Illegal Eviction Transcripts
LINK TO THIS BLOGPOST: http://www.publiusroots.org/2024/12/illegal-eviction-transcripts.html
Notes regarding this Transcript
HOUSING COMPLAINT HEARING 31 OCT 2024
Note, the cover sheet was pushed down to the end by CYBER CRIME...FYI
The person who was “presiding” was NOT Judge Alayna Stone! Yet she and the court identified her as that! She was a woman in her 60’s, I would say! Looked nothing like her.
So that is fraud No. 1 for the hearing!
The hearing was marked for noon! I got there and confirmed everything. I waited about 10 min and was approached to go see the Housing Mediator. I said, “Why? This is a hearing on the merits of the case. I want to find out the ruling on it before I consider resorting to this. I paid my rent!”
I was told I HAD to attend it. What BS! The young man who said he was Peter Hoops did such a botched job in describing circumstances and was such a liar! The mediator lied about no hearing, it was marked off and I had to agree there and now. I said I did not believe her; I wanted to validate with the Housing Office. She said I could not leave, like I was being kidnapped. I said, “If I said I had to go to the bathroom, I would have been able to!” This took up about 40 min of bullshit! I kept saying the same damn thing, “I paid my rent! This case has no merit!” I realized she could not make me stay there and I was missing my hearing! I got out and they said they changed the time for the hearing, to be 2:30 pm.
I validated it with the Housing Office and said WTF!
I knew they had something up their sleeves! I went to FedEx to pick up a box or something else, maybe even mail something. I then went to Brueggers Bagels and used my laptop and ate a lunch.
Upon return, the punk who identified himself as Peter Hoops was there motioning me to come up. I said, “I am waiting to be called by the court! You have no authority!” The punk was playing house AND this is what they are doing in most hearings, I presume! Messing with people’s heads, not adhering to the law - and having paid actors represent judges - and who the hell knows if this Alayna Stone is even a judge? Her Juris Number has no information!
I found out after the hearing that the woman was NOT Alayna Stone and the punk who said he was Peter Hoops could not have even been born yet when he entered the BAR in 1987!
I looked for my phone note I made when I asked the clerk who the judge was at noon when I got there. It was gone! I could not look it up when I was at Brueggers, to know what to expect.
I think her Juris Number is 445561; just remembering from referencing it so often, so I may be incorrect.
Hoops FAX number is 860-445-8919 - notice the “445” similarity? Probably is a code for something if I recalled her number correctly. I can’t verify because I am in my apartment and do not have wifi - plus both of my phones had major cyber attacks today - most likely because I entered my MOTION TO PAY FAIR USE AND VALUE into court and indicated I would be motioning to remove the JA’s asses as well as the FRAUD-Judge!
I am not an attorney! I am just a greatly harmed tenant who the corrupted plutocracy want me out so they can blow up this damn building I presume, because that is what everything pointed to! And they illegally enter, steal, vandalize on a continuous basis!
For 11 freaking years! Since Jan 2013!
Page 1
The unrelated matter was my claiming he had no right to call me up to the hearing! I was waiting for the court staff to!
The Hoops impersonator was NOT ATTY ST. ROCK! He also went to the hearing alone!
So they altered the recording using malware. The problem is they have this criminal activity down so pat, that it most likely will not be detected now - as it was when I copied a recording on CD roms and sent the CD roms to others I kept in contact with. The malware was detected by antivirus software at the copy center and boom! They were caught! Each CD had variations because it unpeeled what they deleted and inserted!
The owner of that copy center had an untimely death! That family is a very nice family and enjoyed serving the public! I used to attend an Italian Church and later attended another Italian Catholic Church. I thought they were very family-oriented and had enjoyed learning some customs from them. There was a major drawback when a woman and her daughter, who made me their “project” as “church friends” and lied about themselves - resenting me for enrolling at the University of New Haven and the mother, whose real name was Lucy Wendland, actually conspired with the a security officer to get me arrested even though I never went to the office she worked in; which turned out to be the university President’s office! They claimed HE was the victim yet had no letter of complaint for court, which is required unless the victim is incompetent! I argued everything and they dragged me through the coals - using Richard Blumenthal to fuel it as RETALIATION since the prosecutor Mark Hurley was arrested on 180 charges of embezzlement for just a three-year audit the state police did! He stole money from the court as well as the Prosecutor’s union! They made up crap about him having a gambling problem, which he did not! Obviously he had been embezzling for years! Using a chemical to remove signatures and depositing the checks in his secret accounts! And the Judge would not allow more auditing! They all got paid off, that is why! I motioned to dismiss so many times! Over a year passed and I motioned to dismiss due to Statute of Limitations on misdemeanor charges. It was denied! They deliberately break the law on a continuous basis! They had Richard Blumenthal’s help - what a crook he turned out to be, when I sent him a letter claiming what they were doing was criminal! He joined THEIR party!
I was the one who identified their malware picking it up because I listened to the CD Roms! I was typing the recording; resumed using a different CD Rom and realized they changed it! So I listened to more! Very time-consuming! I realized his antivirus programs were unpeeling what was inserted!
=============================
Resuming the transcript now….
“DEFENDANTS filed lack of subject matter jurisdiction”
Only one defendant was there! Yet thereafter Hoops altered the appearance on record, uploading a replacement, so he must have had help from Atty Pitt, the Chief Clerk! I didn’t bring it up in court because I wanted them DEFAULTED. That is all they earned! It means the case would be in my favor because of it!
I entered the case as Anne Bradley vs Bozzutto, et al --- Attorney Pitt changed it! My fee waiver still had Anne Bradley vs Bozzutto, et al - they love to fraud records and it helps them later to wash the corruption away!
Page 2
Notice the dashes - speaking of striken! The court removed that! The court also claimed only complaints can be striken - as the main part of its order - so why the hell did they mark a hearing for it? They should have allowed me time to revise it to an Objection to the Motion To Dismiss. Did the dah-Plaintiff even file an Objection to the Motion To Strike? See for yourself in the Case Information!
What was typed was what I said - but the court did strike parts!
More dashes!
Page 3
More dashes but what I said was typed with missing parts
Notice on Line 24, the Hoops impersonator said “Regarding the formatting” - that was because I elaborated on the motion being noncompliant, which is why I motioned to Strike rather than Dismiss! The writer, WHICH WAS NOT HIM - did not even paginate or enumerate the paragraphing as they are supposed to - to allow for proper communication in the courts when referencing! There was so much more! A 12-year old would have done a better job because they are more apt to adhere to the regulations!
He says, “I think I complied” as argument. WTF - not what a real attorney would have said! A drug addict using psychotropes would!
Page 4
He did not provide any copy of the letter alluded to! Additionally, when I requested a copy of the lease from Kyle Huckle, my rent amount was still $171.00!
I objected and began stating he supported nothing for the Notice To Quit - no letter, no ledger, no nothing! I was actually getting copies of the ledger every month. In August, Kyle was refusing to give me a ledger! Thus began their nefarious plan to evict me; yet it should backfire in a very large manner, including OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE by the court!
When I objected the paid actor-judge told me not to object; this was not the place to - WTF!!! He did not state any balance due in court - he was a complete bafoon! Had he, I would have demanded the documents, the ledger he referred to! He did not say, “I have all the documentation today” - had he, I would have been all over him demanding copies!
Page 5
Line 8 “should I go into the Motion To Dismiss at this point?”
I gave a thorough emphasis on why his motion should be striken!
The court struck it all! I documented it! Will the court also fraud those records?
He did not say this that way. He argued the Notice To Quit was properly typed and served, that is all! He was a sheer idiot in all respects and even said “I am sure her housing needs should be dealt with but not through this court” What the hell?
It was like they were punishing me for not being a hooker!
Lines 19 to 21: “the plaintiff has to attest under oath that the plaintiff has not been served”…..Sheer stupidity! They screwed up while frauding the recording!
Line 21-24…”The judicial form itself does not even use he term “valid” ….they dug the rabbit hole even deeper!
Line 25-27 He goes on to say “Ms Bradley have a false answer on that”….on WHAT? They struck it! And they struck dialogue even in his sentencing!
At the hearing, the Hoops Impersonator only kept saying the NTQ was properly typed and served, and regarding the crumpling in my door, he made no comment! He just kept saying it was properly served and I was mistaken. Nothing to validate the payment, the order, the printout of the marshal - nothing!
I would have to subpoena that info and the point is, THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON THEM REGARDING THE NOTICE TO QUIT.
Why do they even call it Quit? To confuse it with AQUIT?
Page 6
Lines 10-17: ACTIVELY? He did not even file the case after the Summons was issued! Just look up cases under Hoops Associates! They do not wait a freaking week before uploading what they served! Nonpayment of Rents give a 3-day notice to the tenant!
I mentioned all this in court! I mentioned the fact that the alleged sale of this building took place November 2022; and my alleged balance was almost $14,000! And when the court ordered them to remove the fraudulent charges, the maintenance manager decided to take a dump in my trash can as a demented, psychotic retaliation!
Lines 25-27 : they removed my dialogue to allude to their WANTS, as they did several times on this recording!
Page 7
Yes, I did emphasize that the Hoops impersonator said the NTQ was dated the 12th …he responded with a ‘you say tomato, I say tomotto, lets call the whole thing off’ attitude!
Lines 5-9: I emphasized they conspired due to not allowing me to get a printout of the ledger as they do every month, as of August, and as of September.
He did not ever say anything about giving me a letter of notice and he dug his rabbit hole even deeper because they should have given that letter to the Housing Authority, which is crooked as hell but they would have admitted getting that letter! Once they decide to enforce that, they cut off HUD assistance to this landlord - and they have received HUD Assistance up to the present!
So Housing Authority pulls a fast one on me telling me I never completed a packet WHICH THEY MAILED TO A DEFECTIVE ADDRESS AND I NEVER GOT! The rep, Tara Jones, told me I could go to their office to pick up the November 7 letter which she said was Hoops notified them, despite the fact they are supposed to notify Housing Authority 30 days PRIOR to even issuing a Notice to Quit! This is to allow cure time for the dispute on owing them a freaking thing to take place! As well as have a hearing at the Housing Authority! They never give me a hearing when I request it so I didn’t ask for one when I illegally served a Notice To Quit! Yet if they had done their job and got a timely letter from the landlord, they would have to approach me about a hearing!
Lines 16-19: I did say he was putting more spin on it. Yet emphasized they can only argue what is in the Notice To Quit. The Court has no more subject matter jurisdiction to litigate than what was on the Notice to Quit! All removed/striken by the freaking corrupted court!
Lines 20-27: again they removed dialogue from the recording! The court reporter adds dashes to areas where it seems like dialogue is missing. I will verify if that is still when they add dashes, but reporters have told me that before. The crooked courts use upstanding reporters as a “face” for their corruption!
I also emphasized their erroneous argument of having two leases when that was in fact, FRAUD for them mentioning. The Section 8 addendum specifies that if the Contract ends, the lease ends. There is no lease without the contract! And the lease cannot require any more than what the contract has! That dialogue was deleted from the recording!
Page 8
At least there is some dialogue about the Section 8 being an addendum to the lease. Yet they removed the very important issue that the Section 8 addendum CONTROLS the lease and nothing on the lease can be a violation of the Section 8 law or Section 8 HAP Contract issued to the landlord.
Lines 7-10: more dialogue deleted from recording to allude I owe them! I emphasized to the court that they got a court order to remove the $14,000 FRAUDULENT CHARGES.
Lines 11-17: They removed the dialogue about this being the same maintenance manager from Jan 2023, who took a dump in my trash can in the bathroom and also the date he broke into my apartment and was obviously ordered out by a higher authority - on July 2, 2024!
Lines 18-25: Yes, I did refer to the consideration of calling police, but the police work for these people; who pay for their pensions, etc. They have proven that in other experiences when I was stupid enough to make a report which they delete!
Page 9
So the court asks me if I would like to add anything and they remove dialogue in the recording! Here I am talking to a paid actor, not a judge, who says she is Alayna Stone!
Lines 3-12: they not only delted portions of the dialogue yet this was actually my opening statement to the court - not closing!
Lines 13-17: EMPHASIS - I PAY MY RENT;
I HAVE PAID THE SAME AMOUNT FOR ABOUT 5 YEARS (DIALOGUE DELETED!)
NOW HE IS PUTTING SPIN ON IT SAYING, WELL, SHE HAS AN OUTSTANDING BALANCE…I EMPHASIZED THAT HE CAN ONLY ARGUE WHAT IS ON THE NOTICE TO QUIT! I DID SAY, NO I DON’T BUT THE EMPHASIS WAS HE CAN ONLY ARGUE WHAT WAS ON THE NTQ!
Lines 18-24: Though dialogue was deleted, at least the emphasis of their fraudulent billing and that they had a court order to remove the fraudulent billing is in the transcript. Additionally, the fact they started erroneously billing me all over again is also in the transcript.
Lines 25-26 was said when I objected, not at the end! I responded with his bs about my owing $264 instead of $198. I said “You can only argue what is on the Notice to Quit!” The fake judge did not quite say this dialogue but did mention the following:
The Notice To Quit was valid in this case but not for the Eviction case; she said they were two separate issues. I said, “It is the same law; the law is the same at either juncture”
And of course, I was not dealing with a full deck, I knew that by then. And this was all done when I objected the Hoops impersonator!
Page 10
This page is a wash because much dialogue is deleted! Additionally,
Line 18-22: was emphasizing that the Housing Authority did not have a hearing when I requested it back in 2019 before I was served any Notice To Quit - I disputed the rent increase justly and documented why, requesting a hearing, which they would not have! And thereafter, I requested a hearing in 2022! Not only did T-Mobile refuse to process my autopay, jeopardizing my own safety, I had to get a new phone number because they stopped my service for Their refusing to process my autopay! This would help the Housing Authority to use as an excuse about calling me, yet I promptly gave them my number right on the copy of the hearing request! It was prominently marked on Monday, the day following my getting a new number - I had to go to Best Buy and get a sim card because T-Mobile stopped my service on Sunday!
I stated all that in the hearing!
Page 11
I emphasized the to the court that I made a thorough effort on this case and the court is bound to review what I have submitted.
I also said that when I first spoke! Dialogue was moved as well as deleted on the recording.
If you see any typos here, it is because I did not edit it due to time factor and also due to continuous cyber crime altering spellings. Why bother, in other words.
===========END==================
ILLEGAL EVICTION - EVICTION HEARING 31 OCTOBER 2024
NOTES REGARDING THE TRANSCRIPT
Housing Eviction - Hearing on December 3, 2024
The Attorney identified himself as Peter Hoops! This one was old enough to enter the BAR in 1987! Not like the Housing Hearing, where a young man about 30 said he was Peter Hoops! The only Juris Number showing is a Peter Hoops who entered the BAR in 1987! He was accompanied by a man in his 30’s, with black hair. I never saw him before and he did not make appearance in the hearing! He sat where the majority of people sat. Most likely the bozo who claims he is “Attorney St. Rock”
Page 1
He did not identify himself as Attorney St. Rock! He said he was Peter Hoops!
I could have spent my time accusing them both of fraud since the real Alayna Stone was there instead of a paid actor - or just focus on the issue; that I paid my rent, the case has no merit; and that is what I did! I hope to God all get arrested for this organized crime, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, but I cannot do anything. I am not even an attorney. I just wanted to emphasize my argument because the case had no merit!
Kyle Huckle was NOT THERE! There was no mention of this and of course I would have said something and now Kyle is in more deep shit by conspiring with this and questions could be asked by a professional to easily determine he was not at the trial!
Dialogue is missing
Page 2
EMPHASIS: I did first claim that the JA who ruled on the housing matter should preside on this matter since she ruled the NTQ was valid when it was not. I did claim that it was unfair she not articulate her ruling and did not grant a rehearing or reargument either!
I did mention I wanted to motion for a Transfer of Venue since I was told that Alayna Stone was the only assigned HOUSING JUDGE.
EMPHASIS ON CONFLICT OF INTEREST SINCE SHE RULED THE NTQ WAS VALID. And I claimed it was FRAUD and also improperly served.
The Judge did not say “Okay”
WTF
My dialogue has many areas where they obviously deleted what I said.
Page 3
I further argued about transferring venue but much of it was deleted.
Line 14: Alayna Stone claimed the issue was not whether the NTQ was valid or not in the housing case
SHE DID NOT SAY THAT - HER OPINION EVEN STATES IT WAS VALID AND REASON TO DISMISS THE CASE!
I need to go downstairs,and use wifi, I see that!
The rest of this dialogue is BS - and yes, she said a lot of BS, but she actually said the NTQ was valid in the Housing matter and not in the Eviction matter!
That was nuts! She refused to articulate why. There are caselaws which refer to the NTQ valid at one juncture and not valid at another - THEY WERE SERVED TWO NTQ’s!
My battery is almost out! I forgot to plug this in when I began typing this.
Time is 4:28 am
In other words, this Alayna Stone said she would not let me transfer the case.
Page 4
Line 4: now this Alayna Stone says the NTQ was valid.
WTF
Dialogue deleted from recording!
I argued LEGAL EFFECACY - dialogue removed! I argued a check cannot be written and claimed valid just because the words are spelled correctly! If the writer knows there is insufficient funds, they commit a crime!
I emphasized I was seeking to appeal; not that “I’m appealing right now” - this same person granted the fee waiver to appeal!
I also said I would appeal upon decision of this case since if I prevailed, I would motion to open the Housing Complaint.
Because I said that, the court wanted to keep the case in the books for a longer time than 4 months! It is all DEVIL’S CHESSBOARD TACTICS!
I could see that; so I pursued an appeal. The Appellate Court refused to let me appeal using hard copies; I would have to e-file when I do not have wifi in my apartment and they cause me much more suffering as well a violation of my privacy since I would have to use my email on public computers. Though I did create a temporary email for a case they demanded I e-file on, uploading using the court equipment was manipulated and cyber crime allowed them to alter documents and more.
It is a free-for-all for e-filing that way…..and it will be worse now that Trump created the e-god/DOGE agency = WTF.
Page 4
The judge did not emphasize needing to reach the merits of the case! She dodged that bullet! The merits of the case prove it is meritless!
They claim I did not pay my rent for August and September
I paid my rent for August and September!
Case closed! They did not provide any supporting documentation! That is the subject matter she is limited to!
The judge claiming : We haven’ t gone to trial did take place
YET - she argued that when I wanted transfer of venue, not here!
What their plan was - was to use delay tactics to evade my opportunity to submit a Motion to Open! A Motion To Open can be submitted 4 months after the dismissal!
Lines 14-16: Is not what she said, claiming my motions were all on procedural grounds, not on whether I paid my rent. THAT WAS FRAUD. I WOULD HAVE CLAIMED THAT NOT TO BE TRUE! MY ANSWER TO THE SUMMONS WAS I PAID MY RENT! THAT ARGUMENT RESONATED THROUGH THE WHOLE CASE SO FAR!
Dialogue is missing to get the full context of what happened!
So the judge claimed I had to go to court to claim I paid my rent; it could not be documented, which is BS! Yes, she was capable of saying that at that point yet my response to her was deleted!
In every damn document I said I paid my rent! The court fails to respond with anything about validating the check yet the plaintiff admitted the checks were cashed anyway - so case closed!
Lines 20-24: I emphasized the court has the jurisdiction to address the nonpayment of rent in August and September. I emphasized there is too much spin on this case. Stick with the facts. I knew I was talking to a fraud since that was not her at the housing hearing.
THAT IS WHAT THE COURT’S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION IS FOR THIS CASE. PERIOD. ADDITIONALLY, THE PLAINTIFF LIED IN THE COMPLAINT CLAIMING I PURCHASED THIS APARTMENT!
If I just get these transcripts scanned and uploaded, at this point, I will need to take a break before scanning in more. I was hoping to get the whole case scanned in by Tyco Copy Center. I have had to pick my battles regarding time factor!
Page 6
More emphasis on “dealing with procedural stuff” on the case rather than the damn merits!
Probable Cause is a first and foremost in any case!
That is a procedural requirement! I doubt she is an attorney even!
My dialogue was deleted!
Lines 10-13: Though they deleted a lot of my dialogue, I emphasized the NTQ said nonpayment of rent for August and September; I paid my rent!
I had a deposition typed - to make damn sure they would not alter the record more - my deposition was altered by cyber crime so I had to stop and say I cannot read anymore due to obvious cyber crime and would not submit this into court. Is that dialogue there? NO!!!
Page 7
Lines 6-11: Yes, I did emphasize to the court that the plaintiff identified himself as Peter Hoops; and on that Eviction hearing; a different person identified himself as Peter Hoops! So the court alters both records and claims that Attorney St. Rock appeared.
Did anyone object to my saying it was Hoops? NO!! Did the court correct me? No!! Because she is a fraud also!
Because they inserted this shit in the transcript, that is why - and the ones who did it are psychopaths!
The Hoops impersonator did argue that he wanted me to show him the law on everything as argument when he claimed to be an expert on Landlord-Tenant evictions!
I skipped a paragraph because the deposition was frauded by cyber crime!
Line 18: deleted was the segment about the judge claiming no letter was issued to the Housing Authority to create a cure period so the Section 8 tenant may continue to stay in her apartment.
Line 22-27: Again, I emphasized no letter to the Housing Authority was issued by the plaintiff. Therefore the eviction is illegal!
Page 8
I did not refer to any short payment. I was realizing what I typed was altered and did not read that paragraph and stopped referring to the deposition altogether. “And they did the same thing this time around” This is fraud injected in the case!
Page 9
I would not read any more of the deposition after a paragraph or two because it was frauded by cyber crime!
No freaking way would I say that “This is the same thing this time around” They twist words like that!
Emphasis on the maintenance Manager terrifying me. I did almost have a heart attack! He was probably on PCB’s!
I did emphasize I overpaid with two proofs; not just one. I said according to the law, I should only pay 10% of the rental value.
Also, I emphasized the lease which the landlord has on file indicates I only pay $171 as my portion of the rent. Those were argued.
All dialogue with “Peter Hoops” claiming the burden of proof is on me is gone! Because he was a jackass saying it! I said, “The burden of proof is on him and he has not even proven I did not pay my rent for August and September!”
They obviously did not allow me to get printouts of the ledger for August and September because they planned to steal my check copies out of my apartment and say I never paid! Probably using CIA even to do it! Since my uncle was an obvious CIA operative and fraudulently used my SSN to purchase a Mercedes Benz For his wife; he already had a Rolls Royce and an obvious multimillionaire! He did that to destroy my personal efforts since I am against corruption! He also saved himself thousands of dollars in taxes and tariffs, I’m sure! I called the bank when I realized what he did! They admitted it was my SSN he used but said, “You call your uncle and work it out with him” I said, “I will not! He committed a crime against me! I left $300 in cash on the table when I left his home even though I gave his niece a ride back to upstate NY as a favor, with her claiming her plane was cancelled and she could not get back up there! Bullshit! She had many choices with airlines and a cancellation results in REFUND and she had plenty of money and no doubt this uncle would have given her anything since she lived there for free for quite a long time, becoming his obvious work-study on how to meander your way through the government and appease the corruption!
Page 10
Lines 4-6: Dialogue disrupted to allude I said “Had I been there, there would have been no Section 8 contract”
WTF!
I was emphasizing that if there was no Section 8 contract, I would not be there!
Lines 7-11 does refer to the defective deposition I typed yet leaves out the cyber crime that caused it!
Page 10: The fact that the lease did not have an addendum to correct who the landlord is was emphasis on their fraud, their failure to do what they are supposed to be doing!
Page 11
I may have mentioned they requested I reapply as a Section 8 tenant which was illegal since the new landlord had to apply for approval, not me. Dialogue is disrupted.
Lines 18-20: I did argue this again, that they claimed I did not pay the rent; I did pay the rent. But I had paid $198 for more than 2 years definitely and would not have said two years.
Page 12
I referenced the non appearance of all defendants in the Housing Complaint; yet this alludes I am referring to this case, which is more abuse of the recording!
Lines 6-11: I was not going to modify the deposition. They have caused me so much harm on the case! So much work on getting my rights even though there is no merit to the case!
Line 20-21: This was altered. Attorney Hoops requested to the court to receive copies of the opinion from 2019. That was all. Besides he was not aware of a prior case, which was a big fat lie! I even referred to it in other pleadings and it is his duty to determine history!
It would have been in the tenant file!
The excuse that the landlord changed was brought up! How stupid! The records did not change!
Page 13
The fraudulent plaintiff with a Pro Hac Vice Juris Number which means he is out of state (I argued this at the Housing complaint hearing yet it is completely removed from the dialogue!)
Did argue the catch-me-if-you-can bullshit yet with complete ignorance that I had to prove it!
Dialogue was deleted! Both in what he said and what I said - as more tricks to alter the course!
I did not say they were withholding information to prove their case against me!
I emphasized the burden of proof that I did not pay my rent for August and September was not even addressed by the court, the case has no merit! They provided no evidence whatsoever and obviously are enjoying access to my apartment through illegal entries in attempt to steal whatever documents they can get away with stealing! Here I am telling a “judge” who allows someone else to impersonate her at the Housing Hearing!
I hoped the emphasis on this would end this damn case, but no, she ruled that my motion to dismiss was denied! So I have to hurry to motion to remove her to remove that other alleged judge, located in Sandy Hook Shooting FRAUD Land, Fairfield! Last name is Spader.
He claimed my Motion To Continue to pay rent can only be granted if it is a motion to pay fair use and value, even though I cited the proper law, etc. How abusive!
=================== End===============
Here is the complaint. I either made an error about the plaintiff claiming I purchased my apartment or they altered the document using cyber crime.
Nevertheless they do not abide by any law except wants of the elites!
Will see if this works to upload.
.png)
.png)
Best I can do now. The law states that they have to give me a 30 day notice before even considering a Notice To Quit - and the Housing Authority has to allow a hearing!
OCKET NO. NHH-CV24-6024196-S : SUPERIOR COURT OF CT
ANSONIA STATE STREET, LLC : J.D. OF NEW HAVEN
V : HOUSING SESSION
ANNE M. BRADLEY : December 19, 2024
LAW
REGARDING LANDLORD HAS TO PROVIDE 30 DAY NOTICE, ALLOW SECTION 8 TENANT TO RESPOND, ETC.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CONTINUE TO PAY RENT INTO COURT
Yes, a landlord must give a Section 8 tenant notice before evicting them:
· Notice period: The notice period for a Section 8 tenant is typically 30 days.
· Notice content: The notice must include the date of termination, the reason for termination, and the amount of rent due if the termination is due to nonpayment. It should also include information about the tenant's right to request a grievance hearing and review PHA documents.
· Other steps: The landlord must also notify the local housing authority before evicting a Section 8 tenant. The landlord must then discuss the eviction with the tenant and file a petition for eviction.
The eviction process for a Section 8 tenant is similar to a normal eviction process, but there are some differences. The tenant may be able to challenge the eviction and remain in their home.
Ending
·
Ending the Lease and Evictions in Section 8 and Public Housing
Tenant-based Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, the Project-Based Section 8 program, and Public Housing are the largest and primary rental housing assistance programs for low-income families, this article focuses on the ending the lease in Section 8 and public housing, including evictions and lockouts.
Topics on this page
Public Housing
Termination by public housing agency (PHA) - A PHA may not terminate your tenancy (right to live there as a tenant) except for:
· serious or repeated violations of "material" (important) lease terms;
· being over the income limit of the program;
· other “good cause.”
Note that there are some exceptions. Your lease agreement must lay out the procedures to be followed by the PHA and by the tenant to terminate the tenancy.
NOTE: Your local PHA may have additional protections and restrictions than what is included in this article. Review your lease agreement carefully, and contact your local PHA for more information.
Serious or repeated violations of “material” terms of the lease can include:
· failure to pay rent or some other financial obligation; or
· failure to fulfill a tenant's obligation such as:
o not to sublet the unit (rent it to someone else)
o not to keep boarders or lodgers
o to use the unit only as a private dwelling
o to abide by all housing authority rules and regulations
o to maintain the unit in a clean and safe condition
o to not destroy or vandalize the unit
o to pay for unit damage caused by the tenant, a member of the household, or its guests (other than normal wear and tear)
o not to disturb the peaceful enjoyment of other residents
o not to engage in criminal activity or alcohol abuse
Other "good cause" includes:
· criminal activity, drug abuse, or alcohol abuse;
· after you are admitted, the housing authority discovers that the tenant is ineligible;
· you make false statements or commit fraud in your application for housing or recertification;
· failure of a family member to comply with the program’s community service or self-sufficiency work activity requirement; or
· failure to accept a modification of a lease.
Termination by Tenant - Generally, if the tenant wishes to terminate the tenancy, they can do so for any reason but must provide the required notice. Review your lease agreement carefully for information about the required notice and other procedures.
Notice of Termination – Landlords must provide tenants with written notice of any termination of the lease. The notice period may vary depending on the reason for termination.
· 14 days for failure to pay rent;
· a reasonable period of time considering the seriousness of the situation (but not to exceed 30 days) if the health or safety of other residents, PHA employees, or persons residing in the immediate vicinity of the premises is threatened; if any member of the household has engaged in any drug-related criminal activity or violent criminal activity; or if any member of the household has been convicted of a felony;
· 30 days in any other case, except if Maryland or local laws allows a shorter notice period, then the shorter notice period will apply.
The landlord’s written notice must include:
· the date of termination;
· the reason for the termination, with enough detail so that the tenant may prepare a defense;
· if termination is due to failure to pay rent, the dollar amount of the balance due and the date the computation was made;
· information about tenant’s right to review PHA documents; and
· Information about tenant’s right to request a grievance hearing (unless an exception applies).
The notice must be sent to tenant by first class mail, properly stamped and addressed to tenant at tenant’s address at the project, and with proper return address OR delivered in person to any adult member of the tenant’s household.
Pre-Eviction Grievance Process – In most situations, tenants are entitled to a pre-eviction grievance process, which includes an informal conference (and summary of that conference) as well as a grievance hearing (if the tenant makes the request in a timely manner). Be aware, however, that there are exceptions to a tenant’s right to the pre-eviction grievance process if the eviction is related to certain criminal activities. In addition, there may be an expedited procedure that may apply. The PHA must provide a copy to the grievance procedure to each tenant. Read this carefully.
Eviction - If a tenant remains past the termination date, the landlord must go to court before the tenant can be evicted. The landlord cannot change the locks, cut off the water or electricity, or move tenant’s belongings without going to court. If you fail to object to a termination notice, it does not mean you waive your right to contest the termination in court.
I DID NOT CONTACT AN ATTORNEY! I BECOME A VICTIM ALL OVER AGAIN!
If you receive a court summons or eviction letter, contact an attorney as soon as possible. If your landlord agrees to let you stay but wants you to sign a written agreement, contact an attorney before signing it. Learn more about getting help from a legal professional in Maryland.
Read the law: U.S. Code, Title 42 §1437d
Read the regulations: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 24, Part 966
THE FRAUDING PLAINTIFF CLAIMED I HAD A MONTH TO MONTH LEASE = BULLSHIT! HUD LAW STATES IT HAS TO BE RENEWED ANNUALLY. NOT MONTH TO MONTH! THIUS IS SUCH A CESSPOOL OF CORRUPTION HERE!
SLIP THEM SOME BRIBES, IT WON'T MATTER!
The lease shall convert to a month-to-month term for families determined to be over-income whose tenancy will be terminated in accordance with § 960.507(d)(2) of this chapter as of the date of the notice provided under § 960.507(c)(3) of this chapter. PHAs must charge these families, who continue to be public housing program participants, the family's choice of income-based, flat rent, or prorated rent for mixed families during the period before termination.
Section 8 Housing
Termination of Tenancy – The landlord may not terminate the tenancy except for:
· serious or repeated violation of the terms and conditions of the lease (e.g., failure to pay rent);
· violation of federal, state, or local laws; or
· other “good cause.”
Other "good cause" can include a family history of disturbance of neighbors, destruction of property, or of living or housekeeping habits that damage the unit or premises.
After the initial lease term, other “good cause” can include:
· failure to accept the offer of a new lease or revision;
· landlord's desire to use the unit for personal or family use; or
· business or economic reason (e.g., sale of the property, unit renovation, leasing at a higher rental).
NOTE: Terminating the tenancy is not the same thing as terminating the Section 8 Housing Choice Program voucher. Learn more about terminating the voucher.
Termination by Tenant - Generally, if the tenant wishes to terminate the tenancy, they can do so for any reason but must provide the required notice and comply with any lease procedures. Review your lease agreement carefully for information about the required notice and other procedures.
Notice – Landlords must comply with the lease terms and state laws. In addition, both the landlord and tenant must also provide the PHA with a copy of the notice. Review your lease agreement carefully, and contact your local PHA for more information. Learn more.
Eviction – The landlord can only evict you after going through the court process. The landlord’s eviction notice is not the eviction order. It is the court that orders the eviction. The landlord cannot change the locks, cut off the water or electricity, or move tenant’s belongings without going to court. If you fail to object to a termination notice, it does not mean you waive your right to contest the termination in court.
Project-based Section 8 Housing – For Project-based Section 8 Housing, the procedures related to ending the lease, including required notice, can vary depending on the specific type of project. Review your lease agreement carefully, and contact your local PHA for more information.
Read the law: U.S. Code, Title 42 §1437f
Read the Law: U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 24, Part 247; Part 982; Part 983
State and Local Laws
In addition to the provisions provided by federal laws and the policies of local PHAs, landlord must also follow state and local laws related to eviction, except where the state or local law has been preempted by federal law. Learn more about evictions and ending the lease in Maryland.
Exceptions
There may be situations where a landlord can terminate a tenancy for reasons other what is listed in this article. For example, the information above may not apply where a tenant’s occupancy is terminated because HUD, or the landlord with HUD's consent, has decided to substantially rehabilitate or demolish the project, or sell the project to a purchaser for substantial rehabilitation or demolition.
In addition, sometimes a landlord is allowed to stop providing a specific kind of subsidized housing. If your landlord wants to do this, the landlord must send you a letter telling you about it. They are now lying that they did - pancaking fraud on fraud but the court just will keep the fraud going if they can get away with it! There are things you can do to fight your landlord’s decision to end this type of subsidized housing, to stay where you are, or to make sure that you can find other affordable housing. Even if the landlord changes the type of subsidized housing, you may have other options. For example, when owners do not renew their project-based Section 8, tenants provided with Section 8 tenant protection vouchers.
Read the Law: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 24, Part 247
Last Updated: Fri, 01/20/2023 - 1:32 pm
https://www.peoples-law.org/ending-lease-and-evictions-section-8-and-public-housing
DOCKET NO. NHH-CV24-6024196-S : SUPERIOR COURT OF CT
ANSONIA STATE STREET, LLC : J.D. OF NEW HAVEN
V : HOUSING SESSION
ANNE M. BRADLEY : December 19, 2024
Notarized Statement
Elm City Communities Received Nov 7, Letter
From Plaintiff - 2+ months beyond the stated law
1, On December 17, I, the Defendant on this case, made follow-up calls to Elm City Communities due to the failure of Tara Jones responding to me.
2. I was able to reach her finally and emphasized I wanted to know what the status of my Section 8 is due to the plaintiff claiming the lease ended in November 2022, my proof that that it had not ended, yet I was unable to show a ledger to cover August and thereafter because this landlord at 360 State Street had already begun their nefarious plan to get me illegally evicted.
3. Tara Jones stated “We do not get involved with evictions”. I asked her if she got any letter from the Plaintiff regarding a 30 day notice that they would seek to evict me. She said NO, but recently, on November 7 they received a letter. I asked her for a copy. She said she would leave it at the front desk yet when I got there she shocked me with a notice that they were discontinuing my HUD contract as of December! Accusing me of not completing a renewal packet, which they title as an application. I never received any mail from them. I never received any email from them. I never received any phone call from them. And even when I have called, they have said nothing regarding this. I spoke to Tracey Dancy about a month ago. She said, “I cannot talk to you anymore. Tara said she will handle your account” There was nothing else discussed. She would not answer any questions. And it was very difficult to even reach her because she did not respond to my calls. Apparently I caught her off-guard and she didn’t realize I was calling.
4. I have provided a copy of the letter to Tara Jones with this motion. Most of that letter was already emailed to her.
5. I cannot deliver that letter to Tara Jones until tomorrow due to the immense physical burden they have placed on me; which is a frequent circumstance since I have moved here. Apparently they expected me to be evicted right away due to having a too-small apartment, which they deliberately caused and which Dragana LaCore falsified the record I had already signed, replacing Tudor Terrace as my actual prior landlord to Corey Spruil at 38 Arch Street. (Corey went bankrupt)
6. They have no legal right to stop funding. They requested I complete a renewal packet in October 2020 and REFUSED TO PROCESS IT ONLY AFTER THEY RECEIVED THIS 65+ PAGE PACKET THEY REQUIRE. For additional expenses I referred to the false arrest and avulsion injury behind my knee as I was actually going to the post office to mail a renewal packet to this agency, the housing authority, aka Elm City Communities!
7. My Motion For Disclosure is a matter of establishing what they are responsible for and accountable for, for I never see any accountability when they harm me as often as they have.
8. I was fortunate a caring employee gave me some attention when I was at the front desk, being shocked with this notice that my HUD assistance would be discontinued.
9. Not only did Elm City Communities fully understand I was only using my mailing address when the landlord tried to get me evicted in 2019, erroneously claiming “nonpayment of rent” but also it was on their record before that and they did use my PO Box. Tara Jones also claimed she tried to call me but my voicemail was not set up. She called my prior phone number despite having my current one and despite my always saying what my current one is in every voicemail message I left her. Additionally, I have dropped off documentation regarding my phone number change - which I never wanted to occur yet T-Mobile nefariously refused to process my auto pay even when I went to their store. I was angry and told them I would change services, that they were doing what Storequest did to me, refusing to process my rent payment and then stealing all my possessions in the unit, and the court refused to default the case I brought against them even though they failed to appear and the judge committed more illegalities, which probably got her a raise in pay. A small claim can be served by Priority mail and motions thereafter can be sent first class mail. The court even had the Priority Mail tracking number.
a) My scanner was damaged by cyber crime and illegal entries. I am unable to scan at this point. I am hopeful to get this rectified yet without wifi in my apartment; it is likely that I will not be able to.
.png)
Comments