Jury Duty - No Way Jose (Prior blogpost was deleted by CYBER CRIME!)
Jury Duty - No Way Jose (Prior blogpost was deleted by CYBER CRIME!)
Link to this blogpost: http://www.publiusroots.org/2024/04/jury-duty-no-way-jose-prior-blogpost.html
hopefully the cyber criminals will not activate this link above again! It is provided to copy. You are already on the link.
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/02/table-of-contents-premier.html?m=1
UPDATED MAY 14, 2024
- Do you see anything in the law requiring them to get my ID to be removed, but no ID is required to serve? Neither are there, they make up laws as they go along and expect me to go oo-ahh because he cited a law. I read what was cited in the form! I submitted my motion! Did they return it claiming 'NO ACTION TAKEN" OR REJECTED MOTION DUE TO "WHATEVER" --- NO! They just expect the criminal TECHNOCRACY to "fix" things for them! And no doubt they will illegally enter my apartment and steal whatever they can, alter documents they can! That is why I got WPS service - no longer using Microsoft Word! So what does Bill Gates mafia do? They hack my computer! They alter documents! They intercepted my efforts to save my info from an order I placed with a company in China - to FORCE it to be saved as a Microsoft Word Document! It is not activated on this laptop! I REMOVE/UNINSTALL APPS, THEY PUT THEM BACK ON - especially co-pilot to MANIPULATE, TRESPASS! All their wealth should be seized! The TECHNOCRATS should all be prosecuted.
WTF - I am so sick of this lawlessness! What is the point responding? And of course, I will save the file and the file will disappear because they illegally enter my apartment!
He told me to call him! He cannot get my ID over the phone! He is a pathalogical liar! And that is what this state rewards, just as they did where I grew up! Even though I said he made no sense requiring me to call him, he ignored what I said! Of course I will not call him! They use the phone system as a weapon! First of all, do not ever hold the phone up to your ear. Second of all, they scan your smart phone to steal, invade your privacy! Thirdly, they will do all they can to control your phone! The TECHNOCRATS ARE THEIR CRIMINAL WEAPON!
Good morning Anne,
I’m sorry that I was unable to assist you regarding your permanent disqualification. Below is the statute regarding a juror’s date of birth and social security required for permanent disqualification. Also, here is a link to the statutes as well: https://www.cga.ct.gov/
Regards,
Eric S
Jury Administration
Sec. 51-217. Qualification of jurors. (a) All jurors shall be electors, individuals lawfully admitted for permanent residence, as defined in 8 USC 1101(a)(20), as amended from time to time, or citizens of the United States, who are residents of this state having a permanent place of abode in this state and appear on the list compiled by the Jury Administrator under subsection (b) of section 51-222a, who have reached the age of eighteen. A person shall be disqualified to serve as a juror if such person: (1) Is found by a judge of the Superior Court to exhibit any quality which will impair the capacity of such person to serve as a juror, except that no person shall be disqualified because the person is deaf or hard of hearing; (2) has been convicted of a felony within the past three years or is a defendant in a pending felony case or is in the custody of the Commissioner of Correction; (3) is not able to speak and understand the English language; (4) is the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of the State, Treasurer, Comptroller or Attorney General; (5) is a judge of the Probate Court, Superior Court, Appellate Court or Supreme Court, is a state referee, is a family support magistrate or is a federal court judge; (6) is a member of the General Assembly, provided such disqualification shall apply only while the General Assembly is in session; (7) is a registrar of voters or deputy registrar of voters of a municipality, provided such disqualification shall apply only during the period from twenty-one days before the date of a federal, state or municipal election, primary or referendum to twenty-one days after the date of such election, primary or referendum, inclusive; (8) is seventy-five years of age or older and chooses not to perform juror service; (9) is incapable, by reason of a physical or mental disability, of rendering satisfactory juror service; or (10) for the jury year commencing on September 1, 2017, and each jury year thereafter, has served in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut as (A) a federal juror on a matter that has been tried to a jury during the last three preceding jury years, or (B) a federal grand juror during the last three preceding jury years. Any person claiming a disqualification under subdivision (9) of this subsection shall submit to the Jury Administrator a letter from a licensed health care provider stating the health care provider's opinion that such disability prevents the person from rendering satisfactory juror service. In reaching such opinion, the health care provider shall apply the following guideline: A person shall be capable of rendering satisfactory juror service if such person is able to perform a sedentary job requiring close attention for six hours per day, with short work breaks in the morning and afternoon sessions, for at least three consecutive business days. Any person claiming a disqualification under subdivision (10) of this subsection shall supply proof of federal jury service satisfactory to the Jury Administrator.
(b) The Jury Administrator may determine, in such manner and at such times as the Jury Administrator deems feasible, whether any person is qualified to serve as juror under this section and whether any person may be excused for extreme hardship.
(c) The Jury Administrator shall have the authority to establish and maintain a list of persons to be excluded from the summoning process, which shall consist of (1) persons who are disqualified from serving on jury duty on a permanent basis due to a disability for which a licensed physician, a physician assistant or an advanced practice registered nurse has submitted a letter stating the physician's, physician assistant's or advanced practice registered nurse's opinion that such disability permanently prevents the person from rendering satisfactory jury service, (2) persons seventy-five years of age or older who have requested not to be summoned, (3) elected officials enumerated in subdivision (4) of subsection (a) of this section and judges enumerated in subdivision (5) of subsection (a) of this section during their term of office, and (4) persons excused from jury service pursuant to section 51-217a who have not requested to be summoned for jury service pursuant to said section. Persons requesting to be excluded pursuant to subdivisions (1) and (2) of this subsection shall provide the Jury Administrator with their names, addresses, dates of birth and federal Social Security numbers for use in matching. The request to be excluded may be rescinded at any time with written notice to the Jury Administrator.
Sec. 51-217a. Jurors excused from service. Option to be considered for service. (a) A person shall be excused from jury service during the jury year commencing September 1, 1999, and each jury year thereafter, if during the next three preceding jury years such person appeared in a court for jury service and was not excused from such jury service, except that such person may request to be summoned for jury service during such three-jury-year period in the same manner as persons are summoned who are not excused from jury service. Such request may be made at any time with written notice to the Jury Administrator.
ReplyForward |
UPDATE MAY 13, 2024
They sent me this email today:
| from: | Jury Administration Jury.Administration@jud.ct.gov | ||
| to: | Anne Bradley <bradley.annemarie@gmail.com> | ||
| date: | May 13, 2024, 1:13 PM | ||
| subject: | RE: PLEASE EMAIL ME THE DECISION SINCE IT HAS NOT BEEN IN THE MAIL- 0002436837 ES | ||
| mailed-by: | jud.ct.gov | ||
| signed-by: | jud.ct.gov Good afternoon Anne,
Thank you for your response and let me know if you do decide to give me a call so I can provide you with the permanent excusal. I’m happy to assist.
Regards,
Eric S. Jury Administration HOW STUPID! He says he wants me to talk to him on the phone - yet claimed before that he would not do anything without my ID! Which of course they will add to the databank they SELL! HOW DO I RESPOND TO SUCH STUPIDITY? THIS IS WHAT I AM SAYING, WORD FOR WORD: Response to PERMANENT JURY REMOVAL REQUEST 1. I submitted the form, signed by my doctor. 2. It was approved by your office 3. I requested the formal hard copy approval. THE FORM ITSELF SHOULD HAVE THE SPACE FOR ORDER ON IT, SINCE FORMS WITH CITED LAWS ARE MOTIONS TO THE COURT. 4. Provide me the formal hard copy. FOLLOW YOUR LAWS! You cannot make things up as you go along! Sincerely, Anne Bradley POSTED 5/13/2024 3:31pm. |
UPDATED MAY 11, 2024 - PLACED AT THE BEGINNING DUE TO CYBER CRIME ALTERING THE FORMAT OF THE END SO EVERY LETTER STARTS ON A SEPARATE LINE.
email from the Court:
My response 5/11/2024
Good afternoon,
Thank you for contacting Jury Administration. Which decision are you looking for? It looks like you were excused from the summons. Also, please provide your Juror ID or full name.
Regards,
Allison S.
Jury Administration
FIRST FOLLOW-UP TO FIRST RESPONSE
From: Anne Bradley <bradley.annemarie@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2024 10:53 PM
To: Jury Administration <Jury.Administration@jud.ct.
Subject: PLEASE EMAIL ME THE DECISION SINCE IT HAS NOT BEEN IN THE MAIL
Below is the message I received a week ago. Yet I do not have that decision.
Good morning,
Thank you for contacting Jury Administration. Based on the information you have provided, you are excused from serving on this summons. A excusal notice will be sent out. You will also receive an application for permanent removal from the jury pool, this is the second step in the permanent disqualification process. If you would like to be permanently removed please fill the application out in it's entirety and send it back to us. If you do not complete the application and return it to us, you will be disqualified from this summons only and you could be summoned again in the future.
Please do not submit the application via email. You can submit the application via regular paper mail or you can call us and provide the information over the phone.
If you have any questions, please contact us Monday gm Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., at 1-800-842-8175 and speak with a customer service representative.
Regards,
gmail covered up the name of the sender!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hello,
| Apr 17, 2024, 10:51 AM |  | ||
| ||||
Good morning,
Thank you for contacting Jury Administration. The permanent disqualification application can take a few weeks to arrive. If you would like to fill it out sooner, you may call 1-800-842-8175 and do it over the phone. You will just need to provide your date of birth and social security number. Please let me know if you have any questions.
| Apr 17, 2024, 4:00 PM | | ||
| ||||
Good morning,
Thank you for contacting Jury Administration. While your doctor did select permanent, and you have been permanently excused, it is a two step process. The next step is for a permanent disqualification application to be filled out. This will prevent other summonses from coming to you. If you do not fill this out, you will still be excused permanently, you may just receive a summons in the future. If you do, you would just need to contact us to let us know you have a permanent excusal on file.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
| Apr 18, 2024, 12:55 PM | | ||
| ||||
Update, their excusal via email is at the end of this, pasted from Gmail. They did not send me any mail - they did not scan anything to attach as a document that they made record. THE FORM ITSELF SHOULD JUST HAVE *EXCUSED *NOT EXCUSED to select but oh, no, that makes too much sense since forms cited with laws are supposed to have decision of the court on them because they are in effect MOTIONS! posted 4/24/2024 at 7:52am
I emailed a request for them to email me their alleged mailing, which I never got! I got an email from them which does not open!
I can only show a picture on the referenced blogpost provided in this blogpost. https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/03/jury-duty-2024-no-way-jose.html?m=1
I lost a lot of notes regarding this pathetic court system! For them to even have the audacity to send me a Juror request for a date that was nefariously concocted
4/24/2024
when they had me ILLICITLY ARRESTED
6/16/2006
Is so pathetically provable of their intent!
I had several notes on that blogpost! I am so sick of this f*king CYBER CRIME!
Reference blogpost:
https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/03/jury-duty-2024-no-way-jose.html?m=1
FOLLOW-UP AND LETTER EMAILED TO THE COURT
To: State of Connecticut Judicial Branch
Jury Administration
Jury.administration@jud.ct.gov
From: Anne M. Bradley
Assigned Juror ID #0002436837
203-508-0858
Date: 3/18/2024
Today I made numerous efforts to folow up on the letter faxed to your office five days ago. THE COURTS JUST USE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NO ONE IS AVAILABLE. IN FACT, IT IS OBVIOUS THEY PROGRAMMED MY PHONE TO NO BE CONNECTED TO ANY CLERK IN THE CLERK’S OFFICE.
Your office fails to respond or act on the Letter Requesting Permanent Removal.
Should you keep playing your game, I will submit a motion. I assure you, I will not make this secret! Quite possibly this may feed the narcissism that fuels the corruption in the courts. Any attention they can gain, is savored.
All I can do is try. This is a horrible state to live in.
Regards,
Anne Bradley
THIS IS THE LETTER I SENT:
Anne M. Bradley
PO Box 206514
New Haven, CT 06520
March 13, 2024
State of Connecticut Judicial Branch
Jury Administration
PO Box 260448
Hartford, CT 06126=0448
Fax No. 860-263-2770
Email if possible: jury.administration@jud.ct.gov
Ref: CT JUROR ID 0002436837
RESPONSE TO SUMMONS
Attention Jury Administrator,
RE: REQUEST TO BE REMOVED FROM JURY SELCTION
I have absolutely no confidence in the court system in Connecticut. There is no accountability. ORGANIZED CRIME is what this state relies on most of the time!
I have no choice but to live here. I am indigent. I pay my bills. I live within my means. I assert my rights. I expose corruption!
The court operations is pathetic! A great waste of money and I emphasize, only serves Organized Crime.
Apparently excuses for Jury Duty include:
Reasons for Being Excused from Jury Service
· Medical reasons.
· Public necessity.
· Undue hardship.
· Dependent care.
· Student Status.
· Military conflict.
· Other reason deemed sufficient by the court.
My “other reasons” would include:
1. There is no Due Process
2. Records are frauded
3. Judges lie
4. They play constant DEVIL’S CHESSBOARD
5. MY LANDLORD ILLEGALLY ENTERS MY APARTMENT WHEN I LEAVE MY APARTMENT; AND VANDALIZES, STEALS ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS.
Should your office still demand my presence, I will follow up with another letter and elaborate on all the corruption I have experienced. They may want me to be an opportunity to make a case sway a certain way because I will NOT vote! The continuous fraud is a big reason! Failure to abide by laws, court rules is a typical day at the park here!
My participation - even any juror’s participation, will not matter! The court already has their ENDS JUSTIFIES MEANS agenda on cases requiring jurors!
Please see to it that I am taken off the list permanently and the summons is revoked! I want this proof in writing.
I was not able to check my mail for several weeks due to my apartment having been vandalized severely. I checked my mail on March 9, at which time I found this notice in my mailbox. I do not get mail where I have lived since January 2013 due to corruption by the owner-landlord. They tamper with mail.
Sincerely,
Anne M. Bradley
203-508-0858
Page 2 of 2
THIS IS THE MOTION I SENT THEREAFTER SINCE THEY REFUSED TO DO ANYTHING WITH THE LETTER:
Docket No. : STATE OF CONNECTICUT
______________________ : SUPERIOR COURT
V : NEW HAVEN, CT
_____________________ : MARCH 21, 2024
MOTION FOR SUMMONED ANNE M. BRADLEY TO BE PERMANENTLY REMOVED FROM CONNECTICUT JUROR LIST AS OF TODAY
Pursuant to CPB 16-2, 16-4 and DUE PROCESS OF LAW this summoned citizen is motioning the court to be removed from the Juror List Permanently, including on aforesaid case.
HISTORY
A summons for Jury Duty was mailed to aforesaid citizen, Anne M. Bradley, to which she immediately responded to upon obtaining from her mail, as requested by the court. Request for Removal was made by letter. Yet the DANBURY, CT court fails to reciprocate this justified request.
FACTS
1. The court has used artificial intelligence to manipulate Ms. Bradley’s calls so she is unable to speak to a person as a follow-up of her response, faxed to the court using the fax number on the Summons Notice.
2. Anne Bradley is ordered by the court to be at the court on April 24, 2024.
3. Response to Anne Bradley’s letter was an it’s-not-my-job and therefore this motion is being submitted to ensure the court processes this citizen’s justified lack of confidence in the court system of Connecticut.
4. No information on the court case to which this court is summoning her for was provided and since she is unable to speak to a person to find out more information, this cannot be provided at the time of which this Motion is presented. A copy of the Summons is provided and should be made part of the case for attorneys’ reference.
5. As stated in the letter, also attached to this motion, Ms. Bradley has experienced NO JUSTICE WITH THE COURTS. They serve their wants. They break laws. They fraud records. They abuse power. They enjoy an immunity which in fact is criminal, since no one should be above the law. They are appointed to abide by the law. They take oaths to administer the law when they join the BAR. They take further oaths of office as employees of the State, which includes NOT ABUSING POWER, NOT STEALING MONEY, NOT TAKING BRIBES, NOT ENJOINING THEMSELVES WITH ORGANIZED CRIME.
6. This summoned citizen realizes that SATANISM is a common practice in the State of Connecticut, including by many who have made great profit through committing crimes. An example would be the ENRON CORPORATION. Another example would be the CLINTON FOUNDATION. There are many more which could be listed. The Church of Satan is located in SANDY HOOK, CT.
7. This summoned citizen has been traumatized by this state’s corruption, has been illegally evicted, has been a victim of attempted murder several times, and has been sexually assaulted and physically assaulted. The physical assault was by a state trooper, Jon Naples.
8. The Elites in this state consider assaults as a means to get people to be obedient, which aligns with NAZI ideology. There has been nothing this summoned citizen who is disabled, has ever done to harm anyone. She only believes in accountability, which is greatly lacking in this state.
9. This summoned citizen has FEDERAL POVERTY LEVEL INCOME; otherwise she would leave this state today if she could afford it. In addition, she has been frequently frauded, as well as a victim of theft of her possessions in her storage unit at Public Storage as well as at Storquest - even though she timely paid her rent.
a) Storquest failed to appear on the case she brought against them, which is an automatic default in her favor. This court enjoyed breaking the law and not issuing that! Judge Abrams enjoyed being the administrating judge in charge of civil lawsuits in New Haven, abusing power.
b) Judge, John Abrams, enjoyed being in the New Britain Court when her possessions were stolen by Public Storage in 2011, which refused to deposit her prepaid money order, which she had issued for a few years since there were incidences they claimed her check was missing and she would issue a replacement check and they would cash both checks. Anne Bradley told them if they do not want to deposit it, they would have to wait for the money order to clear the Post Office before they could get that payment, which takes 60 days, at which time they would issue a replacement check to Public Storage. In the meantime, Anne Bradley continued to pay her rent yet they fraudulently billed her with criminal intent to steal her possessions, claiming they were seizing her property over a fraudulent bill of $260, even though they never paid her for the $400 they owed her from a court case ruling less than 6 years prior to that.
10. This summoned citizen could list many traumatic incidences involving this court directly and indirectly and may have to take the time to present that in a revised motion, should this court continue to abuse power and fail to not act upon this PRE-TRIAL MOTION sufficiently and timely before April 24, 2024
11. Any payment which this citizen obtains will just be considered due to the state, as they have criminally done with food stamps. This citizen does not have MEDICAID, considers the MEDICAID program illegally managed, and never will take part in any MEDICAID program. This citizen has federally-funded FOOD STAMPS, which this state enjoys profiting from as administrator. This citizen has FEDERALLY-APPROVED, FEDERALLY-FUNDED Qualified MEDICARE Beneficiary, which this state has somehow been able to latch onto as administrator, which this citizen claims is nothing more than OBSCUNDING FUNDS. This state has a duty to follow and administer state laws. Not federal laws. They are obligated to follow them, not administer them. This state claimed that since this citizen received a 3% increase in SOCIAL SECURITY, they can now take that money from her by decreasing her food stamps and increasing her Section 8 rent. This state also frauded records further, to cover their tracks, by issuing a report that this citizen pays $93.20 for her rent to cover up for their demented reasoning about her SOCIAL SECURITY increase, which still leaves her as a TITLE 19, FEDERAL POVERTY LEVEL, indigent citizen.
12. This state shows no reflection of being competent and relies on criminal activity to cover up for its deliberate fraud, embezzlement, etc. Lawrence Mark Hurley was charged 180 counts of embezzlement from removing people’s signatures from their checks using a chemical, and then signing them himself and depositing them in his secret accounts. That activity for which he was audited only covered three years. The State Police requested further audit to be approved due to the obvious probable cause. It was denied by the Middletown Court! Additionally, the Middletown Court changed the charges to ONE COUNT LARCENY, AND ONE COUNT FORGERY - even though Lawrence Mark Hurley stole on separate occasions as a serial embezzler, to include taking money from the STATE PROSECUTOR’S UNION. The state’s disbarring this career criminal who obviously had accomplices, was not enforced, since he was obviously practicing law for criminal defense attorneys such as Norman Pattis. Hurley was replaced by his assistant, Kevin Russo, who should have been investigated thoroughly due to his obviously taking part as a conspirator or co-conspirator in this embezzlement operation. No investigation on the court files was made, since Hurley had the chemical to remove ink from anything, right at his work site. Additionally, the supervising marshall attending this citizen;s illegall-conducted trial as if he was an assistant attorney to Russo - both of whom should have been investigated as conspirators or co-conspirators in the criminal embezzlement operation which Lawrence Mark Hurley had regularly taken part in - most likely the 20 years he was there at the courthouse. Instead, Russo was later rewarded with a judicial position in the Danbury Court - WHICH IS THE LOCATION OF WHICH THIS STATE CLAIMS JUROR SELECTIONS ARE HANDLED BY THE STATE. It is also the court which pushed the fake SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOOTINGS, which nobody died, and Adam Lanza was not even a real person. Experts have estimated well over ONE TRILLION DOLLARS was obscunded from the economy, especially the government and through donations coming from fraudulent local events as well as from all over the world. This citizen considers that apparently the clerk in the City of Milford was realizing this was a fraud operation, since he was fired and they used mainstream media to accuse him of frauding the donations.
13. Many crimes are hidden in this state, even to a high expense of spinning the lies.
14. The fact that this court selects April 24, 2024 as a date for this citizen to appear as a juror is another issue, reflecting SATANISM, reflecting malicious and vexatious intent. Upon searching this date, there is much social spin, including news articles regarding April 24 being a “doomsday” of some sort. FAKE fire alarms was a frequent abuse from 2013 to 2018 where this citizen lives. They enjoyed this trick since she had severe injuries to her leg on a few occasions, and required several months to heal. Having to go down 7 flights of stairs, only to find out the fire alarms were FAKE. And they frequently did this during the times she was recovering physically, or was working on numerous documentation, for which they would enjoy opportunity in stealing from her if she had to leave her apartment from an emergency. As difficult as those times were, she would place her work in a cart and have to take the stairs bringing it with her to keep them from illegally entering her apartment and stealing them during the fake alarm.
15. Aforesaid citizen could validate more facts, yet it is evident that what she has already relayed to the court is indisputable and reflects her right to be permanently removed from the Juror’s Selection. This was the third time for which she was summoned since she has lived in this state since 1998.
a) One time for which she was summoned to Meriden, CT in 2005- which was literally impossible to go to timely using public transportation, which is all she could afford. Additionally, she requested to be permanently removed from Jury Selection.
b) The second time was a trial involving an auto accident, which she was removed from the list based on her bad experiences with several attorneys.
16. It is this citizen’s suspicion that Kevin Russo, et al in DANBURY, CT decided to isolate her as a form of abuse. Why he is even able to be an attorney, let alone judge is just reflective of how deeply involved the organized crime in this state manipulates the government. Russo picked up where Hurley left off on
the false arrest case involving University of New Haven Police on 6-16-2006,
Anyone reading this can easily see the pattern: 6-16-2006 and now 4-24-2024. The point is it is reflective of CRIMINAL INTENT for that day, and most likely she will be a victim again - the illicit arrest also included their enjoying a forced, illegal commitment order at the Yale-New Haven psychiatric dept with a psychiatrist named DR. SAVAGE, who lived up to her name, bragging she was trying to permanently commit her and also at which time she was drugged and raped after leaving a Voicemail for a law officer since a patient, who told Dr. Savage he was suicidal, was not placed on suicide watch and he broke the mirror in the bathroom and slashed his arms, bleeding to death. Dr. Savage only responded to him that he just wanted to stay longer because he liked the food, when in fact, he wanted to get back to work as a wall-border for a contractor.
a. Anne Bradley refused to plea due to lack of probable cause at the preliminary hearing; and no letter of complaint from alleged victim, the President of the University, Dr. Kaplan. Additionally, this involved a letter she mailed, and yet they failed to notify the Post Office or FBI. Police charged her with RISK OF INJURY, which is negligance of a minor - obviously to further inflate the case on record rather than actually do their jobs. Lori Semrau explained to her what that charge was, to minors, not a University President.
b. Anne Bradley emphasized that the illicit arrest was abuse of power
c. For two years, the case was heard nearly every month, with no disposition.
d. According to law, when a person is accused of a Misdemeanor and there is no disposition for a year; the case must be dismissed.
e. Instead of dismissing the case, as Russo should have recommended, when Hurley was arrested, he was hell-bent on abusing Anne Bradley all the more since she claimed all along that Lawrence Mark Hurley was an obvious criminal, including conspiring with assigned judges, on the case. Only one judge, Cronan - not the Kronin who was part of staff there, was ordered to hear her case that day - and he said her justifications for dismissal were indeed compelling and since it was the first time he viewed the case, he promised to hold a hearing on it on a scheduled date. Instead, the court operations told him to go elsewhere, which was no coincidence! Judge Levin was the assigned Trial Judge = who was father to Attorney Paul Levin of Hartford, CT - who was an abusive attorney who she removed from an injury case when a medical employee on duty ran into her and was not ticketed by police even though he caused her to have a severe concussion, most likely attempting to kill her as what has happened to her before. He pushed her out into traffic at a very busy intersection in Windsor, CT. It is conceivable that Attorney Levin got a back-door deal from the multi-billion dollar Medical Company he worked for, to wash out the case. Though Anne Bradley had great pain from a severe concussion, reinjuring her head since she was hit head-on by a 20-ton sander truck on a sunny day, with bare roads and a driver who was working a second shift despite that making sure his truck was fully loaded with sand - which was a deliberate reflection of just how criminal the courts are, abusing power, tied to organized crime, and using their jobs as a weapon rather than administering justice. Upon disputing this judge to have a right to hear the case due to CONFLICT OF INTEREST, Judge Levin took it upon himself to deny that motion. Nefariously argued by Kevin Russo, who also enjoyed adducing charges to the case, which was illegal. They charged Anne Bradley two counts of Breach of Peace and one count of Reckless Endangerment on the University President, whom she never met and only sent letters to; and who never issued a LETTER OF COMPLAINT, which is mandatory as part of DUE PROCESS OF LAW, and which they deliberately broke the law on, as a matter of everyday practice. They informed the court reporter that the charges were NOT adduced, they were REDUCED to further their court crime. Nevertheless, the laws which were cited reflected ADDUCE. The reporter still refused to change her transcript because she was told to leave it as-is.
f. Judge Levin and Kevin Russo falsified records to “justify” adducing charges on a case which began with a false arrest of RISK OF INJURY, and no probable cause. They enjoyed taking advantage of Anne Bradley’s lack of knowledge of the Law, yet Anne Bradley learned as much as she could, discovering that their manner only reflected an attitude of “laws are made to break” rather than administer - of which she argued in court proceedings.
g. Judge Levin illegally only allowed three preemptory challenges for a jury selction of 6 on a case which originally only had one misdemeanor charge, which they even altered from RISK OF INJURY TO RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT, obviously to cover up a need for a Letter of Complaint, probable cause, etc.. One juror relied on the police for his welfare, being that he did contracting work for them and obviously knew them, causing CONFLICT OF INTEREST, yet the judge wanted him on the case. That juror caused the jury to be a hung jury and was obsessed with a guilty verdict. He was also appointed the administrator of the jurors. The other 5 jurors were anxious to return to work and therefore compromised with a guilty on one of the Breach of Peace Charges - which in fact reflected VIOLATION OF THE 14th Amendment, DOUBLE JEOPARDY, since no one can be charged twice for the same crime on the same case. Though argued., the judge denied argument.
h. This citizen Anne M. Bradley, seeks the court to remover her from this case as a juror and permanently remove her from the Juror’s List, which she considers to be fraudulently managed anyway.
17. This Motion comprises of 11 pages with an Appendix comprising of 11 pages. Paginations had to be entered by hand due to an uncorrectable typing defect.
18. This is a pre-trial motion and therefore should be ruled on sufficiently, within 10 days, with April 4 as the 10th day. Case Name and Number has to be entered by the Court, since none was provided in the Summons. Request for issuance of ruling to be emailed as well as mailed.
LAW
The below referenced laws and rules are printed and provided in Appendix
Sec. 51-217
Sec. 51-219
PB 16-2
PB 16-4
PB 16-5
PB 16-6
PB 16-7
PB 16-8
CHAPTER 16, JURY TRIALS - to be applied throughout
SUMMARY
Rather than the court just allowing this summoned citizen to be REMOVED FROM THE JUROR LIST, she has to go public with this motion. Extreme Narcissists love this attention. They latch onto whatever public attention they can get, affixed on their belief system that nobody can touch them, they can get away with anything.
CYBER CRIME makes this motion an even more difficult document to create. There is little accountability when it comes to the billionaires who became billionaires as government parasites.
As relayed, this citizen would not be residing here in Connecticut if she could afford to leave. It has been nothing but hell. The few she has been able to rely on are not reachable. Living on the East Coast has been nothing but one nightmare after another - all because of organized crime, which includes the murder of her own father after a pedophile priest obviously poisoned him with arsenic, causing him to bleed out. The depravity in this state is only increasing. The courts are organized crime. The few judges who she has known to be honest and forthright either have untimely deaths or they are shuffled around the state. This DELIBERATE LACK OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, in fact, is DOMESTIC TERRORISM.
WHEREFORE, This citizen Anne M. Bradley, moves the court to remove her from this case as a juror and permanently remove her from the Juror’s List.
Prepared, And Submitted,
Anne M. Bradley
Summoned Juror #0002436837
PO Box 206514, New Haven, CT 06520
APPENDIX
LAWS
Juror Summons
Response by the court to Request For Removal Letter
Information regarding the date 4/24/2024 being used for DECEPTION, CRIME
_________________
Anne M. Bradley
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Chief Clerk's Office: 203-503-6800. Fax: 203-789-6424
From: Anne M. Bradley
Date: 3/22/2024
Re: MOTION TO BE PERMANENTLY REMOVED FROM JUROR’S LIST AS OF TODAY, DATED 3/21/2024
Attached is the aforesaid Motion, which was sent to the appropriate court, which had summoned me for Jury Duty.
A summons is a writ or process ISSUED BY THE COURT, requiring appearance of the receiver of the summons.
A summons is an ORDER OF THE COURT, AND THERFORE THE RECEIVER HAS THE RIGHT TO MOTION THAT COURT.
Not that I expect either your court or the ordering court to do the legal thing by hearing this motion, I am submitting it because I am a citizen, greatly aggrieved by the corruption of the courts, which should have taken me off the Juror’s List when I submitted a LETTER requesting to do so.
A motion is required to be heard within 10 business days according to the Rules of Practice, which you all seem to think you do not have to follow. This serves as PAGE 15 of the MOTION TO BE PERMANENTLY REMOVED FROM JUROR’S LIST, WHICH WOULD INCLUDE NOT HAVING TO APPEAR ON APRIL 24, 2024.
Prepared and Submitted,
____________________
Anne M. Bradley 3/22/2024
203-508-0858
15
MY FORM WAS HALF-ASSED APPROVED, PASTED EMAIL BELOW:
RE: PLEASE EMAIL ME THE DECISION SINCE IT HAS NOT BEEN IN THE MAIL-AS
| Tue, Apr 16, 4:03 PM (8 days ago) | | ||
| ||||
Good afternoon,
Thank you for contacting Jury Administration. Which decision are you looking for? It looks like you were excused from the summons. Also, please provide your Juror ID or full name.
Regards,
Allison S.
Jury Administration
From: Anne Bradley <bradley.annemarie@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2024 10:53 PM
To: Jury Administration <Jury.Administration@jud.ct.
Subject: PLEASE EMAIL ME THE DECISION SINCE IT HAS NOT BEEN IN THE MAIL
Below is the message I received a week ago. Yet I do not have that decision.
Good morning,
Thank you for contacting Jury Administration. Based on the information you have provided, you are excused from serving on this summons. A excusal notice will be sent out. You will also receive an application for permanent removal from the jury pool, this is the second step in the permanent disqualification process. If you would like to be permanently removed please fill the application out in it's entirety and send it back to us. If you do not complete the application and return it to us, you will be disqualified from this summons only and you could be summoned again in the future.
Please do not submit the application via email. You can submit the application via regular paper mail or you can call us and provide the information over the phone.
If you have any questions, please contact us Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., at 1-800-842-8175 and speak with a customer service representative.
Regards,
Thank you for your assistance. |
| Wed, Apr 17, 9:51 AM (7 days ago) | | ||
| ||||
.png)
Comments