Illegal Eviction - HOUSING COMPLAINT - MOTION TO OPEN DENIED IN 24 HOURS!
Link to this blogpost:
http://www.publiusroots.org/2025/01/illegal-eviction-housing-complaint.html
REFERENCE LINKS:
NOTE, YOU MAY NEED TO ADD ?m=1 after the link to access if you are using your phone
http://www.publiusroots.org/2024/12/illegal-eviction-transcripts.html
https://singhasongflower.blogspot.com/2024/11/home-on-deranged.html?m=1
https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/09/illegal-eviction-2024.html?m=1
http://www.publiusroots.org/2024/12/illegal-eviction-motion-to-continue.html
there are more links showing on this topic/horrible experience, if you are up to it. Links are on the motherearth and thunderflower blogs....
https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/09/illegal-eviction-2024.html?m=1
https://motherearthtoo2022.blogspot.com/2024/10/illegal-eviction-2024.html?m=1
WHO IS THE LANDLORD REALLY HERE AT 360 STATE STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT?
http://www.publiusroots.org/2025/01/illegal-evictionwho-is-landlord-really.html
The city gave Bozzuto's the land for $1; Barack Obama gave them millions and milliuons of government money! Most likely they will revoke all promises made to the former FRAUD-In-CHIEF, who sabatoged Iran deliberately and organized the Sandy Hook Shooting fraud, printed trillions of illegal dollars, and more! Though they promised to have at least 50 section 8 apartments and those who live in them for 20 years OWN them like condos, and so much more but the city now hides that agreeement and so what - the new fraud who owns this building doesn't have to promise anything and is not even HUD approved!
They also got the city alderperson to order all section 8 tenants to complete REQUEST FOR TENANCY PACKETS which is outright illegal! I not only cited the law but copied and pasted the 89 pages and emailed it to this inept landlord! THE LANDLORD HAS TO BE APPROVED, NOT THE HUD TENANTS! I stated this to them several times; the manager Kyle Huckle said, "Never mind. You don't need to sign anything." NOT EVEN AN ADDENDUM THAT ACKNOWLEDGES THEY OWNER CHANGED! THE PRIOR OWNER WAS REGISTERED AS A NONPROFIT, PART OF THE CHURCH COMMUNITY AND SOLICITED "DONATIONS" WHICH WAS PROBABLY A WAY TO LAUNDER CRIME MONEY!
MEPT CHAPEL, LLC - WTF
No problem, the Secretary of State will cover for them! They are even acting agents for Bozzuto and the Chief Clerk lies about someone dieing - THE SECRETARY OF STATE HAS BEEN THEIR AGENT SINCE BEFORE 2012!
I could say so much more!
WHO OWNS, WHO OPERATES ITS "TWIN TOWER" THREE BLOCKS AWAY?
Reference update: http://www.publiusroots.org/2025/01/illegal-eviction-housing-complaint.html
I should have had a hearing! https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ct-court-of-appeals/1265718.html
Instead, the judge breaks all rules by issuing an early decision, within 24 hours of upload - probably because she is not even an attorney! She listens to her puppeteers tell her what to do via microchip or other wireless means! I said I was going to resume this later and kept going. But I do have to stop now to run errands due to inclement weather setting in
1/19/2025 2:18pm
My point is no motion can be heard in 24 hours. A motion involves BOTH parties and the other party is allowed time to respond. In Superior Court, at the least 5 days. Should the other party not care to respond, they have to submit a revocation of their rights to respond if the court wants to issue a decision right away!
======================================================================
Significant problems in processing occur because instructions do not cover housing matters or civil matters unless it is family court.
This YouTube video does not allow comments also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2TeH6sC_v0
Before you waste your time reading, I will upload the actual documents because they deleted my files on my laptop using CYBER CRIME/MALWARE - most likely by MICROSOFT! I do not use Microsoft to create documents anymore due to their criminal activity!
I will upload them once I get back from running some errands, in preparation for this very cold weather coming up.
1:43 pm/ Sunday
I may get back to this later this evening or Monday is most likely when I will
================================================================================================================================================
Here is my Affidavit first, just because it was easier to locate:
DOCKET NO. NHH-CV24-5006875-5 : SUPERIOR COURT OF CT
Copy: Docket No. NNH-CV24-
ANNE M. BRADLEY : J.D. OF NEW HAVEN
V : HOUSING SESSION
ANSONIA STATE STREET, LLC et al : January 10, 2024
AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF
MOTION TO OPEN
1. My name is Anne Bradley. I am over the age of 18 years and believe in the power of oath. I am the Plaintiff in the aforesaid matter.
2. The court ruled a dismissal on this Housing Complaint on 11/12/2025. There is no disposition. The court refuses to articulate or comply with standard procedure on rulings of dismissal. I question the court’s honesty. It is a crime to impersonate a judge, whether that judge allows it or not. If the judge allows it, then the judge is also committing a crime. The woman who said she was Judge Alayna Stone on 10/31 was NOT. She was a woman who appeared to be in her 60’s.
3. It is not even known that Alayna Stone is an attorney or judge. Her juris number does not exist in Juris Lookup. The Court Operations clerk hung up on me when relayed there was no validation. This is what he was obviously taught to cure accountability.
a) I was thereafter denied MOTION FOR EXEMPTION to file hard copies on my appeal on this Housing Matter. I consider it only reflective of ignorance, not justice. As one who is severely disabled from a 20 ton truck slamming into me years ago, I have done my best to assert my rights and report the injustices which are continuous!
i. For Two years, I have had to wash my clothes by hand; I had to sleep on the floor for 1 year 10 months; I have had to fix and clean what the illegal intruders do. I have given no one my key; yet the landlord and housing authority lied about my door lock being changed. I found out later it was not. There was no initial inspection on my apartment, yet they enjoyed making me wait to allow COLONIAL FOUNTAIN MANAGEMENT, LLC. to illegally enter and damage my bathtub to blame me and keep my deposit money. They also charged me rent for February 2013 when I paid for a half-month’s rent, $400 and they had a couple move in my apartment the day after I left, January 15 or earlier, which was indeed reflective of the notice I gave them on December 13, 2013.
b) COLONIAL FOUNTAIN MANAGEMENT owns the building at 42 Temple Street - which is the location of the Agent for the several businesses owned by Gideon Friedman - who now uses media to claim he owns the apartment building I live in. Four were served my complaint by the marshal, which the Chief Clerk, Attorney Pitt claimed I had to use. One, 360 State Street, LLC, has no affiliation and the agent of service is on Whitney Ave, not there. The other company titled 360 State Street was dissolved. For the landlord to continue to tell me to make my checks out to a non-existing company is additional FRAUD. Yet I have determined that my checks do get deposited in a Bank Of America account titled Ansonia State Street.
4. The law states I can serve each defendant with Priority Mail. The Chief Clerk told me I had to have them served by a marshal. I consider this abuse of procedure; as a means of delay. I lost two weeks in processing my Complaint due to these means of delay.
a) My four extra toner cartridges were stolen by illegal intruders out of my apartment. I did not realize this until I reached for them when my printer toner ran out. I had to order more.
5. According to PB Rule 10-17, AND MORE, A Motion To Open may be submitted within 4 months of the ruling.
6. There is no merit to the Eviction Case, which was uploaded a week AFTER the summons was supposedly served by a marshal, who did not knock or ring my doorbell. So I do not know who placed it attached to my doorknob accessible in the hallway, WHICH IS A COMMON AREA.
7. My rent was current at the time the Plaintiff served me a Notice To Quit for nonpayment of rent for August and September of 2024. I consider this FRAUDULENT which makes the LEGAL EFFICACY of the Notice To Quit WITHOUT MERIT and INVALID. The court turns a blind eye to BURDEN OF PROOF. The court had a fraud preside, claiming she was Judge Alayna Stone on October 31, 2024. I do not know if Alayna Stone is even an attorney. There is no Juris number of her in the Juris Lookup. There is no such thing as TRANSPARENCY in the court, either.
a) My Complaint was centered on the ongoing abuses of the landlord, breaching the Section 8 lease, violating HUD laws, violating my own safety and security, yet the court has complete disregard for that! I SUBMITTED MANY COMPLAINTS PRIOR TO THAT, AND VALIDATED THAT IN MY APPENDIX TO THE COMPLAINT! NONE OF THE RECIPIENTS DID ANYTHING! Not the landlord, not the housing aurthority, not the city’s housing inspectors which only claim they work for the housing authority! I filed a BBB complaint! I did everything in my power to get my rights since this landlord breached the Section 8 contract on a daily basis and had no regard for my safety and security! On September 18, 2024, someone shoved an INVALID NOTICE TO QUIT in my doorframe. It was backdated to September 12; the marshal’s alleged proof of service was dated as September 13! The Plaintiff-Landlord argues so what if the date is wrong. The so-called judge claims the reason she claimed the Notice to Quit as valid was because everything was typed right on it - despite not acknowledging their failure to use the published court form - not citing any law - and even using a wrong date - because it was spelled correctly. My impression is the type of spelling refers to the spells used in SATANISM.
i. Payments into court validated my rent was current! Only current rent may be accepted into court as stated by the law. These laws should be known like the back of their hands; yet what they are doing is lying about them.
ii. CITED:
b) I titled the Complaint as Anne Bradley vs Bozzuto, et al. Attorney Pitt wanted it changed to Anne Bradley vs Ansonia State Street et al
i. Bozzuto Management Company has the SECRETARY OF STATE as their Agent of Service; they have done this for over ten years and therefore Attorney Pitt’s claim that someone died is INVALID.
c) ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSES centered on the very fact my rent was paid for August and September. The Subject Matter Jurisdiction on that case can only be limited to the NOTICE TO QUIT
d) SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT on the Illegal Eviction Case ADDED MORE FRAUD. I DENIED ALL 6 PARAGRAPHS. The Defendant-Landlord fraudulently left out this involves a SECTION 8 CONTRACT; WITHOUT SECTION 8 THERE WOULD BE NO LEASE. LANDLORD’S LEASE CANNOT INCLUDE ANYTHING WHICH IS NOT IN THE SECTION 8 LAWS AND SECTION 8 CONTRACT ADDENDUM TO THE LEASE. THE HAP CONTRACT SPECIFIES THE LANDLORD’S RESPONSIBILITIES AND ALSO CITES THE SECTION 8 LAW, FEDERAL LAW 42 SECTION 8, and therefore it is their responsibility to follow that law; not their whims.
e) The landlord violated Section 8 laws again by failing to issue a PRETERMINATION NOTICE in order to provide me time to appose their fraudulent quit and thereafter fraudulent Summons.
8. The woman who presided at the hearing on October 31 was a FRAUD impersonating the woman who is claimed to be Judge Alayna Stone. Her Juris Number, 445561, It is not in the system and I do not find her listed as an attorney in the Juris Lookup. https://www.jud.ct.gov/attorneyfirminquiry/attorneyfirminquiry.aspx The Defendant, Hoops & Associates, uses a fax number which begins with “445”. As a Pro Se, I did not know a FRAUD was acting as Judge Stone at the hearing of October 31. I could only take the words of the clerk that she was presiding. I could only take HER claim that she was Judge Stone. Yet she was not and the woman who presided in the eviction case on December 3, admitted she ruled on the October 31 hearing and therefore proved to have been conspiring with this illegal activity. The recording of the hearing was frauded. Therefore the transcript I paid almost $200 for is defective for evidence on both the Housing Complaint and Eviction case; yet should the court officials be prosecuted, in my opinion would be effective evidence to contribute to the deliberate fraud that goes on in the court system. The closest in name in the Juris lookup is an “Alicia Stone” which oddly has an A for active as her status yet the records indicates she is retired and the only address is 2200 N. George Mason Drive, PO Box 7527, Arlington, VA 22207. There is no administrative suspension on that record; this record may be just another situation of deliberate fraud. The Juris codes are prominently posted on this site. There is one attorney out of this list of “Stone” which uses a Pro Hac Vice appearance, Ronald Stone located at 2 Maplewood Road, New Haven, CT 06515 -- which literally changed as I have been typing this affidavit and this record now states he is on ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION and his address is now 1516 Lawton Drive, El Paso, TX 79902. Even a Laurie L. Stone, located with the STATE OF NJ DEPT OF EDUCATION, 100 Riverview Plaza, Trenton, NJ 08625 - has an A for active status, which means she is in the state of Connecticut. All the rest, as of TODAY, are using A for active - including a Terrance Walter Stone, who uses an out of state Address: at 63 Chatam Street, 3rd Fl, Boston, MA 02109 Yet the record indicates he is on an ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION. Upon printing this list, attached, another record shows “PHV Stone Alan J 8/31/23” with an address of Milbank, LLP, 55 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001 with an “A” status even though the address is out of state.
9. It was also the court’s responsibility to ensure the Defendant-LANDLORD was legitamately represented. Instead, a young man of about 30 years of age, possibly younger, attended, claiming he was Attorney Peter Hoops and that he wrote the Motion To Dismiss.
a) I do not know who is retaining Hoops & Associates. They have altered their appearance TWICE, adding on more defendants since the defendants defaulted by not showing for the hearing. The allowed the fraudulent appearance, since an appearance has to be resubmitted, they cannot just help themselves by attaching more parties. The software is made so they can fraud case records at their choosing.
10. This Affidavit is being prepared for my Motion to Open aforesaid case. I was unable to appeal due to the Appellate Court REFUSING TO TAKE MAIL-IN OR FAXED PLEADINGS I claimed that was unconstitutional since they are blocking the means to which one may have DUE PROCESS OF LAW, and require use of internet, which is not a requirement for anyone to have since it is a means of communication. As a disabled individual who has gone through immense stress and trauma from the illegal actions of this landlord, I find this one-sided in favor of the landlord who has breached my lease since I moved here, There have been minor accountabilities to these breaches yet they continue to breach and that includes fraudulent billing even though they were ordered by the court to remove the fraudulent charges. In January 2023, which they posted that month and then changed to posting it in February 2023.
a) As further abuse, those who illegally entered my apartment after I apposed their denial of my REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION from using internet - my scanner was disabled so I am unable to scan multiple-page documents. My files were altered, and my 4 cartridges of toner were STOLEN OUT OF MY APARTMENT. Additionally, a leather-like cube-shaped, zippered bag was also stolen from my apartment. It included my $260 radiowave meter
11. This affidavit is being submitted with the court’s required Form JD-CV-107; Pursuant to CGS 52-212, CGS 52-212a, 52-259c; PB 17-4, PB 17-43
12. I find it quite perplexing and unfair that the court demands I complete forms rather than full motions; yet for the defendant, they permit them to do as they want, not using published forms and creating their own documents; yet the court even stated Defemdant’s document, the NOTICE TO QUIT, was VALID when it was FRAUDULENT since rent for August and September were paid, and failing to cite a law for justification. The court only could use this Notice To Quit as subject matter jurisdiction in the eviction case and it is unlawful to support fraud. The court had copies of the checks which validated I paid the rent for August and September, just as I have been doing for years. I have lived at this premesis since January 2013 and have been a Section 8 tenant all of this time.
13. I struggle with CYBER CRIME. As you can see, the size of my paragraph numbers have been altered. That is just a small example of the continuous CYBER CRIME I have had to contend with. My laptop is often hacked and the hackers alter what I type. They delete files and also rename files to hide them. INTERNET is far from being an honest platform yet the ones who run internet, referred to as the Technocrats, have a “cart blanche” with the USGov oftentimes and their actions of fraud allowed, which is illegal on its face as well as being unconstitutional since FRAUD disrupts one’s liberty.]
14. As I resume this affidavit, I see more is missing; having been deleted while I was using wifi in the lobby of the apartment building I live in, since the landlord invests in a team of cyber frauds to push their agenda, which has nothing to do with making the world a better place.
15. I motioned to strike Hoops & Associates pleadings due to noncompliance - pursuant to the only rule which exists in the CT Rules of Practice; due to their nefarious repealing of CPB 10-41 in 2014 (Reasons in Motion To Strike) and CPB 10-42 (Memorandum of Law - Motion and Objection)
a) 2014 is when Colin Powell and his team successfully took down ISIS in Syria and also disposed of the WOMD which GHW Bush and his CIA paid Saddam Hussein to make; then took the factory down and secretly transported them to Syria after Colin Powell’s intelligence located the factory. 2014 is when Barack Obama began funding terrorism against Russia, to incite war. Funding billions of dollars a year, which was continued by Donald Trump, who lies about everything and only switched parties to run for President and lose to Hillary Clinton in a big fanfare. That was not how things worked out since Hillary Clinton had a blood disease, equivalent to what cannibals get, and everything points to her being a cannibal due to her activity in the Church of Satan and being Grand Dame at the Church of Satan in San Francisco, which former army captain Mike Aquino established, most likely funded throught the Clintons.
16. CPB Rule 10-43: When Memorqancum of Decition Required on Motion To Strike. Whenever a motion to strike is filed and more than one ground of decision is set up therein, the judicial authority, in rendering the decision thereon, shall specify in writing the grounds upon which that decision is based.
a) No, the JA only plays on the one string of fraud! Fully knowing that a Motion To Strike is a matter of right according to American Juris Prudence and other PUBLISHED LAW DOCUMENTS!
b) Additionally, CPB Rule 10-44 states: Substitute Pleading: Judgment. Within 15 days after the granding of any motion to strike, the party whose pleading has been stricken may file a new pleading;
i. Provided that it is a Complaint that has been stricken; not just a pleading! READ IT:
1. provided that in those instances where an enttire complaint, counterclaim or cross complaint, or any count in a complaint, counterclaim or cross complaint has been stricken, and the party whose pleading or a count thereof has been sto stricken fails to file a new pleading within that fifteen day period, the judicial authority may, upon motion, enter judgment against said party on said stricken complaint, counterclaim or cross complaint, or count thereof. Nothing in this section shall dispense with the requirements of Section 61-3 or 61-4 of the APPELLATE RULES.
17. Will any of this matter - anything I state? Most likely not! Because this is NOT a free country; it has been hijacked by a plutocracy which keeps getting richer and richer, thanks to the criminal mechanisms established by Jeffrey Epstein and others he affiliated with. The State Of Connectic claims they don’t have to follow the US Constitution because it was signed in this state!
None of this in red was stated in the submitted document! I expect more fraud occurred on this, I just noticed the last paragraph.
CYBER CRIME IS THE TOOL THAT COURTS USE TO HARM PEOPLE!
I just don't have time to state any more on this!
=============================================
Motion to Open
.png)
I will see if I can find it another way.....
But I may just have to close this for now because I am in a hurry.
MICROSOFT DELETED EVERYTHING IN THE CLOUD AND WILL NOT ALLOW ME TO ACCESS MY OWN DAMN FILE ON MY FLASH DRIVE! I WILL NEED TO SCAN IT IN AND THIS WILL TAKE A FEW DAYS.
I am the plaintiff; the clerk actually uploaded it for the P; the chief clerk overrided it by entering a separate upload describing me as D for defendant in the Housing Complaint! then deleted hers! I checked it frequently enough to catch the fraud!
For those who may be able to find it in the case lookup, https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=29174715
Updare 1/22/2025
Sorry it took a while.
That's all for now....I will share my Motion To Reargue asap. For those who don't realize, no judge can rule on a motion to open in 24 hours! Only fee waivers are ruled like this! She granted the damn fee waiver! Then denied the motion! Hearing is required and also time for other party (which she conspires with) to respond!
DOCKET NO. NHH-CV24-5006875-5 : SUPERIOR COURT OF CT
Copy: Docket No. NNH-CV24-
ANNE M. BRADLEY : J.D. OF NEW HAVEN
V : HOUSING SESSION
ANSONIA STATE STREET, LLC et al : January 23, 2025
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REARGUE
Pursuant to PB 11-12, Plaintiff motions to reargue Decision of Denial of Motion To Open on aforesaid case. Hearing has been requested since the court failed to mark a hearing on the MOTION TO OPEN.
HISTORY
1. Plaintiff issued aforesaid Housing Complaint after discovering on her own it was her matter of right. An invalid Notice To Quit was served on her, claiming she did not pay rent for August or September 2024.
a) Plaintiff proved to the court that she did pay August and September rent, providing copies of her checks as well as notations by the branch manager that they were cashed by ANSONIA STATE STREET, LLC.
i. As already informed to the court, Plaintiff has been told to write her checks out to “360 State State Street” - not MEPT or Bozzuto, which she has been doing since her first check for deposit and rent. Though she asked the management if she needed to change who she wrote her checks out to due the alleged sale of this property at 360 State Street, she was told not to change it.
2. Hearing took place on October 31. Neither the Defendant, who claimed to be Attorney Peter Hoops, or the person who claimed to be Judge Alayna Stone were the actual people who they said they were. Plaintiff’s argument on the Notice To Quit was greatly emphasized: The rent was paid. Insufficiency of Service also took place yet was secondary to the very point that the subject matter jurisdiction was FRAUD.
3. “Judge Alayna Stone” ruled in favor of dismissal on November 7, 2024 and stated on record that she considered the Notice To Quit Valid because it was typed correctly. There was no discussion of this in court.
a) Housing Authority told the Plaintiff approximately one month ago that Defendant mailed them what they deemed as a Pretermination Notice Letter on November 7, the same date as the aforesaid ruling. According to LEGAL EFFICACY, that letter was 60 days past HUD requirements. Their law states that the Pretermination Letter must be delivered to the tenant 30 days before a Notice To Quit is issued to allow for a cure period to save the Section 8 Tenant from being evicted and the Housing Authority is ORDERED to have a hearing upon request (rather than ignore requests as been the case for all these years.
i. “Judge Stone” asked the Plaintiff in court on January 13, 2025 if she considered she qualified as an indigent tenant who should be paying ten percent of the fair use and value of the rent in court. Plaintiff emphasizes that the Housing Aurhority denied she qualified because she was NOT in a project-based housing. Yet they have flip=flopped regarding this and now claim it is a project-based housing unit yet the HUD forms she completed in 2012 were NOT for project-based housing.
4. Thereafter, Judge Stone denied motions for articulation, reconsideration, reargument. The motion for reargument was denied before Plaintiff submitted her Memorandum of Law, which was stated to be submitted forthwith in the one-page motion. Yet the judge’s ruling on that motion indicated otherwise.
FACTS
1. A hearing is an automatic right for Motions To Open. There was no hearing; in fact the Motion was ruled on 24 hours after it was entered into court.
2. Plaintiff has initiated an escrow account for rent, as she stated to the court which she would do during the Eviction Trial of January 13, 2025.
a) Defendant cashed and posted rent as Fair Use and Value for December 2024 yet told Plaintiff that when she timely submitted this to their office, they refused to provide a receipt and the manager, Kyle Huckle said he refused to cash it. The rent check was left on the desk and tenant Anne Bradley, who is Plaintiff walked out.
b) It was only at the trial and seeing it posted on the Ledger, which Plaintiff discovered that the landlord-Defendant cashed the check, which had already been shown as evidence to the court in a submission which reflected her attempt to pay rent since the court refuse to accept fair use and value; yet another motion was again submitted due to a minor technicality which the court used as reason not to accept it, since she referred to it as rent rather than “Fair Use And Value”, citing the proper law; and emphasiizing the court has a RECEIVER OF RENTS; not a RECEIVER OF FAIR USE AND VALUE.
i. It is also known by the Plaintiff that the court may have used this as a tactic to get the RECEIVER OF RENTS to evict the Plaintiff-tenant since they refused to take the Fair Use And Value into court.
ii. The Defendant, who is Plaintiff in the Eviction Case, made no comment, request, or motion when the Plaintiff, who is Defendant in the Eviction case, stated that she would set up an escrow account to cover for her paying Fair Use And Value into court, since the court refused to accept the rent and the landlord refused to respond to her question, “Was the rent check cashed?” It is obvious that if they can get away with it, they will further alter the recording using text to voice malware to fraudulently prove otherwise. A copy of that Ledger is attached to this motion, and marked by the Plaintiff as areas of specific interest.
1. Note, Plaintiff emphasized the landlord continues to fraudulently bill her despite being ordered by the court to remove almost $14,000 in charges in January 2023, which is when the maintenance manager relieved himself in her bathroom trashcan and the management remotely turned off her washing machine (so she has to wash all laundry by hand and hang them to dry) and vandalized her bed so she had to sleep on the floor for two years due to being unable to fix what they did, which she discovered was NOT replacement of her boxspring (from queen size to king size, since it was overlapping the bedframe) but was caused by using spray insulation to destabilize the bed and cause it not to have any weight over approx 50 pounds on it because it would collapse.
2. Numerous breaches were caused by the landlord and summarized in Plaintiff’s Pre-Determination Notice entered on this case, with a total of damages excluding dollar amounts when the apartment was illegally entered while she was in the apartment and she was assaulted or, in this last circumstance which occurred on July 2, 2024 - the maintenance manager was ordered to leave by a higher authority - probably an FBI agent - before he assaulted her. He was most likely accompanied by someone in the hallway.As a Pro Se, a dollar amount to reflect that would rest on the court’s determination; yet the court failed to do anything about anything on this case; evading from its duties, and most likely Alayna Stone is not even an attorney. Her Juris Number does not exist in Juris Lookup and her name does not exist.
3. Practice Book 11-13 is not written coherently for Plaintiff Pro Se, regarding reclaims and case assigned for Trial. Therefore, Plaintiff, Pro Se, is unable to determine it is applicable and can be used for arguing her rights.
4. If an attorney withdraws its appearance, a Housing Hearing is required. Thus, this would explain how Hoops & Associates got away with frauding its appearance twice - to add the 7 defendants who failed to appear on October 31, although they were served notices and they also failed to answer the complaint. This is also contrary to the appearances already on file.
c) As Plaintiff has stated in court, this is a catch-me-if-you-can dynamic,where they consider the law does not exist unless the harmed Plaintiff Pro Se discovers it. They are not only obligated to administer the law, they are obligated to adhere to it.
5. Memo of Law is REQUIRED for Motions to Reargue, yet the court ruled on Plaintiff’s motion before she could submit the Memorandum of Law, which was noted to be submitted forthwith on the one-page motion. Rather than call the Plaintiff or order the Plaintiff to resubmit the motion with a Memorandum of Law, the court nefariously and prematurely ruled a denial, even stating there was no Memorandum of Law (because the Plaintiff had not submitted it yet, as a matter of right, as she was doing what she could as a Pro Se who has been greatly harmed. All four of her toner cartridges were stolen out of her apartment at that timeframe, which deterred her ability even more to work on these cases. Additionally, her scanner was manipulated to keep her from scanning multiple-page PDFs for her own record.)
6. “Evasive Denials” as stated in PB 10-47 refers to the requirements of the parties to fairly meet the substance of allegations denied.
7. Not only did the court not require Defendant to prove that nonpayment of rent for August and September did occur; the Plaintiff in fact proved that she DID pay rent for August and September yet the court falsified that her only argument was on Insufficiency of Process, which was secondary to the LEGAL EFFICACY of the Notice To Quit.
8. The court is required to allow at the very least 5 days for the opposing party to respond in this summary process before issuing a decision.
9. NONE of the defendants Answered this Housing Complaint.
10. Only one defendant was represented at the hearing of October 31, 2024 - which was Ansonia State Street, LLC. Yet the representantion was fraudulent. The young man who appeared looked like he could have been the son of Attorney Peter Hoops. Yet he claimed HE was Attorney Peter Hoops. He also claimed that he wrote the Motion To Dismiss, which was also false. It was signed by Attorney St. Rock who was not appearing.
a) The court has frauded the record indicating that Attorney St. Rock appeared at the hearing on October 31.
11. The court failed to enter DEFAULTS for the parties which failed to Answer as well as failed to appear at the October 31 hearing.
a) The person who said she was Judge Alayna Stone began the hearing requiring the Plaintiff Anne Bradley to state her case.
i. Without the other parties at the hearing and having to state her case was at the least, abuse of procedure - particularly since the woman was fraudulently representing Judge Stone.
ii. Indeed this would cover “matters arising since the original pleading” as described in PB 10-10.
12. Return Date on the Complaint was inept. Despite discussing with the Chief Clerk that the Return Date is supposed to be two weeks after it is served, according to law, the Chief Clerk prematurely uploaded the Complaint a week before it was served and made the Return Date completely fictitious, never amending it. The Chief Clerk also failed to enforce the fraudulent Return Date on the Summons, which was NOT entered as 3 days from when it was served, which was also another fraudulent dating which conflicted with the date on the Summons versus the marshal’s proof of service. This is REQUIRED BY LAW, and obviously the court’s software would not allow any other date.
13. There were numerous violations which the Plaintiff, Pro Se, indicated in her Motion To Open; none of which were heard or actually ruled on. The judge just dismissed it ineptly with no reason, as she did on the Housing Complaint after the hearing on October 31, 2024; not caring about the missing defendants.
a) Not even all motions were heard OR ruled on, on the case; namely, Motion For Disclosure.
14. The Connecticut Practice Book only publishes a Motion To Reargue as a pre-appeal pleading in order to sustain her rights as a greatly harmed tenant due to daily breaches of the Section 8 HAP Contract by this landlord-owner, whoever it may be. They refuse to provide proof that they were HUD-approved.
15. PB 10-15 refers to when “NUMEROUS DEFENDANTS” are part of a case, yet fails to specifiy what it construes as numerous. There has been no court declaration of this case as having numerous defendants when only 8 parties were served - none of which answered the complaint; 4 of which are owned by the same person (Gideon Freidman) who claims to own 360 State Street which is the property at which the Section 8 tenant-Plaintiff resides.. Livable City Initiative did not even enter an appearance. Yet the Chief Clerk entered them as self-representing, despite the fact the city has its own legal team and they could have entered an appearance.
a) As already mentioned, Hoops & Associates were only representing Ansonia State Street, LLC. It was AFTER this that they alterred their appearance TWICE on record; rather than submit a proper withdrawal and issuing a new appearance, which requires a hearing.
16. The Motion To Open was meticulously prepared by the Plaintiff yet as with everything else, the court issued a denial with no reason - not even a hearing as required by the Rules of Practice regarding Motions To Open.
17. This Motion To Open is delaying the appeal period; yet despite informing the court of Plaintiff’s intent to Motion To Open and thereafter appeal if necessary, the court granted a fee waiver for appeal to the Pro Se Plaintiff, who did not realize that a Motion To Open was a non-appeal at that point.
18. No judgment was actually issued in the form of a declaration.
19. PB 11-11 refers to motions which delay the appeal period.
a) Plaintiff is currently aware that both a Motion To Open and Appeal may be simultaneoulsly submitted if she so-choosed.
iii. Plaintiff’s intent was to wait for ruling on the Eviction case; expecting to prevail since she paid rent for August and September. At that point she believed her argument would be strongest to Open the aforesaid Housing Complaint. Yet due to the voluminous improprieties, to say the least; and the deliberate lack of DUE PROCESS OF LAW, she has considered it necessary to go forward with a Motion To Open.
b) The problem here is LACK OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW.
c) The additional problem here is Legal malpractice.
d) And the additional problem here is how can a woman claim to be Judge Alayna Stone at a hearing she is supposed to be presiding; and then allow Judge Stone to rule on the hearing she did not even attend - and also allow the Defendants FAILURE TO APPEAR, FAILURE TO ANSWER, and not even mention this in court when in fact the Plaintiff was told to state her case; and thereafter arguments took place on the Motion To Dismiss with a fraudulent-appearing Defendant, which is what the hearing was marked for - yet covered the Plaintiff’s statement of case without any Answers from any defendants because they disobeyed the court when they received hearing notices. including the fraudulently appearing young man who claimed he was Attorney Peter Hoops, using a Pro Hac Vice appearance, which is also illegal. Motion To Strike was also marked for a hearing, yet they were combined into one hearing;
20. This motion to reargue is in compliance with the Rules of Practice and comprises of 9 pages with an Appendix which includes
a) the Ledger submitted by the Defendant in the Eviction Trial - marked by Plaintiff in areas for emphasis
b) Proof an escrow account for rent has been established
c) Email to the Housing Authority, which is titled Elm City Communities, following up on efforts to get their status of Plaintiff’s Section 8 Renewal
d) Printout from Housing Authority regarding subsidies paid to the Defendant Landlord; should that not be accomplished on 2/23/2025 when Plaintiff goes to their office, a substitute document will be provided.
e) Denial by “Judge Stone” 24 hours after Motion To Open was entered by the court
f) Any other document which clearly supports aforesaid motion has already been submitted to the court. For Judge Stone to claim in the Eviction Case that no evidence that has been submitted will be considered unless it is submitted again at the trial is abuse of process and more CRUEL AND UNUSUAL TREATMENT BY THE COURT.
21. It is the Plaintiff’s opinion that Devil’s Chessboard tactics are used by both the court and the Defendants. Currently, they no doubt figure that if they can successfully and illegally evict the Plaintiff, they can rule everything as moot. Causing the Plaintiff to be homeless! Though she has tried to seek housing outside of Connecticut, the fact she has no wifi in her apartment most of the time keeps her from completing online applications. This dynamic as well as the rest of these matters, aids and abets the landlord to get away with its fraudulent activity through use of CYBER CRIME.
LAW
PB Sec 11-12.
(a) A party who wishes to reargue a decision or order rendered by the court shall within twenty days from the issuance of notice of the rendition of the decision or order, file a motion to reargue setting forth the decision or order which is the subject of the motion, the name of the judge who rendered it, and the specific grounds for reargument which the party relies….
.
SUMMARY
Plaintiff is obviously not an attorney and has no prosecutorial powers. She is a tenant who has been greatly harmed by this landlord and has filed numerous complaints to the landlord, to the Housing Authority, to Livable City Initiative, and even the Better Business Bureau (on Bozzuto Management Company, since it was common knowledge that they were the true owners, passing the building off to a company for $1, now defunct, titled 360 State Street, Inc. And thereafter the MEPT QALCOM for $1 which also withdrew its registering as a business, and yet records changed it to MEPT Chapel, LLC - which were claiming to be a nonprofit and even publically soliciting money as if it was a church.)They displayed Satanic symbols throughout the building, particularly in the lobby and on the 6th floor where several common areas are.
The Notice To Quit was fraud! They knew Plaintiff paid rent for August and September as she had been doing all along. That is the subject matter jurisdiction for the eviction case; not the Housing Complaint. The subject matter jurisdiction for the Housing Complaint covers Housing matters. The court claimed that the Notice To Quit was valid because it was “Typed properly” yet entered the Housing Complaint as a case and allowed the Plaintiff to pay rent into court, without allowing time for the Defendant to object such motion. It is pertenant to a Housing Case that the complainant may pay rent into court; yet equally pertenant for the other party, as long as it has appeared, to have time to object.
Despite claiming the Notice To Quit was “typed properly”, the court allowed the defendant to state “So what if it was dated the 13th or 12th - the marshal’s proof of service stated it was served on the 13th This was another false statement reflecting insufficient service, which was detailed by the Plaintiff as to why;
Someone crammed a crumpled up paper in her door frame on September 18, 2024, which was the Notice to Quit - having no attached Pretermination Notice (copy) which they should have served the plaintiff 30 days before.
This was secondary to the fact that the rent was paid and proof was provided the court
To make matters worse, Hoops & Associates and this landlord obviously got the Housing Authority, Elm City Communities, to nefariously surprise Plaintiff with a notification they were discontinuing her subsidy in two weeks’ time due to Plaintiffs failure to complete a packet which they nefariously mailed to a defective address, even receiving it back, when her address has been a PO Box since 2019 or even earlier, due to the tampering with her mail at the premesis. Judge Stone asked the Plaintiff if she was losing the subsidy at the eviction hearing. This seemed quite odd to the Plaintiff since the judge has the power to find these things out, and most likely has through the Chief Clerk. Nevertheless the Judge was told by the Plaintiff that the subsidy was continuing since she was able to get assistance from a different employee, who assured Plaintiff that day that her subsidy would continue if she completed the packet and submitted it promptly. That was done, despite their offices having a sign indicating they were closed for an undetermined length of time. Plaintiff mailed it through Federal Express and they received it on December 24, 2024, Tracking Number 770995668780, Receipt Number HVNK007701883.To the Attention of Tracy Dancy. . Attorney Hoops and Kyle Huckle claimed that this premesis did NOT receive a subsidy for the month of December or January. It is known that they did receive subsidy for December and this disabled Plaintiff gets no response regarding emails and calls she has made; and thus causing her to have to go to their office physically due to this lack of communication. At that point she will obtain a printout of payments made to the landlord, to compare with the Exhibit issued by the Defendant in the Eviction Case, which was the Ledger.
There are way too many Devil’s Chessboard tactics here and this disabled defendant who has been greatly harmed for years by this landlord emphasizes she has only tried to get her rights as a Section 8 tenant. This stress has taken much of her time, harmed her health; and as a reminder, she has had to sleep on the concrete floor for two years and still has to wash her laundry by hand due to vandalism by illegal intruders,which have been harming her for 10 years. They steal, they vandalize on a continuous basis. Her apartment door lock was never changed just before she moved in. This apartment was known to be used for parties which involved drug use and open sexual activity. Yet they claimed they never rented this apartment. They were also renting select apartments like hotel rooms, which was complained about by the local hotel businesses.
What will it take to get this landlord to stop breaching the contract? The court fails to maintain proper records and it has nothing to do with the clerks who work there. This seems to be either a deliberate deviation or just a common way of doing things to serve wants rather than abide by rules and laws. As already mentioned, the Pro Se Plaintiff discovered that the housing complaint only needed to be duplicated by her and mailed out with return receipts requested, for the defendants to send to the court. Plaintiff could not continue paying rent into court if there was a loss of time in paying rent or declared valid arrearage. Despite reminding the court of the defendant-landlord whoever they are, being ordered by a court to removed their almost $14,000 in fraudulent billing - and their pattern of billing behaviour thereafter resuming the same thing - why is it that the court goes out of its way to keep spinning rather than just adjudicate for what it is: Breach of Contract by the landlord.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff motions this court to have a hearing for argument, which would be reargument if the court had followed the rules by having a hearing on the Motion To Open.
ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
APPENDIX AS STATED
Prepared and Submitted,
FOR THE PLAINTIFF
____________________
Anne M. Bradley, Pro Se
PO Box 206514
New Haven, CT 06520
Ph 203-508-0858
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ARGUE DENIAL OF MOTION TO OPEN
January 23, 2025
Plaintiff certifies that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following Defendant-Attorney:
HOOPS & ASSOCIATES FAX: 860-445-8919
==================================================================
good night.
_____________________________
I apologize for not uploading sooner. You wouldn't believe how difficult it is for me to even use wifi!
Thanks to cyber crime (as you can tell from above) I have to make a few changes and get back to this! Finally, I get some of them - best I can do now. I will enlarge them to make it easier for viewing.
The judge granted fee waiver for Motion To Open and simultaneously denies the motion without a hearing! The $350 filing fee is to have a hearing!
See how damn crooked, in-your-face this court is?
One minute I am told none of my documents that I meticulously typed with DETAILS, is "not acceptable" because these assholes want to cover up their crimes! using the excuse that they are perfectionists ....
And the next minute he makes excuses for DEFAULT BY ALL DEFENDANTS BECAUSE THEY FAIL TO ANSWER, deliberate fraud, illegal appearances - saying "nobody is perfect"!
And once again, I am being illegally evicted in this corrupted state! It is just like what I had to grow up with - constant organized crime, there it was mafia! Here, it is CIA being the ring leader and mafia and just rogue attorneys and judges joining in! Sandy Hook Elmenentary Shooting was FRAUD!!!! Barack Obama stole over $1 trillion from the economy!!!
This state titles its housing regulations as THE PLAN, TO MIRROR BARACK OBAMA'S FRAUD BOOK, THE PLAN!
---1/26/2025
6:47pm
I just registered for e-filing. my email address is IllegalEviction2024@aol.com
I would leave this god-foresaken, run-by-scumbags state in a heartbeat if I had the money and opportunity! I have boxes and boxes of papers from all the abuse and corruption and attempts on my life! It just goes to show you how spineless they are! Picking on me who is disabled, a peaceful person. First thing that the Housing Chief Clerk said to me when I submitted my Housing Complaint with 8 defendants, to include the city's housing inspector and the housing authority - he said, "Like John Wayne said in the movie blah blah blah, Kill them all!" He said something about shooting them dead also! I said, "I am a peaceful person! I don't talk like that!"
It is just a tactic to frame me to aid and abet the corrupted landlord and corrupted attorney!
--1/26/2025
--1/26/2025
.png)
Comments