Affidavit on Transcript from January 13, 2025
Link to this blogpost
I am in a hurry so I will just paste what I copied for now
10Mar2025 9:02am.
NHH-CV24-6024196-S : APPELLATE COURT OF C
ANSONIA STATE
STREET, LLC : STATE OF CONNECTICUT
V : HOUSING SESSION
ANNE BRADLEY : MARCH 7, 2025
Still in Draft Form
3/14/2025: THEY PROBABLY USED THE SAME AI TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT AS THEY DO WITH THE TRANSCRIPTS - I COULD ONLY UPLOAD THE JAN 13 TRANSCRIPT FROM PDF. THEY WON'T GIVE ME THE WORD VERSION.
ALL TRICKS, BELIEVE ME I ASKED FOR THAT VERSION. THE ACTUAL COPIED TRANSCRIPT IS ON ANOTHER BLOGPOST.
AFFIDAVIT
STOP RIGHT HERE, PLEASE
I HAVE FOUND THAT WHAT I TYPED WAS GREATLY COMPROMISED BY CYBER CRIME. THE TRANSCRIPT ITSELF IS THE ONE ON RECORD, BUT MY AFFIDAVIT IS SO MESSED UP THAT IT WILL WASTE YOUR TIME LOOKING IT OVER. They must have decided to become more aggressive, use other methods to hack my computer after submitting the Motions for Rectification on the other transcripts. What the court will not give me is the transcript on the hearing of February 11. The chief reporter told me that it was not part of the appeal, which is BS in my opinion. She specifically said, "That is between you and the trial court" - she is full of crap. They cannot pull out a segment of trial court and say it is rogue! I will pay for the damn thing if I have to and make sure the court has THAT on record so I can request my money back!
So today, I need to focus on getting a bank check, preparing my Affidavit to submit to Appellate Court, and pay my rent. I am so blown away at how much my Affidavit on the January 13 proceedings was altered by cyber crime - they cut and pasted my text to make no sense of what I stated. It is like having to redo the whole thing again! Feel free to look at it, and essentially they are my words as far as I know. I stopped at about page 10 because it is such a mess. My words were moved here and there....The actual affidavit submitted to court will have much less anyway due to taking out my opinions and such. I will resume that project tomorrow. --10Mar2025
MOTION FOR RECTIFICATION ON JANUARY 13, 2025 TRANSCRIPT
My name is Anne Bradley and I am the defendant-appellant in aforesaid matter. I believe in the power of oath. This statement is in regards the frauded recording of the transcript before this was typed by the court reporter.
I was there! I am harmed by cyber crime every hour, every day.
The fact the court uses it as a weapon to promote their wants rather than administer the law, as they took oaths to do, is frankly so disgusting and fails to reflect any decency. I do believe these people should be held accountable; as Lawrence Mark Hurley was finally, yet to a small degree, since just from a three year audit it was proven that he stole hundreds of thousands of dollars from the court and prosecutors union. He had that position for approximately 19 years and no double helped himself to much more! The court in Middletown denied the state police to further audit! And to further this, they used various state police to further fraud on events that took place after that. Some were fraud, which amounted to over one trillion dollars stolen from the economy, and some involved the murder of good people!
I have been a victim here in this state since I have lived here because I will not participate in this corruption. They seem to think they want to finish what was done to me in Upstate New York since I told a stalking sex trafficker to leave me alone, he was a pig. All my personal possessions have been stolen - hundreds of poems I wrote stolen and they isolate me and me! To have the maintenance manager use violence smashing in my door when I was taking a bath - and this society lets him get away with and harm me more because I complain, is just why I would not call police! Yet it was obviously federal authorities who ordered him out as he was only a foot away from me and I just had a towel, dripping with water because he was smashing my door in when I was taking a bath! I have already stated this crime and reminded the court that I filed an appearance on July 2, 2019 when they tried to illegally evict me; so this was some kind of satanic ritual to humor themselves and say it was time for me to disappear! No one came to my aid when I screamed for my life here. Two tenants were obviously convinced that it was some kind of game! I do not even know this maintenance manager’s last name nor do I care to! He is a reflection of the type of people who illegally enter, vandalize on a continuous basis and steal from me as well!
This case began at 2 pm and ended at 4:40. There was only a 15min recess, so I could go print the checks which I had already presented to the court - becauser this trial judge who likes to make up her rules as she goes along - stated that nothing I submitted in court mattered prior to trial. What does that tell you? It tells you nothing she ruled on had any legal effect because had an ENDS JUSTIFIES THE MEANS motive - nothing about due process of law. Abuse of Process is so blatantly used that she even allowed a woman in her 60’s impersonate her at the first hearing, which was my housing complaint. I did not know who she was, what she looked like. Upon finding out, I realized this fraud goes deep! She, who did not even preside over the October 31 hearing, ruled a dismissal!
1. This transcript has 67 pages, which essentially reflects one page a minute. Yet the hearing and trial took 2 1/2 hours, which is 150 minutes. The recording was obviously frauded!
2. The attorney at the hearing was Attorney Peter Hoops. It was probably his son or nephew who was at the October 31 hearing, at which time he lied about being Attorney Hoops. I discovered later that Attorney Hoops entered the bar obviously before this young man was born, 1987. And the fraud just keeps flowing! I do not know who Joseph St. Rock is. They fraud this because Joseph St. Rock signed the Motion To Dismiss on the Housing Complaint, which was so ineptly prepared, I Motioned to Strike, which would have given him a chance to resubmit one, among other things. Instead this judge, who is greatly lacking in the law and obviously wired or microchipped, which violates our constitutional rights since there is no transparency, claimed Motions to Strike can only be entered for complaints - which is so false that a tree made of plastic would be more real.
INCOMPLETE DIALOGUE
3. Page 1, Line 16. I specifically said I was the DEFENDANT PRO SE. I always emphasize I am not an attorney and do not want to be one. I have resented people who were socially engineered at the courthouse, who do not work there, to believe I was an attorney. I also have had to suffer from an attorney and my own relatives claiming I had all the money in the world after I was nearly murdered by a sander truck drriver when I was 18, attending college and working full time to pay for my schooling. I have to emphasize this because these transcripts are so frauded!
4. Page 1, Line 17-18: Another trick they enjoy pulling is moving dialogue to another spot to humor themselves. Cyber Crime is how they do it, using text-to-voice and cutting and pasting dialogue, etc. The movie makers do that all the time for producing movies. The judge was identified for the court. That does not exist in the transcript.
5. Page 1, Line 21-22. This judge had no intention of credibly hearing my motions because if she did, there would be no trial! So you see, THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ADMINISTERING THE LAW. My motion to change venue has over 100 pages - many are an appendix reflecting much research on caselaws to support the fact this court is supporting FRAUD,not administering the law. She already grranted a motion to dismiss! I requested a change of venue at the December 3 hearing! She said, “No, you cannot reques that. In fact, the transcript of that hearing shows what did NOT take place, that I motioned for that and she denied it. Now she is hearing the same motion again? WTF This would have been a Motion to Reargue. But I did not motion to reargue because there was no hearing of my motion. I submitted the Motion To Change Venua and Motion To Remove Judicial Authority almost at the same time, possibly the same day. It was shortly after the December 3 hearing or shortly after the ruling on the December 3 hearing.
6. Page 2, Line 9 - dialogue is missing where there is a dash. I confirm this.
7. Page 3, Line 9 - dialogue was taken out regarding the abuse of process by this same court when my landlord Corey Spruill filed a Notice To Quit for Lapse of Time. I not only paid my rent timely but gave him advanced rent since he was so cheated by the city with that building. The Certificate of Occupancy indicated three apartments, yet Andi Rizzo, the Director of LCI, WAITED for me to move in and quickly ordered me to be evicted. I told him that was literally criminal, fraudulent, particularly since their office assured me before I signed the lease that the basement apartment had a certificate of occupancy. Corey Sprull lost one apartment’s worth of income because of that. I tried to help him by informing him of his rights as I sttated right in court. In fact, I found out that LCI was over $160,000 in debt while elites werer walking away with money they did not deserve. That case was badly litigated and the judge pitted Corey against me and he was encouraged by someone to file a small claim against me for back rent, which was fraud and yet they pulled strings and got the small claims administrator to go along with it. I told her in person she did a disservice to the public by knowingly allow a fraudulent small claim in the books. But the court didn’t care because the wanted the spin. I am a targeted person because organized crime has followed me ever since I didn’t die from atgtempted murder and the attorney who took that case was a very dishonest person who made that case No Fault lying to me about what No Fault was. Here I was in the hospital, just left ICU with a severe concussion and people had to whisper in my room for a month. My siblings were only interested in a big lawsuit. I didn’t die so they didn’t automatically get the jackpot. So after that, it was all my fault they didn’t get money becaue I settled out of court because the atotrney was a liar. His brother paid a hit mah to kill the President of Chile becaue he refused to sell Pepsi in his country. I never got my rights then and so my siblings only wanted to spin the lie that was I fine, that I had a lot of money and they refused to be any kind of family to me. They were living for themselves. My brother and his wife would walk up and go to another table when I greeted them publicly.
8. Line 19-22 on Page 3 are out of place. Dialogue is missing, to include between sentences. THIS TRANSCRIPT COVERS ONLY HALF OF WHAT TOOK PLACE.
9. Lines 26-27 Page 3 to Line 19. Much of this was extracted and makes no sense. Attorney Hoops had actually asked the judge to give him a copy of the opinion from 2019. He CLAIMED he knew nothing about it, yet they were actually performing a MODUS OPERANDI with a fraudulent NOTICE TO QUIT. This time, they figured they had to successfully push their fraud and that would vindicate their fraudulent Notice To Quit from 2019! This is all about plotting and planning rather than administering the law and certainly the inept pleadings from that office reflect what they have as their priority!
10. Page 4, Lines 22- 27 I was more specific than this about the fraudulent notice to quit and fraudulent Summons and Complaint which followed. I was served that eight days prior to this October 31 hearing. Despite the Chief Clerk PREMATURELY uploading my housing complaint a full week prior to it being served; he turned around and DELAYED the uploading of the Eviction case - a week AFTER the marshal supposedly served the summons, which was placed in a common area, curled up on my door handle. He obviously tried to help out the marshal, calling me that day he did it and told me I could pick up documents at the court. He did not call me on those matters as a matter of practice!
a) The Notice To Quit was what had the return date of September 18, which I argued in court that they could care less about actually doing their job as attorneys since they waited a week to so-called serve me the Summons on September 24, yet it was dated September 23 as I recall. They always argued the dates did not matter yet I firmly claimed they indeed to since the return date on the Summons has to be 3 days after the date it is officially served. Instead, the return date for the Summons placed on my door handle outside my door on October 24 was illegally entered as November 12; and yet deliberately entered as November 4 on the court record, with Attorney Pitt entering the date of the document as October 30. Nothing was done, though I complained and complained and just gave up because other frauds were taking place thereafter. Attorney Pitt devised a so-called compliance form with no law cited saying “These things take time” as if I considered what he said to have any value, which I do not since he has frauded my case on many instances, to serve the wants of the judge, Bozzutos, who are the real owners of 360 State Street, assessed at $2.2 billion, and of course Gideon Friedman the owner of many companies including Ansonia State Street and others such as Ansonia Apartments, which he uses in housing eviction cases yet the company ws not even registered in Connecticut and yet also indicated right on the $89 billion mortgage of this property, which is stated that Ansonia only “owns” (in actuality Leases, since the deed is defective for reselling it and he only gave Bozzutos $160 million - repoorting it was given to MEPT Chapel, which “acquired” the building for a $1 from Bozzutos, as did “360 State Street, Inc”, one of the defendants listed, and I was told by Dragana LaCore to make my checks out to THEM not MEPT, so they had my checks right when I was processed, made out to 360 State Street and I still made them out to 360 State Street as I was ordered to. Who knows who else “owns” this property since others were also quit claimed in documentation. And Pitkin Plaza is supposed to be part of the same piece of property. As I state things like this, they cook the books even more to make it seem like I am wrong, when they are frauds. .
11. Page 5 is incomplete yet may be useful to determine the fact my main emphasis was a fraudulent Notice To Quit and Fraudulent Summons. This judge only cared about pushing an agenda, not applying law. Her juris number is not recoognized in the juris lookup yet all the codes are there on that location, and judges are included. She is obviously wired or microchipped being told what to do, as several people do, to include Kyle Huckle.
12. Page 5, Lines 15-27. Regarding the chief clerk passing the buck, I knew firmly by then that the duties of the chief clerk include setting the return date. When I was at the law library working on researching case information for the Motion To Change Venue, I also looked up the duties of the chief clerk in the statues of Connecticut .
13. Page 6, Lines 1-5 has missing dialogue. I REQUESTED ALL PROCEEDINGS. The court did not document they had stricken anything - which of course would make what Judge Stone’s statement about strikes as INVALID. It’s all a game to thise people, spinning to meet their wants.
14. Page 6, Lines 6-7 is so typical of the rhetoric coming out of this judge. One minute she says this, next minute she says that. They removed a lot of the flip-flopping from the recording.
15. Note, my computer is hit with cyber crime on a continuous basis. Whether I am on or off internet. That cyber crime also exists using the court computers. The common phrase, “They’re everywhere” fits this experience.
16. Page 6, Lines 13-15: I did NOT say the return date of the Notice To Quit has to be three days. It was the Summons I claimed has to have a return date of 3 days. As you notice, the judge did nothing to correct that. It was not said, for one thing, Yet conceivably, she would not correct something like that because her mission had nothing to do with administering the law. Her mission was to abuse her power and get me evicted for the Bozzutos, et al.
17. Page 7, Lines 1-8 has missing dialogue since I could not believe my ears that this judge could care less about the merits of the case. I had emphasized the Notice To Quit is the subject matter jurisdiction. She could only preside over that.
18. Page 7, Lines 11-21: These were the words of Attorney Peter Hoops, and just reading the Motion To Dismiss that Attorney St. Rock signed, you would realize that. His excuse may be “I was on cocaine when I was writing that motion” as if he was ME-U-I …..being himself while under the influence?
19. Page 7, Lines 23-27 to Page 8, Lines 1-9. Dialogue is missing and also displaced. The emphasis on being disabled and having to lug all these court documents with me on a frequent basis, etc - was because of my disatisfaction with denial of MOTION TO EXEMPT me from electronically filing. I wanted to submit the hard copies or fax to the court. They would not allow it and cyber crime is causing some of my uploaded documents to be altered already. Another problem indeed! The Motion For Review I submitted was all centered on the judge’s order - I certainly worked hard enough to get the chief clerk to do his job in making it part of record so I could submit a Motion For Review as soon as possible. He ARGUED with me about “so what, you have all the time in the world”, to use delay tactics and serve the wants of those who had no right to have their wants to be served. He is supposed to serve the law. DIALOGUE IS MISSING.
20. Pages 8-9, the court’s dialogue…reflects again that the hearing was a sham. She had no intention of actually responding to any arguments and recycling the order of Judge Spader had no value because he recycles hers! He even stated that anything she rules is okay with him and even said that SEVERAL JUDGES WERE INVOLVED WITH MY CASE. Which meant NO TRANSPARENCY, since they made no appearances or entered anything in the record - and of course most likely are the ones listening to the microship or wiring which this judge obviously wears like state police do and they tell her what to say and do. In fact, in the hearing or trial, she skipped over what should have been the order of process and said said, “You just speak to me, not them” being the plaintiff. I asked for clarification because I had a right to speak to the plaintiff, ask questions when it was my turn. Though she said I could speak to them, instead she closed the trial quite unexpectedly but she could have cared less about the merits of the case - the fact the case had no merit was someithing irrelevant to her and made statements to that effect, that was argued by me. He Plaintiff no legal effect.
21. Page 9, Lines 24-26: is a classic example that the cyber criminals using malware to alter and dialogue are the culprits here because Judge Stone did not claim I could pay into court on the housing case. She in fact said I could not because she dismissed it; I proceeded to substantively argue that I had a right to pay into court on the aforesaid case, that being current in my rent was important and I expect for my right to prevail since this case is built on a fraudulent Notice To Quit and illegal Summons. That dialogue is missing!
22. I have not read this transcript until now. I am typing my notes as I read it.
23. Page 10, Lines 2-7. Much dialogue is missing and it was my ARGUMENT that I had a right to continue to pay rent into court on the housing matter since I will appeal and also submit a Motion To Open. I found her lack of issuing a Memorandum of Law on that case improper and even in the Appellate Rules of Procedure, one from trial court is required.
24. Page 10, Lines 8 to 27 dialogue again is missing and the repetition of “change venue” “change venue” did not occur. The cyber criminal obviously humored theirself in entering that.
25. Lines 19-27 on Page 10 was the beginning of my argument regarding the Motion To change venue, which comprise of over 100 pages due to the caselaw I included. This judge made no response or consideration to any of it. Her demand before the hearings was nothing discussed prior to the trial would have any affect on the trial. Throughout this time, I knew I had to keep reminding her the subject matter jurisdiction was only regarding the Notice To Quit. It made no difference to her. Yet she claimed she dismissed the Housing Complaint claiming no subject matter jurisdiction!
26. She seems to be a puppet on a string and judges or whoever are telling her what to say and do electronically, which is VIOLATING DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND ALSO GANGING UP ON ME.
27. Page 10, Lines 19 to 27 and Page 11 much dialogue is missing! This was my argument, emphasizing that I provided the court many caselaws to validate the case had no merit. Cases were dismissed on invalid Notice to Quits, which include fraudulent claims that nonpayment of rent was made even though it was paid; and additionally and also important is the fact there was no pretermination letter as required by HUD. Nevertheless this judge plowed through the hearing and trial totally ignoring the case had no merit! Even though she had the caselaws to prove it as well! In this dialogue I mentioned the housing specialist that Attorney Hoops claimed I had to see; and the specialist even claimed that Judge Stone marked off the hearing, which was lie. I went to the housing court to find out. Much of this dialogue was chopped up on the recording using malware!
28. Again, Lines 1-15, Page 12 is greatly lacking in dialogue! My argument was simple! The Notice to Quit was invalid because they claimed I did not pay rent for August and September! There was no letter of arrearage even. No pretermination letter which is a legal requirement for Section 8 Landlords to issue! All they had to do was contact the Housing Authority, which of course in this neighborhood, has a bad reputation due to fraud, abuse of power, and just targeting people such as myself, abusing the procedure. The landlord’s being ordered to remove the almost $14,000 from the ledger in January 2023, resulted in abuse to me, including the maintenance manager relieving himself in my trashcan and many aggressive vandalisms by illegal intruders when I am not in my apartment - which, in fact, never had the key changed on despite this apartment being used as a drug and sex party room oftentimes! Additionally, I was assured I could move in a matter of a few days after the inspection was done. NOT ONLY DID THEY ALLOW ME TO MOVE IN, IN A FEW DAYS, THEY NEVER DID AN INSPECTION AND THE PRIOR LANDLORD - who in fact own the building that the the agent of service is in - 42 Temple Street, New Haven - for more than four of Gideon Friedman’s inept companies, some of which are not even registered, such as Ansonia Apartments - yet the housing court allows him to evict people any way.
29. Page 12, Lines 17-21. This was NOT Attorney St. Rock saying this. I greatly doubt Attorney St. Rock is a qualified attorney. Nevertheless, I continued to repeat what I had already stated based on my own esperience. I paid rent into court for a year on the case that Corey Spruill brought against me. That caused him to go bankrupt. Yet the court had no right just giving him the money without a hearing with me in in it. I stated that! They knew I was in a hospital out of the state. They just figured their tactics would make me disappear since I was supposed to be transported to the med ward and instead the psyche director disguised as a medical assistant claimed he was taking me to the med ward yet kidnapped me in his psyche ward. This was right after I called the appellate court and told them I got very ill on the plane had to be transported to the hospital yet I was supposed to leave in a few days once I stayed in the med ward for a few days. I called to retain my position on the case, since that was my right. Instead it all blew up in my face from abuse of power, and getting the psyche director to literally kidnap me.
30. Attorney Hoops is the one who did not understand. Yet the abuse of procedure is really what the court relies on. What he said did not matter since he knew his words would be crafted by cyber criminals and records could be frauded and so forth to cover for him. His discussion even turns into foolishness in Lines 22-27 and even though the dialogue was altered, it still has a similar effect, that subject matter jurisdiction did not matter. Flip-flopping since the Motion To Dismiss claimed there was no subject matter jurisdiction, which was a lie. Even if a Notice To Quit was was invalid - it does not cancel out the fact that the many breaches caused by the landlord did not exist! He was just trying to use abuse of procedure to get the case dismissed and certainly lying about the Notice To Quit was their way out - all to target me, as abused as I have been here!
31. Page 13: I recall getting my phone which I had laying on the tabletop to look up the word recusal since I never used that in any motion. Recusal means to stop prosecution as if I was essentially seeking a nolle or something. I never agreed to the merits of the case! So Attorney Hoops definitely twisted words and I made sure I said that in the hearing, which is supposed to still be a hearing because if you don’t notice, there was to resuming to trial. Additionally, there was no mention of a 15min break. The fact they altereed the recording is overwhelming proof that only the WANTS of the court are implemented; not administration of justice. Attorney Hoops claiming the case had wrinkles about non-payment caused a significant emotional reaction from me since he considers fraudulently accusing me of not paying rent as a wrinkle!
32. On page 14, Lines 1-7 - I do recall the issue of the use of “pattern of behavior” but the fact he echoed what I said and I mentioned this was taken out. I said the Plaintiff, et al have a pattern of behavior in being fraudulent at the December 3 hearing.
33. Lines 8-9 is missing words yet does reflect the typical rhetoric of “Judge Stone”. OMG, “We’re not here to ask eachother questions” was indeed said, after which she claimed I just had to look at her and talk to her claiming I could say what I wanted to say to the plaintiff after that, which did not happen because her electronic puppeteers obviously told her to close the hearing abruptly, which she did. The inept order of eviction took place on February 11. I submitted requests for that transcript more than once and yet they are not on file.
34. It’s like they want me to pay for the February hearing as well! I placed that in the order and do have it!
35. Page 14, Lines 17, the judge again said she was not going to allow me ask the plaintiff questions, as if she had to be their protector, which did anger me and I stated so.
36. Page 15, Lines 5-11 are missing dialogue. That was my response to the judge saying “you can respond to what he said WITHOUT CLARIFICATION” - indeed I was angry and my dialogue was altered. The judge did agitate me more by telling me I could not ask the plaintiff questions. They could ask ME, but not vice-versa! And then she did cut off the hearing! I insisted on saying more, aggravated that this judge refused to allow me to ask them questions. She was not administering justice, she was actually creating more animosity. She did not want the case to be resolved in a proper manor. She was hell-bent on getting me evicted to satisfy the landlord and other elites who want to keep the corruption going. The missing dialogue is additional evidence of that. Nevertheless, she kept hop, skipping, and jumping over the very fact I paid the rent and there was no letter of arrearage and no pretermination letter. And the Summons was illegal, with an deliberately illegal return date which Chief Clerk William Pitt was allowing, since as I reminded the court, it is HIS responsibiity to set the return date. So he certainly could change it, as he did with other various info which I was angry about because he altered the names of motions to allude something alse.
Page 15 lacks so much dialogue and comments are not in the proper place - the cyber criminal is playing on the one string they have; to infer I was hostile,which I was far from it. In fact, I had resented the chief clerk telling me in the court that I was like John Wayne in a movie, “Shoot them all”. I argued that I am a peaceful person and did not like him saying that.
37. Basically page 16 is only a gross refledtion of cyber malware altering the recording; it makes no sense as is. That is not how things occurred!
38. Page 17, Lines 6-7: The judge said, “And I have not pre-judged this case” so it is obvious to a person reading this that my dialogue telling her she already had her mind made up before the hearing, similar to what took place in the housing complaint. I did not go into the fact that she used an impersonator because it would take up too much time and waste it. I was there to save my own skin, not prosecute their crimes.
39. On Page 9, the judge denied payment into court
40. On Page 17, the judge denied change of venue (Line 12-13)
41. Dialogue is obviously missing since line 14-15 indicate, my words: May I ask you why you don’t have the evidence because I’ve submitted it several times”
42. This is where the judge claimed that nothing that took place prior to trial has any legal effect. That angered me! She repeatedly showed disrespect for the law and only respect for herself, claiming/alluding that only she was the law!
43. Much dialogues is missing in Page 17!
44. Emphasis, my question which ironically is the last line in Page 17 to the first Line in Page 18: So you expect me to make copies of what I already submitted into the court [for trial, was said but left out]
45. There were only two hearings marked, then trial was marked. So what is THIS hearing for? Is dialogue moved again?
46. Yet right after this, the judge calls recess. And she says “It’s ten minutes to 3; Recess was to 3:05pm. Trial lasted from 3:05 to 4:30! These first pages infer that they cover the case which took place from 2:00 - 2:50. 18 pages for 50 minutes!
47. Pages 19-67 are supposed to cover 90 minutes. What is the page difference? 48 min vs 90 min….the difference is 42 missing recording for the trial time.
48. They keep using Attorney St. Rock, which is fraudulent!
49. Attorney Hoops questions Kyle Huckle….using a trick referring to “360 State vs Ansonia State Street” to cover for themselves on why I was told to continue making my checks out to 360 State Street. I asked! I said, “If this is a valid owner, I wanjt to know what to make my checks out to” Chris Robinson was told by Kyle to continue making them out to 360 State Street!
50. They were also trying to get tenants to pay South Oxford and also for a time to pay Beachwold, though they called it Beachwood Residential. This lead me to believe that Ansonia State Street was not the actual owner; and as I discovered they did not have selling rights on the property. The deed was LIMITED.
51. Therefore they lie about referring to themselves as owner!
52. Page 23, Line 3 - They were doing something to the microphone to keep me from hearing what was being said; to keep me from objecting!
53. Line 23, Page 9: another validatiion they were doing something to the microphone to keep it from being uderstood.
54. Page 23, Line 20: The judge asked if I objected; and would not allow me to speak about this according to the transcript. Yet I recall claiming that it was NOT the controlling lease, which I submitted in full on my Housing Complaint. I also claimed that the plaintiff is proving they are mismanaging since there is supposed to be an addendum when a new owner takes over. I also claimed that the lease states right on it my rent is $171 - not $198 - so they are only proving they have no case against me.
55. That was all taken out of the recording!
56. On Page 24, I objected about the rent and emphasized that was not the controlling lease and they have no lease if there is no HAP Contract and the lease is required to be in compliance with Section 8 laws, as cited in the HAP Contract - all that is gone now
57. Page 25: Line 18 was removed! Line 21-23 was altered! I immediately said what is at Lines 25-26, that they are only framing themselves …and I said more! I said the letter is dated April 29, 2024 (as he confirmed in Line 5) and yet he states that the “ORDER” was for me to pay Section 8 rent increase from January 2022! I said, “Where is the original letter? The court should care about this.” But the court did not care! She covered it up instead. She did not care about getting an original and meantime they planted a letter in my apartment dated January 2022, which I never got, addressed to me at 360 State Street, even though I was not getting maiasl here since 2019 due to they management tampering with my mail. Consider the many vandalisms to my apartment, and other harm and the fraudulent billing. I certainly was at a point where I was not going to put up with any more of their abuse if I could help it. And of course, all the complaints were not acted upon!
58. I want to finish this but I need some sleep. It is 3:17 and unfortunately I could have a stroke right now from working on all this. I need a few hours anyway. I want to get this uploaded tomorrow afternoon. ---3:18 am …as it turned out I needed more sleep because my head felt like it was going to explode. I have resumed on Saturday the 8th yet could not do the things I hoped to do because I need to complete this affidavit first. I will be removing this paragraph before uploading to the court. I am just stating this for my blog. The courts have everything rigged! Can I bold the text before copying and pasting? I cannot even copy and paste this 68 page Transcript. I don’t think I can. I will attempt to…..But need to complete this affidivat first……It is now 8:25 pm. I have entered over 80 paragraphs here. I need to stop to go access wifi because oddly the exhibits I placed in a separate pile while looking for my transcript orders (not one is in my paperwork! And I am missing the requested order for February 11! The chief court reporter said she woulf not issue that one because it was not part of my appeal - WTF. She said what I paid into court for rent is between me and trial court, pending appeal, not the appellate court! I motioned for Review because it obviously is! I requested it for a reason! What she reflects is corruption to what degree, I don’t know. She may just be a puppet for a judge - namely JUDGE ELIZABETH BOZZUTO! ..nevertheless, I need to find that one exhibit, the letter coming from Elm City Communities. They FRAUD to cover up what they have said, what they have done, and rely on CYBER CRIME and vandalizing my apartment and more to do the dirty work to cover up files, etc! So I need to resume this in a short time. I have to access that letter. The chief clerk would not enter the damn exhibits as part of the case, so I submitted them! Will the Appellate Court fudge things over? Not if I can help it because I do plan to enter a specific motion to ensure they are part of the record!
Note, I discovered more when looking for my ledgers.
I shared what I could on
https://singhasongflower.blogspot.com/2024/11/home-on-the-deranged.html?m=1
Trial Court’s Order on payments of Rent
http://www.publiusroots.org/2025/02/trial-court-order-on-payments-of-rent.html
If that link doesn’t work, try this, with ?m=1 at the end for mobile phones
http://www.publiusroots.org/2025/02/trial-court-order-on-payments-of-rent.html?m=1
You can navigate on PubliusRoots and see many more blogposts I created. I try to post what I have when I have; however I can…
It is now Sunday, the 9th of March. I only had 2 hrs sleep. But I got up to post this in my blog. I have to be quick because they take me off wifi usually! Tomorrow I have to go to the office and give them a check. Rest Assured, I am also giving them a statement about this, which will be notarized Monday-hopefully before I pay it. I need to finish this affidavit and expect to have this notarized and uploaded on my appeal before I go to their office. Here I had a Motion For Review submitted 3 weeks ago and they knew it was urgent! This is their DEVIL’S CHESSBOARD! All I can do is suggest you navigate on the PubliusRoots blogpost when you can and I will upload things when I can - to include the ledger I got from them in August 2023 - the BALANCE WAS ZERO OCTOBER 2022. Yet in November they balance was almost $14, 000 and they were ordered by the court to remove it - saying in court they were just being nice, and the recording was altered. Yet when I was asking questions, I even asked why he claimed he was just being nice. There was no opposition to the fact I asked that question! And it is one of many logical examples why the transcript was altered, covering only 70 minutes of a 2 1/2 hour court proceeding; first two hearings and a trial!
None of this paragraph will be in what I submit to the Appellate Court!
59. Page 26, Lines 2-3. Attorney Hoops gave all documents to Kyle Huckle to prepare for court before court! Whatever cyber criminal injected that in there, was typically foolish! Especially right after that, in lines 6-7 Attorney Hoops proceeds to question Kyle Huckle about it! There was no recess so he could look at HIS attorney was presenting! And this exhibit was referencing the ledger and he did describe the ledger!
60. $668 + $264 = 932, which is the fair use and value of rent for my apartment. What they fail to admit is they were obviously abated. What they fail to admit is they don’t have the original letter, and just use a letter dated April 2024 because there was no original letter. Neither the judge ask for that to validate, and again, was just forging ahead on a mission to get me evicted using fraudulent means! I stated that my address I get mail it is a PO Box ONLY since 2019, when I changed my address. I have not seen this so far in the transcript; when I changed my address. The “judge” directly asked me when I changed it!
61. Only PRIOR to questioning did the court ask if I have any objection in entering items as evidence! I allowed it because what they entered was exculpatory for ME. I was the one being prosecuted; they were the ones who only framed themselves as frauds! The ledger indicated they were ordered by the court to remove fraudulent charges. I am still expecting to see that.
a) Additionally, in August 2023, when I asked for a ledger, SOM Living was in place. The landlord Ansonia State Street, claimed they had been there since November 2022.
b) The balance on my account was $0 yet they would not provide me a full printout to the current date. The Balance was that as of October 2022!
c) My point is they are consistently only one thing: FRAUDS.
d) I pay my rent timely every month. I am never past due and my checks always clear. They have frauded me so much in billing that I began using bank checks years ago and still they fraud me. They fraud the law! They apply legal malpractice!
62. Lines 17-18 “It states” is just THEIR ledger, which they have a history of fraudulent billing on! Refusing me the courIt order which ordered them to remove the almost $14,000 in charges! When Kyle Huckle claimed that this removal was to “be nice” I requested the court order! I said, “It has right on it that it was ordered by the court. Where is the court order?” I was refused the court order! And yet Kyle Huckle flip-flopped and admitted it was a court order. Will this be in the transcript?
63. Line 23-27: This location may not be where I said that; yet I do admit there were sporadic times they were using someone to tamper with the microphone and immediately told them to repeat. Not after a few sentences. Oddly, line 22, BEFORE my asking, is REMOVED! They obviously stated something tactical and realized they would get caught since they tampered with the microphone to keep me from hearing. I felt like asking them who was tampering with the microphone? There was already so much dishonesty by the court; I did not want to say anything that would take away opportunity to defend the very issue of the ILLEGAL EVICTION. I am not a prosecutor. This trial seemed to have been a closed courtroom. No one was in it but myself, the plaintiffs, the alleged judge, and marshal. Most likely to add “alarm” to the public!
64. I emphasized the ledger originated by them, they enter whatever they want to enter. Is that in the transcript?
65. Page 27, Lines 25-27: missing dialogue yet at least the fact the court order for them to remove fraudulent charges was said by me AND NOT EVEN OBJECTED TO BY THE PLAINTIFF BECAUSE IT WAS TRUE, AND ALSO, THEY WERE ONLY SAYING WHAT THEY WERE TOLD BY WIRED OR MICROCHIPPED DEVICES THAT THEY HAD ON. NOT FOCUSED ON THINKING FOR THEMSELVES. The date February 16 was not said by me on line 27!
66. Page 28, Line 5. The transcript fraudulently indicates: (Attorney Hoops) asked, “At the time South Oxford Management took over this property, November 2022, as you testified, it looks like there was a large balance showing; do you agree with that?” He said yes… and Lines 16-17 says “So this was the balance that was remaining from the past - or prime - “ Obviously the cyber criminals were aligned with AMAZON. He did not say “past OR prime” What he just said was that it was the balance. They were saying what they were told through wires, microchips. And microchips can be made of a plastic which is not traceable!
67. Lines 18-19, Page 28. I did NOT say I could not hear what he was saying there. I had no problem hearing him and claimed to the court this was all their nefarious record keeping; nothing which could be validated. They do not even manage the ledger! I also claimed it was like an Excel spreadsheet because they alter information and never enter any corrections. It is all fraud!
68. That is WHY this judge said on Page 29, Lines 1 and 2: “Ma’am, Ma’am. You’re going to have to wait until his attorney is done asking 30questions” PEOPLE CAN OBJECT IN HEARINGS AND TRIALS! ANY REAL JUDGE KNOWS THAT. SHE JUST WANTED TO CRAFT IT THAT WAY IN ORDER TO SAY AND DO WHAT SHE IS ELECTRONICALLY TOLD TO SAY AND DO.
69. Page 29, Lines 6-12. The attorney did not ask Huckle if anything! Kyle Huckle offered the response, that the balance was so high they decided to remove it to give me a clean slate. I objected! THEY REMOVED IT IN FEBRUARY 2023, FEBRUARY 11! THEY WERE ORDERED TO BY THE COURT IN JANUARY 2023!
70. This is just more proof the audio was altered!
71. In fact, most of this audio was NOT said! They DO HAVE TO USE THE MICROPHONE because that is how it is recorded!
72. The judge did not say that no one has to talk into the microphone. EVERYON DID TALK INTO THE MICROPHONE AT ALL TIMES.
73. Page 30 - again, had Attorney Hoops questioned like that, I would have objected. If I could not hear just a few words, I would tell them to fix the microphone or tell them to talk into the microphone, since Kyle Huckle deliberately pulled away one time. I was pissed! And I let the court know that I was pissed! I said, “What kind of trial is this, anyway?”
74. There was no discussion on Rent storage! Because on-site charges are not owed by the section 8 tenant. They have to submit them to the administrator. I sent the law to them so many times! They vandalize my apartment and steal the resources, they disrupt the wifi - and get someone in Texas, a company called “US Tech” to literelly destroy my laptop! I told them I wanted nothing to do with them, I already have a service and they have no right to access my computer. It was then that the destroyed my Dell laptop! Hitting it with an EMP! And where is this landlord’s phone calls routed to? TEXAS! Anyone who calls this company is at-risk for their own privacy, data, etc. I say etc because they could be hitting people with EMP’s through the phone system! I have seen one neighbor’s health diminish to the point she can barely walk and she is at home 90% of the time and talks on the phone a lot. A neighbor across the hall from me died! It was untimely, though he was wheel-chair bound. And his wife thereafter had a stroke when she was in great health, took good care of herself! By killimg her off, they most likely can embezzle or even outright fraudulently bill the surviving family to enrich themselves, who have an $89 billion mortgage on this $2.2 billion single building, which is nefariously ISOLated from the rest of the Bozzuto property, known as Pitkin Plaza! There was never any change in the property! I scanned in every document on record - and yet my flashdrives were all stolen in New York City, which is where Gideon Friedman’s office is in! These are people who have known each other for years and years obviously! I made statements to that effect!
INVALID DIALOGUE (not said)
1. Page 1, Line 10-11: He was NOT Joseph St. Rock. He identified himself as Attorney Peter Hoops. He was a man about 5’ 10”, with a gotee and a mustach, aged in his 40’s. Caucasion.
2. Page 21, Line 7 - Kyle Huckle claimed he was COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER, NOT PROPERTY MANAGER
3. Page 21, Line 10 The question then posed was How long have you been in the position of Community Services Manager? - not Property Manager
4. My point is the cyber criminals altered the recording as THEY saw fit. Actually, Kyle was first Property Manager, then it changed to Community Services manager when Ansonia State Street began leasing the building. Chris Robinson was Assistant Property Manager yet he went on to a better job just after this SOM Living - Beachwold Residential - Ansonia State Street menagerie took over and misinformed tenants left and right. Kyle would not say who the Property Manager was, yet an email from Dragana LaCore indicated that SHE was, which I thought was nuts since they supposedly fired her here. Nothing is transparent here.
5. Lines 17-19: Kyle Huckle affirms that Ansonia State Street owns the building - which for all purposes is perjury and he is saying what he is told, obviously fed electronically to his ear.
6. At no point was Attorney Hoops spoken to as Attorney St. Rock in this trial!
7. Line 27, Page 27. I did not state “was posted on February 16 in this ledger” and notice the dash in the line above because they deleted dialogue. I also said much more than what is on the transcript, about their dishonest billing, and they create the ledger, so they are no authority on the Section 8 Tenant Portion. In fact, they failed to have the Housing Authority, for-profit Elm City Communities, to testify and this was THEIR case to prove, not mine! I said all that!
8. The fact that Kyle Huckle committed perjury about removing the balance of almost $14,000 from the ledger TO BE NICE; and then flipflopping and admitting it was a court order - was also deleted from the recording!
9. Page 30, Lines 8-14 WERE NOT SAID. They did not discuss the storage rent becase it was an onsite charge, and when they began using the fuel cell to make electrictity, etc. I told them on-site charges cannot be charged to the section 8 tenant. Promptly they got the other section 8 tenants pitted against me and frankly, I do not care. They do not think for themselves. They run this building like a Group Home!
10. Line 16, Page 30 indicates I owe $3,339 - ACCORDING TO THE LEDGER. Where is my dialogue regarding how much is allegedly calculated for their acclaimed $66 a month and now plus $50 a month from allegedly “when they purchased” 360 State Street..multiply that and you do not, get this amount! In fact if you asked him what 2 + 2 was, he would only say what he was told/wired to say! He failed to explain why there was no effort in collecting that money from me for two years, and why they aabused me so much by vandalizing and damaging and stealing from me! After this trial, someone stole all my possessions out of my storage area, and scattered the boxes I had neatly stacked on a flatbed truck - all over! That reflects violent tendancies and also depravity, which is an everyday occurrence on this property if I leave my apartment.
a) How many months is November 2022 to trial, January 13, 2025? I took my phone, which was right on the table top in front of me and calculated! 26 months! Multiply $66+$0 x 26! Did he even respond to break down the charges? Of course not because he is working for organized crime which does the billing, not the office! He doesn’t even know what he is talking about! $2,990 is the total which reflects his lies, but he is lying on top of lies! And the ledger reflects all that! So that is why I emphasized, “Sure, enter it; it only proves they are lying and are frauds!”
11. This whole page, No 30, lacks dialogue, and injected the dialogue which I have already mentioned on this affidavit.
12. Page 31, Lines 2-8 were NOT SAID. There was nothing to confirm that my payment was deposited. Kyle Huckle REFUSED MY PAYMENT. Kyle Huckle would not respond to my question about if they entered my payment, when he refused it and I left it on the desk anyway and walked out! I said that in court! The “judge” said I could not ask him anything even though they were discussing the evidence! I had a right to say something to emphasize their lies! I paid rent into court on the housing complaint! NONE OF THAT DISCUSSION WAS IN THE AUDIO EITHER!
13. Page 31 is where this transcript shows I begin questioning the “Community Services Manager” (note, his duties are left out of the audio as well!) My efforts were to defend my rights, no prosecute, but they did a lot of dishonest things in that courtroom - before, during and after trial!
14. Page 31, “In regards to the posting of February 16, 2023, was NOT SAID” - they removed the charges on February 11, as probably an effort to resume their fraudulent billing and still show a balance!
15. What is the balance on February 11, 2023?
16. What is the balance on Februyary 16, 2023?
17. I NEVER REFERRED TO THE REMOVAL OF FRAUDULENT CHARGES AS ANY “POSTING” LET ALONE “FEBRUARY 16” - they are probably making some kind of Satanic ritual over this. Fidel Castro rose to power on Feb 16, 1959….Kim Jong II, who became North Korea’s leader, was born in Siberia, Russia…. They seem to make their lies have some kind of depraved purpose as a means of social engineering as well. I was born the same year as Kim Jong II. Kim Jong II was only 70 when he died. Having great health, yet having a massive heart attack on 12/17/2011 while traveling on a train - using public transportation as a leader who trusted his people - to Pyongyang. When was the Battle of Chosin fought? And this word is actually derived from a Japanese word. The data on Wikepedia is not trusted by me because I learned that Chinese lost way more than that during the 17 day battle, which the USA LOST. It was not referred to as the Battle of Chosin Reservoir, either. The Technocracy have altered so much information on that. China lost hundreds of thousands of men! Most or all of them were just wearing sneakers when they were unexpectadly called up to DEFEND the USA Invasion. Wikipedia refers to it as UN invasion, which is false! The atomic bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were dropped in August 1945 and USA was moving in on the world using violence!
18. The maintenance manager in the complex I have lived at since January 2013 was using violence on July 2, 2024!
19. They used violence to steal my possessions in my storage area here!
20. I certainly brought that violence up in this trial, but it was deleted from the audio as well!
21. Page 31, Lines 22-23 was left in, which reflects what Kyle Huckle really said, “Because what you had stated was, we removed it to be nice, and it was not that. It was a court order which makes a big difference.”
22. There was no objection to what I said! Page 31, Line 25-27 “And I asked for a copy of that court order…” so that audio was still left in and validates my prior statement regarding I wondered if they also took that request out also. They actually did, but what I said in questioning stayed there.
23. Page 32, Lines 1-5: some of my dialogue was taken out of the recording, emphasizing this was my account, they were the ones who entered the info, testifying only what they enter with no validation.
24. Oddly, Line 6 indicates “By Ms. Bradley” when I was still talking - or maybe the audio suspiciously sounded like the judge spoke but this judges dialogue was removed by the cyber criminals who alter recordings.
25. Based on the dialogue I have just noted, it seems obvious to me that the judge spoke up on behalf of Ansonia State Street, in attempt to suppress my efforts to get them to relay the truth! Because she did that a lot, abusing power to aid and abet!
26. Page 32, Lines 11-21. THIS IS NOT WHAT KYLE HUCKLE SAID. He admitted the letter from Elm City Communities was to
27-58 deleted by cyber crime! I have to fix it later. Remember, this is a draft and my personal opinions will be removed for the most part - when submitting to the court. I updated my notes but am not finished. 3/9/2025 9:34 pm. I have to hurry because this landlord disrupts my connection when they know I am on it.
NOT ONE ANSWER FROM ANY DEFENDANT. The point I am making is due to the following:
1. Lines 15-27 was the court’s attempting to wash out the fact that FRAUD and BREACH OF CONTRACT were allowed by the HAP administrator on a continuous basis, and they rigged an illegal situation to stop my housing assistance altogether as a deliberate shock, since Hoops & Associates is framing themselves on this case, not me. I stated all this and do not see it in the transcript at this point. And I stated that is why I request a hearing then, and have been denied hearings in the past, so they had a Modus Operandi.
2. Pages 41-42 show obvious segments are missing and what dialogue is there was in part moved. “this convoluted situation where they can mix things up and say, oh, well, this happened four years ago.” There is no description of “this” and with a judge that will tell me “what do you mean” on my direct questioning; it would certainly not be unnoticed. This was injected by cyber crime, out of context to say the least.
3. The hearing request would involve the landlord due to breaches of contract on a continuous basis, so the dialogue on Page 42 is greatly damaged.
4. Page 43, Lines 1-3. In that dialogue regarding the maintenance manager using violent force to smash his way in my apartment, my dialogue is greatly altered on the recording. I said I screamed for my life. I said he used violent force. I said he broke the latches on my side of the door. I said all that and the recording was deleted! And for emphasis, the judge could have cared less.
5. Page 43, Line 12. Dialogue missing. MY dialogue. It is transcribed with dashes for obvious reasons: “So this case is based -- the subject matter jurisdiction can only be based on the rent payments for August and September.” Previous to that I had repeatedly said “I paid the rent for August and September” and the COURT refused to let me question KYLE HUCKLE regarding the checks I paid. I could only rely on their ledger, which was most likely to be frauded if they could get access to my copies.
6. More altering of the audio, to infer the maintenance manager smashed in my doorwhen they got a court order! COMPLETELY FRAUDULENT! The court order for them to remove the fraudulent charges was in January 2023. The maintenance manger smashed in my door on July 2, 2024! Yet the transcript reads in Lines 16-19: “And as I had mentioned, that maintenance manager smashed in my door the same month that they got the court order. And I knew that they [had got - NOT MY WORDS!] the court order in January….
7. Page 44, Lines 2-7 Dialogue again was altered. I emphasized they tried to evict me the same way in 2019 and lost. This was Modus Operandi. The Notice To Quit didn’t even have any amount, there was no letter of arrearage and definitely no Pretermination letter. Though the judge did all he could to rig this meritless case, he was called from the bench and whoever spoke to him told him obviously to do his job. In the voluminous opinion, he stated the one and only thing needed, THERE WAS NO CURE PERIOD. He would not admit the Pretermination Letter was required. He worded it like that so no one else would learn their rights, and for the record, it was hidden. A 6-page opinion which was completely out of whack - yet he had to admit no Pretermination Letter was issued. The fact that the lease indicated that my payment was $171 a month and there was no addendum to change that, made no difference. This again was another opportunity to ILLEGALLY EVICT ME, because I am a targeted person who happens to have no support system and worse yet, relatives who enjoy harming me, exploiting me more.
8. Page 44, my emphasis which I repeated throughout: The subject matter jurisdiction is on one issue, non-payment of rent for [September and-whoever alters the audio got demented humor in injecting this] August and September. And obviously, they’re frauding the billing and they had a court order to remove almost $14,000. So that’s the reason why I am emphasizing that.
9. I decided to paste where I left off here…20+ more pages to go and I am losing all desire to finish but I will. --9:17pm 3/9/2025
.png)
Comments