HOUSING_Section8_Statement 15March2024
HOUSING SECTION 8 STATEMENT
Link to this blogpost:
http://www.publiusroots.org/2024/03/housingsectionstatement-15march2024.html?m=1
Once again! my device is hacked and they delete what I am typing!
https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/03/documents-reflecting-corruption.html?m=1
I may be unable to link the above due to CYBER CRIME ON THIS DEVICE. Hopefully you can copy and paste - yet GOOGLE IS abusing power - using CYBER CRIME - I can only hope that CEO Sundar Pichai may address this corruption and have support from his officers in the company to hold people accountable. They should be arrested, fired!
(I had to take pictures because this device is being manipulated - most likely MICROSOFT co-pilot app, WHICH I UNINSTALLED! These bastards put it back on my device and do not list it in the apps to DELIBERATELY ENJOY CONTINUOUS CYBER CRIME! I can not scan the documents and post them as I was able to do in the past - and ofcourse, the criminal underworld - CIA et al - stole my flashdrive 2 years ago when I was in NYC! They can alter what they want! FRAUD COURT RECORDS ON CASES I HAD! THE COURTS FRAUD RECORDS AS COMMON PRACTICE IN CONNECTICUT!
DONALD TRUMP FILED BANKRUPTCY IN 13 CASES IN BRIDGEPORT, CT ALONE! NO DOUBT HE FILED MANY MORE IN NYC - FLORIDA, AND MANY OTHER LOCATIONS! AND THE USA PAYS FOR THAT! TRUMP TOLD THE PUBLIC HE ONLY FILED ONCE OR TWICE!
HOUSING CONNECTICUT HOUSING LAWS FOR LANDLORD - TENANT https://www.doorloop.com/laws/connecticut-landlord-tenant-rights#:~:text=If%20the%20tenant%20requests%20any,days%20within%20a%20written%20notice
**Due to current abuse by maintenance, 3/27/2024, I claim they landlord had nefarious intent to begin with. Not even providing 24 hour notice--when they are required to give at least 48 hour notice before ATTEMPTING to enter tenant's apartment
**Additionally, the landlord is REQUIRED to take care of maintenance problems reported by tenant WITHIN 15 DAYS. Instead, they trash my letters of request!
The landlord must provide a rental unit that complies with local health and safety conditions. If the tenant requests any big repairs on the unit, landlords must promptly provide them, which is usually 15 days within a written notice.
THE LAW DOES NOT MATTER HERE! IF I WITHHELD MY RENT, THEY WOULD EVICT ME!
Keep in mind that if the landlord doesn't comply with these repairs and the unit doesn't comply with minimum housing requirements, the tenant may be legally allowed to partially withhold rent, deduct the repairing costs from the monthly rent, or file a court order through their Housing Court.
THE LAWS DO NOT MATTER! ORGANIZED CRIME MATTERS!
Landlords may not evict a tenant in acts of retaliation or discrimination for exercising their required housing rights.
THIS LAW IS A TYPICAL SELF-SERVING LAW:
Is There Rent Control in Connecticut?
As of today, rent control policies are prohibited in Connecticut; this means that a landlord may charge the tenant any amount of rent that they consider appropriate for their lease.
THE LAW CONTRADICTS THE LAWS OF SECTION 8! FEDERAL SUPERSEDES STATUTORY! YET WHEN THERE IS NO JUSTICE, ANYTHING GOES!
I will be back...I am working on some notes on another video 3/28/2024 at 3:52pm. EST-USA
YET THIS BLOGPOST INCLUDES:
* JUROR DUTY RESPONSE - PERMANTENTLY REMOVE ME FROM THE LIST
*UPDATE 3/27/2024
Maintenance entered my apartment this morning, an hour after they tried to illegally enter! One of them unlocked my door. They stupid guy who had to check the HVAC filter said I did not have a HVac. I said, You do not even know what a HVAC is? I told you I do not use the HVac when you walked in. He looked at my WINDOW and said, "There is no way I can get over there. I said, "You are supposed to be checking the HVac not the window." Does he even know what a HVac stands for? Heating Ventilation And Collong? I wish I recorded this! The other man, probably a Ukrainian, was ruder than hell and woul not tyell me what he was doing! He was obviously messing with the washing machine also, which was remotely turned off, but he probably got on the phone and told "Victor the the Deficator" to turn it back on for him to to vandalize it, probably!
Victor relieved himself in my trashcan last maintenance check - WHICH WAS MORE THANA YEAR AGO!
My email to management:
The motion is in this blog twice because of CYBR CRIME. This was made a separate blog which is easier to review: https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/03/jury-duty-2024-no-way-jose.html?m=1
* FEDLOAN RESPONSE SINCE THEY DISCHARGED MY LOANS
(This is just another Technocracy Targeting Trick) SEIZE THE TECHNOCRATS' WEALTH, PUT THEM IN PRISON! ALL OF THEM!
Link for this blogpost: http://www.publiusroots.org/2024/03/housingsection8statement-15march2024.html
Due to Microsoft now blocking me from uploading screenshots and scanned pictures from my laptop, I have taken pictures from my phone and place them on the link BELOW - this is the beginning, more pictures to come! way more:
https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/03/documents-reflecting-corruption.html?m=1
UPDATE: I HAD TO PREPARE A MOTION TO REMOVE ME FROM JUROR LIST. 3/21/2024
PICTURES OF THE APPENDIX WILL BE UPLOADED O THE LINK ABOVE.
I need to scan in the document and email it now.... 4pm 3/21/2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/02/table-of-contents-premier.html?m=1
The following is my statement made in segments according to certain aspects of the corruption I have experienced, beginning with the current HOUSING LEDGER / BILLING FRAUD.
I had to get over this hurdle, but was able to create a new blogpost after swearing for a while.
Re: OVERPAYMENTS BY SECTION 8 TENANT
SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS
TOTAL PAID FROM 1/13/2013 TO 1/1/2016
$221 X 35 = 7,956.00
Amount which should have been billed me
$93.20 x 35 = 3,262.00
OVERPAYMENT $4,694.00
TWO ERRONEOUS RENT INCREASES OCCURRED
Erroneously initiated 3/1/2016? No! 1/1/2016 $198
Note, they actually charged me 1/1/2016; frauding records to cover up they got me arrested 2/4/2016 since I told them what my legal rights were, citing laws and reg’s!! I refused to pay the on-site charge anymore, telling them they overbilled me. I also said they are illegally administering Section 8; I do not pay any on-site charges - their notice letter regarding the on-site electricity charges was specifically referred to as on-site! Thereafter, they went to high expense granting United Illuminating access to their building (which is illegal on its face since there was no inspection; and the services they provide were not grounded, which made me sick from the excessive wifi radiowaves. This was corrected only recently, 2024, only upon order from higher authority, since this city government is so corrupted)
Total charges I paid: $198 x 84 months $16,632.00
TOTAL I SHOULD HAVE PAID 7,828.80
OVERPAYMENT 8,803.20
Note, I was erroneously arrested 2/4/2016!
This NAZI-RUN GOVERNMENT IN CONNECTICUT IS WHY! I paid my rent on 2/3 - via automatic check sent to them 5 days prior to when it could be deposited, due to the landlord lying about not getting the check and illegally posting checks as late, etc.
Payment of rent was $198; which I documented opposition to and yet the local Housing Authority refused to conduct a hearing, etc! They NEVER responded to any of my complaints throughout these 11 years!
Erroneously initiated 1/1/2022 $264
Again, this was erroneously instituted! They did not even notify me; let alone provide me opportunity to respond or sign agreement to this amendment in the lease! I found out just from going to their office in 2023 with a complaint packet - and request for hearing - which they did nothing about - except backdate a notice saying they would call me and do a phone hearing - so I had no idea and nor did they call me!
TOTAL PAYMENTS I MADE
198.00 X 26 MONTHS $5,148.00
TOTAL I SHOULD HAVE PAID 2,423.20
OVERPAYMENT 2,724.80
TOTAL OVERPAYMENTS $16,222.00
Prepared and Signed by:
_________________
Anne M. Bradley
SECTION 8 TENANT
PH 203-508-0858 Apt #719
Page 2 of 2
Tenant’s Statement
Regarding
SECTION 8
Fraudulent Billing
By 360 State Street Landlord
My name is Anne M. Bradey. I am over the age of 18. I believe in the Power of Oath. This statement has been notarized below.
It is my contention that the real owners of 360 State Street are the builders, Bozzuto Management, Inc. Or the like, with the name of Bozzuto - there is so much fraud in the documentation, that I am unable to determine the name of the real company - and no doubt they do this to evade taxes and more.
It is my contention that they have an illegal relationship with State Street Bank - which has listed many banks which fall under its name, of which they profit from. They claim that their worth is in the trillions of dollars.
Regarding the ledger, it is so far from being legitamate billing, I focused on what I owe instead. They overbilled me over $13,000 and tried to evict me in 2018 in retailiation for my persistant demand for a hearing with the Housing Authority - which of course, was never acted upon - because the Housing Authority is very corrupted and the Director and other upper management do not care about doing their jobs. They serve corrupted politicians.
I believe a thorough audit of their records should be made due to their abuse of power and obscunding of funds.
INOMPETENCY should not be allowed as a defense by them!
I have calculated my rent according to the regulations, not their bogus tier model which is outright illegal and serves their nefarious wants.
(1)
There is no point in seeking an attorney for representation in this state. I have yet to meet an honest attorney here, and no doubt they remain unseen due to the immense corruption, including cover-up of murders, illicitly arresting innocent people, and more.
NEGOTIATING IS OFF THE TABLE. They have proven to be criminal in intent and I demand my rights.
My objective is to leave this state - life has been hell for me and because counseling has been interrupted with more corruption to get through MEDICARE (since I have QUALIFIED MEDICARE BENEFICIARY, QMB - a federally-funded program which this state has absolutely no legal right to run, though they claim it is now a MEDICAID. PROGRAM, WHICH IS TYPICAL FRAUD IN THIS STATE. I have Food Stamps, issued through the Dept of Agriculture. This state wastes more money in managing it FRAUDULENTLY. For instance, they claimed they could reduce my food stamps by over $50 a month because they claim that the small increase I obtained to SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY, which is $15,000 year, and certainly falls under TITLE 19, is THEIR DESERVED MONEY, NOT MINE, DESPITE THE FACT THAT IT WAS SLIGHTLY INCREASED DUE TO COST OF LIVING! I submitted my response to their corruption. Carefully prepared, typed. I got no response, which is typical when they do things wrong in this state!
I have suffered a great deal from this corruption and there is no solution unless I contact a few people I have kept in contact with - one of whom was obviously murdered - poisoned by this criminal underworld: Hon. Colin Powell. I have been very grateful for his attention to my problems with this pathetic, unjust system, reflecting NAZI socialism, not the Federal Republic with a Constitution!
Because of the abuse I have had from this landlord, I made discoveries on researching the company and city records. They managed to get a first mortgage for Bozzuto, Inc. Which is not marked as satisfied on record. They managed to get a second mortgage for a separate company - not the owner - which also is
(2)
not marked as satisfied on record. To make things much worse, they erroneously used MEDIA LIES to report that this $2.2 billion building was sold for $160 million to the following company in November 2023: SOM Living (using a UK name but they are registered in USA, South Oxford Management Living)
I will make a separate statement regarding Storage Facilities (2 - Public Storage and Storquest) literally stealing my possessions, both times which involved Judge John Abrams, who is nothing but a career criminal, in my opinion. Recently they had the audacity to summons me for Jury Duty. I am providing you my response, which I had faxed by the copy center. My gmail is corrupted by Gmail and Microsoft CYBER CRIME. Recently they saturated my gmail to rig it being way over storage. Google not only refused to allow me to continue Google One, they took back my Google One payments (3 for 3 separate accounts) claiming “You cannot do that; you have to have one account only” I told them that was criminal, they had no right to demand that. I had been paying for storage like this for about 15 years. Their creating their Google One agenda was nothing I wanted, and they cannot breach contract since I was still paying. That is when they took back my money from my bank account. My bank has to allow them to do that, according to banking laws which nefarious politicians enacted, which deprive us our Constitutional Rights to our own money and reflect companies being allowed to breach purchase contracts made! It is additionally easier for them to fraud people with excessive charges!
Total overpayments in Section 8 rent are $16,222.00
The violations to me also run in the tens of thousands in cost and excessive trauma! They include: Illegal arrests, assault by state trooper, sexual assaults, illegal housing evictions (3), failure to implement legitamate housing regulations with criminal intent, frequent illegal entries in my apartment including vandalism and theft, medical abuse, dental abuse, fraudulent billing, fraudulent small claims, fraudulent courts and more!
An additional statement regarding this last paragraph (above) will be issued. Emphasis: I prepared blogs to share my own experiences as well as share information regarding the good and
(3)
bad circumstances which this society has activity in. I do not monitize or monitor. Hopefully it will save the good people time, and as far as those who enjoy doing wrong, they are nothing which I support, and they frame themselves!
Prepared and Signed,
________________________
Anne M. Bradley
SECTION 8 TENANT
360 State Street, #719
New Haven, CT 06510
(no mail is allowed by me here due to to their tampering with my mail!)
Mailing Address Only: PO Box 206514, New Haven, CT 06520
Current Phone number: 203-508-0858
MY NUMBER HAD TO CHANGE DUE TO BILLING CORRUPTION BY T-MOBILE. They stopped my autopay and REFUSED TO PROCESS MY PAYMENT, then turned off my service two weeks later. I got another service, which unfortunately is now owned by them, Mint Mobile.
MY BLOGS CAN BE FOUND HERE:
(4)
Personal Statement
Regarding
Corruption Experienced in Connecticut
My name is Anne M. Bradley. I am over the age of 18 and believe in the power of oath.
This statement is to elaborate on the following paragraph, for emphasis:
The violations to me also run in the tens of thousands in cost and excessive trauma! They include: Illegal arrests, assault by state trooper, sexual assaults, illegal housing evictions (3), failure to implement legitamate housing regulations with criminal intent, frequent illegal entries in my apartment including vandalism and theft, medical abuse, dental abuse, fraudulent billing, fraudulent small claims, fraudulent courts and more!
ILLEGAL ARRESTS
I was a matriculated student at the University of New Haven. The bookstore, located where their campus police are, called me and told me to pick up my book which I needed for my Saturday class, the following day. They said they were not open on Saturday. They did not tell me if the library could issue me one in order to be prepared for the class, so I had to stop what I was doing in order to get there to pick up the book which I had already paid for. In fact, they told me they would give the book to the campus police for me to pick up there because they were closing at noon. This was a rigged dynamic which police came out and falsely arrested me. Accusing me of sending a dangerous package to the university president, whose secretary was actually a woman I even sat by at the Catholic Church I was attending. Even though she and her daughter were well aware I had applied and was being processed to begin school that coming semsester, she (Lucy Wendlyn) did not tell me she was the university president’s secretary and her daughter claimed to have been permanently brain damaged from a car accident and SHE could no longer work at Stop & Shop. - obviously mocking my experiences yet
(1)
I did not realize they were lying and humoring themselves. I gave them the benefit of doubt and thought they were friends at church. They were nothing of the sort. Her daughter also worked at the university and upon a trial by jury for a misdemeaner (deliberate, illegal abuse by the court judge, who was the father of the crooked attorney, Paul Levin, who was abusive to me when I was deliberately hit by a vehicle by a medical employee in training, and therefore had a right to sue the company as well - all destroyed by this crooked attorney who I removed within weeks, yet my insurance company said they could not speak to me even though I removed that attorney, based on information he submitted, which they would not disclose! Obviously false information! I had a concussion and the ambulance refused to take me to the hospital, saying so what, and making numerous abusive remarks. I stood there crying. Fortunately a co-worker at Kaman Aerospace, Nick, came to the site and took me to the hospital. I was on a temporary assignment there although hoped it would work into a permanent job. My head was visibly injured, very black and blue and the attorney refused to take a picture and made abusive statements to me. I could barely get to his office, having impaired vision and feeling ill as well as having immense pain in my head. I had a prior head injury from being hit head-on by a sander truck, weighing 20 tons, years before that. The truck slammed into me head-on deliberately trying to kill me on a sunny day with bare roads. I was unable to stop my vehicle; my brakes were disabled by someone. I was called into work that day, another obviously rigged circumstance. And the attorney who took over that case was tied to organized crime, depriving me of my rights, making the case a NO-FAULT case rarther than AT-FAULT. He was a liar through-and-through.
I motioned to dismiss the case many times. Arrested in 2006, with no disposition for over two years, and a judge threatening to have trial by jury if I did not plea. I stated over and over, there was no probable cause. They did not contact FBI due to claims that it was a mailed package. They charged me requiring me to be a in public place, which I was not at the time the secretary claimed the crime occurred. She conspired with Campus Police and rigged all this to keep me from attending the school and eventually discovering she and her daughter had been lying to me at church.
(2)
The prosecutor was Lawrence Mark Hurley, who for years had been stealing money from the courts and prosecutor’s union. He stole almost $200,000 just based on a limited audit of three years. The Middletown Court refused to allow them to audit more records even though Hurley had been there 19 years. The case was washed out. Though they disbarred Hurley and told him to pay back the small percentage of what he obviously stole from the state of Connecticut (made up of many parasitic traitors helping themselves to government money) they allowed Hurley to practice law behind the scenes, working for criminal defense attorneys who are filfthy rich in this state. The crooked attorney who replaced Hurley was a co-conspirator obviously, working as his assistant, who was promoted to Supervisory Prosecutor and was thereafter promoted to being a judge in Danbury, which took part in spinning the fake SANDY HOOK SHOOTING, which no doubt Barack Obama rewarded him/them for.
At trial, the judge ADDUCED charges and had the stenographer claim they were REDUCED. I argued to the stenographer/court reporter that the laws were cited and just look them up - the word was ADDUCED which made a big difference!
I was charged a misdemeanor. No trial can be conducted for a misdemeanor and the case HAS to be dismissed if it is not properly disposed of in one year! My dismissal on that issue was also submitted!
The judge, Judge Levin, would only give me three preemptory challenges for a jury of 6, which was illegal. They therefore got away with allowing a contractor who worked for city and other police as a living, to be entered on the jury. I apposed it, claiming conflict of interest. They judge gave me a too-bad answer. He used that very juror to manipulate the case. There were jurors who told me this when I saw them in public. Because of him and because they wanted to get back to work, they compromised and allowed a guilty for one of two charges - a repeated BREACH OF PEACE (charging me twice for Breach of Peace for the same incident, which is a VIOLATION OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY), adding charges past the statute of limitations, another violation, and more! I also emphasized these corrupted police forced me at the psyche hospital to further their abuse, at which time I was drugged up and raped after reporting a young man who said he was suicidal, breaking glass in the
(3)
bathroom and slitting his arms to die. The hospital covered it all up and probably charged the young man even though the narcissistic psychopath of a psychiatrist refused to put him on suicide watch and claimed he just wanted to stay there because he liked the food - when just the opposite was the reality. He wanted to go back to work as a contractor. I think he worked on wall-boarding. I called a police officer’s phone voicemail and told him what was happening there. I do not recall anything after that. They obviously drugged and raped me, based on circumstances. A common NAZI ploy to keep people obedient.
The case continued to illegally spin by the judge. He was unsuccessful in getting an attorney to approach me and tell me I could not motion for aquittal, dismissal, and retrial all at the same time. I told her I did not believe her. The conspiring that goes on in this state is massive.
Because I motioned for all three, the judge was not able to do what he WANTED to do. He had to aquit me, yet rigged it for Prosecutor Russo to appeal secretly and last minute so I would have no time to respond! I kept up on the status of the case, as Lori suggested incase more twists and turns occur. I promptly submitted my objection, citing laws, caselaws, even doctrine was quoted. Levin knew this was his last wildcard and denied my objection an allowed the appeal! No matter how much they used stupid-as-a-weapon, the higher courts went along with it because they knew how corrupted they are and wanted to put me in my place, as criminals do. I was sentenced to probation, humiliated at Albertus Magnus School, which violated me for billing, and a few teachers were enjoying being abusive. The Business Law teacher said our assignments were to analyze the given cases. So I went to the law library, pulled the court documents and analyzed them, providing the reasons the judge lied, falsified the case and therefore the caselaw he created from the issued opinion was false. The plaintiff was the Connecticut WineGrowers and I called them and told them my discoveries and took the time to send them copies and my statement. He was very upset because he said the attorney they paid to represent them was swindling them yet they were up against a wall regarding what to do since politicians just went along with the dishonest attorney, who conspired with the court. I told him I could understand why this would greatly upset them all. I said I could not do anything more but
(4)
make him be aware of the falsehoods; that my experience with attorneys from accidents that I was victim of already in this state (two; concussion and eye damage and the Berlin Police commander’s daughter broad-sided my car and I could not even get out of the car because she smashed in my door and totaled my car) and my landlord, a group of attorneys in Fairfeld, CT, poisoned my water, leaching lead and many other harmful substances, which thereafter caused me to have a heart attack - all of which was covered up and the city employee who got the water tested a few times and it was still excessive for lead, sabatoged me as a witness in court - probably threatened to be fired.
This criminally adjudicated case resulted in probation, at which time the probation officer attempted to use lies and deceit to accuse me of not showing up when in fact I was not informed of any change to report. She said whe was on vacation, as I recall. They probably gave her an unannounced paid vacation to set me up for not reporting! I had to inform a number of people, most not in this state, yet sent emails to politicians anyway, even though most of them would only add coal to the fire to keep their organized crime going.
She was unsuccessful in getting me forced in prison, which would be an opportunity for this organized crime to get someone to kill me!
ASSAULT BY STATE TROOPER
The stalking trooper, Jon Naples, from Southington, CT, impinged my shoulder while arresting me, so he could force me at the hospital. I was in immense pain from the assault and yet refused treatment at this same place that was a house of horror when I was illegally forced there by University of New Haven police.
The recording of the assault is on the Spotify account,which I had referenced in my Table of Contents for my blogposts. It would not surprise me they further altered the account, when it was switched from Anchor.fm/terra-cotta. This recording was indeed altered and took me several months to get through the court. Upon having copies made so I could share them with some people I kept in contact with, I discovered they were unlayerd by the copy center’s anti-virus programs, and shared this with the FBI agent I kept in touch with.
(5)
The CD was frauded by the police. Nevertheless, the assault by the officer was still there and anyone with any sense would be able to tell they altered it.
SEXUAL ASSAULTS
I was sexually assaulted at the psyche ward in 2006, when I was illegally committed there and the psychopathic psychiatriast, Dr. SAVAGE, was trying to get me permanently committed even though the commitment was illegal as it was. BASICALLY, I WAS KIDNAPPED - a common practice of this pathetic, wasteful psyche community, which enrich themselves from corruption. Few people in it are actually there to help people.
After volunteering for United Way, which scooped up $19 million of the FAKE SANDY HOOK SHOOTING MONEY, someone offered me a ride home as apposed to taking a bus, which in fact was rigged so no buses would be stopping there after 8 pm. And I was asked to work past that. I do not recall anything about the ride, I was obviously drugged with chloroform and assaulted. My apartment was ransacked, and when I woke a day later, having no clue what occurred, all I could do was call the FBI agent and leave him a voicemail telling him what a blur everything was and my apartment was ransacked and I think they sexually assaulted me in my apartment.
ILLEGAL HOUSING EVICTIONS
1. New Britain, CT - where the landlord, a group of attorneys in Fairfield, CT - under the title “Managers, LLC” or possibly another name - it is so difficult to recall which landlord was which name - possibly that was the name of my landlord when I lived on Prospect Street in New Haven, which also illegally entered my apartment, vandalized, and stole my my $1,600 deposit. I submitted a lawsuit against them, the court used abuse of procedure to dismiss my case, also enjoying the FORCED DEATH of my father - after the pedophile priest from Albany poisoned him with arsenic causing him to bleed out and refusing to take my father to the hospital. I called police from the other side of the country telling them that priest was obviously trying to kill my father and to please make sure an embulance gets there to pick him up. Though I had no proof he was a pedophile at
(6)
the time, it was evident he was the filfthiest type of person on this earth, and as it turned out he had been a pedophile for 20 years in Albany, NY and 26 victims joined a class action lawsuit against him, which is why the Catholic Church transferred him to New Mexico to hide him. His name is David Bentley. His right to be a priest was taken. That was all, even though he was an obvious seriel killer as well. My brother and other siblings conspired with the priest, who they never even met - but just love to befriend anyone who I claim is harmful, to “prove” that I have a bad judge of character, and frankly, to satisfy their disappointment they never hit the jackpot when I was nearly murdered - because they would have been the beneficiaries if I died. My brother went down to New Mexico telling me he would help me get Dad in a decent nursing home since he was being abused. He lied to me and bragged he lied, that he came down to kill Dad since he was no longer useful. I sent letters to the Medical Examiner and other officials and no one cared to investigate. Instead, I was poisoned in my home, with lead, my cat was poisoned by an intruder, I had a heart attack and more. Housing Court is just a weapon for crooked politicians. I was evicted, forced homelessness at the shelter I had actually volunteered at for over a year. They all made a joke of it, saying I “earned” my right there, which I found hurtful and ignorant of the corrupted circumstance.
a) As emphasis of prior attorney corruption: (My mother already retained the crooked attorney who isolated her when my father wasn’t around and my father was against what she did but could do nothing about it since she signed the lawsuit and thereafter prayed I would die. I resented her telling people this, she was showing she had no mind of her own and I was embarassed she kept telling others. I never wanted to return to the East Coast in 1998 but due to corrupted attorneys, I had no choice. I was illicitly fired from my job, they constantly socially engineered my life, they even stole my insurance files on the sander truck lawsuit, that the insurance kept open and said I would be covered for life, modifying my lawsuit agreement, thanks to my father’s help - but my father was killed and thereafter Barack Obama got my lawsuit transferred to Chicago, which is outright illegal since every state has their own laws - and I completed a claim form and was able to email it to them because I had a scanner and internet in my apartment. The next day, I headed to the courthouse to see Lori to get her help in what to do next. I never made it and the
(7)
man in front of me as I was getting on the train, sprayed silicone on the floor. Most likely using a WD-40 can since it is easy to conceal, and since WD-40 makes silicone. He just stood there and watched. I fortunately had hold of the handrail which saved my life. Richard Blumenthal had that train removed - after all, my life was saved and that was the last thing he wanted! He also tried to socially engineer me to sue Metro North, which had nothing to do with it. It was the criminal in front of me trying to kill me. If I had not had hold of that handrail, I would have surely died from a broken neck or back, slamming into the other side of the train. As it turned out, my leg was severely injured from a grade 4 hamstring tear and unfortunately I had to go the abusive local hospital which refused treatment, claiming I had nothing wrong and he would give me crutches to passify me! I called the FBI agent’s voicemail at 10 pm. Or later telling him they made me wait over 5 hours in severe pain even though I was taken there by ambulance. I said they should have at least done an ultrasound, to locate the tears in my leg. 5 minutes later that nasty doctor issues an ultrasound, so I am sure Agent Aldenburg gave them hell. The doctor reported still I had no damage, and the technician called him saying, “I can’t find anything because there is too much blood” I was internally bleeding that badly and the doctor refused to do anything and also demanded I walk home after midnight - over a mile away and most surely an opportunity to cause me more harm, even death due to my inability to do any long walking - he did not even wrap my leg, let along put a brace on it, as I needed. I suffered over 2 weeks before I could see a doctor and unfortunately it was at their clinic. I just happened to have a scheduled check up there; having no real choice on doctors and could only hope I would not be treated like that ER supervisor. The doctor I saw ordered an MRI and they said I had a badly torn hamstring. He called me immediately and said I needed surgery. I said, “If you think I will have surgery there, you are crazy. They will kill me.” I saw a doctor outside of the hospital and he arranged for me to have light physical therapy including heat and cold treatments and I gradually healed.
2. New Haven, apartment had no Certificate of Occupancy. Yet the Housing Court processed the Notice To Quit. A friend offered to help me move, having just recovered from a badly broken foot as I was painting the wall which the landlord could not paint because he got very ill. I said not to worry, I would do it. Someone rigged it so I
(8)
would fall, I am sure. I broke my foot in three places and this crooked hospital set me up for blood clots,placing my foot in a hard cast so the swelling was disrupted and I had another brush with death. I was fortunately saved by a nurse hotline which the hospital had. Thereafter the hospital removed that service, obviously disappointed their attempt to kill me failed! Fortunately I had decent nurses in the pulmonary unit near ICU. Yet an abusive wacco psychiatrist came in my room trying to recruit more bodies for his ward. I told him to get the hell out of my room or I would call security. He refused, so I called the nurses and also called security. Shortly after my foot recovery, they rigged my landlord to process an eviction and I later found out that this apartment, referred by a real estate agent, had no CO. The Housing Court is REQUIRED to make sure the apartment was legitamate before proceeding with a case for a landlord. THEY OBVIOUSLY KNEW IT WASN’T BUT WERE EAGER TO HARM ME, since I am a targeted person in this state. I had to pay for movers, which milked me dry just to move a mile away. It cost over $1,500. The NEXT apartment also did not have a certificate of occupancy, even though the city housing inspector said it did when I checked! And their director, who put that department into over 160,000 debt, told me he was evicting me just days after I moved there! I told him that was illegal in so many ways. The senator, Toni Harp - who I found out was a transgender from San Francisco - was also trying to get me evicted at that point and thereafter. The representative lived right next door. He got his daughter to refuse documents even though he clearly knew how indigent I was, and he wasn’t doing a damn thing to help me get my rights. He became the representative after being an alderman since the representative who was there in that district had a suspicious car accident which killed him. It made no difference how many laws and rules I cited. I paid rent into court since the landlord was lying, to cover up his incompetency - and the court allowed him to file a small claim against me even though I paid rent into court! The abusive judge was John Abrams. I was sick when the marshal smashed in my door and activated my ADT system. He walked over and entered a code, which was a clear reflection those systems have no value! They allow crooked officials burglarize, illegally invade whereever they want - probably police as well. I called the FBI agent I had met a year before leaving him a voicemail because I had no one else. Support System in this corrupted state just did not exist. I thought attending church would
(9)
help, and it turned out to be disasterous. Housing Court REFUSED my rent for that month because they needed a backup reason to evict me. I ended up using that money to fly to Minnesota to seek help from attorneys there, since my case was at the US Supreme Court. I was very sick that day with a sinus infection that was not treated. The doctor I saw at UConn Health Center had a predsposition, first time I saw him and he was very abusive, obviously only caring to feed the corruption in this state because they reward people like that. He refused treatment, and I got angry, left. It took over 4 hours to get there just by bus, and another 4 to return. The next day I was illegally evicted. Neither police or ADT called me when the alarm went off. It was all rigged!
3. Attempted eviction where I live now. This landlord claimed I owed over $13,000 as a Section 8 tenant who paid my rent timely! Again, I had another corrupted judge and greatly struggled to get my rights. He was trying to evict me the same day,denying my motions to subpoena Housing, etc. He furthered his corrupted tactics yet I am grateful the ones I contacted pressured him to do his damn job and not be such a lying good-for-nothing in a pay-to-play scheme to harm me. Two years later they finally remove the $14,000 balance saying it was a court order yet continued to fraudulently bill me, which is where I am at now. They also remotely turned off my washing machine and continue to vandalize my apartment, including replacing my queen size box springs with king size boxsprings and I can not even sit on the bed because it will collapse! I was gone for about 6 hours that day. I have had times when there is no oxygen to breath, running to the window, like I was poisoned with a gas. I have covered the HVac unit ducts and use alternative heating and cooling. They have infested my apartment with maggots. I had to use spray cans that release the spray until they empty, and could not be in the apartment for at least 4 hours. The maintenance manager relieved himself in my bathroom trash can in January 2023! It was after this they decided to get revenge for my complaining about that - and remotely turned off my washing machine when I had a load of clothes in it. They did nothing for three months. An employee came to my apartment and said he would make the door open - not using a tool - calling the maintenance manager and having him turn on the washing machine! Yet he claimed the washing machine had a wiring problem and could not be turned on! I wanted to call him a liar but it would not prove to be productive and they would just cause more harm to me. They keep entering and vandalize my apartment. They
(10)
never changed my door lock when I moved in, and I complained about that in court. The manager, Susan, retorted, “We don’t have to change your lock. You can trust us” which was outright stupid to say. She had a fake pregnancy all of the sudden and the judge insisted the case had to be promptly conducted since she was due to have her baby any day, which was a lie. She was not pregnant. She had a surrogate. The following days the management office said she was not available because she was going to all the properties they owned in the state. Again, my emphasizing that is no way for a 9-month pregnant woman to be working, was just obvious that they were just all lying about her being pregnant anyway. Though I won the case, they continue to use their corruption to harm me whatever way they can, including poisoning my food.
FAILURE TO ADMINISTER LEGITAMATE HOUSING REG’S WITH CRIMINAL INTENT
Though I could add more, I do not want to take time to since this has already cost me several hours of time to prepare.
ILLEGAL ENTRIES IN MY APARTMENTS
Though I could add more, I do not want to take time to since this has already cost me several hours of time to prepare.
VANDALISM, THEFT, POISONING MY CAT, KILLING RESCUED CATS, TASERING MY PET CAT
My cat was poisoned by an illegal intruder and killed in New Britain, CT
I rescued cats, to be picked up by a nonprofit I called. Someone illegally entered and killed them. They were safely in clean pet containers. I left my apartment and they were killed. One of the four cats I adopted and took care of was also taserd and she was bleeding out when I returned home. The crooks who illegally entered put her in a closet! That is like what murderers do when they kill a homeowner! I was able to get help from a nonprofit to take care of that cat, telling that nonprofit I would be happy to make as generous of a donation as I could once my social security is retroactively sent to me, covering two years’ time since I applied. Barack Obama got
(11)
them to only send me a couple months and they refused to do anything else! They treated me like I deserved it - that is just how corrupted this government is! That nice lady who helped me died shortly after that, just like the alderwoman who was deceived by the city government on what the MTW program really was, and sent her to Washington DC to argue for it when she was only going by what they told her, not what she researched. It was just a way to syphon out Section 8 money to favorites through the Housing Authority. She understood why I told her that, emphasizing the one who signed that program as the author just took History at Stanford Univ in CA and did not even get his degree - he was paying someone to do his homework. He also was claimed to be the founder of the fraudulent donation website, gofundme.org - his name is Rod Solomon. How could he become a member of the BAR in Washington DC? They obviously microchipped him. Nevertheless the MTW program had no value. Though I know of only one person who greatly benefited, they basically used him as “poster child” to prove how well it worked. Many companies are so corrupted in this state. When they rolled out the fake COVID agenda issuing lockdowns, the local attorneys filed “pro hac vice” on cases to evade taxes etc! That term reflects they were from other states, which they were not!
I could share much more but have time constraints. I am providing copies of the fraudulent ledger billing which is just the tip of the iceberg in this state:
l MEDICAL ABUSE
l DENTAL ABUSE
l FRAUDULENT BILLING
l FRAUDULENT SMALL CLAIMS
l FRAUDULENT COURTS
l PHYSICAL INJURIES TO ME, CAUSED BY OTHERS
l MY FATHER WAS MURDERED
By my brother and pedophile priest!
This concludes my statement prepared to the best of my ability. Any edit needs will be hand-written if necessary. Misspellings will be underlined.
Prepared and Submitted,
__________________
DATE INSERTED HERE: 3/21/2024 - beginning
SECTION 8 HOUSING
HOW MUCH IS PAID BY TENANT?
HERE IS THE LAW!
Source of the complete law:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2010-title42/html/USCODE-2010-title42-chap8-subchapI.htm
(3) 40 percent limit
At the time a family initially receives tenant-based assistance under this section with respect to any dwelling unit, the total amount that a family may be required to pay for rent may not exceed 40 percent of the monthly adjusted income of the family.
People with Median-based incomes qualify, yet are not guaranteed housing. That is when the 40% cap is applied. In Connecticut, a median income for one person is $69,000 a year! (See notes at the end of this)
§1437a. Rental payments
(a) Families included; rent options; minimum amount; occupancy by police officers and over-income families
(1) Dwelling units assisted under this chapter shall be rented only to families who are low-income families at the time of their initial occupancy of such units. Reviews of family income shall be made at least annually. Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subject to the requirement under paragraph (3), a family shall pay as rent for a dwelling unit assisted under this chapter (other than a family assisted under section 1437f(o) or (y) of this title or paying rent under section 1437f(c)(3)(B) 1 of this title) the highest of the following amounts, rounded to the nearest dollar:
(A) 30 per centum of the family's monthly adjusted income;
(B) 10 per centum of the family's monthly income; or
(C) if the family is receiving payments for welfare assistance from a public agency and a part of such payments, adjusted in accordance with the family's actual housing costs, is specifically designated by such agency to meet the family's housing costs, the portion of such payments which is so designated.
§1437f. Low-income housing assistance
(a) Authorization for assistance payments
For the purpose of aiding low-income families in obtaining a decent place to live and of promoting economically mixed housing, assistance payments may be made with respect to existing housing in accordance with the provisions of this section.
(g) Regulations applicable for implementation of assistance payments
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, assistance payments under this section may be provided, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary, with respect to some or all of the units in any project approved pursuant to section 1701q of title 12.
(10) Rent
(A) Reasonableness
The rent for dwelling units for which a housing assistance payment contract is established under this subsection shall be reasonable in comparison with rents charged for comparable dwelling units in the private, unassisted local market.
(B) Negotiations
A public housing agency (or other entity, as provided in paragraph (11)) shall, at the request of a family receiving tenant-based assistance under this subsection, assist that family in negotiating a reasonable rent with a dwelling unit owner. A public housing agency (or such other entity) shall review the rent for a unit under consideration by the family (and all rent increases for units under lease by the family) to determine whether the rent (or rent increase) requested by the owner is reasonable. If a public housing agency (or other such entity) determines that the rent (or rent increase) for a dwelling unit is not reasonable, the public housing agency (or other such entity) shall not make housing assistance payments to the owner under this subsection with respect to that unit.
****
(i) In general
Not more than 25 percent of the dwelling units in any project may be assisted under a housing assistance payment contract for project-based assistance pursuant to this paragraph. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term “project” means a single building, multiple contiguous buildings, or multiple buildings on contiguous parcels of land.
(H) Rent calculation
A housing assistance payment contract pursuant to this paragraph shall establish rents for each unit assisted in an amount that does not exceed 110 percent of the applicable fair market rental (or any exception payment standard approved by the Secretary pursuant to paragraph (1)(D)), except that if a contract covers a dwelling unit that has been allocated low-income housing tax credits pursuant to section 42 of title 26 and is not located in a qualified census tract (as such term is defined in subsection (d) of such section 42), the rent for such unit may be established at any level that does not exceed the rent charged for comparable units in the building that also receive the low-income housing tax credit but do not have additional rental assistance, except that in the case of a contract unit that has been allocated low-income housing tax credits and for which the rent limitation pursuant to such section 42 is less than the amount that would otherwise be permitted under this subparagraph, the rent for such unit may, in the sole discretion of a public housing agency, be established at the higher section 8 [42 U.S.C. 1437f] rent, subject only to paragraph (10)(A). The rents established by housing assistance payment contracts pursuant to this paragraph may vary from the payment standards established by the public housing agency pursuant to paragraph (1)(B), but shall be subject to paragraph (10)(A).
(I) Rent adjustments
A housing assistance payments contract pursuant to this paragraph shall provide for rent adjustments, except that—
(i) the adjusted rent for any unit assisted shall be reasonable in comparison with rents charged for comparable dwelling units in the private, unassisted, local market and may not exceed the maximum rent permitted under subparagraph (H), except that the contract may provide that the maximum rent permitted for a dwelling unit shall not be less than the initial rent for the dwelling unit under the initial housing assistance payments contract covering the unit; and
(ii) the provisions of subsection (c)(2)(C) of this section shall not apply.
Connecticut State Median Income: 2023-2024
Family size | 100% State Median | 60% State Median |
1 | 69,255 | 41,553 |
2 | 90,565 | 54,338 |
3 | 111,874 | 67,124 |
4 | 133,184 | 79,910 |
Note:
Very Low Income (VLI): VLI incomes are 50 percent of area median incomes. Low Income (LI): LI incomes are 80 percent of area median incomes.
For me, my income is $15,000 yet they treat me like I have a high income! They never give me my rights as a matter of practice and procedure! I have to continue to make argument after argument, and they keep cheating me! I get a COLA increase in Social Security - they claim they reduced my food stamps because
you got a raise and that money belongs to us
To say their reasoning involves TARGETING BY ORGANIZED CRIME, would be an understatement!
DATE INSERTED HERE: 3/21/2024 - end
========================================
JURY SHMURY DUTY.... NO F IN WHEY!
======================================
Anne M. Bradley
PO Box 206514
New Haven, CT 06520
March 13, 2024
State of Connecticut Judicial Branch
Jury Administration
PO Box 260448
Hartford, CT 06126=0448
Fax No. 860-263-2770
Email if possible: jury.administration@jud.ct.gov
Ref: CT JUROR ID 0002436837
RESPONSE TO SUMMONS
Attention Jury Administrator,
RE: REQUEST TO BE REMOVED FROM JURY SELCTION
I have absolutely no confidence in the court system in Connecticut. There is no accountability. ORGANIZED CRIME is what this state relies on most of the time!
I have no choice but to live here. I am indigent. I pay my bills. I live within my means. I assert my rights. I expose corruption!
The court operations is pathetic! A great waste of money and I emphasize, only serves Organized Crime.
Apparently excuses for Jury Duty include:
Reasons for Being Excused from Jury Service
· Medical reasons.
· Public necessity.
· Undue hardship.
· Dependent care.
· Student Status.
· Military conflict.
· Other reason deemed sufficient by the court.
My “other reasons” would include:
1. There is no Due Process
2. Records are frauded
3. Judges lie
4. They play constant DEVIL’S CHESSBOARD
5. MY LANDLORD ILLEGALLY ENTERS MY APARTMENT WHEN I LEAVE MY APARTMENT; AND VANDALIZES, STEALS ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS.
Should your office still demand my presence, I will follow up with another letter and elaborate on all the corruption I have experienced. They may want me to be an opportunity to make a case sway a certain way because I will NOT vote! The continuous fraud is a big reason! Failure to abide by laws, court rules is a typical day at the park here!
My participation - even any juror’s participation, will not matter! The court already has their ENDS JUSTIFIES MEANS agenda on cases requiring jurors!
Please see to it that I am taken off the list permanently and the summons is revoked! I want this proof in writing.
I was not able to check my mail for several weeks due to my apartment having been vandalized severely. I checked my mail on March 9, at which time I found this notice in my mailbox. I do not get mail where I have lived since January 2013 due to corruption by the owner-landlord. They tamper with mail.
Sincerely,
To: State of Connecticut Judicial Branch
Jury Administration
Jury.administration@jud.ct.gov
From: Anne M. Bradley
Assigned Juror ID #0002436837
203-508-0858
Date: 3/18/2024
Today I made numerous efforts to folow up on the letter faxed to your office five days ago. THE COURTS JUST USE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NO ONE IS AVAILABLE. IN FACT, IT IS OBVIOUS THEY PROGRAMMED MY PHONE TO NO BE CONNECTED TO ANY CLERK IN THE CLERK’S OFFICE.
Your office fails to respond or act on the Letter Requesting Permanent Removal.
Should you keep playing your game, I will submit a motion. I assure you, I will not make this secret! Quite possibly this may feed the narcissism that fuels the corruption in the courts. Any attention they can gain, is savored.
All I can do is try. This is a horrible state to live in.
Regards,
Anne Bradley
Anne M. Bradley
PO Box 206514
New Haven, CT 06520
March 13, 2024
State of Connecticut Judicial Branch
Jury Administration
PO Box 260448
Hartford, CT 06126=0448
Fax No. 860-263-2770
Email if possible: jury.administration@jud.ct.gov
Ref: CT JUROR ID 0002436837
RESPONSE TO SUMMONS
Attention Jury Administrator,
RE: REQUEST TO BE REMOVED FROM JURY SELCTION
I have absolutely no confidence in the court system in Connecticut. There is no accountability. ORGANIZED CRIME is what this state relies on most of the time!
I have no choice but to live here. I am indigent. I pay my bills. I live within my means. I assert my rights. I expose corruption!
The court operations is pathetic! A great waste of money and I emphasize, only serves Organized Crime.
Apparently excuses for Jury Duty include:
Reasons for Being Excused from Jury Service
· Medical reasons.
· Public necessity.
· Undue hardship.
· Dependent care.
· Student Status.
· Military conflict.
· Other reason deemed sufficient by the court.
My “other reasons” would include:
1. There is no Due Process
2. Records are frauded
3. Judges lie
4. They play constant DEVIL’S CHESSBOARD
5. MY LANDLORD ILLEGALLY ENTERS MY APARTMENT WHEN I LEAVE MY APARTMENT; AND VANDALIZES, STEALS ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS.
Should your office still demand my presence, I will follow up with another letter and elaborate on all the corruption I have experienced. They may want me to be an opportunity to make a case sway a certain way because I will NOT vote! The continuous fraud is a big reason! Failure to abide by laws, court rules is a typical day at the park here!
My participation - even any juror’s participation, will not matter! The court already has their ENDS JUSTIFIES MEANS agenda on cases requiring jurors!
Please see to it that I am taken off the list permanently and the summons is revoked! I want this proof in writing.
I was not able to check my mail for several weeks due to my apartment having been vandalized severely. I checked my mail on March 9, at which time I found this notice in my mailbox. I do not get mail where I have lived since January 2013 due to corruption by the owner-landlord. They tamper with mail.
Sincerely,
Anne M. Bradley
203-508-0858
Page 2 of 2
FEDLOAN USED TO GANG UP ON ME RECENTLY
===========================================================
To: DEPT OF EDUCATION? THIRD PARTY BILLER, CONTRACTED BY US GOV: EDFINANCIAL, dba Federal Student Aid
From: ANNE BRADLEY
DATE: March 13, 2024
Re: Fake Account: 1028813360-1
Real Account: 864825862
CONGRATULATIONS, YOU HAVE DONE WELL IN USING YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A SOCIAL WEAPON TO TARGET HONEST PEOPLE!
I spent years, thousands of documents, corrupted judges in lawsuits I filed, and more - all at my own expense, from being deprived of an education in Connecticut - all due to corruption! THEY FRAME THEMSELVES!
I RIGHTFULLY SUBMITTED REQUEST FOR THE LOANS TO BE REMOVED FROM MY RESPONSIBILITY DUE TO BREACHES OF THE SCHOOLS AND THE DEPT OF EDUCATION! I FILED COMPLAINTS ON TWO SCHOOLS RIGHTFULLY! ABUSE BY TEACHERS DISRUPTING MY STUDIES WAS GENERALLY WHAT I EXPERIENCED AT THE FIRST SCHOOL.
1
I transferred because of that abuse! I did all I could to file complaints at that school and they said, “You cannot file any complaint because this is night school, accellerated” I argued that the school should not be able to get any funding for it and student loans are breached by the school.
Thereafter, I was abused again! Literally kicked out of the school with no incident, and a lying employee who claimed my Chinese professor requested it! I went back to the campus the following Monday, and at least had enough time to discuss this issue to Jian Xing Wu, PhD. He assured me he did nothing of the sort! He left the school thereafter!
As a matriculated student, I had a right to meet with school administrators yet was deprived in both circumstances. I have had to continuously file documents! UNQUALIFIED TO EVEN TEACH, Betsy Devos forwarded my one complaint requesting the Inspector General of the Dept of Education, located in Washington, DC - to the Governor of NY! I do not even live there, do not EVER want to step foot in the area I lived in due to being so badly abused, including attempted murder putting me in the hospital 3 1/2 months, a crooked attorney whose brother paid a hitman to murder the President of Chile just because he refused to sell Pepsi in his country, and so much more - lies upon lies! Sexual Assaults, with no rights as a victim! Always worried about what my siblings will do next to me, what my mother will do next to me, and
2
completely destroying any sense of social support - rather, being cheated and slandered instead! Including my younger brother stealing the money he got from selling my store, rather than handing it over to our father, at which time he would have handed it over to me! Taking advantage of the fact our father could never file a lawsuit against his own son! This aspect was taken advantage of on many occasions, and my father was killed by a brother bragging he came down to make him die because he was no longer useful to anyone! Additionally, during school, the storage unit I had for over 9 years and timely paid for decided not to process my payment and then accused me of evading my payment. I proved I had paid for the money order with a copy and mailed it the same way! I had to use prepaid money orders because they tried frauding me other times, telling me they did not get my check, and I would send a replacement and they deposited both when I only owed for one month! It overdrafted my account! This corrupted scheme worked so well for them, others did the same thing to me! The next storage unit I had, as well as T-Mobile refusing to process my payment and thereafter closing my account - they all breached contract yet in this corrupted state, they are given a pat on the back by corrupted judges and officials!
To say I have been hit with corruption from all sides would be an understatement! The state I live in is constantly abusive, constantly
3
illegally invading my apartment, vandalizing and stealing my property as well as my personal information! Why not? My own uncle stole my Social Security Number to evade taxes and US Customs tariffs on a SECOND brand new luxury vehicle, a Mercedes Benz for his wife! My father confronted him about it and shortly thereafter my father almost died on the operation table from having an obviously poisoned gall bladder which almost burst on the operation table when he had emergency surgery! They did they same thing to me to allude it is hereditary, claiming my gall stones were made of fat, which was false - they were made of calcium, 8 of them in the gall bladder, and the doctors did not want to operate, they wanted me to die! Fortunately, when I had another very bad attack and went to the ER, the hand specialist was on staff for emergency surgies, and he operated and I was told after that I was filled with infection and could have died had it lapsed any longer! (I had to see him for an injured finger from a co-worker and unsafe work conditions using a deli slicer which had no guard. The co-worker threw a heavy metal piece into the sink, making a loud noise like a gun went off and terrified me. She said she was sorry, anxious to leave work because she had a date.)
To summarize, GET OFF MY BACK! THE LOANS WERE FINALLY DISCHARGED FROM MY ONE SUBMISSION OF
4
REQUEST FOR DISCHARGE! I SUBMITTED MY FINAL REQUEST FOR DISCHARGE TO FAFSA, SINCE I WAS A VICTIM OF ADMINISTRATIVE ABUSE OF PROCEDURE EVERYWHERE ELSE! IT DIDN’T HELP TO HAVE A SECRETARY OF DEPT OF ED WHO WAS AN AMWAY BILLIONAIRE, UNQUALIFIED TO HOLD THAT POSITION, OR EVEN BE A TEACHER, YET KNEW BARACK OBAMA WAS FAVORING MY YOUNGER BROTHER, GIVING HIM $500,000 FREE MONEY TO EXPAND HIS BUSINESS! REWARDING HIM FOR CHEATING ME OUT OF $30,000! I NEVER THOUGHT HE WAS DO SOMETHING SO EVIL, HAVING A THIRD CHILD AND BUYING A NEW CAR WITH IT! IT TOOK PROBABLY TWO YEARS OR MORE TO GET THIS DISCHARGE, OF MY REQUEST, AFTER NELNET’S ABUSE INCLUDING FRAUDING THE LARGE FILE I SUBMITTED CAREFULLY!
Sincerely,
"ME2" - not really signed like that, just adding some dry humor
======================================================
======================================================
AS FOLLOW UP ON JUROR SELECTION, I PREPARED THE FOLLOWING MOTION:
Docket No. : STATE OF CONNECTICUT
______________________ : SUPERIOR COURT
V : NEW HAVEN, CT
_____________________ : MARCH 21, 2024
MOTION FOR SUMMONED ANNE M. BRADLEY TO BE PERMANENTLY REMOVED FROM CONNECTICUT JUROR LIST AS OF TODAY
Pursuant to CPB 16-2, 16-4 and DUE PROCESS OF LAW this summoned citizen is motioning the court to be removed from the Juror List Permanently, including on aforesaid case.
HISTORY
A summons for Jury Duty was mailed to aforesaid citizen, Anne M. Bradley, to which she immediately responded to upon obtaining from her mail, as requested by the court. Request for Removal was made by letter. Yet the DANBURY, CT court fails to reciprocate this justified request.
FACTS
1. The court has used artificial intelligence to manipulate Ms. Bradley’s calls so she is unable to speak to a person as a follow-up of her response, faxed to the court using the fax number on the Summons Notice.
2. Anne Bradley is ordered by the court to be at the court on April 24, 2024.
3. Response to Anne Bradley’s letter was an it’s-not-my-job and therefore this motion is being submitted to ensure the court processes this citizen’s justified lack of confidence in the court system of Connecticut.
4. No information on the court case to which this court is summoning her for was provided and since she is unable to speak to a person to find out more information, this cannot be provided at the time of which this Motion is presented. A copy of the Summons is provided and should be made part of the case for attorneys’ reference.
5. As stated in the letter, also attached to this motion, Ms. Bradley has experienced NO JUSTICE WITH THE COURTS. They serve their wants. They break laws. They fraud records. They abuse power. They enjoy an immunity which in fact is criminal, since no one should be above the law. They are appointed to abide by the law. They take oaths to administer the law when they join the BAR. They take further oaths of office as employees of the State, which includes NOT ABUSING POWER, NOT STEALING MONEY, NOT TAKING BRIBES, NOT ENJOINING THEMSELVES WITH ORGANIZED CRIME.
6. This summoned citizen realizes that SATANISM is a common practice in the State of Connecticut, including by many who have made great profit through committing crimes. An example would be the ENRON CORPORATION. Another example would be the CLINTON FOUNDATION. There are many more which could be listed. The Church of Satan is located in SANDY HOOK, CT.
7. This summoned citizen has been traumatized by this state’s corruption, has been illegally evicted, has been a victim of attempted murder several times, and has been sexually assaulted and physically assaulted. The physical assault was by a state trooper, Jon Naples.
8. The Elites in this state consider assaults as a means to get people to be obedient, which aligns with NAZI ideology. There has been nothing this summoned citizen who is disabled, has ever done to harm anyone. She only believes in accountability, which is greatly lacking in this state.
9. This summoned citizen has FEDERAL POVERTY LEVEL INCOME; otherwise she would leave this state today if she could afford it. In addition, she has been frequently frauded, as well as a victim of theft of her possessions in her storage unit at Public Storage as well as at Storquest - even though she timely paid her rent.
a) Storquest failed to appear on the case she brought against them, which is an automatic default in her favor. This court enjoyed breaking the law and not issuing that! Judge Abrams enjoyed being the administrating judge in charge of civil lawsuits in New Haven, abusing power.
b) Judge, John Abrams, enjoyed being in the New Britain Court when her possessions were stolen by Public Storage in 2011, which refused to deposit her prepaid money order, which she had issued for a few years since there were incidences they claimed her check was missing and she would issue a replacement check and they would cash both checks. Anne Bradley told them if they do not want to deposit it, they would have to wait for the money order to clear the Post Office before they could get that payment, which takes 60 days, at which time they would issue a replacement check to Public Storage. In the meantime, Anne Bradley continued to pay her rent yet they fraudulently billed her with criminal intent to steal her possessions, claiming they were seizing her property over a fraudulent bill of $260, even though they never paid her for the $400 they owed her from a court case ruling less than 6 years prior to that.
10. This summoned citizen could list many traumatic incidences involving this court directly and indirectly and may have to take the time to present that in a revised motion, should this court continue to abuse power and fail to not act upon this PRE-TRIAL MOTION sufficiently and timely before April 24, 2024
11. Any payment which this citizen obtains will just be considered due to the state, as they have criminally done with food stamps. This citizen does not have MEDICAID, considers the MEDICAID program illegally managed, and never will take part in any MEDICAID program. This citizen has federally-funded FOOD STAMPS, which this state enjoys profiting from as administrator. This citizen has FEDERALLY-APPROVED, FEDERALLY-FUNDED Qualified MEDICARE Beneficiary, which this state has somehow been able to latch onto as administrator, which this citizen claims is nothing more than OBSCUNDING FUNDS. This state has a duty to follow and administer state laws. Not federal laws. They are obligated to follow them, not administer them. This state claimed that since this citizen received a 3% increase in SOCIAL SECURITY, they can now take that money from her by decreasing her food stamps and increasing her Section 8 rent. This state also frauded records further, to cover their tracks, by issuing a report that this citizen pays $93.20 for her rent to cover up for their demented reasoning about her SOCIAL SECURITY increase, which still leaves her as a TITLE 19, FEDERAL POVERTY LEVEL, indigent citizen.
12. This state shows no reflection of being competent and relies on criminal activity to cover up for its deliberate fraud, embezzlement, etc. Lawrence Mark Hurley was charged 180 counts of embezzlement from removing people’s signatures from their checks using a chemical, and then signing them himself and depositing them in his secret accounts. That activity for which he was audited only covered three years. The State Police requested further audit to be approved due to the obvious probable cause. It was denied by the Middletown Court! Additionally, the Middletown Court changed the charges to ONE COUNT LARCENY, AND ONE COUNT FORGERY - even though Lawrence Mark Hurley stole on separate occasions as a serial embezzler, to include taking money from the STATE PROSECUTOR’S UNION. The state’s disbarring this career criminal who obviously had accomplices, was not enforced, since he was obviously practicing law for criminal defense attorneys such as Norman Pattis. Hurley was replaced by his assistant, Kevin Russo, who should have been investigated thoroughly due to his obviously taking part as a conspirator or co-conspirator in this embezzlement operation. No investigation on the court files was made, since Hurley had the chemical to remove ink from anything, right at his work site. Additionally, the supervising marshall attending this citizen;s illegall-conducted trial as if he was an assistant attorney to Russo - both of whom should have been investigated as conspirators or co-conspirators in the criminal embezzlement operation which Lawrence Mark Hurley had regularly taken part in - most likely the 20 years he was there at the courthouse. Instead, Russo was later rewarded with a judicial position in the Danbury Court - WHICH IS THE LOCATION OF WHICH THIS STATE CLAIMS JUROR SELECTIONS ARE HANDLED BY THE STATE. It is also the court which pushed the fake SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOOTINGS, which nobody died, and Adam Lanza was not even a real person. Experts have estimated well over ONE TRILLION DOLLARS was obscunded from the economy, especially the government and through donations coming from fraudulent local events as well as from all over the world. This citizen considers that apparently the clerk in the City of Milford was realizing this was a fraud operation, since he was fired and they used mainstream media to accuse him of frauding the donations.
13. Many crimes are hidden in this state, even to a high expense of spinning the lies.
14. The fact that this court selects April 24, 2024 as a date for this citizen to appear as a juror is another issue, reflecting SATANISM, reflecting malicious and vexatious intent. Upon searching this date, there is much social spin, including news articles regarding April 24 being a “doomsday” of some sort. FAKE fire alarms was a frequent abuse from 2013 to 2018 where this citizen lives. They enjoyed this trick since she had severe injuries to her leg on a few occasions, and required several months to heal. Having to go down 7 flights of stairs, only to find out the fire alarms were FAKE. And they frequently did this during the times she was recovering physically, or was working on numerous documentation, for which they would enjoy opportunity in stealing from her if she had to leave her apartment from an emergency. As difficult as those times were, she would place her work in a cart and have to take the stairs bringing it with her to keep them from illegally entering her apartment and stealing them during the fake alarm.
15. Aforesaid citizen could validate more facts, yet it is evident that what she has already relayed to the court is indisputable and reflects her right to be permanently removed from the Juror’s Selection. This was the third time for which she was summoned since she has lived in this state since 1998.
a) One time for which she was summoned to Meriden, CT in 2005- which was literally impossible to go to timely using public transportation, which is all she could afford. Additionally, she requested to be permanently removed from Jury Selection.
b) The second time was a trial involving an auto accident, which she was removed from the list based on her bad experiences with several attorneys.
16. It is this citizen’s suspicion that Kevin Russo, et al in DANBURY, CT decided to isolate her as a form of abuse. Why he is even able to be an attorney, let alone judge is just reflective of how deeply involved the organized crime in this state manipulates the government. Russo picked up where Hurley left off on
the false arrest case involving University of New Haven Police on 6-16-2006,
Anyone reading this can easily see the pattern: 6-16-2006 and now 4-24-2024. The point is it is reflective of CRIMINAL INTENT for that day, and most likely she will be a victim again - the illicit arrest also included their enjoying a forced, illegal commitment order at the Yale-New Haven psychiatric dept with a psychiatrist named DR. SAVAGE, who lived up to her name, bragging she was trying to permanently commit her and also at which time she was drugged and raped after leaving a Voicemail for a law officer since a patient, who told Dr. Savage he was suicidal, was not placed on suicide watch and he broke the mirror in the bathroom and slashed his arms, bleeding to death. Dr. Savage only responded to him that he just wanted to stay longer because he liked the food, when in fact, he wanted to get back to work as a wall-border for a contractor.
a. Anne Bradley refused to plea due to lack of probable cause at the preliminary hearing; and no letter of complaint from alleged victim, the President of the University, Dr. Kaplan. Additionally, this involved a letter she mailed, and yet they failed to notify the Post Office or FBI. Police charged her with RISK OF INJURY, which is negligance of a minor - obviously to further inflate the case on record rather than actually do their jobs. Lori Semrau explained to her what that charge was, to minors, not a University President.
b. Anne Bradley emphasized that the illicit arrest was abuse of power
c. For two years, the case was heard nearly every month, with no disposition.
d. According to law, when a person is accused of a Misdemeanor and there is no disposition for a year; the case must be dismissed.
e. Instead of dismissing the case, as Russo should have recommended, when Hurley was arrested, he was hell-bent on abusing Anne Bradley all the more since she claimed all along that Lawrence Mark Hurley was an obvious criminal, including conspiring with assigned judges, on the case. Only one judge, Cronan - not the Kronin who was part of staff there, was ordered to hear her case that day - and he said her justifications for dismissal were indeed compelling and since it was the first time he viewed the case, he promised to hold a hearing on it on a scheduled date. Instead, the court operations told him to go elsewhere, which was no coincidence! Judge Levin was the assigned Trial Judge = who was father to Attorney Paul Levin of Hartford, CT - who was an abusive attorney who she removed from an injury case when a medical employee on duty ran into her and was not ticketed by police even though he caused her to have a severe concussion, most likely attempting to kill her as what has happened to her before. He pushed her out into traffic at a very busy intersection in Windsor, CT. It is conceivable that Attorney Levin got a back-door deal from the multi-billion dollar Medical Company he worked for, to wash out the case. Though Anne Bradley had great pain from a severe concussion, reinjuring her head since she was hit head-on by a 20-ton sander truck on a sunny day, with bare roads and a driver who was working a second shift despite that making sure his truck was fully loaded with sand - which was a deliberate reflection of just how criminal the courts are, abusing power, tied to organized crime, and using their jobs as a weapon rather than administering justice. Upon disputing this judge to have a right to hear the case due to CONFLICT OF INTEREST, Judge Levin took it upon himself to deny that motion. Nefariously argued by Kevin Russo, who also enjoyed adducing charges to the case, which was illegal. They charged Anne Bradley two counts of Breach of Peace and one count of Reckless Endangerment on the University President, whom she never met and only sent letters to; and who never issued a LETTER OF COMPLAINT, which is mandatory as part of DUE PROCESS OF LAW, and which they deliberately broke the law on, as a matter of everyday practice. They informed the court reporter that the charges were NOT adduced, they were REDUCED to further their court crime. Nevertheless, the laws which were cited reflected ADDUCE. The reporter still refused to change her transcript because she was told to leave it as-is.
f. Judge Levin and Kevin Russo falsified records to “justify” adducing charges on a case which began with a false arrest of RISK OF INJURY, and no probable cause. They enjoyed taking advantage of Anne Bradley’s lack of knowledge of the Law, yet Anne Bradley learned as much as she could, discovering that their manner only reflected an attitude of “laws are made to break” rather than administer - of which she argued in court proceedings.
g. Judge Levin illegally only allowed three preemptory challenges for a jury selction of 6 on a case which originally only had one misdemeanor charge, which they even altered from RISK OF INJURY TO RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT, obviously to cover up a need for a Letter of Complaint, probable cause, etc.. One juror relied on the police for his welfare, being that he did contracting work for them and obviously knew them, causing CONFLICT OF INTEREST, yet the judge wanted him on the case. That juror caused the jury to be a hung jury and was obsessed with a guilty verdict. He was also appointed the administrator of the jurors. The other 5 jurors were anxious to return to work and therefore compromised with a guilty on one of the Breach of Peace Charges - which in fact reflected VIOLATION OF THE 14th Amendment, DOUBLE JEOPARDY, since no one can be charged twice for the same crime on the same case. Though argued., the judge denied argument.
h. This citizen Anne M. Bradley, seeks the court to remover her from this case as a juror and permanently remove her from the Juror’s List, which she considers to be fraudulently managed anyway.
17. This Motion comprises of 11 pages with an Appendix comprising of 11 pages. Paginations had to be entered by hand due to an uncorrectable typing defect.
18. This is a pre-trial motion and therefore should be ruled on sufficiently, within 10 days, with April 4 as the 10th day. Case Name and Number has to be entered by the Court, since none was provided in the Summons. Request for issuance of ruling to be emailed as well as mailed.
LAW
The below referenced laws and rules are printed and provided in Appendix
Sec. 51-217
Sec. 51-219
PB 16-2
PB 16-4
PB 16-5
PB 16-6
PB 16-7
PB 16-8
CHAPTER 16, JURY TRIALS - to be applied throughout
SUMMARY
Rather than the court just allowing this summoned citizen to be REMOVED FROM THE JUROR LIST, she has to go public with this motion. Extreme Narcissists love this attention. They latch onto whatever public attention they can get, affixed on their belief system that nobody can touch them, they can get away with anything.
CYBER CRIME makes this motion an even more difficult document to create. There is little accountability when it comes to the billionaires who became billionaires as government parasites.
As relayed, this citizen would not be residing here in Connecticut if she could afford to leave. It has been nothing but hell. The few she has been able to rely on are not reachable. Living on the East Coast has been nothing but one nightmare after another - all because of organized crime, which includes the murder of her own father after a pedophile priest obviously poisoned him with arsenic, causing him to bleed out. The depravity in this state is only increasing. The courts are organized crime. The few judges who she has known to be honest and forthright either have untimely deaths or they are shuffled around the state. This DELIBERATE LACK OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, in fact, is DOMESTIC TERRORISM.
WHEREFORE, This citizen Anne M. Bradley, moves the court to remove her from this case as a juror and permanently remove her from the Juror’s List.
Prepared, And Submitted,
Anne M. Bradley
Summoned Juror #0002436837
PO Box 206514, New Haven, CT 06520
APPENDIX
LAWS
Juror Summons
Response by the court to Request For Removal Letter
Information regarding the date 4/24/2024 being used for DECEPTION, CRIME
_________________
Anne M. Bradley
I COULD have written so much more on the crap this state is full of!
LAWS for this motion:
LAW
Sec. 51-217. Qualification of jurors. (a) All jurors shall be electors, individuals lawfully admitted for permanent residence, as defined in 8 USC 1101(a)(20), as amended from time to time, or citizens of the United States, who are residents of this state having a permanent place of abode in this state and appear on the list compiled by the Jury Administrator under subsection (b) of section 51-222a, who have reached the age of eighteen. A person shall be disqualified to serve as a juror if such person: (1) Is found by a judge of the Superior Court to exhibit any quality which will impair the capacity of such person to serve as a juror, except that no person shall be disqualified because the person is deaf or hard of hearing; (2) has been convicted of a felony within the past three years or is a defendant in a pending felony case or is in the custody of the Commissioner of Correction; (3) is not able to speak and understand the English language; (4) is the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of the State, Treasurer, Comptroller or Attorney General; (5) is a judge of the Probate Court, Superior Court, Appellate Court or Supreme Court, is a state referee, is a family support magistrate or is a federal court judge; (6) is a member of the General Assembly, provided such disqualification shall apply only while the General Assembly is in session; (7) is a registrar of voters or deputy registrar of voters of a municipality, provided such disqualification shall apply only during the period from twenty-one days before the date of a federal, state or municipal election, primary or referendum to twenty-one days after the date of such election, primary or referendum, inclusive; (8) is seventy-five years of age or older and chooses not to perform juror service; (9) is incapable, by reason of a physical or mental disability, of rendering satisfactory juror service; or (10) for the jury year commencing on September 1, 2017, and each jury year thereafter, has served in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut as (A) a federal juror on a matter that has been tried to a jury during the last three preceding jury years, or (B) a federal grand juror during the last three preceding jury years. Any person claiming a disqualification under subdivision (9) of this subsection shall submit to the Jury Administrator a letter from a licensed health care provider stating the health care provider's opinion that such disability prevents the person from rendering satisfactory juror service. In reaching such opinion, the health care provider shall apply the following guideline: A person shall be capable of rendering satisfactory juror service if such person is able to perform a sedentary job requiring close attention for six hours per day, with short work breaks in the morning and afternoon sessions, for at least three consecutive business days. Any person claiming a disqualification under subdivision (10) of this subsection shall supply proof of federal jury service satisfactory to the Jury Administrator.
(b) The Jury Administrator may determine, in such manner and at such times as the Jury
Sec. 51-217a. Jurors excused from service. Option to be considered for service. (a) A person shall be excused from jury service during the jury year commencing September 1, 1999, and each jury year thereafter, if during the next three preceding jury years such person appeared in a court for jury service and was not excused from such jury service, except that such person may request to be summoned for jury service during such three-jury-year period in the same manner as persons are summoned who are not excused from jury service. Such request may be made at any time with written notice to the Jury Administrator.
(b) The court shall have authority to excuse a juror from juror service, upon a finding of extreme hardship.
(P.A. 84-393, S. 2, 20; P.A. 86-278, S. 2, 12; P.A. 94-169, S. 5, 20; P.A. 98-81, S. 6; P.A. 08-103, S. 1.)
History: P.A. 86-278 added provisions re excuse from service during jury year commencing September 1, 1986, for service during preceding year and excuse from service during jury year commencing September 1, 1987, and each jury year thereafter, for service during next two preceding years; P.A. 94-169 eliminated obsolete provisions by deleting former Subsecs. (a) and (d) and relettered remaining Subsecs. accordingly, effective July 1, 1994; P.A. 98-81 amended Subsec. (a) changing “1987” to “1999” and changing “two” to “three” preceding jury years; P.A. 08-103 amended Subsec. (a) to delete requirement re request to be excused from jury service and add provision re excused person may request to be summoned for jury service.
Sec. 51-217b. Information for prospective jurors. Postponement of jury service or accommodations for breastfeeding women. (a) The Judicial Branch shall maintain on its Internet web site a section providing prospective jurors with general information regarding jury service, including, but not limited to, information for breastfeeding women regarding their ability to postpone jury service. Said web site shall also provide contact information for Jury Administration in the event that a breastfeeding woman or other prospective juror would like to request that a reasonable accommodation be made.
(b) The Jury Administrator shall provide training to his or her staff and court staff on discrete issues and policy for breastfeeding women who have been summoned for jury service, including, but not limited to, reasonable accommodations that may be made.
(P.A. 12-51, S. 1.)
Secs. 51-218 and 51-219. Jury service for women. Exemption from jury service. Sections 51-218 and 51-219 are repealed.
(1949 Rev., S. 7907, 7927; P.A. 73-47; P.A. 75-264, S. 1, 2; P.A. 76-52, S. 4, 8; P.A. 78-197; P.A. 79-386; P.A. 82-248, S. 121; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-5, S. 17, 18; P.A. 84-393, S. 18–20.)
Sec. 51-219a. Duties and powers of Jury Administrator. (a) The Jury Administrator, who is appointed in accordance with section 51-10 and subject to supervision by the Chief Court Administrator, shall be responsible for qualifying, summoning, selecting, managing and utilizing jurors in the Superior Court.
(b) The Jury Administrator, subject to the approval of the Chief Court Administrator, shall have the authority to study and to implement procedures for the improvement of jury administration, for the reduction of costs of selection and management of jurors, and for the more effective utilization of jurors.
(c) The Jury Administrator shall have the authority to cancel the service of any juror for good cause, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) The town in which the juror resides is reassigned to a different judicial district than that to which the juror was originally summoned, or (2) there is a reduction in the need for jurors. When jury service is canceled due to a reduction in the need for jurors, individuals shall be selected on a random basis for cancellation of jury service.
(d) The Jury Administrator shall have the authority to receive a list of deceased persons from the Department of Public Health and to delete the names of such persons from the lists compiled pursuant to section 51-222a. The Jury Administrator may exclude the names of additional deceased persons if supplied with a death certificate or other proof satisfactory to the Jury Administrator.
(P.A. 76-52, S. 1, 8; P.A. 82-248, S. 122; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-5, S. 3, 18; P.A. 84-393, S. 3, 18, 20; P.A. 86-278, S. 3, 12; P.A. 97-200, S. 4; P.A. 98-81, S. 12, 20; P.A. 00-116, S. 2, 7.)
History: P.A. 82-248 replaced “executive secretary of the judicial department” with “chief court administrator”, replaced “state-maintained courts” with “superior court” and inserted Subsec. indicators; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-5, effective July 1, 1985, and applicable to summoning of jurors for jury duty on and after September 1, 1986, deleted “qualifying” in Subsec. (a); P.A. 84-393 repealed amendments enacted by June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-5 and amended Subsec. (a) by providing that Subsec. (a) applies to jurors selected and summoned to serve on or before August 31, 1986, and added Subsec. (b) re duties and powers of jury administrator applicable to jurors selected and summoned to serve on or after September 1, 1986; P.A. 86-278 eliminated repetitive language in Subsec. (b) re duties of jury administrator; P.A. 97-200 amended Subsec. (a) by deleting provision re design, implementation and maintenance of a computerized electronic data processing system; P.A. 98-81 added Subsec. (c) re authority of jury administrator to cancel service of juror for good cause, effective May 22, 1998; P.A. 00-116 added Subsec. (d) re authority of Jury Administrator to receive list of deceased persons from Department of Public Health and to delete names of deceased persons, effective September 1, 2000.
Memo attached to motion today, 3/22/2024
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Chief Clerk's Office: 203-503-6800. Fax: 203-789-6424
From: Anne M. Bradley
Date: 3/22/2024
Re: MOTION TO BE PERMANENTLY REMOVED FROM JUROR’S LIST AS OF TODAY, DATED 3/21/2024
Attached is the aforesaid Motion, which was sent to the appropriate court, which had summoned me for Jury Duty.
A summons is a writ or process ISSUED BY THE COURT, requiring appearance of the receiver of the summons.
A summons is an ORDER OF THE COURT, AND THERFORE THE RECEIVER HAS THE RIGHT TO MOTION THAT COURT.
Not that I expect either your court or the ordering court to do the legal thing by hearing this motion, I am submitting it because I am a citizen, greatly aggrieved by the corruption of the courts, which should have taken me off the Juror’s List when I submitted a LETTER requesting to do so.
A motion is required to be heard within 10 business days according to the Rules of Practice, which you all seem to think you do not have to follow. This serves as PAGE 15 of the MOTION TO BE PERMANENTLY REMOVED FROM JUROR’S LIST, WHICH WOULD INCLUDE NOT HAVING TO APPEAR ON APRIL 24, 2024.
Prepared and Submitted,
____________________
Anne M. Bradley 3/22/2024
203-508-0858
So I am trying to close the screen and get this crap, which is really CYBER CRIME!
"Blogger says you have pending file uploads that may not be saved"
Saved where? By Google Data, which is nefarious, cyber crime? They are very dishonest and abusing!
- just another cyber crime to help someone hack or even get on my laptop physically when I am not home - since they illegally enter every time I leave. They vandalized my dresser - I had to scrub it and scrub it before using linseed oil on it. This took days since it had to thoroughly dry. That is just one example of many! - posted 4:51pm. 3/22/2024
15
I did post this motion, but the Technocrats constsantly commit CYBER CRIME and delete my information of My intellectual property!!!
Docket No. : STATE OF CONNECTICUT
______________________ : SUPERIOR COURT
V : NEW HAVEN, CT
_____________________ : MARCH 21, 2024
MOTION FOR SUMMONED ANNE M. BRADLEY TO BE PERMANENTLY REMOVED FROM CONNECTICUT JUROR LIST AS OF TODAY
Pursuant to CPB 16-2, 16-4 and DUE PROCESS OF LAW this summoned citizen is motioning the court to be removed from the Juror List Permanently, including on aforesaid case.
HISTORY
A summons for Jury Duty was mailed to aforesaid citizen, Anne M. Bradley, to which she immediately responded to upon obtaining from her mail, as requested by the court. Request for Removal was made by letter. Yet the DANBURY, CT court fails to reciprocate this justified request.
FACTS
1. The court has used artificial intelligence to manipulate Ms. Bradley’s calls so she is unable to speak to a person as a follow-up of her response, faxed to the court using the fax number on the Summons Notice.
2. Anne Bradley is ordered by the court to be at the court on April 24, 2024.
3. Response to Anne Bradley’s letter was an it’s-not-my-job and therefore this motion is being submitted to ensure the court processes this citizen’s justified lack of confidence in the court system of Connecticut.
4. No information on the court case to which this court is summoning her for was provided and since she is unable to speak to a person to find out more information, this cannot be provided at the time of which this Motion is presented. A copy of the Summons is provided and should be made part of the case for attorneys’ reference.
5. As stated in the letter, also attached to this motion, Ms. Bradley has experienced NO JUSTICE WITH THE COURTS. They serve their wants. They break laws. They fraud records. They abuse power. They enjoy an immunity which in fact is criminal, since no one should be above the law. They are appointed to abide by the law. They take oaths to administer the law when they join the BAR. They take further oaths of office as employees of the State, which includes NOT ABUSING POWER, NOT STEALING MONEY, NOT TAKING BRIBES, NOT ENJOINING THEMSELVES WITH ORGANIZED CRIME.
6. This summoned citizen realizes that SATANISM is a common practice in the State of Connecticut, including by many who have made great profit through committing crimes. An example would be the ENRON CORPORATION. Another example would be the CLINTON FOUNDATION. There are many more which could be listed. The Church of Satan is located in SANDY HOOK, CT.
7. This summoned citizen has been traumatized by this state’s corruption, has been illegally evicted, has been a victim of attempted murder several times, and has been sexually assaulted and physically assaulted. The physical assault was by a state trooper, Jon Naples.
8. The Elites in this state consider assaults as a means to get people to be obedient, which aligns with NAZI ideology. There has been nothing this summoned citizen who is disabled, has ever done to harm anyone. She only believes in accountability, which is greatly lacking in this state.
9. This summoned citizen has FEDERAL POVERTY LEVEL INCOME; otherwise she would leave this state today if she could afford it. In addition, she has been frequently frauded, as well as a victim of theft of her possessions in her storage unit at Public Storage as well as at Storquest - even though she timely paid her rent.
a) Storquest failed to appear on the case she brought against them, which is an automatic default in her favor. This court enjoyed breaking the law and not issuing that! Judge Abrams enjoyed being the administrating judge in charge of civil lawsuits in New Haven, abusing power.
b) Judge, John Abrams, enjoyed being in the New Britain Court when her possessions were stolen by Public Storage in 2011, which refused to deposit her prepaid money order, which she had issued for a few years since there were incidences they claimed her check was missing and she would issue a replacement check and they would cash both checks. Anne Bradley told them if they do not want to deposit it, they would have to wait for the money order to clear the Post Office before they could get that payment, which takes 60 days, at which time they would issue a replacement check to Public Storage. In the meantime, Anne Bradley continued to pay her rent yet they fraudulently billed her with criminal intent to steal her possessions, claiming they were seizing her property over a fraudulent bill of $260, even though they never paid her for the $400 they owed her from a court case ruling less than 6 years prior to that.
10. This summoned citizen could list many traumatic incidences involving this court directly and indirectly and may have to take the time to present that in a revised motion, should this court continue to abuse power and fail to not act upon this PRE-TRIAL MOTION sufficiently and timely before April 24, 2024
11. Any payment which this citizen obtains will just be considered due to the state, as they have criminally done with food stamps. This citizen does not have MEDICAID, considers the MEDICAID program illegally managed, and never will take part in any MEDICAID program. This citizen has federally-funded FOOD STAMPS, which this state enjoys profiting from as administrator. This citizen has FEDERALLY-APPROVED, FEDERALLY-FUNDED Qualified MEDICARE Beneficiary, which this state has somehow been able to latch onto as administrator, which this citizen claims is nothing more than OBSCUNDING FUNDS. This state has a duty to follow and administer state laws. Not federal laws. They are obligated to follow them, not administer them. This state claimed that since this citizen received a 3% increase in SOCIAL SECURITY, they can now take that money from her by decreasing her food stamps and increasing her Section 8 rent. This state also frauded records further, to cover their tracks, by issuing a report that this citizen pays $93.20 for her rent to cover up for their demented reasoning about her SOCIAL SECURITY increase, which still leaves her as a TITLE 19, FEDERAL POVERTY LEVEL, indigent citizen.
12. This state shows no reflection of being competent and relies on criminal activity to cover up for its deliberate fraud, embezzlement, etc. Lawrence Mark Hurley was charged 180 counts of embezzlement from removing people’s signatures from their checks using a chemical, and then signing them himself and depositing them in his secret accounts. That activity for which he was audited only covered three years. The State Police requested further audit to be approved due to the obvious probable cause. It was denied by the Middletown Court! Additionally, the Middletown Court changed the charges to ONE COUNT LARCENY, AND ONE COUNT FORGERY - even though Lawrence Mark Hurley stole on separate occasions as a serial embezzler, to include taking money from the STATE PROSECUTOR’S UNION. The state’s disbarring this career criminal who obviously had accomplices, was not enforced, since he was obviously practicing law for criminal defense attorneys such as Norman Pattis. Hurley was replaced by his assistant, Kevin Russo, who should have been investigated thoroughly due to his obviously taking part as a conspirator or co-conspirator in this embezzlement operation. No investigation on the court files was made, since Hurley had the chemical to remove ink from anything, right at his work site. Additionally, the supervising marshall attending this citizen;s illegall-conducted trial as if he was an assistant attorney to Russo - both of whom should have been investigated as conspirators or co-conspirators in the criminal embezzlement operation which Lawrence Mark Hurley had regularly taken part in - most likely the 20 years he was there at the courthouse. Instead, Russo was later rewarded with a judicial position in the Danbury Court - WHICH IS THE LOCATION OF WHICH THIS STATE CLAIMS JUROR SELECTIONS ARE HANDLED BY THE STATE. It is also the court which pushed the fake SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOOTINGS, which nobody died, and Adam Lanza was not even a real person. Experts have estimated well over ONE TRILLION DOLLARS was obscunded from the economy, especially the government and through donations coming from fraudulent local events as well as from all over the world. This citizen considers that apparently the clerk in the City of Milford was realizing this was a fraud operation, since he was fired and they used mainstream media to accuse him of frauding the donations.
13. Many crimes are hidden in this state, even to a high expense of spinning the lies.
14. The fact that this court selects April 24, 2024 as a date for this citizen to appear as a juror is another issue, reflecting SATANISM, reflecting malicious and vexatious intent. Upon searching this date, there is much social spin, including news articles regarding April 24 being a “doomsday” of some sort. FAKE fire alarms was a frequent abuse from 2013 to 2018 where this citizen lives. They enjoyed this trick since she had severe injuries to her leg on a few occasions, and required several months to heal. Having to go down 7 flights of stairs, only to find out the fire alarms were FAKE. And they frequently did this during the times she was recovering physically, or was working on numerous documentation, for which they would enjoy opportunity in stealing from her if she had to leave her apartment from an emergency. As difficult as those times were, she would place her work in a cart and have to take the stairs bringing it with her to keep them from illegally entering her apartment and stealing them during the fake alarm.
15. Aforesaid citizen could validate more facts, yet it is evident that what she has already relayed to the court is indisputable and reflects her right to be permanently removed from the Juror’s Selection. This was the third time for which she was summoned since she has lived in this state since 1998.
a) One time for which she was summoned to Meriden, CT in 2005- which was literally impossible to go to timely using public transportation, which is all she could afford. Additionally, she requested to be permanently removed from Jury Selection.
b) The second time was a trial involving an auto accident, which she was removed from the list based on her bad experiences with several attorneys.
16. It is this citizen’s suspicion that Kevin Russo, et al in DANBURY, CT decided to isolate her as a form of abuse. Why he is even able to be an attorney, let alone judge is just reflective of how deeply involved the organized crime in this state manipulates the government. Russo picked up where Hurley left off on
the false arrest case involving University of New Haven Police on 6-16-2006,
Anyone reading this can easily see the pattern: 6-16-2006 and now 4-24-2024. The point is it is reflective of CRIMINAL INTENT for that day, and most likely she will be a victim again - the illicit arrest also included their enjoying a forced, illegal commitment order at the Yale-New Haven psychiatric dept with a psychiatrist named DR. SAVAGE, who lived up to her name, bragging she was trying to permanently commit her and also at which time she was drugged and raped after leaving a Voicemail for a law officer since a patient, who told Dr. Savage he was suicidal, was not placed on suicide watch and he broke the mirror in the bathroom and slashed his arms, bleeding to death. Dr. Savage only responded to him that he just wanted to stay longer because he liked the food, when in fact, he wanted to get back to work as a wall-border for a contractor.
a. Anne Bradley refused to plea due to lack of probable cause at the preliminary hearing; and no letter of complaint from alleged victim, the President of the University, Dr. Kaplan. Additionally, this involved a letter she mailed, and yet they failed to notify the Post Office or FBI. Police charged her with RISK OF INJURY, which is negligance of a minor - obviously to further inflate the case on record rather than actually do their jobs. Lori Semrau explained to her what that charge was, to minors, not a University President.
b. Anne Bradley emphasized that the illicit arrest was abuse of power
c. For two years, the case was heard nearly every month, with no disposition.
d. According to law, when a person is accused of a Misdemeanor and there is no disposition for a year; the case must be dismissed.
e. Instead of dismissing the case, as Russo should have recommended, when Hurley was arrested, he was hell-bent on abusing Anne Bradley all the more since she claimed all along that Lawrence Mark Hurley was an obvious criminal, including conspiring with assigned judges, on the case. Only one judge, Cronan - not the Kronin who was part of staff there, was ordered to hear her case that day - and he said her justifications for dismissal were indeed compelling and since it was the first time he viewed the case, he promised to hold a hearing on it on a scheduled date. Instead, the court operations told him to go elsewhere, which was no coincidence! Judge Levin was the assigned Trial Judge = who was father to Attorney Paul Levin of Hartford, CT - who was an abusive attorney who she removed from an injury case when a medical employee on duty ran into her and was not ticketed by police even though he caused her to have a severe concussion, most likely attempting to kill her as what has happened to her before. He pushed her out into traffic at a very busy intersection in Windsor, CT. It is conceivable that Attorney Levin got a back-door deal from the multi-billion dollar Medical Company he worked for, to wash out the case. Though Anne Bradley had great pain from a severe concussion, reinjuring her head since she was hit head-on by a 20-ton sander truck on a sunny day, with bare roads and a driver who was working a second shift despite that making sure his truck was fully loaded with sand - which was a deliberate reflection of just how criminal the courts are, abusing power, tied to organized crime, and using their jobs as a weapon rather than administering justice. Upon disputing this judge to have a right to hear the case due to CONFLICT OF INTEREST, Judge Levin took it upon himself to deny that motion. Nefariously argued by Kevin Russo, who also enjoyed adducing charges to the case, which was illegal. They charged Anne Bradley two counts of Breach of Peace and one count of Reckless Endangerment on the University President, whom she never met and only sent letters to; and who never issued a LETTER OF COMPLAINT, which is mandatory as part of DUE PROCESS OF LAW, and which they deliberately broke the law on, as a matter of everyday practice. They informed the court reporter that the charges were NOT adduced, they were REDUCED to further their court crime. Nevertheless, the laws which were cited reflected ADDUCE. The reporter still refused to change her transcript because she was told to leave it as-is.
f. Judge Levin and Kevin Russo falsified records to “justify” adducing charges on a case which began with a false arrest of RISK OF INJURY, and no probable cause. They enjoyed taking advantage of Anne Bradley’s lack of knowledge of the Law, yet Anne Bradley learned as much as she could, discovering that their manner only reflected an attitude of “laws are made to break” rather than administer - of which she argued in court proceedings.
g. Judge Levin illegally only allowed three preemptory challenges for a jury selction of 6 on a case which originally only had one misdemeanor charge, which they even altered from RISK OF INJURY TO RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT, obviously to cover up a need for a Letter of Complaint, probable cause, etc.. One juror relied on the police for his welfare, being that he did contracting work for them and obviously knew them, causing CONFLICT OF INTEREST, yet the judge wanted him on the case. That juror caused the jury to be a hung jury and was obsessed with a guilty verdict. He was also appointed the administrator of the jurors. The other 5 jurors were anxious to return to work and therefore compromised with a guilty on one of the Breach of Peace Charges - which in fact reflected VIOLATION OF THE 14th Amendment, DOUBLE JEOPARDY, since no one can be charged twice for the same crime on the same case. Though argued., the judge denied argument.
h. This citizen Anne M. Bradley, seeks the court to remover her from this case as a juror and permanently remove her from the Juror’s List, which she considers to be fraudulently managed anyway.
17. This Motion comprises of 11 pages with an Appendix comprising of 11 pages. Paginations had to be entered by hand due to an uncorrectable typing defect.
18. This is a pre-trial motion and therefore should be ruled on sufficiently, within 10 days, with April 4 as the 10th day. Case Name and Number has to be entered by the Court, since none was provided in the Summons. Request for issuance of ruling to be emailed as well as mailed.
LAW
The below referenced laws and rules are printed and provided in Appendix
Sec. 51-217
Sec. 51-219
PB 16-2
PB 16-4
PB 16-5
PB 16-6
PB 16-7
PB 16-8
CHAPTER 16, JURY TRIALS - to be applied throughout
SUMMARY
Rather than the court just allowing this summoned citizen to be REMOVED FROM THE JUROR LIST, she has to go public with this motion. Extreme Narcissists love this attention. They latch onto whatever public attention they can get, affixed on their belief system that nobody can touch them, they can get away with anything.
CYBER CRIME makes this motion an even more difficult document to create. There is little accountability when it comes to the billionaires who became billionaires as government parasites.
As relayed, this citizen would not be residing here in Connecticut if she could afford to leave. It has been nothing but hell. The few she has been able to rely on are not reachable. Living on the East Coast has been nothing but one nightmare after another - all because of organized crime, which includes the murder of her own father after a pedophile priest obviously poisoned him with arsenic, causing him to bleed out. The depravity in this state is only increasing. The courts are organized crime. The few judges who she has known to be honest and forthright either have untimely deaths or they are shuffled around the state. This DELIBERATE LACK OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, in fact, is DOMESTIC TERRORISM.
WHEREFORE, This citizen Anne M. Bradley, moves the court to remove her from this case as a juror and permanently remove her from the Juror’s List.
Prepared, And Submitted,
Anne M. Bradley
Summoned Juror #0002436837
PO Box 206514, New Haven, CT 06520
APPENDIX
LAWS
Juror Summons
Response by the court to Request For Removal Letter
Information regarding the date 4/24/2024 being used for DECEPTION, CRIME
_________________
Anne M. Bradley
LAW
Sec. 51-217. Qualification of jurors. (a) All jurors shall be electors, individuals lawfully admitted for permanent residence, as defined in 8 USC 1101(a)(20), as amended from time to time, or citizens of the United States, who are residents of this state having a permanent place of abode in this state and appear on the list compiled by the Jury Administrator under subsection (b) of section 51-222a, who have reached the age of eighteen. A person shall be disqualified to serve as a juror if such person: (1) Is found by a judge of the Superior Court to exhibit any quality which will impair the capacity of such person to serve as a juror, except that no person shall be disqualified because the person is deaf or hard of hearing; (2) has been convicted of a felony within the past three years or is a defendant in a pending felony case or is in the custody of the Commissioner of Correction; (3) is not able to speak and understand the English language; (4) is the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of the State, Treasurer, Comptroller or Attorney General; (5) is a judge of the Probate Court, Superior Court, Appellate Court or Supreme Court, is a state referee, is a family support magistrate or is a federal court judge; (6) is a member of the General Assembly, provided such disqualification shall apply only while the General Assembly is in session; (7) is a registrar of voters or deputy registrar of voters of a municipality, provided such disqualification shall apply only during the period from twenty-one days before the date of a federal, state or municipal election, primary or referendum to twenty-one days after the date of such election, primary or referendum, inclusive; (8) is seventy-five years of age or older and chooses not to perform juror service; (9) is incapable, by reason of a physical or mental disability, of rendering satisfactory juror service; or (10) for the jury year commencing on September 1, 2017, and each jury year thereafter, has served in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut as (A) a federal juror on a matter that has been tried to a jury during the last three preceding jury years, or (B) a federal grand juror during the last three preceding jury years. Any person claiming a disqualification under subdivision (9) of this subsection shall submit to the Jury Administrator a letter from a licensed health care provider stating the health care provider's opinion that such disability prevents the person from rendering satisfactory juror service. In reaching such opinion, the health care provider shall apply the following guideline: A person shall be capable of rendering satisfactory juror service if such person is able to perform a sedentary job requiring close attention for six hours per day, with short work breaks in the morning and afternoon sessions, for at least three consecutive business days. Any person claiming a disqualification under subdivision (10) of this subsection shall supply proof of federal jury service satisfactory to the Jury Administrator.
(b) The Jury Administrator may determine, in such manner and at such times as the Jury
Sec. 51-217a. Jurors excused from service. Option to be considered for service. (a) A person shall be excused from jury service during the jury year commencing September 1, 1999, and each jury year thereafter, if during the next three preceding jury years such person appeared in a court for jury service and was not excused from such jury service, except that such person may request to be summoned for jury service during such three-jury-year period in the same manner as persons are summoned who are not excused from jury service. Such request may be made at any time with written notice to the Jury Administrator.
(b) The court shall have authority to excuse a juror from juror service, upon a finding of extreme hardship.
(P.A. 84-393, S. 2, 20; P.A. 86-278, S. 2, 12; P.A. 94-169, S. 5, 20; P.A. 98-81, S. 6; P.A. 08-103, S. 1.)
History: P.A. 86-278 added provisions re excuse from service during jury year commencing September 1, 1986, for service during preceding year and excuse from service during jury year commencing September 1, 1987, and each jury year thereafter, for service during next two preceding years; P.A. 94-169 eliminated obsolete provisions by deleting former Subsecs. (a) and (d) and relettered remaining Subsecs. accordingly, effective July 1, 1994; P.A. 98-81 amended Subsec. (a) changing “1987” to “1999” and changing “two” to “three” preceding jury years; P.A. 08-103 amended Subsec. (a) to delete requirement re request to be excused from jury service and add provision re excused person may request to be summoned for jury service.
Sec. 51-217b. Information for prospective jurors. Postponement of jury service or accommodations for breastfeeding women. (a) The Judicial Branch shall maintain on its Internet web site a section providing prospective jurors with general information regarding jury service, including, but not limited to, information for breastfeeding women regarding their ability to postpone jury service. Said web site shall also provide contact information for Jury Administration in the event that a breastfeeding woman or other prospective juror would like to request that a reasonable accommodation be made.
(b) The Jury Administrator shall provide training to his or her staff and court staff on discrete issues and policy for breastfeeding women who have been summoned for jury service, including, but not limited to, reasonable accommodations that may be made.
(P.A. 12-51, S. 1.)
Secs. 51-218 and 51-219. Jury service for women. Exemption from jury service. Sections 51-218 and 51-219 are repealed.
(1949 Rev., S. 7907, 7927; P.A. 73-47; P.A. 75-264, S. 1, 2; P.A. 76-52, S. 4, 8; P.A. 78-197; P.A. 79-386; P.A. 82-248, S. 121; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-5, S. 17, 18; P.A. 84-393, S. 18–20.)
Sec. 51-219a. Duties and powers of Jury Administrator. (a) The Jury Administrator, who is appointed in accordance with section 51-10 and subject to supervision by the Chief Court Administrator, shall be responsible for qualifying, summoning, selecting, managing and utilizing jurors in the Superior Court.
(b) The Jury Administrator, subject to the approval of the Chief Court Administrator, shall have the authority to study and to implement procedures for the improvement of jury administration, for the reduction of costs of selection and management of jurors, and for the more effective utilization of jurors.
(c) The Jury Administrator shall have the authority to cancel the service of any juror for good cause, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) The town in which the juror resides is reassigned to a different judicial district than that to which the juror was originally summoned, or (2) there is a reduction in the need for jurors. When jury service is canceled due to a reduction in the need for jurors, individuals shall be selected on a random basis for cancellation of jury service.
(d) The Jury Administrator shall have the authority to receive a list of deceased persons from the Department of Public Health and to delete the names of such persons from the lists compiled pursuant to section 51-222a. The Jury Administrator may exclude the names of additional deceased persons if supplied with a death certificate or other proof satisfactory to the Jury Administrator.
(P.A. 76-52, S. 1, 8; P.A. 82-248, S. 122; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-5, S. 3, 18; P.A. 84-393, S. 3, 18, 20; P.A. 86-278, S. 3, 12; P.A. 97-200, S. 4; P.A. 98-81, S. 12, 20; P.A. 00-116, S. 2, 7.)
History: P.A. 82-248 replaced “executive secretary of the judicial department” with “chief court administrator”, replaced “state-maintained courts” with “superior court” and inserted Subsec. indicators; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-5, effective July 1, 1985, and applicable to summoning of jurors for jury duty on and after September 1, 1986, deleted “qualifying” in Subsec. (a); P.A. 84-393 repealed amendments enacted by June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-5 and amended Subsec. (a) by providing that Subsec. (a) applies to jurors selected and summoned to serve on or before August 31, 1986, and added Subsec. (b) re duties and powers of jury administrator applicable to jurors selected and summoned to serve on or after September 1, 1986; P.A. 86-278 eliminated repetitive language in Subsec. (b) re duties of jury administrator; P.A. 97-200 amended Subsec. (a) by deleting provision re design, implementation and maintenance of a computerized electronic data processing system; P.A. 98-81 added Subsec. (c) re authority of jury administrator to cancel service of juror for good cause, effective May 22, 1998; P.A. 00-116 added Subsec. (d) re authority of Jury Administrator to receive list of deceased persons from Department of Public Health and to delete names of deceased persons, effective September 1, 2000.
.png)
Comments