MOTION TO ARGUE_APPELLATE COURT_MOTION FOR JUDGMENT FOR APPELLANT
Link to this blogpost: http://www.publiusroots.org/2025/04/motion-to-argueappellate-courtmotion.html
Hello,
This is actual title, but blogger did not make spaces for words: MOTION TO ARGUE_APPELLATE COURT_MOTION FOR JUDGMENT FOR APPELLANT
I am pasting these now but will provide a link to the whole motion with full appendix in the next 24 hours...It is almost 1 am EST and I am very tired, exhausted emotionally and physically. I will be able to finish this once I get a good rest.
=========================================================
AC 48452
NHH-CV24-5006875-S : APPELLATE COURT OF CT
ANNE BRADLEY : STATE OF CONNECTICUT
V : HOUSING SESSION
ANSONIA STATE
STREET, LLC, et al : April 10, 2025
MOTION TO ARGUE (EN BANC)
Pursuant to PB 61-5, 66-2, 66-3, 64-1, 60-5, and 60-3 if necessary - and any other rule or law which pertains to this motion, Appellant, Pro Se, motions this court for argument (en banc) on its DENIAL order on the Motion For Default Judgment for appellant.
History
1. HOUSING COMPLAINT, which reflects aforesaid case, was submitted to the court to include EIGHT defendants.
a) ANSONIA STATE STREET, LLC
b) LIVABLE CITY INITIATIVE
c) ELM CITY COMMUNITIES
d) 360 STATE STREET, FAIRFIELD, CT *dissolved
e) SOUTH OXFORD, LLC, NEW YORK CITY
f) BEACHWOLD RESIDENTIAL, NEW YORK CITY
g) MEPT CHAPEL STREET, BETHESDA, MD *withdrew registration
2. Appellant proved to the court that the Notice to Quit was INVALID, establishing merit and aforesaid housing case against the landlord-appellee, et al at 360 State Street was ACCEPTED. This included an Appendix of 246 pages. The proof of rent was confirmed as being current and the landlord, was presented in the Complaint, to be FRAUDULENT and ABUSIVE, breaching the Section 8 HAP contract on a daily basis since January 2013.
3. Appellant revised her complaint and Summons prior to serving the defendants, although the chief clerk ordered her to write AMENDED on it since he uploaded it in the court system one week prior to being served. Appellant claimed to the clerk that is logically wrong to do.
4. A direct appeal on this case was attempted yet there was a delay in processing her Motion for Exemption in using internet. Extension of Time to file that appeal was denied by the trial court. Appellant claimed was more abuse of process since she set forth valid reasons for her need for more time, to include her intent to file a Motion To Open. Trial judge simultaneously granted her fee waiver and denied the Motion without a hearing, despite the obvious fact this motion was not gratuitous; the court had been informed in Motion For Extension of Time which they denied; the court is well aware that a Motion To Open is a matter of right. Again, there was no articulation; only a denial.
5. Appeal on aforesaid case proceded and is in effect now. Motion For Default Judgment in favor of appellant was issued yet the Appellate Court Order on this Motion indicated the following: It is ordered, sua sponte, that the plaintiff shall certify her filings to all counsel of record in this appeal including Lloyd Langhammer of the Law Offices of Lloyd Langhammer, Joseph Strock of Hoops & Associates, LLC, Ryan Driscoll of Bercham Moses, PC, and Michael Leone of Lynch Traub Keefe and Errante, PC. Failure to comply with this order may subject the plaintiff to sanctions including dismissal of this appeal. See PB 85-1 et seq. By The Court Notice sent to counsel of record.
6. Judicial Order was attempted to print on appellant’s computer. It did not print. Thereafter, the order read that it was also DENIED.
7. Aforesaid Motion To Argue is presented today due to no hearing of the motion has taken place prior to court’s ruling.
FACTS
1. A motion has to be HEARD by the court. Hearing a motion requires argument or, at the least, the other party submitting an acknowledgment they read the motion and leave the decision up to the judge’s discretion. Source: CE Brooks, Michigan Law Review, 1939 - JSTOR. “The late Professor Ernest Freund once wrote “A judicial hearing involves two things: that the party be heard as to his own case, and that he hear the case against him”
a) Therefore there are THREE involved with a motion: The Judge, the Plaintiff, the Defendant. The concept of a motion involves a movant and opposition - involving debate - to satisfy the equal and opposite reaction. And the third person would be the decider, the judge.
b) The Connecticut Procedure and its hearing criteria is referenced yet cannot be found as a source. Nevertheless it is simply COMMON LAW as well as Rule of Practice that parties on record are served and if they are not, the motion cannot be ruled on.
c) Only when an Ex Parte motion is submitted does the court have the right to hear a motion without argument. This motion was not an Ex Parte Motion. Notice was given to the adverse party; yet the court would not recognize this; nor was there argument; despite the fact the trial court dismissed this case at the will of the appellees, all of which defaulted on the trial case by not submitting an Answer to the Complaint. For the court to dismiss the trial court case without it, is lack of Due Process. Appellee who appeared was a fraud at the hearing, not even an attorney; and therefore its will on Motion For Judgment in Appellant’s Favor - should be defaulted and the court should rule in appellant’s favor.
2. Appellee-landlord has proven to be frauds in the adjunct trial of AC48416. they fraud billing records by submitting the ledger which includes the court order for them to remove fraudulent charges amounting to almost $14,000. Motion for Judicial Notice is at .Appendix G
8. Appellant found this abuse of process; particularly stressful since the only appearance information from a form that is on the case information is Attorney Langhammer who ineptly “mispelled” the appellant’s email on the appearance form, never correcting it so she did not know he filed an appearance until viewing the case information, WHICH IS AGAINST THE RULES yet the court did nothing about that. She was not called to be informed of any email error. Additionally, Attorney Langhammer served the following parties on his appearance form:
9. Hoops & Associates - Attorney Struck, which does not exist on record yet on the order copied what the appellee typed rather than validating the actual parties to the case as set by the appellant in the REPLACEMENT COMPLAINT AND SUMMONS, WHICH THE TRIAL COURT ORDERED HER TO ENTER AS AMENDED DESPITE THE FACT IT HAD NOT BEEN SERVED YET. Motion For Judgment had no DENIAL until AFTER it was uploaded by the court - with no indication that it was amended. The order reflected the appellant to serve all defendants, which it had and certification was in the papers, as required by the Rules of Court.
a) Having frauded its appearance in trial court; originally representing Ansonia State Street, which claims to own 360 State Street with a LIMITED DEED, which gives them no right to sell the property and more.
10. Bercham & Moses - Ryan Driscoll Not Served
i. Instead sent email to jbenson@berchamoses.com
11. LTKE Law Firm - had not appeared yet
a) This attorney tacked-on others who are not part of the Order of the Court, WHO ALSO DEFAULTED ON THE TRIAL COURT CASE, which is also UNLAWFUL:
i. Elm City Communities - was served a court order of Delinquency
ii. Livable City Initiative - was served a court order of Delinquency
12. Appellant Anne Bradley - failed; email would have been returned, no action taken to correct a POSSIBLE error vs DELIBERATE fraud
13. To elaborate on the HISTORY above, there are inept appearances and juggling of files rather than entering the appearances on the Appellate matter, to include official appearances of all parties; which for the most part do not exist. And they all defaulted on the trial court case. The same-assigned trial judge (Alayna Stone) simultaneously ruled granting the fee waiver for the Motion to Open and immediately denying the Motion to Open - despite the fact that pleadings were not closed on the Housing Complaint, the judge was not even present at the hearing of October 31 - allowing a woman in her 60’s to impersonate her and reject appellant’s MOTION FOR DEFAULT since defendants were not there - and yet she ruled on the hearing despite the failure to appear by the majority of defendants. Hoops Law altered its appearance on the case, re-uploading the appearance on two occasions and adding a total of 3 pages to it; yet now, changed it again with just one page, which is more fraud particularly since 360 State Street is a company that dissolved and since Beachwold Residential is the named defendant, yet they echo’d what was on the court case, not a supposed retainer. Appellant claims this unlawfulness disrupts DUE PROCESS. There is a process in changing appearances, to include PB 3-8, particularly when attorneys do it. Appeal on the Motion To Open on the aforesaid Housing Case has also been submitted to the Appellate Court, with emphasis that the Motion For Extension of Time to appeal on the judge’s ruling was submitted and denied; and emphasis that these cases are similarly-situated.
14. There is no statement of decision by the trial court, pursuant to PB 64-1. Yet the record is supposed to be adequate for review. Appellant’s diligence to correct the files has been denied.
15. Motions involve the movant, the opposition, and the court hearing and ruling, as described in PB 66-2. The court has accused the appellant of not serving her Motion For Default Judgment to the parties which the court has made appearances for, referring to Juris numbers only. There was no objection made by any of these parties including the attorney who appeared on the case. The motion was in fact not argued, and therefore could not be heard by the court due to lack of diligence on the party who originally moved to dismiss the case, and the court’s indication that the parties were not even served. Appellant was never sent any messages by any of these parties to send any documents to them. This reflects that they are not diligent, and they have not been diligent at all; which makes them incapable of being an active party to the case. Defendants in TRIAL COURT, lower juncture, failed to appear at the one and only hearing on the trial court case on October 31, 2024, which was “presided” by a 60+ year old woman who claimed she was Alayna Stone, which was a lie. Additionally a young man representing Hoops Law claimed he was Attorney Peter Hoops, which was a lie. Additionally the court entered that Attorney St. Rock appeared at that hearing, which was false.. At no point was the appellant argued with regarding the fact that a non-attorney appeared as an attorney, arguing a motion which was signed by someone else.
16. To elaborate on the HISTORY above, there are inept appearances and juggling of files rather than entering the appearances on the Appellate matter, to include official appearances of all parties; which for the most part do not exist. And they all defaulted on the trial court case. The same-assigned trial judge (Alayna Stone) simultaneously ruled granting the fee waiver for the Motion to Open and immediately denying the Motion to Open - despite the fact that pleadings were not closed on the Housing Complaint, the judge was not even present at the hearing of October 31 - allowing a woman in her 60’s to impersonate her and reject appellant’s MOTION FOR DEFAULT since defendants were not there - and yet she ruled on the hearing despite the failure to appear by the majority of defendants. Hoops Law altered its appearance on the case, re-uploading the appearance on two occasions and adding pages to it. Appellant claimed that was illegal; there is a process in changing appearances, to include PB 3-8, particularly when attorneys do it. Appeal on the Motion To Open on the aforesaid Housing Case has also been submitted to the Appellate Court, with emphasis that the Motion For Extension of Time to appeal on the judge’s ruling was submitted and denied; and emphasis that these cases are similarly-situated.
.
17. There was no judgment rendered by the trial court that disposes the case for all purposes pursuant to PB 61-5. Additionally, all pleadings were not closed. Yet this judge dismissed the case, refused to grant extension of time to appeal, and simultaneously granted a fee waiver on Motion To Open and immediately denied the motion. Regarding 360 State Street:
a) THERE IS NO LEGAL OWNER ON RECORD. A limited Deed prohibits the possessor from having selling rights to the property.
b) Appellant spent several hours on April 9 in attempt to reach the company which Hoops & Associates fraudulently added to its appearance in the trial court record: 360 State Street, 100 Crown Street, New Haven CT. This was not even the company included in appellant’s complaint. The Secretary of State record showed them still active yet altered the record thereafter indicating they were dissolved. So how can Hoops & Associates even represent a dissolved company? This would have been argued at trial court yet they only indicated they were appearing for Ansonia State Street and thereafter kept changing their appearance, reuploading it, which is fraud. Affidavit of Appellant further describes these circumstances today in her efforts to reach the “360 State Street” at 100 Crown Street; at which time she was hung up on. A letter to that company is being submitted forthwith and a copy will be included in Appendix H.
18. A Predetermination Notice was submitted to the court by the appellant, reserving right to update it.
19. On March 7, 2025, appellant submitted her MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF APPELLANT, Appendix D, certifying it to all parties which the case manager has listed in the case information, as he so-ordered on April 2. Appellate Court would not recognize that the parties were served, ordering the appellant to serve them YET THE APPELLATE COURT RULED A DENIAL OF APPELLANT’S MOTION. This is a very important motion, which they in fact claimed that the parties which THEY claim should be served her pleadings were not served. This is a violation of DUE PROCESS OF LAW. This is therefore a wrongful ruling on her motion. Not one party claimed they were not served and should be served;. THERE WAS NO OPPOSITION TO HER MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, therefore the motion was not heard, since arguments are required. Should the party choose to refrain from arguing they are expected to enter that statement. Their lack of diligence on the matter which only Hoops Associates ineptly prosecuted a DISMISSAL on, not even showing burden of proof! The fact that CYBER CRIME is a huge problem crippling cases is indeed a factor. Nevertheless, the parties which the court has appeared for as appellees fully know the appellant’s contact information, contrary to their flip-flopping contact information.. Appearances on the appellate case only provide juris numbers and most of these listed attorneys fraudulently have out-of-state appearances and fail to show any diligence, which according the appellate rules, automatically marks them off as parties to the Appellate Case. (Appendix B includes page 38a, Certification of electronic service to Bercham & Moses)
20. Bercham & Moses along with several others should be defaulted on the case as well as charged for fraudulent appearances as out of state attorneys. Yet the Appellate Court claimed this was NOT certified, despite the proof and in addition, the parties received the emailed MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF DEFAULT FOR APPELLANT on March 7, 2024, as proven to the court in Appendix B. Certification Pages are legitamate as long as they are with the papers - this is stated right in the Connecticut Practice Book 2025 Edition.
21. Motion For Clarification of the Order by Appellate Court had to be abruptly changed to MOTION FOR ARGUMENT, since the court’s ruling was altered over a day later, to include DENIED. Appellant is including reference to PB 60-3, which is Suspension of the Rules since the Appellate Court does not provide a Motion to Argue in its listed motions. Printed Choices in motions are at Appendix C - most of which are not even applying any Practice Book Rule or Law.
22. The order, Appendix A, initially had no actual ruling on the Motion yet its order is titled as a ruling on the motion. This continued to be the ruling, yet they altered the ruling to include a DENIAL. This was discovered at about 10:30 pm on April 4, 2025. At 3:30 pm on April 5, appellant called her case manager and informed him there was a delay in submitting a Motion due to cyber crime on her devices as well as the need to change it from Clarification to Argument. The Court is wrongfully accusing the appellant of not certifying to all parties, yet the case manager acknowledged them all and filed the corrected certification with the motion.
23. Motion For Default was prepared correctly and properly served to ALL parties, despite having fraudulent appearances and NO DILIGENCE in trial court OR APPELLATE COURT.
c) DEBT COLLECTORS are the attorneys who appear
d) The trial court deliberately skipped over the months of January and February to pay rent, yet appellant has brought it up on record WITH NO ACTION BY THE COURT OR THE APPELLEE
24. This motion comprises of 10 pages of History, Facts, and Law with Certification Pages on 11, 12 and 13. Appendix A through G is included.
LAW
PB 60-3: SUSPENSION OF THE RULES. In the interest of expediting decision, or for other good cause shown, the court in which the appeal is pending may suspend the requirements or provisions of any of these rules in a particular case on motion of a party or on its own motion and may order proceedings in accordance with its direction.
PB PB 61-5, 66-2, 66-3, 64-1, AND 60-5 - PRINTED in Appendix F
SUMMARY
Deleted to comply with the requirement of a 10-page limit.
WHEREFORE, the appellant motions this court to HEAR Motion for Default in Favor of Appellant.
ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
APPENDIX ATTACHED
Prepared and Submitted,
FOR THE DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
_________________________
Anne M. Bradley
PO Box 206514
New Haven, CT 06520
Ph. 203-508-0858
CERTIFICATION
THIS MOTION FOR ARGUMENT ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT’S FAVOR, COMPRISES OF TWELVE PAGES, TEN OF WHICH ARE THE MOTION, HISTORY, FACTS, AND LAW. It is Pursuant to P.B. §§ 62-7 and 66-3, it is hereby certified that a copy of the foregoing was sent electronically this 10th day of April, 2025, to the Attorneys who are listed by the Appellate Court:
Lloyd L. Langhammer (Appellate)
JURIS NO. Is oddly different than AC 48416 appearance
LAW OFFICES OF LLOYD L. LANGHAMMER, LLC
18A Granite Street
New London, CT 06320
860-440-3340
LTKE LAW OFFICES
52 Trumbull Street
New Haven, CT 06510
203-787-0275
Fax: 203-401-3343
Bercham Moses
75 Broad Street
Milford, CT 06460
FAX: 203-878-2235
info@bmdlaw.com and also lstilson@berchmoses.com
HOOPS & ASSOCIATES
19A THAMES STREET
GROTON, CT 06340
PHONE: 860-445-8911
FAX: 860-445-8919
APPELLEES NON-APPEARING / NO APPEARANCE ON FILE
ALL APPELLEES FAILED TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT AT ANY TIME. A TWO-WEEK PERIOD IS SET BY LAW; DESPITE THE INEPT RETURN DATE SET BY CHIEF CLERK WILLIAM PITT.
* BOZZUTO MANAGEMENT COMPANY
* BEACHWOLD RESIDENTIAL
* LIVABLE CITY INTITIATIVE, WHICH IS PART OF THE CITY OF NEW HAVEN OFFICES, WHICH HAVE ATTORNEYS
* ELM CITY COMMUNITIES - DELINQUENT NOTICE SENT, THOUGH BERCHAM & MOSES ARE NOW LISTED; THOUGH THEY SHOW NO DILIGENCE AND USE A FRAUDULENT APPEARANCE
* MEPT CHAPEL - THEY WITHDREW THEIR REGISTRATION ONLY AFTER THEY WERE SERVED AND NEVER NOTIFIED THE APPELLANT
* 360 STATE STREET, LLC, WHICH WAS LISTED AS DISSOLVED SHORTLY AFTER SERVICE BY MARSHAL; yet Hoops & Associates thereafter altered their appearance again indicating they were representing this dissolved company. Attempt to reach the active company, 360 State Street, 100 Crown Street, New Haven, resulted in being hung up on.
______________________
Anne M. Bradley, Pro Se
PO Box 206514
New Haven, CT 06520
Ph 203-508-0858
IllegalEviction2024
It is also certified that this document has been redacted or does not contain any names or other personal identifying information that is known by appellant to be prohibited from disclosure by rule, statute, court order, or case law. It is also certified that this document complies with all applicable rules of appellate procedure.
PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
_____________________
Anne M. Bradley, Pro Se
PO Box 206514
New Haven, CT 06520
Ph 203-508-0858
IllegalEviction2024
AC 48452
NHH-CV24-5006875-S : APPELLATE COURT OF CT
ANNE BRADLEY : STATE OF CONNECTICUT
V : HOUSING SESSION
ANSONIA STATE
STREET, LLC, et al : April 10, 2025
APPENDIX OF APPELLANT
MOTION TO ARGUE (EN BANC)
APPENDIX DESCRIPTION PAGE NUMBER
A ORDER ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT 1
(as described) DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF APPELLANT
B PROOFS OF JURIS INFO,
PROOF OF SERVICE
CERTIFIFICATION OF SERVICE
C CHOICES IN MOTIONS
ISSUED BY APPELLATE COURT
D MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
E CYBER CRIME
DOCUMENTS OF RECENT EXPERIENCES ONLY
F LAWS
G MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, ON RECORD
RENT AMOUNT ON RECORD: $171; NOT $198; NOT $264 which trial court increased it to
H Letter to 100 Crown Street, attn: David Goldblum, 360 State Street - 3d Floor, New Haven, CT 06510
I AFFIDAVIT
AFFIDAVIT OF APPELLANT
Motion for Arugument on Motion For Default Judgment
1. My name is Anne Bradley and I am the appellant in the aforesaid matter. I believe in the power of oath - that includes MY oath, the oath of a Connecticut Attorney, and the oath of a Connecticut Judge, to name a few. I am NOT an attorney. I am someone who has struggled with corruption my whole life and it has disrupted my right to pursue happiness. Yet the US Constitution promises this right.
2. My objective is to get the Illegal Eviction case, AC48416, ruled in my favor, and the aforesaid Housing Complaint Appeal to be ruled in my favor. I just cannot believe how many people can get away with what they do; continuing spin on a case without merit.
3. I issue my rent checks to “360 State Street”. I was told to continue to issue my checks to them after Ansonia State Street declared themselves to be owner of the property without validating they really were. They failed to provide an addendum to the lease that they were owners of the property. The lease indicates that MEPT Chapel Street is the owner, yet that company dissolved after the housing court had a marshal serve the 8 named defendants on the housing complaint, which is the trial court case of this appeal. MEPT QALICB, LLC company was entered at the clerk’s office as the “new owner” yet there was no addendum to the lease to correct the record. That company has withdrawn its registry as a business. A new business named MEPT EDGEMOOR TRS, ENERGY LLC has surfaced in the business registry. Oddly, as before, its Principal is titled: By God Diversified US Property Fund Operating LP having the same agent as before, CT Corporation System. As before, it is a NewTower Trust company located at 7315 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 350W, Bethesda, MD. 20814. It is also categorized as Foreign-owned, as the previous. The date it allegedly formed is 11/18/2010 yet it has not registered in Connecticut until recently. Its NAICS code is 531390 which they claim as ‘Other” activities related to real estate”.
4. The same month that my mother died unexpectingly (August 2024) this plaintiff began its eviction agenda despite the fact my monthly rent is timely and I get a printout of the ledger when I pay to validate my Section 8 payments are posted. The elites who have control over this property must have had some kind of agreement with TD Bank to send fraudulent checks on a non-existing account for two years. The management would process them and charge me late fees, bounced checks, etc. Some employees would make sure that would not be posted and provided me back the fake checks. TD Bank would take the complaints from me, yet it is my opinion that bankers who abuse power, such as Canada’s current Prime Minister, were obviously using this as a targeting tool - since I repeatedly called them and told them to stop sending the checks on a fake account. The call center representatives were understanding and would send messages to ensure this would stop yet they continued to send me “no reply” emails that they issued a rent check and also allowed the landlord at 360 State Street, including Ansonia State Street, to process the checks, return the checks to the landlord’s bank account, and never acknowledge the account does not exist and never remedy the remitting checks.
5. Judge Alayna Stone, knowing that I intended to appeal, made sure that her order of eviction was uploaded on a Friday afternoon, AFTER I had checked the case status; and not once did they call me inform me that this 5-day eviction notice would be entered. Nevertheless, I worked all weekend on proceeding with an appeal and went to the courthouse to prepare an appeal document on the court computer since I had no access to internet in my apartment, which this landlord causes most of the time. I followed the prompts regarding defendant and plaintiff correctly. The form was signed and submitted in the housing court office, which from that point on any defects would be their responsibility if the officials complied with the law.
6. Despite my producing proof that the appellee had lied about not receiving rent for August and September 2024, the trial court continued the case, which I, the appellant, claimed was abuse of procedure and denial of my right to DUE PROCESS OF LAW, since the case had no merit and should have been removed from the docket. The Notice To Quit was not valid. The Summons was not valid. They had no legal efficacy.
7. Though the original check copies for August and September were missing in my apartment, I was able to locate backup copies to prove that I paid the rent, including the Bank of America manager, Mr. Kahn, noting on each one when they were cashed or deposited. He said he was not at liberty to indicate which transaction took place, though banking laws had changed since she was able to get cancelled bank checks when she occasionally requested, since this company has a continuous reputation of falsifying charges, including charging for late fees when my rent was always timely, etc.
8. There were only two appearances in the trial court case of aforesaid matter.
a) BERCHAM AND MOSES, signed by Ryan P. Driscoll, with Juris Number 022801. The juris number is fraudulent because they are not out-of-state attorneys. The court is well aware; and they do nothing when I bring it up. ALL INFORMATION IS SUPPOSED TO BE VALIDATED BY THE COURT, yet instead they even allow companies which are not even registered in the State Of Connecticut, apartments do not have to have a certificate of occupancy, and more. It is a “catch me if you can” dynamic. The attorney who signed the appearance is NOT THE CONTACT PERSON BECAUSE THEY USE A DIFFERENT EMAIL FOR THAT, lstilson@berchmoses.com. The appearance of the appellate attorney even altered the email address again, yet the court allows anything from attorneys and opinions I make publically are prejudicially-scrutinized because they want to serve the will of the elites, to have me evicted. After all, I didn’t go to prison when they conspired with attorneys to get me arrested on false charges and I didn’t die when I had some sever injuries caused by someone else. My food gets poisoned. My apartment is vandalized. Illegal intruders steal from me. The Appellate Court has changed Bercham & Moses’ email address as if they were their attorney, ordering me to send them email to another contact, yet the Appellate Court altered its own order without indicating it was amended. They removed the email address of Bercham & Moses which was in the Order and also entered DENIED on my motion, which was not even heard because they ordered me to certify it to the same parties I had already certified it to, claiming it was NOT served on them.
i. There is little or no need for me to contact the apposing parties. I seek accountability yet so far, I am bullied and they are not accountable for the harm they cause me. I appealed due to abuse of process, fraud, and the overall FACT that they are “kicking me when I am down” after being abused greatly here at 360 State Street, New Haven, CT for over 12 years, since January 2013. They are using their jobs as a weapon. The appendix to my complaint, which was served on defendants comprises of 246 pages of longstanding abuse, to include frequent illegal entries, vandalism, theft, and refusing to fix anything but a toilet seat, which I said was last priority, take care of the other matters, including turning back on the dehydrator which keeps windows from being saturated with water - causing mold around the frames which I have had to clean off with Clorox, and more. For a long time they wanted to install yet another vent in my apartment. I claimed that to be abusive and covered the two vents which they were pumping the “garbage flies” and fleas into my apartment along with with something which literally caused me to be so depleted with oxygen, I had to run to a window, open it and try to breath in oxygen.
ii. Bercham & Moses claim to be representing DEFENDANT Elm City Communities on NNHCV245006875-S yet, as with the other defendants, failed to Answer my Complaint and pleadings were not closed.
iii. They only served their appearance on myself and Hoops & Associates. THERE WERE 8 DEFENDANTS. HOOPS entered appearance only for Ansonia State Street. They frauded the upload twice after that, adding pages to conspire with the non-appearing parties. This is unlawful, obviously. Yet the court is oblivious to that fact. My motion also indicates they frauded it after I have appealed, to include adding “360 State Street” which is a dissolved company! I tried to speak to the “360 State Street” which is active, though I had the pleasure of speaking to Attorney Hurowitz at the firm which is their agent of service. He assured me that the company their firm is agent for only handles one property located in Hamden and had no explanation on why they titled their company as such. As it turns out, they have a property located in North Haven which is at 360 State Street. There was a woman from North Haven who allegedly committed suicide from the property I reside in, July 2013. they claimed she jumped from the garage, five or six floors up yet the photo showed no bleeding of the body, which left me bewildered. I know nothing more about it than that.
1. 100 Crown Street, Third Floor, is 360 State Street. Before that woman hung up on me, she said all offices in that building are part of the hurleygroup.net. The following other companies are also located there: Goldblum Real Estate Investments, Inc.
Hurley Team (State Street) LLC
Hurley 45-55 Church Street, LLC
The Hurley Group Property Management, LLC
iv. The date of service of the Summons is frauded on the case information of this trial court case, as well as many other things, which I Motioned the APPELLATE COURT to order the lower court to rectify in order for the record to be adequate for review. They don’t order the trial court. They let the trial court decide for themselves, which in my opinion, bars due process of law on my appeal.
v. September 23, 2024 was when the marshal served defendants in the trial court case. This appearance for Elm City Communities is dated 10/16/2024; which is past the 2-week deadline to file an ANSWER, let alone an appearance. The law is cited right on the Summons as well as laws regarding appearances cited on appearance forms. The return date set by the chief clerk is defective.
9. HOOPS & ASSOCIATES - allegedly appeared on 10/16/2024 yet it was not the same day as Bercham & Moses. They initially filed appearance for only Ansonia State Street yet frauded the upload MORE THAN twice, reuploading with the following:
a) The First page added one or two defendants. They altered it to a certification page, which is obvious fraud, since they certify the form. I have been firmly spoken to by the chief clerk William Pitt, claiming “You have to put everything on the form. You cannot have a continuation page on court forms unless they provide a separate continuation page form!” Yet he allows them to break the procedure on a continuous basis, including having a fraudulent person appear as Attorney Hoops at the Housing Complaint hearing on October 31, 2025 and most likely laugh among themselves that they were just playing “Halloween”.
b) The Second Page was frauded again; the third page was omitted!
i. On the Second Page, they now include “360 State Street, Inc. “ - that company located in Fairfield, CT is not even registered as a business anymore. The other company, which I thought was affiliated, has nothing to do with them and I spoke directly to one of the attorneys of the firm which serves as their agent. He explained that they are their Agent of Service and provide legal service for a property located in Hamden, CT. My conclusion was the company has only one property, yet I discovered, “One of their properties is 360 State Street, North Haven” as indicated by a woman who I spoke to on, 9April 2025, yet she abruptly hung up on me when I was seeking to speak with someone at their firm since Hoops & Associates have entered an appearance on their company, since they are they only company which is active in the business search with the Secretary of State’s website.
ii. The next company name is South Oxford, LLC - which is not titled properly since they go by South Oxford Management Living on the premises. There is no business which is registered as South Oxford Management Living. Apparently, they are registered as South Oxford Management, LLC in the Business Search of the State of Connecticut. It is just a guess I consider this a trade infraction to say the least. Gideon Friedman owns both Ansonia State Street and South Oxford, as well as numerous other companies which are not necessarily legitamately registered in the State of Connecticut - such as Ansonia Apartments, which is even referred to in the $89 billion mortgage on this $2.2 billion property; and which has numerous eviction cases, and yet the Housing Court fails to validate the companies are legitamate, let alone if Certificate of Occupancies are even on file.
iii. The next company on this frauded document is “Beachwood Residential” which they obviously deliberately spell wrong to satisfy the need to stay under the wire, so to speak. The State of Connecticut Secretary actually had their company registered as Beechwood Residential and after I had the four companies owned by Gideon Friedman served at the same address, which is owned by COLONIAL FOUNTAIN MANAGEMENT, none of them Answered, none of them appeared timely, and yet Chief Clerk William Pitt said he didn’t have to enter Default Judgments on them because “These are informal cases. The law is liberally-interpreted.” In other words, they consider themselves above the law even though they are obligated to administer it themselves, and have more of an obligation to abide by the law!
10. The Chief Clerk marked up the forms I properly typed, making a mini lecture out of it: “You cannot indicate continued on anything! You have to fill the form out only!….You have to include the Agents of Service even though the form does not request it” There was nothing on the form which indicated it could not be continued and additionally the housing court allows attorneys to make up NOTICE TO QUITs with their own formats, rather than use the court form published. This system is corrupted and abusive, in my opinion.
11. I considered what Attorney Pitt did to my forms as wrongful on that Friday since I wanted to submit my typed forms and fee waiver For the Housing Complaint. He also changed the name of the case to Bradley vs Ansonia State Street, et al - “to match the Notice To Quit” which he said they did not have on record.
12. I prepared the JD-HM-19 form properly typed and submitted it on Tuesday, October 8, due to struggles in preparing these documents with no wifi in my apartment, and other landlord abuse.
13. The JD-HM-35, Housing Complaint Form was retyped as well because I do not like to present sloppy forms. I submitted both simultaneously with the JD-HM-19 - I said they were to REPLACE the prior forms, since the complaint had not been served yet.
14. Attorney Pitt said, “I already uploaded your case and you have to mark it as amended” In my opinion, He had no right to upload an unserved case and even allowed the Hoops & Associates to WAIT a week to upload the case they already served me with a Summons on, as defective and even fraudulent as it was, since I paid the rent. BOTH SITUATIONS WERE ABUSE OF PROCESS. The return date on the Summons was ILLEGAL, as November 12, and they even entered a different return date which was also ILLEGAL on the case, as November 4. I mentioned it. And why would I even have to mention it? It is their job to ensure the records are accurate and legitamate. This circumstance, along with a fraudulent Notice To Quit saying I did not pay my rent for August and September (when I did) are fraudulent acts which only aid and abet a criminal landlord.
15. My complaint form submitted on October 8, signed, WAS on the case information. I do not see it now! It was to replaice the other complaint form; as was the Summons to replace the slopped-up form which had defective information on it.
16. Not only was my appearance submitted to the court but my Answer and Special Defenses on the erroneous eviction Case, with the main response to the SUBJECT MATTER JURISIDICTION: I paid the rent due timely and accurately as I always do!
a) THERE WAS NO DOCKET NUMBER ON THE EVICTION CASE!
b) THERE WAS NO DISMISSAL OF THE CASE! I claimed this was illegal, abuse of process and abuse to me! The court should have dismissed it; they should not have even docketed it! Yet the court kept the spin going, making the lie bigger and bigger and causing more harm to me figuring I will just give up! I submitted my Appearance and Answer, resenting the abuse of procedure.
c) My Housing complaint was well-prepared and VALID since I paid my rent! Yet this alleged judge, Alayna Stone who is a fraud on many counts, approved the Housing Complaint, which meant that the court determined the rent was paid timely! I referred to the Notice To Quit as being fraud, I submitted a copy of it and also proved I paid my rent! The plaintiff proved NOTHING!
d) The Housing Complaint was served by a marshal when all I had to do was mail it CERTIFIED WITH RETURN RECEIPT TO GO TO THE COURT. It was simply another abuse of procedure by the court and the marshal charged the state almost $3,000 for this, even though she had all the copies and only had to deliver them to three local address - one which was the Agent for the companies owned by Gideon Friedman, located on Temple Street and the building is owned by COLONIAL FOUNTAIN MANAGEMENT, which was my prior landlord at 564 Prospect Street - who conspired with the Bozzuto Management at 360 State Street and abused me further, damaging my tub by literally removing the surface with an acid when I was not there - and getting their kicks by having a comedian Barry Weintraub, which rhymes with tub, to represent them and refusing to show me any credentials which gave him the right to do so. He was probably part of Barack Obama’s Masonic Order of Jesters, re-established when he was in Hawaii, which some claim replaced the friendly clowns who were well-trained, the Shriners. The magistrate was just as dishonest as he was and ruled in his favor dispite all the obvious facts. That was a loss of $1600 on the deposit and over $200 repairing the tub which THEY damaged through illegal entries, which they lied about was not good enough. I even placed an alarm on my door and their maintenance man opened it while I was taking a shower. The loud alarm scared him away. Thereafter, I baracaded my door as I do where I live now for the same reasons!. Possibly LCI was in on this abuse since I was wrongfully evicted on Norton Street, New Haven - from an apartment which did not even have a certificate of occupancy and the inspector who came to my apartment would not tell me that it was illegitamate.I was referred to that apartment by a real estate agent. I also suffered a severely broken foot, including having a Jones fracture and two other broken bones, and was forced to have a hard cast on my foot which almost killed me due to the blood clots that the doctor caused. I was in the pulmonary unit for over a week on coumadin. The nurse call line told me to hurry and call an ambulance when I told her my symptoms. Because they were so helpful, Yale Hospital decided to dismantle their service! This was not the only time I almost died from malpractice by the hospital, which targeted me for the elites.
e) I moved to 38 Arch Street with a very good outlook even though the neighboorhood a lot of crime, which was known to be because Lt. White was making money off it. I had just enrolled at New Haven University in North Haven and was attending a Catholic Church down the road. Everything was disrupted by an illegal arrest on 6/16/2006 by abusive police when I just went to the campus to get my book for my first class. As it turned out the woman and daughter I sat by at church worked at the University and just couldn’t stand the fact I was taking control over my life. She, in fact, testified lies when I had a trial, which was a year past statute of limitations. Attorney Blumenthal conspired with Attorney Russo, who had recently took Lawrence Mark Hurley’s place in 2008 after Hurley was arrested on over 100 charges of embezzlement, having stolen over 100,000 from the court and more from the Prosecutor’s union in a three year investigation. The Middletown Court denied the State Police’s efforts to continue their investigations. Blumenthal knew the trial ordered by Judge Sequino was illegal, so to cover it up he got charges to be illegally added and the judge assigned was the father of the attorney who abused me when I suffered a severe concussion after being hit by a man on my way to work. My forehaed was all black and blue and I had been nearly killed by a 20 ton sander truck years before that - after telling a sex trafficking stalker to leave me alone, he was a pig. I was hospitalized for 3 1/2 months in traction and the attorney who grabbed my case made it a No Fault lying to me that it was better than At Fault. I did not know the difference.and years later discovered that truck driver who tried to murder me got a hefty $25,000 from that insurance. I was left very badly injured and manipulated by corrupted attorneys for pretty much the rest of my life. On or about January 2010, I was thereafter wrongfully evicted from 38 Arch Street, owned by Corey Spruill. He was cheated by the city, and so was I. LCI assured me that apartment had a certificate of occupancy. Corey Spruill was assured also, that there were 3 rentable apartments, so he figured income from all three. Just a few days after moving in, the director of LCI issued an eviction on me, and refused to find me another apartment. The representative who lived next door did nothing despite my persistence sharing the facts about the City’s abuse of power and being dishonest. He was a former Alderman and was appointed as state representative after someone died in a car accident. I was very sick the day the eviction was issued, which was not even the number of days it should have been issued due to the law. Previously, I was refused medical treatment by the resident doctor who replaced my good Dr. Patel, who also was on a different day so Dr. Dhertogue was not supervising. They used their jobs as a weapon to harm me. I was paying rent into court for year with no disposition and they caused Corey to go bankrupt and refused to allow me to be at the hearing in which Judge Abrams, who has abused me before and thereafter (on the Storequest Storage Facility fraud, which resulted in my losing all my possessions even though my rent was paid timely every month; they took it upon themselves to refuse my monthly payment as did T-Mobile - both were fraudulent actions) unlawfully released all money to Corey. I got very sick on the way back to Minnesota, which is where I lived before I regrettably returned back to the East Coast on circumstances out of my control. I was seeking legal assistance with my appeal to the US Supreme Court. I was so sick on the plane that I was transported to the hospital and placed in a coma for three days, at which time I was told I would be transferred to the medical ward for a few days to fully recover since I still had a sinus infection. I called the Appellate Court to inform them I was hospitalized and would be out in a few days, that my intentions to go forward with being reinstated in that apartment were definite. Just a half hour later, the orderly who the ICU doctor said would be transferring me after lunch, came to my room BEFORE lunch and said he was going to take me to the med ward at that time. Instead, he kidnapped me into the psyche ward and I found out the psyche director was disguised as an orderly to further the abuse of the corrupted elites in Connecticut. I immediately appealed the stay against my will and yet I was forced there for 45 days. The non-profit I took my cats to, to hold for me while I was in Minnesota, gave my cats away. They gave me the impression they enjoyed this, which was no doubt a product of social engineering by elites. [ I still gave them the $200 I promised. I found out the director, veterinarian Dr. Johnson, there stole that money and much more - and shortly after that disappeared from that Newington, CT facility. That was the town Police Officer Lavery served, such a caring man and great officer of the law. He was set up to respond to a domestic dispute where the woman did not tell him her live-in boyfriend had an arsenal of weapons in the basement and he literally blew a hole into Officer Lavery using a high-powered shotgun as he went to see and talk to him in the basement. That man was a former DOC corrections officer. He did not expect to encounter such violence.I greatly grieved for his wife Pamela and two daughters] It was a very horrible experience at that abusive psyche ward. People so doped up, one individual was halucinating continuously, and more. I had a severe infection in my tooth, which they refused treatment for and suffered greatly from it. I finally won my appeal, despite this monster of a psyche director seeking to get me permanently committed when I was staying to myself, crocheting. At least I could get yarn and a crochet hook from the social services rep and she also sent faxes to the facility where my cats were. I resented his destroying my brief case just to bust it open when all he had to do was ask me to open it with a combination. All I had in it was court documents. He humiliated himself and reflected such immorality, that when I finally won my appeal, he got the court to order me to return to Connecticut so I would not connect with people who could help me win my rights and also evade from the abuse he caused WITHOUT THE HOSPITAL’s approval. Yet because he did this harm to me, the hospital would not do anything for me because they did not want to get sued, so they continued to let him harm me. I found out later that Larry, the one who was treated heavily with psychotic meds, was forced in that same facility this derranged psyche director was trying to force me in, in Anoka, MN and Larry died. He may have been about 40 if that. It is tragic when supposed loved ones enjoy such treatment to a family member. It reflects the rollout of the “Order of Barbarians”. The psychotropic med which this evil doctor forced on me only made my health worse. After having had a heart attack from being poisoned with lead in my water a few years before that, I had to go back on atenolol and received very good care from Dr. Patel, whose supervisor was Dr. Dhertogue. Yet this dynamic was greatly disrupted by elites who just had to manipulate me out of Dr. Dhertogue’s care, as Dr. Patel was transferred to the cardiac unit since she did such a great job in that area of expertise. She was very supportive when an orthopaedic doctor tried to convince me I had cancer of the knee. After asking him a series of questions, it was evident to me he was humoring himself, fully knowing that if I had gone on the poison he wanted to force on me I would be dead in a short time. Dr. Patel told me she didn’t blame me any for walking out. That was during the the year of longstanding court delays which was abusive to me as well as Corey, who resorted to criminal activity, as he was encouraged by his brother who had just got out of prison. Corey had good intentions and yet he was cheated by the city, having lost all his retroactive social security money from an eye injury which caused him to lose complete sight in one eye - and someone suggested he serve me a Notice To Quit for Lapse of Time on the lease, which in fact required he give me a 60-day letter which was was never done, and also required the city to take part in relocating me since I was getting the disability I had applied for about three years before that, yet cheated on the retroactive pay for three years by the Obama Administration, which caused great stress for me. I continued to pay rent timely yet could not get the dental service I needed and could not pay a very nice nonprofit the $3,000 for helping a cat I adopted which was abandoned in the neighborhood even though she was full bread cat. Someone, most likely a New Haven police officer like Lt White (who obviously took part in setting up Officer Fumiatti to be shot in the head when he got out of the unmarked vehicle, by Ronald Belle, who was not any gun expert yet was prepared to shoot him even though he had SWAT gear on) who tasered “Tranquilla” and she was bleeding out and needed emergency surgery, having organs removed, including her spleen.from this illegal intruder who was able to trip up my ADT system. The mashal who smashed in my door to illegally evict me also tripped up my ADT System, walking over and turning it off with a code. He may have been the one who nearly killed my cat. I was taking care of four cats and they were very happy and in good health. I brought them to where I though they could be kept for the time I needed to go to Minnesota with the money refused by the court to pay my rent. No doubt they are looking forward to creating this horror on my again; here I am a senior citizen and have had a horrible time in this socially-engineered state. They will tack on the excuse of their corruption by claiming, “She doesn’t like it here anyway.” As I have emphasized, my right to pursue happiness has been disrupted by corrupted people.
17. SOME OF THE COURT DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN FRAUDED:
18. MY MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE WAS NEVER HEARD; ADDENDUM TO THE MOTION WAS SUBMITTED THAT VERY SAME DAY OF THE HEARING AND IT WAS DELIVERED IN PERSON TO NON-APPEARING LIVABLE CITY INITIATIVE AND NON-APPEARING ELM CITY COMMUNTIES, AS WELL AS THE HOUSING COMMISSIONER, ALBERTA WITHERSPOON, BECAUSE SHE SAID SHE TOOK INTEREST IN MY RIGHTS. THE COURT REFUSED TO HEAR ANYTHING EXCEPT A MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT; YET THROUGH ME A CURVE BY HAVING ME STATE MY CASE WITH LITERALLY NONE OF THE DEFENDANTS APPEARING, SINCE THE YOUNG MAN THAT WAS THERE, WHO CLAIMED HE WAS ATTORNEY PETER HOOPS, WAS NOT ATTORNEY PETER HOOPS, WHO ENTERED THE BAR IN 1988 - ADDITIONALLY - the presiding PERSON who claimed she was Judge Alayna Stone was NOT her. .
19. My phone was missing for a week in my apartment at 360 State Street, and when it showed back up, someone had deleted over five years of my notes. I had many notes which I used in court, to read off case information, laws, regulations and more on January 13, 2025. The transcript on that court date and others is frauded due to the recording of the hearing being frauded.
20. Affidavits on the frauded transcripts are being submitted to the court, since this court allowed the trial court to deny motions for rectification.
21. Affidavits on the defective case information are being submitted to the court, on this case as well as the similarly-situated eviction case.
22. Motion To Reargue the Motion For Review on AC48416 is going to be submitted shortly due to the fact the court has no right to increase my rent. My rent should be $171.00 and additionally, the court should have referred to the December and January rent, since it was part of the period of time in court and I had paid rent into court in October and November. Now that I realize that my rent should have been $171 as of January 2023, this is additional money I will add to the Predisposition Notice, which left out a dollar amount on the trauma caused by illegal entries when I am here - two of which resulted in physical harm, ransacking my apartment, and thereafter drugging me up! The third one was indeed another opportunity to do the same and most likely kill me since that same day was when I entered my appearance on the fraudulent eviction case against me, 7/2/2019 - amd this was their satanic opportunity to make me disappear on 7/2/2025. I sought to get the court to accept my payments for December 2024 and January 2025, rather than skipping over those months with nothing articulated and it’s no coincidence that this plaintiff has DEBT COLLECTORS as attorneys - as appellees who also have fraudulent appearances as Pro Hac Vice.
23. The trial court entered a typical illegal order, telling me my rent was increased as well as ordering me to pay the landlord, not me - both completely illegal and this “judge” who takes part in fraud after fraud, had no authority to increase my rent. The law specifically indicates the last agreed upon rent to pay into court. This is why I need to go to the further trouble in getting my rights and Motion for Review or Reargue again!
24. Though the court ordered me, the appellant. to pay into court, they should also fix the rent amount. Any increases in rent values has nothing to do with Section 8, which is based on the tenant’s income, and should not be increased simultaneously, particularly when the cost of living has increased greatly and the health industry is oftentimes built on greed.
25. The eviction case which reflects trial court had no merit. THE NOTICE TO QUIT HAD NO LEGAL EFFICACY, AND THEREFORE NOT VALID. The Section 8 rent was paid. In fact the amount paid was OVER what the Housing Authority has on file, as showing in Appendix G, Page 38a of the motion, and a different page number for this Appendix. The Housing Authority has made their record to be $171 effective January 2023 - the same month this landlord was ordered by the court to remove its fraudulent charges against me, totalling almost $14,000! Also, the same month they took all my underwear and painted the vaginal areas black! The illegal intruders painted a number of other things black in my apartment! The Housing Authority did not receive any copy of a Pretermination Letter from the Plaintiff, as also required. I have been overpaying monthly rent with $198. On site charges are not the responsibility of the Section 8 tenant. Additionally a Notice To Quit cannot be administered one way in one hearing and another way in another hearing. In fact, Alayna Stone claimed that the Notice To Quit was considered valid in the housing complaint because it was typed properly! Legal efficacy had nothing to do with it, in her opinion! She was not even at the hearing and none of the defendants were at the Housing Complaint hearing, yet the judge had me, the appellant state my case for argument when nobody was there, except for a young man who was obviously not even an attorney and fraudulently claimed he was Attorney Peter Hoops; which the court frauded on record to be Attorney St. Rock and thereafter he has been referred to as Strock in the current Appellate Ruling on Motion For Default in Favor of Appellant.
26. I no longer refer to myself as plaintiff-appellant since the Appellate Court defines me in trial court terms as apposed to its own terms, which is improper.
27. Motion for Default Judgment was entered to the best of my ability. I am subjected with constant cyber crime. I am indigent. I was finally able to use my scanner, which for months had been disrupted by cyber crime (by illegal intruders or remotely; both of which are common occurrences). All parties, who are not even legitamate appellees, were served because the court ordered it and the case manager refused to upload the file until it was certified to all parties. The case manager thereafter uploaded the MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF DEFAULT IN APPELLANT’S FAVOR because the motion was served to all parties. Yet the Appellate Court accused appellant of not serving these parties which resulted in an order which is outside the law. Appendix B provides the information on the Juris lookups, since the case information only provides Juris Numbers and no appearances except for Attorney Langhammer and Attorney Leone have been entered on the Appellate Record. The copies of sent emails to these parties, at 11:30 pm. on March 6, 2025, as ordered by the court, are also part of Appendix B.
28. Almost all parties have Pro Hac Vice appearances, which is fraudulent, LTKE Law Office excluded.. ALL PARTIES ON THE TRIAL COURT JUNCTURE HAD FRAUDULENT APPEARANCES, AND DEFAULTED ON THE CASE. This includes Bercham and Moses. Code “F” refers to Pro Hac Vice appearances. Additionally, the addresses from the Juris lookup are not consistently valid. No appearance information in the Appellate Court case results in the appellant to have to rely on Juris Lookups. This is included in Appendix B, reflecting Juris Lookups. Not one party Answered the Summons and Complaint issued to them, confidently figuring the court would wash out the case with abuse of procedure. This default alone should have barred the court from even scheduling a hearing! AN AUTOMATIC DEFAULT IN APPELLANT’S FAVOR SHOULD HAVE TAKEN PLACE! I emphasized the fact that most of them failed to file appearances, Let alone be timely. The Chief Clerk’s deliberate entering of a fraudulent return date and refusing to correct it upon my request is unfair and wrong!
29. Appellate Court and Trial court are not supposed to be enjoined. They are separate files for a reason. When a person appeals, they should not be bullied by abuse of procedure with trial court conspiring with the appellate court. The appellate court is the higher court of which the trial court should submit to, rather than receive appellate motions and rule on them. They should be issued an injunctive order by the Appellate Court to rectify case information and defective transcripts, which are the result of frauded recordings, not the caused by the court reporters.
30. A snowball effect results in more and more documentation as a case is subjected to abuse of procedure and other circumstances which are IMPEADING JUSTICE. Therefore, I, the appellant, am not apologetic in submitting several documents, since the eviction against me is as illegal as their 2019 eviction attempt - both times of which no pretermination letters were even submitted to me or the Housing Authority, which is a requirement for the landlord to do on Section 8 tenants; and the Notices To Quit were FRAUD. Judge Stone had no legal right to claim the Notice To Quit was the Pretermination Letter. They are completely different documents and in addition, the Housing Court fails to enforce its “use published forms only if we have them” which helps frauds stay under the wire of accountability, thus harming unaware people as well as myself who is aware and they break laws right in plain sight! This abuse to me has been unfair and overwhelming, as I have stated in previous pleadings!
#END
________________________
Anne M. Bradley, Pro Se Appellant
Anne Bradley
PO Box 206514
New Haven, CT 06520
April 10, 2025
David Goldblum
360 State Street,LLC
100 Crown Street
3d Floor
New Haven, CT 06510
Dear Sir,
Yesterday I called your offices when I could not find a number for 360 State Street company. The woman I spoke to seemed to be a responsible person and justifiably interested in the purpose of my call, so I told her why I was seeking to speak to someone at the 360 State Street office.
Hoops & Associates have once again altered their appearance and entered your company’s name as being represented by them in an eviction case against me. I wanted to find out if your company had realized this.
This woman I was speaking with so candidly all of the sudden got huffy and said I was yelling at her and I was not. Very likely the call was being altered by cyber criminals to make her think I was yelling. I don’t know. I told her I was not yelling and yet she apparently hung up without even telling me she was, or we were disconnected by cyber crime.
I have gone through hell on this Illegal Eviction case against me. I am a Section 8 tenant at 360 State Street. I am perplexed why you named your company the same name, which apparently was in 2020. Nevertheless, because no other company is active, I wanted to have a short discussion regarding this circumstance. I had the pleasure of speaking to Attorney Hurowitz; I just consider it another loose end in this wrongful eviction case against me and decided to contact your company directly since the law firm he works at handles only your one property in Hamden and could not say any more.
I notice there is just a family house in Milford at 360 State Street, yet there may be other reasons for your naming your company that. Meantime, this is an FYI, that Hoops & Associates have listed you as their client. They also listed Beachwood as their client, supposedly owned by Gideon Friedman, and yet he does not have them correct that and the court refuses to have it corrected even though my court document specifies it is Beachwold and certainly if they really were their client with a retainer, they would know how to spell the name.
What does it benefit to lie, that is what I would like to know. Yet people may see me as an example on WHY since I have gone through hell in my life and it never stops. I am sick of being targeted and bullied.
This concludes my letter, for what it is worth. You may be interested in looking up the case information. I am still working on my Motion For Argument and this letter will be included.
Regards,
Anne M. Bradley
Ref: Case AC48452
NHH-CV-24-5006875-S
.png)
Comments