rent, yet plaintiff, as defendant in that 2009 case was actually paying rent into court for a year as approved by the court. Marshal Miller was exercising an extraducial power enjoying illegally evicting her and keeping the police from responding. Additionally, plaintiff got very ill on the plane to Minnesota, as she was seeking legal help on the actions she had already submitted to the US Supreme Court with pending decision (another reason the eviction was unlawful; the case itself was unlawful. There was no issue of nonpayment of rent, which were the grounds by which Corey Spruill stated. The case should have been dismissed yet Judge Abrams was obsessed with finding a way to make her lose the case, getting Corey Spruill to illegally file a Small claim for rent in the Hartord, CT court as apposed to New
5
Haven, at which time the Small Claims Court in Hartford should have refused to take in the documents since he needed to file in the New Haven jurisdiction at the Housing Court. This is typical corruption in the court. Additionally, the proper number of days
(19) were not counted as required by law, from the issuance of the court clerk’s order for eviction. Plaintiff claimed the court’s refusal to take her rent payment for that month was also unlawful due to her appeal to the US Supreme Court. There is also the issue of when a tenant is not behind on the rent and the landlord just “wants her out” the lease must be followed and if the tenant is disabled the landlord is responsible for moving the tenant to an apartment the landlord finds available, should the city not serve in this capacity, which is actually their responsibility according the very regulations of the city. They were cited in court by the plaintiff as defendant on that case. The law was consistently not administered; the will of the judge took precedence throughout that case, as he is so noted for doing based on her numerous bad experiences with that same judge. Judicial complaints are a waste of time and are simply ignored by this fragmented court system which evades the law and relies on CYBER CRIME to fraud documents for them.
b) If this marshal lives elsewhere and had to be permitted in the building, the concierge is required to verify why he is there before allowing him to use the elevator and help himself to wherever he wanted to go. At that point, the marshal could have had the concierge call the plaintiff since the concierge was well aware that she was in her apartment. Instead, the marshal wedged the paper in plaintiff’s door very quietly and went to the neighbor who was born with cerebral palsy, and asked her where plaintiff was since he told her he could not reach plaintiff, which was a deliberate lie. Upon the neighbor opening her door at the same time plaintiff was leaving to run errands the
6
neighbor told the plaintiff, “A man was looking for you”. The neighbor referred to the 18th of October when she saw him, two days prior. Plaintiff assured the neighbor that was unfair he used her like that particularly since he could not get in the building without management consent and he could have gone to the management office. These actions violated the law regarding the procedure for marshals serving documents, all of which have to be court-approved according the law. The marshal only rang the bell specifically of the neighbor, who is also a graduate of SCSU like SANDillo is, and as well as the alleged teachers at the closed school, SANDy Hook Elementary, and this was a tactic to get her to warm up to him and go along with his insistance that he tried to see the plaintiff for an undisclosed reason. SANDillo emphasized to the neighbor that plaintiff was not responding, which was a deliberate lie and abuseful circumstance he tried to pull her disabled neighbor into. This was most likely a pay-to-play operation he was doing for the landlord -- which includes one or more of the six companies which claim they have a stake in the property at 360 State Street, accessing our personal information, telling us what to do.
c) On September 12, Plaintiff requested the concierge to note (so other concierges on other shifts would know) she could not pick up the 5 crates which were dropped off by Home Depot yet because she was sick with a virus. Thereafter, the marshal quietly stuffed the crumbled up paper into the doorway which had been taped all around since the 16th of September, with no accompanying documentation regarding a ledger or Letter from the Landlord, with signature, informing her they claim she owed money. In fact, according to the law, the landlord is required to submit such a letter in advance and allow the tenant to respond - and this is even more agregious due to the fact that this landlord did the very same thing in 2019, and lost the case. Yet the defendant resumed with fraudulent billing and more. It took two years for them to remove the erroneous charges totalling almost $14,000 (Section B of Appendix to Complaint) from the account and they
7
resumed erroneously charging her all over again, to include a conspiracy with TD Bank to continue printing and mailing monthly rent checks for at least a year on a closed account. That is bank fraud. This was a deliberate, calculated collaboration since the plaintiff called TD Bank about this and also approached them in person. This was definitely instigated by higher banker officials - most likely Mark Carney, et al, since the plaintiff is of the opinion that Mark Carney was on a nefarious career mission to flatline the wealth of the monarchy for the the global NAZI underworld. They most likely found that the plaintiff was interfering with their PLAN, such as one aligned with the “Order Of Barbarians” as published on YouTube and by a book, which is a transcription of what Dr. Dunegan relayed (on what Dr. Lawrence Day lectured in 1969.) Once Dr. Day died, in 1989, Dr. Dunegan took the chance to share this information since they had already disrupted society, families and the economy. He wanted to let people know where it was coming from. And this PLAN is most certainly heavily invested by many of the Banking Elites as well as wealthy elites - and has been carried out on September 11, 2001. SANDy Hook Elementary School FAKE SHOOTING was also carried out in December 2012, where Adam Lanza did not even exist and the Governor of Connecticut gave a million dollars to a favored law firm to allegedly “prove” the existence of a non-existent event; after he unsuccessfully tried to file bankruptcy on Connecticut. One of the frauding teachers (alumni of SCSU) had the last name of Russo and was obviously tied to Kevin Russo, who was promoted to judge in Danbury as an obvious reward for conspiring with Lawrence Mark Hurley in Milford Court - embezzling money for many years, That female teacher by the last name of Russo obviously had extrajudicial power in being a fraud at the SANDy Hook--OBAMA PLAN. Plaintiff contends that frauding and dishonesty is commonplace in Connecticut and rarely is held accountable. This would also include the fact that Raymond Clark did not kill Annie Le and Yale University turned their back on him rather than simply disclosing the facts
8
and supporting the truth. She was chopped up and placed in a maintenance tool box, even decapitated - yet media claimed her body was found in the wall. That was a lie and yet they played out this crime scene for at least 5 days without “finding” her body using cadaver dogs. The police claimed the cadaver dogs were not trained well only AFTER the police were questioned why they still used them since they are supposed to test them first, to make sure they were able to locate her body, which would have a great odor which even a person could detect after 5 days - unless her body was drained of blood (for adrenachrome) and partially embombed by experts working in a criminal collaboration. None of that happened. Raymond Clark was essentially thrown under the bus; forced imprisonment with an abusive environment despite being a grad with master’s degree and he was going to get married when Annie Le returned from her wedding, which they were both planning to attend each other’s weddings. All of this was shared to the plaintiff by a close friend to the best man of her wedding. These numerous circumstances are indeed reflective of why the plaintiff is usually violated in court to include being nefariously kicked out of Southern Connecticut University - with no incident and refusal by the University to have a hearing. Plaintiff issued legal packets to the Student Affairs, the University President, the Student Body which handles grievances by matriculated students - none of them would do anything and violated her rights. The reason they removed her was they claimed Dr. Wu, her Chinese Professor, told them to. That was a lie. They refused to document it and shortly thereafter both the “Hurricane Sandy” (obviously weaponized weather) occurred as well as the fake Sandy Hook shooting where nobody died and fake parents and fake kids made up the major part of the story, including one fake parent by the name of David Wheeler who impersonated Agent Aldenburg, Supervisory Agent for FBI, on several occasions, including most recently at the Alex Jones trial. Additionally there is the circumstance of the mayor
9
of Waterbury, CT, Phil Giordano, who enjoyed raping and molesting children right in the Office of Mayor and it was very difficult to even arrest him, taking years of work because he was “protected” by political elites.
2, The Notice to Quit was additionally invalid for the following reasons:
a) Rent was paid for August and September of 2024. A copy of those checks were provided to the Agent of Service and thus to the Defendants. The defendant not only has noncompliant motion but he additionally deliberately lies.
b) (emphasis) Improper service by Marshal, who graduated from Southern Connecticut State University of as described above in No. 1. Plaintiff’s neighbor additionally attended Southern Connecticut State University.
c) The marshal failed to adhere to proper procedures regarding serving a Notice to Quit in a secure building, etc.
2. Format of the Motion To Dismiss is noncompliant
a) The motion itself at the top of the document has no law or rule applied
b) It is not paginated
c) There is no HISTORY, FACTS/ARGUMENT, LAW, OR SUMMARY
d) LACK OF PARAGRAPHING causes additional difficulty when responding to the motion.
e) There is no section regarding the “court having heard the motion; it is granted/denied”
f) REQUESTS ARE NOT MOTIONS. Requests reflect the will of the requestor when submitted during proceedings. In regards to plaintiff’s request, it was submitted outside of proceedings since no hearing has been conducted and was prepared before any pleading or appearance was made. This indeed would be another factor since the case has not been properly established to even take pleadings due to uploading UNSERVED documents and the failure to provide the plaintiff with the original WRIT and proofs of service on defendants.
10
3. The Motion to Dismiss refers to the CARES ACT as reason defendant/s served the Notice to Quit with a 30-day notice. That would have no bearing on the aforesaid matter. There was no endorsement by Vice President Pence, who lead the COVID TASK FORCE which Trump requested - though was angry that Dr. Fauci would not be leader since by law, the VIce President is in charge. Trump then used a media campaign to accuse Mike Pence of being a paedophile; though he he will not meet with a woman alone, other than his wife. Another person always has to be present. Honorable Pence was a successful Governor of Indiana, worked hard, and achieved a surplus for the state as well as had proper screening and investigations prior to taking office in the White House. The CARES Act was initiated by the Treasurer (who along with Timothy Geitner enjoyed printing trillions of dollars of illegal money to circulate in the economy for Barack Obama and Donald Trump) As emphasized, Vice President Mike Pence assured the public there was nothing to worry about and macrotrends.net ( included as an Exhibit to Appendix of this motion) provides the data that the death rates were never higher than the birth rates and thus, there was not even a crisis, except in the lies by social engineering for Bill Gates, et al. This was a big plan they rigged for years, which blew up in their faces because intelligence replaced his bioweapon made at a North Carolina University lab, with the common flu, aka CORONAVIRUS. Most likely the weaponized weather in that area gave them ample opportunity to destroy records and cover that operative up - and Dr. Fauci was the key person who would achieve that cover up as well as the mass murder by laser weapons that occurred in Paradise, CA - many people were burned alive to ashes. Trump purchased those laser weapons five months before he torched Paradise. The purchasing and receiving documents were shown right on a YouTube video by Blackstone Intelligence Channel. He took down that video when Paradise was destroyed
4. The cited laws on Page 4 (paginated by plaintiff since defendant failed to paginate) have no basis on this case since the defendant for Ansonia State Street cannot prove the Notice To Quit was valid. Due to the many
11
continuous cases which the courts have ruled on frauded records - this state only covered it up more by disposing of Lois Law Program, which actually managed all cases for general public and professional use. Judges were deliberately lying yet the program was shut down and all records were purged to leave only the judge’s opinion and a few other court documents in the file. This type of deliberate dynamic was obviously highly rewarded by political officials who live lives of crime. Cited caselaws by the Defendant were not printed and attached to its MOTION TO DISMISS.
5. Due to Plaintiff’s need to cover the duration of her residency at 360 State Street and other contributing factors, as well as making line-spacing 1 1/2 rather than just 1, this aforesaid motion comprises of 15 pages and is consistent with the Rules of Connecticut requirements.
LAWS
This a list of laws which reflect this aforesaid motion. This list should be sufficient to establish Plaintiff’s argument, yet indeed is not complete regarding the numerous violations which have occurred on this case.
Connecticut Practice Book (CPB)
11-1, 10-3
CARES ACT - written by the Secretary of Treasury, not HUD
Connecticut General Statutes
CGS 6-38a
CGS 6-21
CGS 52-46
CGS 52-54
CGS 62-57
Title 198
Title 42, Section
12
Connecticut Regulations on HUD Processing, titled “THE PLAN”, comprising of over 200 pages - segments are in Exhibit on Laws
SUMMARY
The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is without merit, without compliance, without logic. It therefore meets the criteria to Strike the Motion. Plaintiff has had no results in the numerous attempts to get her rights as a tenant over the years of residing at 360 State Street. She has had to sleep on the concrete floor for two years and also still has to wash clothes by hand due to gross negligence of the landlord. LCI claimed they were going to inspect her apartment around August of 2023, in a three-day period. Plaintiff deliberately remained home those three days since they refused to tell her when they would be in her apartment, LCI never inspected her apartment, which in fact has been damaged greatly by illegal intrusions and more. They wanted to cover it all up.
There was not even an initial inspection in December 2012 - January 2013 and plaintiff was lied to about being able to move in, in a few days, on December 11, 2012 - and Dragana LaCore enjoyed her fake image of not knowing anything as an assistant property manager, and could not do anything about it despite the very fact this disabled plaintiff’s efforts were in great jeopardy. This was one example of many of “Devil’s Chessboard” tactics. In January 2023, the maintenance manager by the first name of Victor relieved himself in plaintiff’s trash can in her bathroom and plaintiff complained about this promptly, with no action taken by the management. Apparently it is common practice for him. Nevertheless, they ransacked her apartment after she complained - to include vandalizing her bed, and creating huge messes in her apartment which took hours to clean. They also stuffed debris in the garbage disposal - all of which times were not successful in destroying the garbage disposal which is used rarely and plaintiff makes it a
13
point to check it with a flashlight if she had been out before using the garbage disposal. The fact that this maintenance manager used much force to enter her apartment when her floor was not flooding as he told her it was, and he was aggressively approaching her when she was wrapped in a towel screaming for her life - and he was only stopped from an obvious order by higher authority to get out immediately. It was not the manager Kyle Huckle. In fact Kyle Huckle sent an email excusing the breaking and entering! A copy is included in Exhibits to this motion. Plaintiff feared for her life and she had a heart problem for weeks, and had to rest for weeks. It was discovered her boxsprings were not replaced with a king size boxspring and plaintiff had to remove the insulation they sprayed in the leg areas to destabilize the leg lifts which plaintiff made. Why tell police? Their pensions depend on the funding of this huge criminal business operation which got away with selling the $2.2 billion building for just $160 million and then turned around and somehow got an $89 billion dollar THIRD MORTGAGE; the other two mortgages were located in the property file with no closings. The depravity that goes on by the alleged group of owners should result in just compensation for the harmed plaintiff as well as not requiring her to pay any of the Section 8 portion of her rent for as long as they remain the owners; and for as long as she resides at the property. Plaintiff has requested portability to Hamden, CT. Instead of determining her elligibility first, plaintiff was told by the Housing Authority that she would have to first issue a 30 day notice of leaving; more Devils Chessboard tactics which do not comply with HUD yet comply with crooked politicians in Connecticut. That is where that circumstance stands now for this indigent person who has Federal Poverty Level Income; been a victim of continous vandalizing at this apartment and has tried to save money to leave this state completely yet is unable to and thus, has resolved to seeking a nice apartment in a community with a good reputation, Hamden, CT.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff motions this court to Strike Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss.
Appendix:
A - email from Kyle Huckle
B - Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss
C - macrotrends.net data regarding death rates and birth rates during Lockdown, etc.
D - Cited Laws
E - Plaintiff’s Motion To Strike, 10/18/2024
Prepared And Submitted
FOR THE PLAINTIFF
______________________
Anne M. Bradley, Pro Se
PO Box 206514
New Haven, CT 06520
Ph. 203-508-0858
Aforesaid Motion, having been heard, is
GRANTED/DENIED
___________________
THE COURT
MAILING CERTIFICATION
Plaintiff certifies that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following appearing attorneys:
Joseph W. St Rock IV - for Ansonia State Street
Hoops & Associates
19A Thames Street
Groton, CT 06340 FAX: 860-445-8919
Ryan P. Driscoll - for Elm City Communities
Bercham & Moses, PC
12 Broad Street
Milford, CT 06460 FAX: 203-878-4912
15
DOCKET NO. NHH-CV24-6024196-S : SUPERIOR COURT OF CT
ANSONIA STATE STREET, LLC : J.D. OF NEW HAVEN
V : HOUSING SESSION
ANNE M. BRADLEY : November 18, 2024
DEFENDANT’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW
MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO OBJECT TO
MOTION TO DISMISS
HISTORY
1. An invalid Notice To Quit was crumpled in Defendant’s Door on September 18, 2024. There was no cited law on this Notice.
2. Upon opening her door on September 20, she discovered it was backdated to September 12, 2024 - two days after September 10 due date for rent.
3. Marshal’s Proof of Service indicates it was served on September 13, 2024. Yet there was no proof a marshal served it. He would have had to go through the concierge or management to get to that floor if he did not live on the premises. No one rang her doorbell or knocked or called her. Defendant’s neighber next door was obviously told by someone to catch her outside as she was leaving her apartment on the 20th
a) At that time Cindy told her, “A man was looking for you two days ago and came to my apartment asking me where you were”. Defendant told her neighbor that was not any of her concern, no one should be using her for these tactics, it is not fair to her, and that person should have gone to management or the concierge.
4. On September 20, 2024, Defendant Anne Bradley was told by the Housing Court that she could not file a Housing Complaint; that it did not matter that the Notice To Quit was invalid.
5. Defendant did her own research, which was very difficult since the landlord of 360 State Street - which claims to be represented by Hoops & Associates, cut off wifi in her apartment January 2023 after she complained about the maintenance supervisor relieving himself in her bathroom and vandalizing the sink and tub faucets. They also remotely turned off her washing machine and vandalized her bed which caused her to sleep on her floor for almost two years before it was repaired just recently, in August 2024. Other vandalizing took place - all indicated in the Housing Complaint, Case No. NNHCV245006875S.
a) She found the state law which gave her the right to issue a Housing Complaint. The Housing Court again refused to take her papers and said nothing about any forms which were required as reason.
b) Defendant faxed her Complaint, which was formatted as a motion and titled COMPLAINT, along with a fee waiver.
c) The court rejected her complaint and at that point indicated she had to complete forms. The Chief Clerk obviously realized the dynamic and argument was placed on an invalid NOTICE TO QUIT as reason to proceed with her Housing Complaint.
d) Those forms were typed with “see attached” and on the attached had the heading of the case with title, for proper record-keeping. Chief Housing Clerk of New Haven, Attorney Pitt disrupted the form, claimed “The Court never take attached lists - you have to hand-write everything on forms, creating numerous pages which resulted defective information. This was on a Friday.
i. Attorney Pitt corrected the address for BEACHWOOD PROPERTIES, still referring to it as that name; yet the Secretary of State altered the record to BEACHWOLD having access to the uploaded complaint prior to it being served.
1. Peter Hoops, who claims to be an attorney who entered the BAR in 1987, entered BEACHWOOD instead of BEACHWOLD as his client on an attached list to his appearance.
2. Defendant discovered the change in record over the weekend on her phone and thus used that information while typing the form using wifi elsewhere on another day.
e) The following Monday, Defendant submitted in person REPLACEMENT FORMS.
i. Attorney Pitt refused to take them as replacement forms, saying he already uploaded the UNSERVED CASE.
ii. Defendant Anne Bradley claimed that should be illegal to do since it was not served yet.
iii. Defendant thereafter claimed that this eviction case was NOT uploaded even after they served her which reflects ABUSE OF PROCESS, FRAUD. This Eviction case was not uploaded for a week. Attorney Pitt encouraged Defendant not to appear, not Answer, “You have all the time in the world. That was nice they gave you until October 15”. Defendant claimed that it was just a trick and she resented her case not being uploaded in the case information system, and requested to either dismiss the Summons and proceedings thereof or upload it. Attorney Pitt claimed, “I cannot do that. The attorney does that. He is in charge.”
iv. Dates of uploaded documents are not consistent with the actual dates the documents were submitted on either the Housing Case or this Eviction Case, which alters the course.
v. Similarly-situated cases are provided here and show when the Housing cases are uploaded and when they are ordered out for NonPayment of Rent, and proofs of letters requesting payments. Appendix_____ Pages ____ to ____
f) Defendant claimed that the reason for the Housing Complaint was numerous and longstanding; asserting her rights to enter one as she had discovered on her own that she had been lied to by Housing Court a number of times since 2013 about not being able to enter a Housing Complaint. She submitted complaints to the landlord numerous times. She complained to the agencies on that Housing Complaint Case and produced numerous pages of proof she contacted Livable City Initiative as well as Elm City Communities. The Appendix is 246 pages long. Defendant cannot understand why she was not allowed to enter an Appendix AFTER the case was served, in order to upload it at that point and serve appearing defendants electronically.
g) Defendant could not undersand why the non-appearing defendants were at the least not DEFAULTED by the Chief Clerk; and since none of them Answered in the two week time period by law, why they were all not defaulted. Appendix on Laws_ Page_____
h) Defendant asserted her defense that the NOTICE TO QUIT WAS INVALID and the court agreed by entering her housing complaint as NNHCV245006875S
i. It is the responsibility of the court to determine merit on a case by a pro se litigant, prior to accepting it in court and docketing it. Appendix on Laws_Page_______
ii. Due to the fact that she paid her rent for August and September; so their claim for nonpayment of rent was FALSE
iii. Due to the fact that the marshal made improper service, crumpling this paper in her door on the 18th of September, which appeared to be a bomb or the like. It was not placed through the large separation between her door/doorframe.
1. The man who referred to himself as “Attorney Hoops” and claimed to have written the Motion To Dismiss at the hearing on October 31, had no valid reason for the marshal gaining access to the building on his own and only stated in argument, “He signed an affidavit that he served it”.
iv. No law was cited on the Notice To Quit
v. No ledger was attached; no letter to prove they sent a letter previously was attached. Appendix Laws_Page_______
vi. No explanation on why they consider it lawful to do this two days after the rent was due was attached. Appendix Laws_Page_____
6. Housing Complaint initially submitted on September 25, after struggling for weeks with the Housing Court about having her right to do so. This was rejected by Attorney William Pitt, who claimed forms had to be completed. Forms were typed; William Pitt rejected the typed forms and told defendant to hand-write them on October 1. This was done and on October 3, Monday, defendant submitted replacements. William Pitt claimed her fee waiver was already granted and he uploaded the unserved case; that replacements were not acceptable. He told defendant they could only have AMENDED at the top or he would not take them in. Defendant entered AMENDED at the top yet the AMENDED copies were not made the primary cause for case.
a) Defendant “360 State Street” was served at 141 Temple Street, c/o Gideon Friedman under other business names. They did not return it to correct the record. They accepted it when it was not valid. The marshal served it when it was not valid.
i. The Secretary of State may have altered that record as well. Nevertheless, the Complaint packet should have been returned to the court in order to correct the record that 360 State Street’s agent of service is located on Whitney Avenue.
b) The Court is taking her fair use and value of rent into court, which was requested at the time the complaint was filed. This validated her rent was current since no rent can be accepted by the court unless it is current. Appendix Laws_Page______
i. There was a delay in getting a marshal to serve papers. Attorney Pitt insisted on making copies of the Complaint and Appendix to be served. He would not allow defendant Anne Bradley to make them for NNHCV245006875S. He said he would have them done around October 18. Defendant asked him if he was delaying this for the landlord and was angry he would not allow her to make the copies from home by printing the scanned documents.
1. Attorney Pitt, Chief Clerk, claimed “You have nothing to worry about! We accepted your Housing Complaint - you are all set - you paid rent into court, so it’s no big deal if this takes time to serve the defendants.”
ii. Attorney Pitt delayed making copies on the Housing Complaint against Plaintiff, whereas Anne Bradley insisted on making them ready to be served promptly after the fee waiver was granted on ________.
1. Through the diligent argument by Defendant, the Complaints were copied by Wednesday the following week - still two days later than what they would have been ready to serve had she been able to print them from the scan she had made and paid for just a half hour prior to submitting them in court. Attorney Pitt encouraged Defendant to let Marshal Paolitto serve the Complaints. That he was in their office at that time. Defendant refused. Defendant sought a marshal on her own and arranged for the service to be done by a marshal in Hamden, CT. Timeline of Communications is Provided at Appendix ___ Pages ___ to ___
a) Return Date which was set by Attorney Pitt was DEFECTIVE; he actually made the RETURN DATE prior to date of service and the marshal did nothing about this. Return date should have been set as the law states; to Answer within two weeks from the date it is served; yet he set the return date before the marshal picked up the Complaint Packets to serve.
iii. This case was served by the Marshal. On October 24, her RETURN OF SERVICE was uploaded by the court, dated October 10, stating she served the documents on October 10, 2024. Anne Bradley, defendant, complained that she charged almost $3,000 for this service which seemed fraudulent. Attorney Pitt accepted her Proof of Service at some point between October 10 and October 24. He claimed she did NOT serve all defendants as reason to not provide defendant the original Complaint and court forms, including the appendix. Anne Bradley continues to argue that what she charged was not reasonable, though the marshal defended what she charged with “It’s in the marshal’s handbook” Appendix ____ Pages ____ to ____
1. It is neither in the marshal’s handbook or found in the statutory law.
a) Defendant discovered that if this marshal made copies, she may charge up to $1.00 yet in circumstances involving fee waivers and using the court services, it is $.60/page if she needed to make copies. There was no need to. Attorney Pitt made all the copies and claimed they were all validated. Defendant also validated the Appendix before the marshal picked up the copies. The marshal was well aware of who was being served, since Attorney Pitt uploaded the case before it was served.
2. She also claimed that she got to the Secretary of State’s office and found out she had to give them TWO copies along with a fee of $50; yet had argued that she was charging $3,000 because she “prepared and verified” the papers she served. Defendant claimed to the marshal and Attorney Pitt that this was outside of any logic, along with law.
7. Defendant entered her Motion To Dismiss aforesaid case due to fraud, no merit, and complete lack of Due Process on November 1, 2024.
a) Upload of the eviction case was DATED October 30, yet they only showed information from the Plaintiff despite the Defendant entering her Appearance and Answer on the same day it fell off the front of her door, October 24, 2024. This is not dated as such on the case even to date. Dates of filings on this case are overall defective. Appendix___ Pages ____ to ____
8. Defendant Anne Bradley called the court regarding this case since the “new” upload of November 4, Document No. 101 was marked as a judicial ruling on the case - not even relating to the defendant or this matter, a ruling dated in 2021. Appendix, Page ____ She considered this an act of fraud. The call center transferred Defendant to William Pitt. Statements he made were:
a) Attorney Pitt claimed, “It doesn’t matter; I mailed you what we uploaded”
i. Defendant argued, “Of course it matters. This is cyber fraud at the least! You know I cannot go anywhere most of the time due to illegal entries in my apartment.” Now there are illegal entries on the case! This is typical Devil’s Chessboard tactics to even humor themselves.
ii. Defendant presumed that the court actually entered DISMISSAL: yet Attorney Pitt was probably angry about a filing she made on the Housing Complaint, in preparation for DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. She claimed the court is abusing procedure, which makes it more difficult to get her rights.
b) Attorney Pitt claimed the court had to ORDER THE PLAINTIFF Hoops Associates to change the return date to November 12, to reflect their Summons. He said it would take a long time to resolve. It is now Document No. 103 on the case information, yet also on Case Information, Document No 104 indicates that on November 7, the PLAINTIFF ordered the court to change what they apparently uploaded which the court allowed.
i. Defendant claimed that it was strange that he allowed the unlawful Juris Number as out-of-state, that they add two separate pages on two separate occasions secretly added to this appearance file, listing what should either be on the form or on a continuance form, as he stated himself were not acceptable. Defendant Anne Bradley argued the fraudulent appearance is unlawful now; The return date on the Complaint was unlawful; the return date on the attorney’s appearance was unlawful; yet he “corrects” the return date that was moot [since defendant Anne Bradley returned it before it was even uploaded as a case--which took a week for them to upload despite the continuous complaining and claiming that this is not DUE PROCESS OF LAW]. She said, “Either docket the case or dismiss the Summons with a stated reason why. How can I submit a motion without the docket number?”
ii. Attorney Pitt claimed, “This will take a while to get them to comply because I mailed it”. Defendant could not understand since they have electronic filing.
9. Plaintiff filed its Motion To Object, dated November 7; and Memorandum of Law on Motion To Object, November 7 also - yet nefariously dated the motions on November 6 with no correction to the date on the motion, simultaneously uploading this motion with its “Request To Conform”, which has no rule or law applied to it despite the fact all pleadings are required to have at least one rule or law applied.
FACTS/ARGUMENT
1. Notice to Quit was invalid, even fraudulent due to false information regarding nonpayment of rent.
a) Insufficient Service along with the fact that Plaintiff stated reason for eviction is non-payment of rent for August and September; dating it September 12 despite the fact that landlords are first required to previously issue a letter to a tenant to pay the balance in a certain length of time, yet they did not.
b) As Defendant has emphasized, in her opinion, they devised this tactic last minute after seeing notes by the concierge that a Home Depot shipment was going to be delivered on the 13th. Updated notes by the concierge indicated that she became very sick with the flu and on her apartment account, and could not pick up the Home Depot delivery of 5 wooden crates until she got better. Appendix __ Page ___
c) On September 18, defendant discovered a wadded up something jammed in her door and was scared to open it since it may have been a bomb. Defendant determined it to be Notice To Quit with an advertisement for attorneys stapled to the Notice when she left apartment on 9/20/2024.
1. This Notice is supposed to be supported by the court since a marshal served it; yet the court denies they have to support the Notice, claiming the attorney or pro se landlord has power to make it an order. Defendant was ordered by the landlord to leave her apartment by October 18 - which is 30 days past the actual day someone set it in her door - yet obviously backdated the document to reflect when defendant told the concierge October 12 that she was expecting her Home Depot package on October 13. Shortly thereafter, defendant called the concierge saying she was sick and would not be able to pick up her Home Depot order that was delivered on October 13.
d) A summons should have been issued the day after October 18 if this case was valid; although it was already unravelling since defendant entered a valid housing complaint before the Summons was issued since the Notice To Quit was invalid. No case brought forth by a pro se party can be uploaded if the court has not approved it for merit! The Chief Clerk is responsible for this. Appendix Laws_Page______
e) Defendant entered a Preliminary Statement regarding Costs affected by the continuous illegal entries, vandalism, fraudulent billing, and more on October 23 on the affiliated HOUSING COMPLAINT case. Plaintiff saw this document and spontaneously responded the same day as retaliatory behavior, obviously, with its summons; rather than withdrawing its attempt to evict her illegally. Defendant got home past 8 pm on October 23. The Summons was not seen until the following day, October 24; yet dated October 23 on the document and dated as served on October 23, placed in the common area of the buiding, on the outside of her door, rolled up in her doorknob, falling on the floor of the common area.
i. Electronic filing allows a party, namely attorneys, to upload pleadings whenever they want.
ii. Both parties are supposed to have equal privileges!
iii. It is not mandatory for anyone to have access to internet in order to have a case in court.
iv. Internet privileges for attorneys are beyond the SCOPE OF LAW and therefore in many cases illegitamate.
v. Attorney Pitt has allowed frauded appearances as Pro Hac Vice
vi. Attorney Pitt has allowed appearance form to be changed at least two times, in the case of Peter Hoops, on Housing Complaint which is affiliated with this case - being the same parties are involved. All eight parties served on the Housing case have either filed appearances or defaulted.
1. Exception: According to Hoops & Associates, they claim that the only landlord of 360 State Street is Ansonia State Street; yet fail to prove this; in particular show HUD’s permission for them to be a Section 8 landlord at that premises. No Section 8 tenant is required to process another “Request For Tenancy” packet since they are already here; already approved. The landlord is the one who has to be approved, should landlords change. USC Chapter 42, Section 8 Appendix Laws_Page____
2. Attorney Hoops’ appearance is fraudulent. Not only has he appeared as Pro Hac Vice yet used a Juris number which indicates he entered the BAR in 1987. Most likely, he was not even born then due to his physical appearance at the Housing Complaint hearing on October 31 and obviously appearing to be in the age range of 30-35 years old.
a) This man who claims to be “Attorney Hoops” conspired with the Housing Specialist, as relayed by the defendant in other submitted documents. Housing Specialist claimed that defendant HAD to see her before the hearing on Motion to Dismiss/Motion To Strike on October 31. The Housing Specialist lied to the defendant claiming that the hearing was marked off and the judge was only taking papers and either she negotiated at that meeting or there would be nothing for her. This was relayed in more detail in other documents submitted to the court.
2. There is a Modus Operandi with this Plaintiff, just basing this on the related HOUSING COMPLAINT CASE, which the court accepted in with merit and at that point could not rule on it not being without merit - yet they recently have since this Motion was entered and before this Memorandum of Law is entered. As Defendant Anne Bradley has claimed, they are playing Devil’s Chessboard; rather than just following the law.
3. “REQUEST FOR THE COURT TO CONFORM” by Plaintiff. Pleading has no rule or law in its request. Oddly Attorney Pitt claimed he mailed to the Defendant, yet it was initiated by the Plaintiff. Document No. 104, entered three days after Document No 103 was entered by the court, which makes no sense. Attorney Pitt told the defendant on the phone, on Tuesday November 5, that the court order from another case dated 2021 (which pulled up when the defendant Anne Bradley tapped on it) was NOT what they did. She wanted to know what they were hiding. She presumed the case was dismissed by the court and the record was frauded to remove dismissal because of their ‘not liking’ Defendant’s diligence on the Housing Complaint. Appendix, Page _____
a) Document 104 is defective on its face since it has no cited law to verify its purpose! No law or rule was cited on the form; and it was reflecting the plaintiff’s attorney, Hoops & Associates, ORDERING THE COURT to change the return date on the case information, which they in fact uploaded fraudulently a week after the Summons was served, since no case was even uploaded for that time, which seems like OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. Additionally, another week went by before the Chief Clerk claimed that the Return Date on the Case Information was a “big problem” and “this will take some time to fix since I have to mail them a request” even though they file electronically and he could just call them.
i. And it doesn’t matter that the return date on the fraudulent appearance is BEFORE the date it is signed. Appendix, Page____.
4. Plaintiff’s client - alleged landlord of 360 State Street, claimed they were getting Livable City Initiative to inspect all apartments. A trick! This trick failed because Section 8 tenants cannot have inspections through Residential Licensing. They have to be notified by the Housing Authority, which is the for-profit business titled ELM CITY COMMUNITIES, yet they withdrew their registration as a business with the Secretary of State under that name, continue using that name for their course of operations as a for-profit business, and entered several other names which are all run from 360 Orange Street, including one titled as 360 State Street Corporation. Motion For Disclosure, Not acted upon; Appendix, Page ____. The conflict of interest and nefarious collaborating is obvious! Motion For Disclosure on Housing Complaint has been submitted to the court. There was no Objection to this Motion. Possibly because the Chief Clerk failed to Default the non-appearing Livable City Initiative, which was served the motion the same day it was entered in court; as was Elm City Communities AND a copy to the Housing Commissioner, Alberta Witherspoon. Note, the Defendant tried following up with Alberta Witherspoon after meeting her in public. The person who answered her phone said she had died. The phone number was correct. Ms. Witherspoon explained she had changed her number. Yet no one else is supposed to get her number for at least a year. She agreed on that.
a) The Plaintiff Hoops & Associates, which has an unlawful apearance which the court permits to date, despite obsessing over a moot return date of November 4, filed electronically. They uploaded the case; not the court, claimed Attorney Pitt. Attorney Pitt claimed the court has to hear any case that an attorney uploads; rather than verifying information and ensuring the case is valid! This also is abuse of process and lack of DUE PROCESS OF LAW since the court has the power to strike or remove whatever it considers to be unlawful. Similarly situated cases will show that this case was indeed unlawfully handled and should be dismissed immediately.
1. Attorney Pitt claimed that only the attorneys can change information on the case because they uploaded it.
2. Attorney Pitt said he would “fix” defendant Anne Bradley’s appearance of October 24 and Answer with Affidavit of October 25; since she complained someone changed the date to October 30, yet it was uploaded and dated on November 1 by Lisa, the housing clerk who she spoke to regarding that problem. Lisa completely understood the distress of the defendant since the case had not even been uploaded for a business week after the Summons was placed on her door knob and fell further into the common area.
a) Again, this is a Devils Chessboard trick since the Housing Hearing was October 31 and they wanted to make it seem that they uploaded the defendant Anne Bradley’s documents just prior to the Housing Hearing. THIS IS FALSIFICATION OF RECORDS. Lisa would have had to date it November 1. Attorney Pitt changed it to October 30 or had his assistant, an attorney, change it to October 30; and then said on the phone he would change it to the actual dates of the documents to October 24 - Yet he has not!
5. This Motion consists of 20 Pages along with an Appendix of ____ additional pages enumerated as “21” for Appendix Listing, which is signed by the Defendant Pro Se, and page numbers thereafter. Defendant found it necessary to add detail due to the tricks which are obviously taking place, etc. and the length of time between the Notice To Quit and Summons. This was very difficult to prepare due to CYBER CRIME, TRAUMA EXPERIENCED CAUSED BY THE LANDLORD, including hacking despite being off-line for much of the duration of this - it occurs off-line as well as on-line.
6. The following directly responds to the plaintiff’s Motion To Object:
Due to cyber crime on defendant Anne Bradley’s laptop, she is unable to continue the auto format. This laptop is manipulated by Microsoft Windows even when offline.
1) The Objection is non-compliant in format as well as content. It is still a motion - WHICH SHOULD BE TREATED AS A MOTION TO OBJECT, ADDRESSING THE COURT, NOT THE SELF-SERVING WANTS OF THE CREATOR OF THE “OBJECTION”. This objection is at Appendix ___ Pages ___ to ____ due to Defendant’s need to mark identifying areas since there are no numbered paragraphs or even pages.
a. Either a motion is submitted to the court in its entirety the same day or the motion is submitted one day with a notation “Memorandum of Law To Follow”. This has been published as an order from the court due to excessive waste of paper and abuse of process. IT IS NOT ALLOWED.
b. The Objection does not have numbered paragraphs. THIS DISRUPTS THE FLOW IN COMMUNICATION AND IS NOT ALLOWED, PARTICULARLY BY ATTORNEYS.
c. Whether Attorney Hoops is a real attorney remains to be seen. The man who attended defendant’s Housing claim was much too young to be an attorney who entered the BAR in 1987.
a) Somehow he got the housing specialist to request defendant to have a negotiation meeting. The Specialist lied about the court not hearing her Motion to Strike that day, October 31. The Specialist claimed that the judge would only take papers, and this negotiation was her only means to argue the case. Defendant Anne Bradley told her she resented her lying and this tactic was just another Devil’s Chessboard game for this alleged attorney, who appeared to be in his 30’s. This was just a way to shove all the Plaintiff’s criminal activity under the rug and call it a day. Defendant told her she had a right to have a hearing, it was marked for a hearing. She wanted to make sure the case was acknowledged as going forward; and then she may negotiate. The Housing Specialist had no power over docketing a case. Defendant said she would go to the Housing Court office and have a discussion with them. The Housing Specialist said, ”No, you can’t do that. You will miss their calling you.” Defendant said, “Oh, so now you are admitting there is a hearing despite lying to me. This was all done to serve the wants of this attorney, if he even is one, not me. He can’t even write a motion. If I said I had to go to the bathroom, so I could go to the court office, you wouldn’t bother me. You have no right to tell me what to do. You are lying to me.” At that point Defendant walked out and advised the court clerk that she would be going to the Housing Court office and would return after that. Upon going to the Housing Court, Defendant Anne Bradley said the Housing Specialist who requested a meeting said that there was no hearing today and she wanted to verify. The person who may be the Assistant Chief Clerk said he would send an email to them to be sure the case was set for noon. It was already 12:40. Upon returning to the court right after that, the clerk told the defendant that her hearing would take place at 2:30 instead. Most likely it was a request by Peter Hoops, allegedly representing the landlord. Attorney Pitt had previously assured Defendant that the case was marked for noon sharp and would be heard at that time and she could leave after that hearing.
i. Defendant is unable to plan anything due to the deception that goes on in this case which has no merit and her unexpected need to drop what she is doing.
2) The concept of “interpreting” what is clearly English, is not only unprofessional but these twisting of words is not legitamate for attorneys to take part in. Page ___ Line ____ (The defendant had to place page numbers and line numbers due to the obtuse and noncompliant formatting of this person who fails to portray being an attorney in person or on paper. He seems as fraudulent as David Wheeler who claimed he was FBI Agent William Aldenburg at the trial involving Alex Jones, claiming that he was in tears and mourned the loss of the those who were shot to death at Sandy Hook Elementary School when in actuality Agent Aldenburg reported nobody died!) The Motion to Dismiss was issued in plain English. Attorneys are not supposed to be bending people’s words -- and to even document it is ludicrous. The argument/facts of the defendant Anne Bradley were enumerated and the fact this “attorney” is twisting her words expecting himself to be unaccountable is a great shame to the process!
a) Plaintiff’s argument regarding the defendant, Pro Se, not producing the law which states the landlord is required to issue a letter stating how much is owed and why is located in the HOUSING COMPLAINT, as argument on why it is valid. The Notice To Quit is invalid; the court docketed the Housing Complaint which reflects rent is current!
b) Defendant has the impression the court’s abuse of process includes intent to go against the law, as a means to get rid rid of her since the Appeal Process is so corrupted based on her experiences with court. They, too enjoy serving their wants and enjoy a US Supreme Court which does the same, as if it was an order from McDonalds.
c) It is common knowledge and certainly a reflection of Plaintiff’s not having any competency by arguing that the law he knows exists was not specifically cited.
d) This dynamic has absolutely no foundation and is not only a complete waste of time to keep on the books, for all concerned, but is reflective of “Attorney Hoops’” abuse of power over the law, and the court not even doing anything about his illegal appearance - and “Attorney Joseph St. Rock” to fraud yet another document with a different juris number which is not consistent with the appearance he originally filed, which is fraudulent. It is most likely that the appearance was also altered, reuploaded, since his signature no longer exists and he placed a Juris number where it belongs; leaving the pro hac vice Juris Number as his official Juris number for this case on the form.
3) The very fact that the appearance is illegal and the court fails to address the illegality yet claims the moot return date to have an impact on the proceedings is simply ridiculous! THE APPEARANCE IS ILLEGAL ON THE APPEARANCE FORM.
a) Defendant has proven her search on the name Hoops and the juris number for out-of-state/pro hac vice, which is what they fraudulently used on its appearance. The Chesson Law Firm did the same, using pro hac vice in its appearance.
b) The fact that the records were altered on behalf of this attorney who behaves in a fraudulent manner is criminal on its face, making this case all the more reason to dismiss despite LACK OF MERIT as the first and foremost reason.
c) As defendant Anne Bradley said in court where this man who claimed to be Attorney Hoops who entered the BAR in 1987, when he’s obviously in his 30’s - on October 31 - these are tricks are similar to what non-attorney and fake parent of the Sandy Hook Shooting case, David Wheeler, has done several times, as relayed on Page 8 of this motion. Attorney Hoops does not even taken the law seriously and shows disrespect to the court and its processes. He cannot argue the Notice to Quit due to the very reason of LACK OF MERIT.
d) The rent was paid for both August and September. Even overpaid for years, according the Section 8 Laws, Appendix Page ____, if the tenant has a federal poverty level income, the rent is based solely on income and should be 10% of the declared rent which has been accepted by the fair rent commission, et al. As already shown in the Housing Complaint, this has been brought up in detail, documented to the Public Housing Authority, yet they do nothing but send back-dated letters as a means to abuse power.
e) Nothing has been submitted by any of the defendants to answer the Housing Complaint and yet the Chief Clerk conspires with them and fails to default them which is an automatic right.
f) As already emphasized, the lease which was produced by the landlord just recently in the past two weeks for the Defendant upon request, comprised of approximately 43 pages and the rent amount indicated was $171.00. Nothing more. On-site charges are not the responsibility of the Section 8 tenant, as stated by the law. Appendix, Page ___ to Page ____ The Plaintiff’s attorney seems to have a depraved confidence that whatever he says will be fixed by cyber crime and/or illegal intruders.
i. In fact, the apartment complex has had false fire alarms just in the past two days, which the defendant Anne Bradley did not leave her apartment for. This landlord has had MANY false alarms during the past 11 years, which are abusive and no longer trusted. Defendant had to go down 7 flights of stairs 3 times a week on an average for months - ON CRUTCHES - due to the abusive false alarms.
4) Oddly, this alleged attorney only quoted “too much” as reason to argue what defendant had relayed as a modus operandi,since 30 days was stated in the CARES ACT, WRITTEN BY THE SECRETARY OF TREASURY, NOT HUD, which is for all intense purposes relating to this case, discontinued.
a) Plaintiff’s Attorney Hoops” claimed defendant stated in its Motion to Dismiss aforesaid case:
i. Defendant gave “too much” time on the Notice To Quit
b) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss did not have “too much” as a phrase in the motion; nor did Plaintiff provide copy thereof in where it was to validate. Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss emphasized there was haphazzard corelation to what the Plaintiff cited as the CARES ACT, failing to even indicate any portion of it to validate which is a routine expectation for motions. He stated at the Housing Complaint hearing as well in his objection on aforesaid case, “The court knows this” This man who claims he is Attorney Hoops who entered the BAR in 1987, yet is obviously about 30 years old, said this a few times as argument in the Housing Complaint Case! Defendant objected His argument on the Housing Complaint case which was centered around his claim to be a valid NOTICE TO QUIT, which for all intense purposes is preposterous. He justified nothing except the fact it was typed by someone and someone placed it in her door.
c) Plaintiff’s representation, who calls himself Attorney Hoops, may perceive whatever he says will be altered for him by cyber crime, or an illegal intruder during a false fire alarm. There is no mention of “too much” let alone any of the other nonsense his “objection” indicates! This truly is a slap in the face of justice!
5) 1 (a) (1) page 2/Paragraph 1 entered by the Defendant in its entirety:
Insufficiency of Process; and Insufficiency of Service Process. The Notice To Quit was insufficiently served. It is unknown if the marshal even served it or when the marshal was actually paid. The marshal very likely lives at the same apartment complex. It was dated the 12th. The marshal may have approached Defendant’s door on the 18th since that was when an unknown object was wedged in her door. The only way the unknown would have been accessible is by possibly opening her door yet she feared it may have been a bomb. She stated that on internet along with posting a picture - if anything happened to her, there would be a record of this circumstance. Two days after it was wedged in her door, Defendant left her apartment to run some errands. She noticed they dated October 18 as the date for her to move out yet it was dated September 12, which made no sense.
i. Insufficiency of Process. People who do not pay rent are given just a few days to move out. Landlords do not give a 30-day “grace period” if rent had not been paid for two months and they have demanded the rent as part of the preliminary requirements to serving a Notice To Quit.
1. There was no letter of demand served the Defendant prior to the Notice To Quit, in accordance with the law. This so-called attorney who claims to specialize in LANDLORD-TENANT LAW, would know that as a basic requirement, particularly for nonpayments of rent.
2. The Housing Authority of the city is required to stop payments after three months of nonpayment of a Section 8 tenant. If this was a valid Notice to Quit, they would have dated the move-out sooner to continue an income for this apartment and also rent it to someone else before the three months were up.
3. There was no demand for payment signed by anyone at 360 Street.
a) There was no signed demand for payment submitted prior to the Notice To Quit, as required by Law.
b) There is a timeframe that should be issued to the tenant if no rent is paid; and October 12, just 2 days past the rent is due is not legitamate.
c) Defendant, Pro Se, says this whole case is botched together is a quick manner upon realizing that she got sick, and most likely they have attempted this and failed many times yet were successful on several incidences; to include twice she had to be on CIPRO for ten days.
4. Plaintiff claimed “paragraphs 4 and the CARES ACT paragraph on page 4” which has no logic as a response/argument yet the defendant stated this on Page 4, which by the way also has nothing to do with insufficiency of process by a marshal. Yet it has to do with the insufficiency of the Plaintiff preparing the Notice To Quit and thereof the Summons, which claimed the CARES ACT as reason with nothing quoted or cited. That aspect would be LACK OF MERIT OF THE CASE and would go along with the fact that rent was paid for August and September; proven by the defendant in her housing case, which was accepted due to the very fact that rent was paid! Why is this even a matter which the court is allowing to be heard? There is no merit to the case. Another copy of the cancelled checks is provided, with notations by the branch manager of her bank indicating in the upper right corners when they were cashed or deposited - into a bank account which most likely was fraudulent; nevertheless, that would take another case and a federal agent to prosecute.
5. Moratorium on Rental Evictions by CDC, which means the CDC would not allow rental evictions with the excuse of containing the alleged WUHAN VIRUS-> CORONAVIRUS->COVID VIRUS, whatever. They kept changing the name which showed lack of actual scientific validation. Nevertheless, the US Supreme Court ruled eviction bans were no longer allowed as of August 26, 2021. The CARES Act has no relevance to this case since it was written by the Secretary of Treasury, not HUD. There was not even any articulated argument by the Plaintiff in the Housing Complaint hearing regarding this in the associated Housing Complaint. He only said “The court knows this” and The Notice To Quit and Summons were typed and served; therefore legitamate. This only further proves how invalid the Notice To Quit was, and additionally, how greatly lacking in professionalism Plaintiff has in preparing its Motion To Object.
6. Even on Page ____ Line ___, Appendix ___, this alleged attorney states “as the court is well aware” which is not only inferring a conspiracy with the court yet complete disregard for responding legitamately to the defendant’s Motion To Dismiss - referring to it as absurd would be an understatement. It is disrespect to the court for an attorney make such a statement. Should he argue the point, he should produce documentation in which the court stated that attorneys are all required to produce affidavits on an act that was discontinued in 2022! From talking to an individual outside of court, defendant has learned that ATTORNEYS GET GOVERNMENT MONEY by referring to the CARES ACT. It was discontinued in 202! Not even an affidavit on this case has been produced to that affect. Attorneys as a rule, do not produce any affidavits anyway! It is not acceptable to the court.
a) Thereafter, a form with no valid law, was submitted, Appendix ______. It is unknown how often this form is used in court. It is not a published form.
6) On Page ___ Lines ____ this plaintiff states that defendant “admits the Notice To Quit was served at her door” . Defendant stated firmly that she did not know who placed the paper wedged in her door like a bomb; and she did not know what it was for two days until she opened her door. This was a futile attempt in twisting words.
7) On Page ____ Lines ________ Plaintiff states:
a) Undersigned counsel’s office sent the Notice to Quit to Marshal Sandillo’s office on September 12. It is much more likely that the marshal served it on the following day and the defendant simply misremembered the day she discovered it, or did not discover it for several days.
i. This statement has no logic or point. It fails to respond to the actual facts which defendant set forth. This is a very small apartment. Plaintiff goes to her door often to retrieve kitchen items as well as clean and use for space since her apartment is not fully organized after the last round of dumping which was done by illegal intruders - placing nonessential items in her apartment which were in her storage unit at Storquest. They obviously stole anything of value, as Public Storage did with the help of Judge John Abrams, interfering with the lawsuit which the Plaintiff submitted, to include the marshal’s promising to serve Public Storage yet doing a complete reversal and holding onto the original documents for several weeks to cause dismissal of the case. Public Storage owed Defendant $450 from a prior case; and lied about not getting her money order which she submitted every month due to problems with making phone payments. She had a copy of it and since it was prepaid, they would have to wait for a replacement. This was all such a corrupted and evil violation on her, which was further enjoyed by corruption by the court.
b) The plaintiff admits the date of the Notice to be the 12th of October; the Marshal served it the following day instead of the day it was dated. These are tricks. They did this with the Summons also.
i. Aside from the fact that the marshal did not crumple it up and wedge it in her door until September 18; and aside from the fact there was not any statement as to why the paper was not slid through the obvious separation which exists in her door, the plaintiff admits the marshal broke the law by serving it on the wrong day it was dated.
8) This motion comprises of 20 pages and has been certified as served to the plaintiff with an illegal Juris Number in its appearance on this case on this day, November 8, 2024. Cyber Crime disrupted the formatting. Preferably, this should be PARAGRAPH 8 and the paragraph below should be PARAGRAPH 9 yet the formatting was disrupted and will not extend back out to the left margin.
9) The extra pages were necessary in order to relay to the court specific manipulations made by the Plaintiff, who has an illegal appearance yet the court failed to remove the case or even act on the fraudulent appearance - and a week after it was uploaded, which was two weeks after the Summons was served, the court picks the RETURN DATE to correct, which was moot, yet the fraudulent appearance was no problem, which makes no sense.
1. It is fraudulent for a marshal to serve a Notice To Quit on a different day it is dated.
2. NonPayment of Rent had no merit. Rent was paid. Appendix ___ shows the checks once again, since they have been already presented to the court and no dismissal on this case has taken place, although it was requested in the Housing Complaint.
a) Livable City Initiative failed to appear on the Housing Complaint and are party to the case. The court should have served them a DEFAULT yet did not.
b) The Plaintiff entered BEACHWOOD instead of BEACHWOLD as a client of theirs. It is the Defendant’s belief this fraud goes deep, altering records goes deep.
3. Plaintiff admits they used the Juris number for pro hac vice, which is out of state - and rather argue an error (on such an everyday task, which would be a hard-sell yet it was not even attempted) he defends using a pro hac vice appearance with a ‘we’re good guys’ - type of reasoning. Pro Hac Vice means they are out of state; they are frauding records! Additionally, as already stated, the Plaintiff has already shown to be a fraud on many counts based on his nefarious behavior including statements to the court. At the hearing on October 31, the young man who claimed he was “Attorney Hoops” said he wrote the Motion To Dismiss on that case and claimed it was his motion he was arguing. Rather, than motion was signed by an alleged attorney “Joseph St. Rock" using a fraudulent Juris number, Pro Hac Vice. The appearance that was orginally uploaded was most likely signed, yet Defendant could only rely on her phone for this information. At some point thereafter, the appearance was changed, or possibly orignially fraudulently uploaded since the attorney is required to sign its appearance. That is basic knowledge an attorney would have! Most likely he is not a real attorney either and why he failed to appear to argue on his own motion.
LAW
1. “In Connecticut, a “strike” refers to a legal motion called a “Motion To Strike:, which allows a party to request the court to remove any “irrelevant, false, or improper matter asserted in any pleading.” from the case, essentially meaning that the court can eliminate parts of a complaint or other legal document that are deemed legally insufficient or not relevant to the casae at hand.
Key points about a Connecticut Motion To Strike:
Purpose:
To challenge the legal sufficiency of allegations within a pleading. Including whether the claims stated are legally valid or if the requested relief is appropriate.
What can be struck:
Any part of a pleading that contains irrelevant, false, or improper information
When to file:
This motion is typically filed before trial, giving the opposing party a chance to address any issues with their pleading.” - quoted from the Connecticut Judicial Branch Law Library
Additional Laws are Provided in Appendix
Summary
This Motion To Strike on the plaintiff’s Objection has three issues:
1) There is no merit to the case; rent was paid for August and September! They cannot argue anything else on this case!
2) Formats of Motions by attorneys cannot be off-the-hip. There was not even any section on Law, nor was any law or caselaw provided for the pro se defendant to read. This alleged “Law Firm” which calls itself “Hoops & Associates” submitted an equally-deficient Motion To Dismiss on the Housing Complaint, which Anne Bradley, Plaintiff on that case, entered a Motion To Strike on. For an attorney, that is clearly disrespect to the court on several counts. The additional deliberate abuses of the law and Devil’s Chessboard tactics only make this Eviction case more reason to throw out.
3) This catch-me-if-you can breaking laws, depriving the defendant of access to internet, causing even her phone to be extremely difficult to read - all through cyber crime - and more is all about CORRUPTION AND MALICIOUS AND VEXATIOUS INTENT - not administering the law. Not even administering any logic. Defendant has been greatly abused for the duration of time she has been at 360 State Street in the same small 150 square feet or smaller apartment - though other Section 8 residents who are single have larger apartments and most likely pay the same or less. She has shown in her complaint on the affiliated case that she has tried to get her rights in every way and was cheated or ignored. Defendant pays her rent timely every month and will not pay any more; will not allow them to cheat her; and reminds this court their constant illegal entries and even breaking into her apartment while she is in it - have never been litigated. This is not run by professional people. When they claim that Ansonia State Street took over this building, November 2022, Appendix ____, no one even sent defendant any notice regarding any balance due BECAUSE IT WAS FRAUDULENT AND A COURT ORDER MADE THEM REMOVE THE FRAULENT CHARGES approximately two months after this alleged owner took over this buidling. They turn around and add the same fraudulent charges all over again as well as lie about bounced checks as TD Bank repeatedly mailed them fraudulent checks for a year or more. Despite the office fully knowing the checks were on a non-existent account, they charged the defendant in excess of $30 each for overdrafts and made up more charges The ledger has been nothing but fraudulent billing on a Section 8 tenant who is only obligated to pay the Section 8 Rent-To-Owner. On-site charges are to be submitted to the administrator.
4) In fact, as a Title 19 poverty level income with QMB and Medicare is proof she has a Federal Poverty Level Income.
a) She does NOT have MEDICAID AND NEVER WILL. The State of Connecticut is very corrupted. There is obscunding of Federal Funds, allowing Medicaid to attach to QMB recipients. The State of Connecticut has no right to her medical records and this whole political agenda is nothing but criminal. Medical Facilities are already refusing to continue to participate in 3d party commerial insurance billings referred to as “Medicare Advantage” such as Aetna and Blue Cross and Blue Shield; which means the insurane companies are fed government money and the indigent insured are left “high and dry”. It is criminal on so many levels. Nevertheless QMB cannot be discontinued and that is what she has. Never will she be willing to see a doctor in Connecticut. She has been almost killed by them and knew people who were; even a public friend who just went in the hospital to get a bunion removed. These elite doctors “play God” and target anyone the elite politicians want to be killed or further harmed.
No oral argument should be necessary.
Appendix Included
Prepared and Submitted,
_________________________
Anne M. Bradley, Pro Se
PO Box 206514
New Haven, CT 06520
Ph 203-508-0858
RULING
The foregoing motion, having been heard, is GRANTED/DENIED
___________________
THE COURT
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO OBJECT
DOCKET NO. NHH-CV24-6024196-S
November 18, 2024
Plaintiff certifies that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following REPRESENTING Plaintiff WITH ILLEGAL APPEARANCE as Pro Hac Vice:
HOOPS & ASSOCIATES FAX: 860-445-8919
_____________________________
Anne M. Bradley, Pro Se
DOCKET NO. NHH-CV24-6024196-S : SUPERIOR COURT OF CT
ANSONIA STATE STREET, LLC : J.D. OF NEW HAVEN
V : HOUSING SESSION
ANNE M. BRADLEY : November 14, 2024
APPENDIX
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO OBJECT TO MOTION TO DISMIS
---- APPENDIX WAS CUT OFF BY A HACKER....i haven't been back here in a while. Still defending myself and up against a hell-bent court that doesn't care about the law! 12/19/2024 1:18 am
LAW REGARDING LANDLORD HAS TO PROVIDE 30 DAY NOTICE, ALLOW SECTION 8 TENANT TO RESPOND, ETC.
Yes, a landlord must give a Section 8 tenant notice before evicting them:
· Notice period: The notice period for a Section 8 tenant is typically 30 days.
· Notice content: The notice must include the date of termination, the reason for termination, and the amount of rent due if the termination is due to nonpayment. It should also include information about the tenant's right to request a grievance hearing and review PHA documents.
· Other steps: The landlord must also notify the local housing authority before evicting a Section 8 tenant. The landlord must then discuss the eviction with the tenant and file a petition for eviction.
The eviction process for a Section 8 tenant is similar to a normal eviction process, but there are some differences. The tenant may be able to challenge the eviction and remain in their home.
Ending
·
Ending the Lease and Evictions in Section 8 and Public Housing
Tenant-based Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, the Project-Based Section 8 program, and Public Housing are the largest and primary rental housing assistance programs for low-income families, this article focuses on the ending the lease in Section 8 and public housing, including evictions and lockouts.
Topics on this page
Public Housing
Termination by public housing agency (PHA) - A PHA may not terminate your tenancy (right to live there as a tenant) except for:
· serious or repeated violations of "material" (important) lease terms;
· being over the income limit of the program;
· other “good cause.”
Note that there are some exceptions. Your lease agreement must lay out the procedures to be followed by the PHA and by the tenant to terminate the tenancy.
NOTE: Your local PHA may have additional protections and restrictions than what is included in this article. Review your lease agreement carefully, and contact your local PHA for more information.
Serious or repeated violations of “material” terms of the lease can include:
· failure to pay rent or some other financial obligation; or
· failure to fulfill a tenant's obligation such as:
o not to sublet the unit (rent it to someone else)
o not to keep boarders or lodgers
o to use the unit only as a private dwelling
o to abide by all housing authority rules and regulations
o to maintain the unit in a clean and safe condition
o to not destroy or vandalize the unit
o to pay for unit damage caused by the tenant, a member of the household, or its guests (other than normal wear and tear)
o not to disturb the peaceful enjoyment of other residents
o not to engage in criminal activity or alcohol abuse
Other "good cause" includes:
· criminal activity, drug abuse, or alcohol abuse;
· after you are admitted, the housing authority discovers that the tenant is ineligible;
· you make false statements or commit fraud in your application for housing or recertification;
· failure of a family member to comply with the program’s community service or self-sufficiency work activity requirement; or
· failure to accept a modification of a lease.
Termination by Tenant - Generally, if the tenant wishes to terminate the tenancy, they can do so for any reason but must provide the required notice. Review your lease agreement carefully for information about the required notice and other procedures.
Notice of Termination – Landlords must provide tenants with written notice of any termination of the lease. The notice period may vary depending on the reason for termination.
· 14 days for failure to pay rent;
· a reasonable period of time considering the seriousness of the situation (but not to exceed 30 days) if the health or safety of other residents, PHA employees, or persons residing in the immediate vicinity of the premises is threatened; if any member of the household has engaged in any drug-related criminal activity or violent criminal activity; or if any member of the household has been convicted of a felony;
· 30 days in any other case, except if Maryland or local laws allows a shorter notice period, then the shorter notice period will apply.
The landlord’s written notice must include:
· the date of termination;
· the reason for the termination, with enough detail so that the tenant may prepare a defense;
· if termination is due to failure to pay rent, the dollar amount of the balance due and the date the computation was made;
· information about tenant’s right to review PHA documents; and
· Information about tenant’s right to request a grievance hearing (unless an exception applies).
The notice must be sent to tenant by first class mail, properly stamped and addressed to tenant at tenant’s address at the project, and with proper return address OR delivered in person to any adult member of the tenant’s household.
Pre-Eviction Grievance Process – In most situations, tenants are entitled to a pre-eviction grievance process, which includes an informal conference (and summary of that conference) as well as a grievance hearing (if the tenant makes the request in a timely manner). Be aware, however, that there are exceptions to a tenant’s right to the pre-eviction grievance process if the eviction is related to certain criminal activities. In addition, there may be an expedited procedure that may apply. The PHA must provide a copy to the grievance procedure to each tenant. Read this carefully.
Eviction - If a tenant remains past the termination date, the landlord must go to court before the tenant can be evicted. The landlord cannot change the locks, cut off the water or electricity, or move tenant’s belongings without going to court. If you fail to object to a termination notice, it does not mean you waive your right to contest the termination in court.
If you receive a court summons or eviction letter, contact an attorney as soon as possible. If your landlord agrees to let you stay but wants you to sign a written agreement, contact an attorney before signing it. Learn more about getting help from a legal professional in Maryland.
Read the law: U.S. Code, Title 42 §1437d
Read the regulations: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 24, Part 966
Section 8 Housing
Termination of Tenancy – The landlord may not terminate the tenancy except for:
· serious or repeated violation of the terms and conditions of the lease (e.g., failure to pay rent);
· violation of federal, state, or local laws; or
· other “good cause.”
Other "good cause" can include a family history of disturbance of neighbors, destruction of property, or of living or housekeeping habits that damage the unit or premises.
After the initial lease term, other “good cause” can include:
· failure to accept the offer of a new lease or revision;
· landlord's desire to use the unit for personal or family use; or
· business or economic reason (e.g., sale of the property, unit renovation, leasing at a higher rental).
NOTE: Terminating the tenancy is not the same thing as terminating the Section 8 Housing Choice Program voucher. Learn more about terminating the voucher.
Termination by Tenant - Generally, if the tenant wishes to terminate the tenancy, they can do so for any reason but must provide the required notice and comply with any lease procedures. Review your lease agreement carefully for information about the required notice and other procedures.
Notice – Landlords must comply with the lease terms and state laws. In addition, both the landlord and tenant must also provide the PHA with a copy of the notice. Review your lease agreement carefully, and contact your local PHA for more information. Learn more.
Eviction – The landlord can only evict you after going through the court process. The landlord’s eviction notice is not the eviction order. It is the court that orders the eviction. The landlord cannot change the locks, cut off the water or electricity, or move tenant’s belongings without going to court. If you fail to object to a termination notice, it does not mean you waive your right to contest the termination in court.
Project-based Section 8 Housing – For Project-based Section 8 Housing, the procedures related to ending the lease, including required notice, can vary depending on the specific type of project. Review your lease agreement carefully, and contact your local PHA for more information.
Read the law: U.S. Code, Title 42 §1437f
Read the Law: U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 24, Part 247; Part 982; Part 983
State and Local Laws
In addition to the provisions provided by federal laws and the policies of local PHAs, landlord must also follow state and local laws related to eviction, except where the state or local law has been preempted by federal law. Learn more about evictions and ending the lease in Maryland.
Exceptions
There may be situations where a landlord can terminate a tenancy for reasons other what is listed in this article. For example, the information above may not apply where a tenant’s occupancy is terminated because HUD, or the landlord with HUD's consent, has decided to substantially rehabilitate or demolish the project, or sell the project to a purchaser for substantial rehabilitation or demolition.
In addition, sometimes a landlord is allowed to stop providing a specific kind of subsidized housing. If your landlord wants to do this, the landlord must send you a letter telling you about it. There are things you can do to fight your landlord’s decision to end this type of subsidized housing, to stay where you are, or to make sure that you can find other affordable housing. Even if the landlord changes the type of subsidized housing, you may have other options. For example, when owners do not renew their project-based Section 8, tenants provided with Section 8 tenant protection vouchers.
Read the Law: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 24, Part 247
Last Updated: Fri, 01/20/2023 - 1:32 pm
https://www.peoples-law.org/ending-lease-and-evictions-section-8-and-public-housing
good night - I still have a lot to do. It is 1:22 am and I am up against a lot of DEVIL'S CHESSBOARD tricks by housing - landlord - housing authority. For those going through similar circumstances or may know someone who is, remember: do not let them exploit you! They exploit themselves!
UPDATE
MY RECREATED MEMO TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY SINCE A HACKER DELETEE IT OFF MY LAPTOP:
Memorandum To Elm City Communities
December 19, 2024
From: Anne Bradley, PO Box 206514, New Haven, CT 06520. ph: 203-508-0858
Tara,
Where is the Nov 7 letter from Hoops & Associates which I asked for?
Today's Date: 12/18/2024
I left you a voicemail while still in your office this evening, regarding the unexpected notice of your stopping my HUD contract - assuming that the letter which Hoops Associates was also in it.
Not only did you shock me with this backdated letter to October 30, 2024 indicating that you were ending my HUD contract for December but you also falsely claimed I received a Recertification packet, WHICH I DID NOT.
The letter is not even sent to my mailing address and of all circumstances you fully knew my mailing address for years - to include the attempted eviction on me in 2019 - which this year is a Modus Operandi using nonpayment of rent as the reason when I paid the rent!
As I had said in court, these are Devil's Chessboard tactics and are destructive to the very purpose of the NONPROFIT program which your office is supposed to be implementing.
I was greatly harmed one year when I completed the 65 page packed on time even though I had only 3 days - someone caused my tendon to tear behind my knee as I was walking to the post office to mail it! That was an avulsion which would have destroyed my leg had the tear been complete.
I still mailed the packet, fully knowing this severe injury would not stop your office from getting me evicted.
This demented attitude must stop. You have disrupted any chances of having a stable life here and I keep requesting you stop this type of behavior and attitude.
Yesterday I spoke to you and you did not say anything about this "order" that you are stoppig my HAP contract because I did not complete the alleged Certification packet which you did not even send to my mailing address.
Additionally, you did not give me the November 7 letter, which leads me to believe this little scheme involves a request to get rid of me by Hoops & Associates.
I know they hack my laptop and see what I prepare before I submit it. And this is another validation of that.
Your office failed to send me any emails and in fact when I search, the last email I got was regarding recertification.
NOTICE MY ADDRESS.
SO WHY DID YOU USE MY RESIDENCY ADDRESS WHEN I HAVE MADE IT VERY CLEAR I STOPPED GETTING MAIL HERE YEARS AGO DUE TO MANAGEMENT OR SOMEONE ASSOCIATED WITH MANAGEMENT WAS TAMPERING WITH MY EMAIL.
My door lock was never replaced before I moved in and your office failed to inspect it yet made me wait almost 30 days for nothing, as I gave my prior landlord a 30 day notice.
This is very abusive to me and that has been the dynamic since I moved here.
I cannot write anymore due to my laptop being hacked while I use wifi in the lobby. Another very abusive dynamic - all because I reported the maintenance manager relieving himself in my trash can in my bathroom while he was waiting for his fake trainee to get him something when he said "my tip is broken" I was working on documents in that very small apartment. It was only when he left that I realized what he did - all reported before.
I have to stop due to this hacking. Regarding the Recertification which you falsely claim I did not complete - yet inserted a recertification form in the envelope - approximately 50-60 pages. They have been running 65 pages - including requiring me to give you another copy of personal documents you already have. What is your office doing with this data?
I have not read this one yet, but rest assured I consider it more abuse to have to have another sleepless night after having many due to this illegal eviction proceeding.
Time is 7:19pm
Anne Bradley
As a continuance of the above email message, I emphasize that there was nothing your office would do to diffuse this corrupted situation, such as tell the landlord the eviction is already illegal since I paid my rent and there was no 30-day notice. That is just for starters.
Enclosed is my motion to continue to pay rent into court. I am sorry I did not have time to draw pictures!
Maybe with a little luck I will have a heart attack or stroke from all this, and you will get your final hurrahs!
Read all of it! I am tired of being treated like crap by your office and that especially includes the Director/President/Principal and whatever else she attaches to her name, running businesses for profit out of the same office. I am motioning for Discovery also, since the judge failed to even rule on it in my Housing Complaint. She also got her jollies by ruling on my Motion To Reargue when I noted that Memorandum of Law would be submitted forthwith. I know enough about the goings-on in courts that there is no consistency. Attorneys have submitted motions and their memorandums do not get submitted for a month. Having the decency to just call me to see if there was a problem HAND DELIVERING THE MOTION to court, since I do not have the ease of electronic delivery, is just a silly little idiosychrosy, no hard feelings. After all, they still get paid and have to serve the corrupted beast that runs this state.
I had this memo all prepared but a hacker damaged my laptop so badly I had to restore it to another date and because of all the damage, it took an hour. No big deal. I will just be staying up all night to complete this voluminous updated lease and so what. Like I said, with a little luck I will be dead before long anyway due to all this abuse I get and your office taking part in the illegal entries obviously since you do nothing about it. It has only been 12 years.
Attachment as stated
_______________________________
Anne M. Bradley, Pro Se
Both of the judges on this eviction case are frauds:
Spader worked for a firm that use an out of state appearance!
| Registered Juris Information For: |
|
|
.png)
Comments